The Biggest Winner of the 2010 Olympics Debate – O’ Canada

March 1, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Babe Ruthless.

The torch hadn’t even been lit, and things were not looking good for Canada at the 2010 Winter Olympics. It seemed like our neighbors to the north were to be cursed with yet another Olympic letdown – a curse that started nearly 35 years earlier.

The 2010 Games in Vancouver was to be the third Olympiad hosted by the Canadians, but the nation had failed to claim a single gold medal in either of their first two runs as host nation – Montreal in 1976 and Calgary in 1988. They were the only nation in Olympic history to have never won a “home” gold, and for a country which was no stranger to the medal podium in other Olympic years, this failure to hear ‘O, Canada’ played on their own beloved soil was simply too much for them to bear any longer.

The Canadian Olympic Committee had even created an initiative called “Own the Podium”, and it was designed as a program that would FINALLY put Canada’s Maple Leaf at the top in as many events as possible. But before the games even got underway, fate had proven unwilling to make hosting or winning these games easy.

During practice runs on the day of the Opening Ceremonies, Georgian Luger Nodar Kumaritashvila was tragically killed on the luge track. The result of that tragedy was to first cast a very somber pall over remaining events of the Opening Ceremonies that day, and it subsequently sparked a controversy over how the Luge event would be run during the games, if they were to be run at all.

Then came the actual ceremony.

Whether fair or not, the city of Vancouver was asked to follow Beijing, whose spectacle to kick off the 2008 Summer Games was nothing short of amazing. Imagine having to follow Jerry Seinfeld in a standup comedy show – the bar simply had been set to high for Vancouver to meet, and in comparison to the Beijing Ceremonies, they had no chance.

Still, the Canadians put forth their best effort in creating a show that would entertain the world while simultaneously celebrating their own culture. Within the build-up to the Opening Ceremonies, the Canadians had been very secretive about who would actually be the one to light the Olympic Torch. The reason for this secrecy was because they had hoped to surprise the world by becoming the first nation to have the cauldron lit by more than just one person. In all, four of Canada’s most beloved athletes had been given the honor of being part of the first ever group lighting – Wayne Gretzky, Steve Nash, Catriona Le May Doan, and Nancy Greene.

Instead of being the dramatic scene of unity that Canada had hoped for, though, a glitch in the mechanism that was supposed to help raise the cauldron prior to lighting created an extremely awkward two-minute delay. Rather than prolong the agony any further, the Canadians finally resolved themselves to having only three of the four final torch-bearers proceed to light the cauldron. It was an anti-climactic ending to a ho-hum ceremony that featured the best Canada had to offer – K.D. Lang, “Slam” Poetry, and a giant polar bear.

But just three days after the less-than-spectacular opening to the XXI Winter Olympic Games, Alexandre Bilodeau succeeded in wiping away 34 previous years of Olympic disappointment.

Bilodeau, a 22-year old skier from Quebec, managed to finally clinch gold in the Men’s Moguls event. It was the moment that Canada had been waiting for, and as Bilodeau stood atop the medal podium, millions of Canadians stood with him, all singing the Canadian national anthem. That single win by Bilodeau helped break the dam, and from that point on Canada could not be denied.

Although the United States would go on to win the most total medals in any single Winter Olympics with 37 overall, it would actually be Canada – gold-starved on their home court for the last 34 years – who would go on to claim the title of “Most Gilded Nation” as they entered the final day of Olympic competition.

Even that wasn’t enough for the Canadians to sleep easy, though. For Canada, there was only one gold that mattered, and it was not to be awarded until the final event on the final day of competition – Men’s Hockey. Standing in their way, however, was an American team that had shocked the world by upsetting the heavily favored Canadians during round-robin play earlier during the Games, and Canada knew that they could not consider their Olympic experience a complete success unless they avenged that loss. For Canada, hockey was the nation’s premier event, and theirs was the premier team.

After jumping out to a 2-0 lead in the first period the Gold Medal seemed a foregone conclusion for the Canadians, but with only 0:24 remaining in the game, the United States managed to tie the game up and force overtime. It was Canada’s worst fear realized. Here they were, on the brink of Olympic glory, and those pesky Americans had snuck in once again and tried to take it all away. But this time the Canadians would not be denied, and 7:40 into the overtime period Sidney Crosby scored the game-winner for Canada. There could not have been a more dramatic (and fulfilling) way to close down the Winter Olympics for our friends up north.

Over the last 16 days, the world witnessed as Canada triumphed time and time again, all on their way to a Games-leading 14 Gold Medals. They rose to meet every challenge put in their way, and came through shining like the golden medallions hanging around their necks.

Both gracious host and worthy adversary, the Canadians made their nation proud!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Biggest Winner of the 2010 Winter Olympics Debate – America… Nation of Winter Domination

March 1, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.

 

As the Vancouver Olympics close, competitors are presented with a great deal of time for reflection. For athletes like the delusional Russian figure skater Evgeni Plushenko, the next four years offer time to come to grips with the fact that he was bested by American Evan Lysacek. The experience of introspection figures to be significantly sweeter for the Canadian Men’s hockey team, which will surely count their epic overtime gold medal victory – in arguably the premier event of the Winter Games – as one of the defining moments of their lives. The Olympics, however, do not just present individual athletes and teams with opportunities to establish enduring memories, but nations as well. Now in the wake of the Winter Olympics, TSD debates who earned the title of ‘Biggest Winner’ at the Vancouver Games. Unquestionably, the biggest winner has to be the USA.

The United States won an amazing 37 medals—9 gold, 15 silver, and 13 bronze. One might say that the US left Canada with so much gold, silver, and bronze the Canadian precious medal markets dropped.

Before frequent TSD followers call shenanigans on the fact that I argued that the quality of medals means more than the quantity last week, I would like to say I still stand behind that statement. And for the record I tip my proverbial cap to Canada for winning a Winter Games record 14 gold medals (I’ll forgo the “home field advantage” talk, and just say congratulations, I did not think they had it in them). I am simply pointing out that the Americans were dominant in terms of both quantity and quality at the Winter Games.

While domination usually comes easy for the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, this has not always been the case for America during the Winter Olympic Games. This year at the Vancouver Games the United States finished on top of the medal count leader board with 37 medals. Four years before that at the Turin Games the US finished 2nd in the overall medal count with 25 medals also with 9 gold. But you might be surprised to know that in1994 at Lillehammer, the US was not as strong, finishing 5th overall with just 13 medals, and only 6 gold. Even more shocking perhaps, is the fact that during last Winter Games held in Canada, the 1988 Calgary Games, the US finished 9th in the overall medal count with just 6 medals and only 2 gold. So considering the past, you can see the US has come a long way. The Vancouver Olympics signified a milestone for the US by demonstrating that they can compete at the upper echelon with the elite nations of the Winter Games.

The games were also a huge success because of key victories for the US. Hannah Kearney set the tone for the US by pulling off an upset over Canadian favorite Jenn Heil. Kearney’s performance in Women’s Moguls gave the US its first gold medal, and kept the Canadian drought of 1st place finishes on home soil intact. Her victory showed that America was not going to lay down for the hometown heroes, and let everyone know that the US was there for one reason only—to win. Likewise, Evan Lysacek’s upset in Men’s Figure Skating was also another declaration that the US could and would hang with the best in the world, even in sports we were not favored to win.

The gold medal performances of Seth Wescott and Shaun White let the world know that the US was still the king of extreme winter events. It was a thrill to watch Shaun White set the bar so high in his first run in Men’s Halfpipe that he even considered just riding down the middle for his second run. Instead he decided to unleash a run that improved on his already Gold Medal-worthy score. Victories like these make fans of the casual follower, and that is exactly what they did for me.

The Olympics had many great moments that will leave the world wanting more, but if you ask me, the best moments always involved the Red, White, and Blue.


The Olympic Medal Quantity Versus Quality Debate – Evaluating Olympic Greatness

February 25, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Apolo Anton Ohno made American history during the 2010 Olympic Games. After winning Bronze in the 1000m Short Track Speed Skating event, Ohno was able to drape his SEVENTH career Olympic medal around his neck, making him the most decorated American to have ever competed in the Winter Olympics.

With that Bronze, Ohno’s Olympic trophy case now holds:

Gold – 500m (2002) and 1500m (2006)

Silver – 1000m (2002) and 1500m (2010)

Bronze – 1000M (2006 and 2010) and 5000m Relay (2006)

Ohno’s career has definitely earned him a place in American history as one of the greatest Olympians of all time, and he may not be done yet!

Another member of that fraternity of “all-time greats” is Eric Heiden, the ‘Man of Gold’, who during the 1980 Winter Olympics in Lake Placid pulled off one of the most remarkable feats in Olympic history, winning Gold in every one of the five Speed Skating Events of that Olympics – 500m, 1000m, 1500m, 5000m, and 10,000m. It is a feat still unparalleled in the Winter Olympics 30 years later.

While Heiden went five-for-five in claiming Gold Medals during the 1980 Olympics, Ohno (who only has two Gold Medals in his Olympic career) actually has more TOTAL medals to his credit. It is because of that difference that I am asking my esteemed colleagues at The Sports Debates to compare the accomplishments of Ohno and Heiden against each other to determine which is the better performance. – As an individual athlete at the Olympics, is it better to win more total medals, but of varying rank, or to win fewer medals, but every one is Gold?

For this debate, Loyal Homer will argue that Ohno’s total medal count is the superior accomplishment, while Babe Ruthless will argue that Heiden’s accomplishment of winning only Gold Medals is greater, despite the fact that he has fewer total medals draped around his neck.

This is a debate that raged even at the national level during the 2008 Summer Games. By the close of those Olympics, the United States had taken home the most total medals, winning 110 in all (36 Gold, 38 Silver, and 36 Bronze). However, it was China who dominated strictly in terms of Gold Medal performances, winning 15 more than the next closest nation (USA) with 51 total Golds. The Chinese, who subscribe to the Ricky-Bobby philosophy of “If you’re not first, you’re last”, argued that theirs was the best performance of the Beijing Games, despite falling 10 medals short of the American count overall.

Both Ohno and Heiden deserve recognition for having accomplished Herculean feats of athletic prowess, but TSD is not here to recognize both of them – that just wouldn’t be any fun! Instead, for the sheer pleasure of creating discord EVEN in moments of triumph, the debaters today are being forced to choose between the greater of two remarkable accomplishments.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Olympic Medal Quantity Versus Quality Debate – Second Place is the First Loser

February 25, 2010

Read the debate intro and the opposing argument from Loyal Homer

The age old debate over which is better – quality or quantity – is something about which I am very passionate, and it is at the forefront of media attention right now because of the Vancouver Olympics. Countries and athletes are engaging in high profile competitions which ultimately entitle them to bragging rights about who is the best in the world at a given sport, at least for another four years. Certainly there is a divided opinion about whether it is better to have a greater quality of Olympic medals or a greater quantity of Olympic medals. But I am here to tell you gold is the only medal that matters, because it is the only medal that actually signifies winning. 

In life, and especially in sports, there are winners and losers. In fact, anyone who engages in a competition and does not win is a loser by the very definition of the word. I realize that many of our more politically correct readers might be beginning to cry right now, because I have just offended their sense of equality, but I speak the truth. Society has done more damage than good by inventing feel-good awards for moral victories, like ‘Best Effort’, ‘Most Improved’, and the ultimate homage to losing – The Participation Trophy. What ever happened to learning to improve and overcome from your losing?

When you stop and think about it, competitions are nothing more than events that classify participants as winners and losers based on a given set of criteria. Take a race for example; the first person to cross the finish line is declared the winner. Each competitor who crosses the finish line after the winner is at least in some respect a loser. It doesn’t matter whether they finish the race in second place or last place; they have lost and therefore are losers.

Should Olympic athletes be proud to receive silver and bronze medals? Yes. Those athletes have represented their respective countries with honor and world class performances. Their medals certainly signify great accomplishments, specifically being second and third best in the world at a given sport. But ultimately there is no substitute for winning the gold.

One needs look no further than the Man of Gold, Eric Heiden, for a perfect example of how quality trumps quantity. During the 1980 Winter Olympic Games at Lake Placid, New York, this American speed skating legend truly beat the world. He won an unprecedented five individual Olympic gold medals, which was more than Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, Switzerland, West Germany, Italy, Canada, Hungary, Japan, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia and France combined. Sure the Commies topped the American medal count that year, but Heiden proved unquestionably that he and his country reigned supreme in speed skating.

Another American speed skating legend represents the quantity argument of this debate, Apolo Ohno. He boasts an impressive 7 total medals making him arguably the best of his generation, but ‘arguably’ is the key word. Ohno’s Olympic record is tainted with silver and bronze. While accomplishments in their own right, the rank him among the best…but that is not the same as the unquestioned best.

The same concept can be applied at the national level. At the time this article was written the US sat atop the medal count at the Vancouver games with 26 overall medals, 7 of which were gold. Germany was nipping at our heels with 24 overall medals, also including 7 gold. Counting silver and bronze medals leaves room for argument–our losers are better than your losers—and there can be no argument when determining who is the undisputed best. The question of superiority can only be settled with gold.

To borrow from a ruthless legend, “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing”. In the case of the Olympics, winning is gold.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Winter v. Summer Olympics Debate – Overpaying or Securing the Future?

February 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.



The Olympics continues to captivate America (Did you know the Olympics scored more viewers last Wednesday night than American Idol, marking the first time in nearly six years that Idol has been defeated in total viewers?). The Sports Debates has tried to give you different perspectives on the Olympics in what has been a very successful period for TSD. We have given you three debates on the Olympics and we wrap that up with today’s verdict. Today’s debate is centered on the water cooler question of “Which Olympics are better… Summer or Winter?”

Bleacher Fan, who is arguably TSD’s biggest fan of the Olympics, obviously is a strong proponent of the Winter Olympics. While not disrespecting the Summer Games, it is rather easy to see that this debater gets a thrill out of seeing extreme sports. Conceding the fact that the Summer Olympics offer a greater variety of games, Bleacher Fan argues that the events featured in the Winter games are “designed to test the human ability to master the ice and snow.”

Babe Ruthless, on the other hand, argues vehemently (and often sarcastically) in favor of the Summer Olympics. A brief history lesson is presented to us, and I am not sure that makes the argument any better. A good point is brought up in the fact that the Winter Olympics are only able to cater to specific countries from a geographical standpoint. Meanwhile, the Summer Olympics is an event that is open to everyone. Obviously, it is difficult for someone in Florida to practice snow skiing! Babe’s argument also shows the numbers. Yes, the Winter Olympics are having solid numbers across the board, but it does not compare to the popularity of the Summer Olympics. The Summer Olympics had four billion viewers for the Beijing opening ceremonies? Wow, that is a lot, and I did not realize it was anywhere close to that! Then Babe went all ruthless on us, and gave us images we would just assume not visualize, even though they are very funny!

The winner of this debate is Babe Ruthless. I feel like the facts presented by both sides tend to go in the favor of Mr. Ruthless. Also, Bleacher Fan even wrote that the summer games are more mainstream. They appeal to a larger mass audience. Not to mention the fact that generally you would think it is more expensive to train and practice as a young child for Winter events. That is assuming an athlete lives in a place where they are able to train and practice with regularity. The majority of this country would be unable to practice skiing on a regular basis. However, as Babe Ruthless noted, all the athletes need to practice for many of the Summer events is a field.

The ability to appeal to a much wider audience, as both a fan and a participant, make the Summer Olympics far superior to the Winter Olympics. In defeat, Bleacher Fan is being ordered to wear one of those figure skating outfits that Babe Ruthless mentioned in the winning argument.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Winter v. Summer Olympics Debate – Winter or Summer… Who Takes The Gold?

February 19, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.



For two weeks a year every four Winters, the whole world is captivated by seeing athletes from all over the world compete for the gold in events like speed skating, curling, and figure skating. That is what is going on right now with the Winter Olympics. Likewise, for two weeks a year every four Summers, millions and millions of folks are fascinated by watching events like swimming, gymnastics and men’s basketball. The next summer Olympics are scheduled for London in the summer of 2012.

I will admit that, at the encouragement of my colleagues, my cold feelings towards the Olympics may be slowly thawing out! Loyal Homer had a birthday yesterday and while at dinner with friends last night the majority of the 15 people in my crew had their eyes glued to the TVs at the bar watching Olympic skiing. And yes I did pay attention… in between stuffing my face with a steak!

In the meantime, The Sports Debates thought it would be really cool to debate: Which version of the Olympics are better?

I am leaving the definition of “better” open ended, which should leave a wide open debate.

Bleacher Fan, who is arguably the biggest Olympic fan out of the four of us, will argue that the Winter Olympics is the best. Meanwhile, Babe Ruthless will try to convince me, and perhaps you, that the Summer Olympics are better.

For the record, I am encouraging both Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless that I truly need to be convinced of which is better. I am admittedly not nearly as knowledgeable on this topic as many of our readers are. Both sides obviously have advantages. It is up to you to convince me which is better!

The torch has been lit by Loyal Homer. Let the games begin!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Winter v. Summer Olympics Debate – Summer Games

February 19, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan.



Is it even a question that the Olympic Summer Games are far superior to their fledgling counterpart, the Winter Games? Seriously, the Summer Games have a history steeped in tradition that goes back thousands of years to the ancient Greeks around 776 BC. The Winter Games are less than 100 years old. The Summer Games feature hundreds of sports and thousands of competitors. The Winter Games feature fewer. The Summer Games have a global appeal. The Winter Games are regional and somewhat of a novelty act. The Summer Games boast some of the most intense and masculine competitions of athletic prowess ever imagined. The Winter Games… not so much. The Summer Olympic Games are the genuine article in comparison to the Winter Games’ cheap knockoff. The Summer Games are bigger and better in every way.

Not convinced? Imagine you are at one of the first Olympic Games in ancient Greece. You can keep it rated G by imagining it before all the nude competition stuff started with the Spartans (which for the record, is freaky-deaky). Now imagine you are listening to the play-by-play calls of an ancient sports commentator. What do you think you would hear? Would it sound something like this?

“And Cleisthenes makes a flawless transition from the double axel into a perfect triple toe loop.”

Probably not. But if I were to say, “Alexandros slams Demetrios to the ground and grapples him into submission” you might be more inclined to admit that sounds appropriate. Why? Because the Olympic Games have an ancient history… that is not tied to Winter sports.

The ancient Olympic competition included the following: horse and chariot racing, wrestling, and running, among others. Each event was found throughout the ancient world, which could be practiced throughout the empire. The modern Olympic Games, date back to the turn of the 20th Century and featured some of the same lineup as the ancient games. While the contests have increased exponentially in number, they have been true to the game’s roots, an athletic competition in which any athlete can engage. The same can not be said of the Winter Games.

The Winter Olympic Games cater to specific countries, those with snowy regions or the ability to practice in those places. Every now and then, a country or athlete gains global attention as an exception to this norm, like the now world famous Jamaican bobsled team or this year’s skier from Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah-Achempong – the Snow Leopard. Unfortunately the performance of these novelty acts is usually substandard. The Summer Olympic Games, however, focus on sports that are as widely practiced as they are ancient in nature. There is nothing elitist or segregated about the Summer Games. For the most part they can be practiced anywhere there is an athlete and a field. The Summer Games are truly a competition for the world, and the numbers reflect it.

More than 11,000 athletes competed in more than 300 events across 28 sports during the last Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China. This year’s Winter Games feature just 5,000 athletes, less than half the number of participants in the Summer Games. The Beijing games had almost 4 billion viewers during the opening ceremonies. While the Vancouver Games – which are shaping up to be one of the most watched Winter Games in Olympic history – had just a 67.5 million viewer audience for the opening ceremonies. The numbers do not lie. The Winter Olympics just cannot compete.

Now I have proven that the Summer Games are better because of their history, appeal, and in sheer numbers of participants and spectators. All these arguments are strong, intellectual, and probably appeal to data driven fans like Sports Geek. But I want to make sure everyone is on board in acknowledging the Summer Games as supreme, so I am going to do what I do best – get Ruthless.

The Summer Games are the biggest compilation of the most awesome sports on the planet. The Winter Games, however, carry about as much machismo as a tickle fight. The Summer Olympics feature sports that comprise many of the individual aspects of modern MMA (i.e. wrestling, boxing, judo, and taekwondo), while the Winter Games feature competitions like curling (seriously… how is that an Olympic Sport and baseball isn’t!?). In 1996 Kurt Angle, Olympic wrestler turned professional wrestler, won the gold with a broken neck. Curling is so gentle one of the Canadian team’s backups is able to do it despite being five months pregnant.

The Summer Olympics boasted unadulterated competitions of manliness, like weightlifting, shooting, and archery. The Winter Olympics feature competitive ice dancing. And yes, the Winter Games have a couple of manly sports, like hockey and the biathlon, (a combination of cross country skiing and marksmanship), but do those make up for the male figure skating costumes? I don’t think so! Even the Americans have lost their minds when it comes to figure skating costumes. American figure skater Johnny Weir wore pink tassels in something that looks like it came out of a Fredricks of Hollywood catalog. I do not know about you, but I do not think that is what the ancient Greeks had in mind. Sure these guys are proudly representing our country, but that sort of stuff just does not have the same mass appeal as watching the American NBA all-stars rip up the boards against defenseless third world countries during the Summer Games. To me, even the gymnastics competitions of the Summer Olympics have more appeal.

There is no doubt the Summer Games are the better than the Winter Games in every measurable way.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Winter v. Summer Olympics Debate – A Winter Wonderland

February 19, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.



I am an Olympics junkie!

Summer or Winter Games, I love them all! There is just something special about watching athletes who have dedicated four years of their lives all as build up to a window of only three to five minutes. Watching as the chosen few who vault into the legendary status of “greatest in the world” get to celebrate the triumphant completion of a life’s work is truly one of the finest payoffs that a sports fan can hope for. When that glorious moment just so happens to be for a compatriot, then all the better!

In the debate of which is better between the two, though, there is no question – the Winter Olympics are unparalleled.

The Summer Olympics may offer a greater variety of games, but it is during the Winter Games that fans are treated to the greatest speeds and highest risks (for all you extreme sports fans), making for the most exciting and entertaining of competitive events.

From Bobsled and Luge to Downhill Skiing to Speed Skating, every one of the events during the Winter Games is designed to test the human ability to master the ice and snow. Often, that mastery manifests itself in jaw-dropping demonstrations of extreme speeds and stunts. Many of the Winter events feature high-flying acrobatics, break-neck speeds, and gravity-defying aerial demonstrations. The Summer Olympics offer none of that (except maybe in Olympic Trampolining – Ooooohhhhh!).

During the Summer Games, the events are usually about who can throw the farthest, or run and jump the best. While those events make for great competition, they simply cannot compete with the thrill that comes from watching your fellow natives sail down a snow-capped mountain at greater than 70 miles per hour. The sharp turns, steep slopes, and lightning speeds create an adrenaline rush that the Summer Games simply cannot compete against. That is what the thrill-seeker in all of us hopes to see – the daring few who are brave enough to push themselves to the limits of safety (and sanity).

As tragic as the death of Georgian Luger Nodar Kumaritashvila is, his accident punctuates the very real danger that exists for those competing during the Winter Olympics. And although fans would never hope for a tragedy such as the one that occurred last Friday, it cannot be denied that the thrill of watching these athletes test themselves (and the laws of physics) in such a death-defying manner creates an added level of attraction. When we see athletes who masterfully execute seemingly superhuman feats, all at the risk of their own well-being, we as fans develop a much greater appreciation for the truly remarkable skills that those athletes possess.

Finally, the Olympics are considered “special.” Why? Because the Olympics are a rare-occurring opportunity for all of the world’s top athletes to congregate in a single exhibition that honors the very best. They are meant to create a sense of “You don’t want to miss this!”… because you know it will not come back any time soon. Yet, it is the Winter Games that seem to embrace the sense of specialness much more than its Summer counterpart.

Perhaps it is because the marquis Summer events are more mainstream. Events like basketball, tennis, volleyball, soccer, baseball (although it will not be included in future Olympics), track and field, and now golf all seem to receive a great deal of attention in American culture. Fans of those events already have ready access on a yearly basis to watch the best in the world compete. Leagues and organizations such as the NBA, FIFA, MLB, PGA, and the ATP World Tour are permeated with international talent, and it is those same athletes who then participate in the Olympic Games, they just wear different shirts.

If I miss the Olympic Basketball tournament, I can still see those same athletes compete against each other in a couple months. Likewise, if I miss the soccer events I have organizations like the MLS, Premiere League, UEFA, or the FIFA World Cup in order to “get my fix” long before the Olympics roll around again. With the exception of hockey (which may be returning to “amateur only” status after Vancouver), the Winter Olympics presents the only real opportunity for fans to see many of these athletes compete together. If I miss out on watching Speed Skating, Downhill Skiing, or Freestyle Moguls as they unfold, I will not get another chance to see that level of elite competition take place for another four years. I will have missed something special.

These athletes may go on to participate in world championships, but the Winter Olympics is the only time when they get to take center stage. After they are done competing, Shani Davis, Lindsey Vonn, and Apollo Ohno will slip into obscurity for another four years, and it will not be until 2014 that these rarely seen (but nonetheless revered) superstars will resurface for another shot at Olympic gold.

The Summer Olympics may offer quantity, but it is the quality of competition that earns the gold medal for the Winter Games. The Winter Olympics present the perfect combination of athleticism, adrenaline, and rarity to let you know that you are watching something great!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NHL and the Olympics Debate – Stop Acting Like Ice-Holes and Do Your Job

February 17, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.



I am going to let you know a dark secret about myself. I am a sucker for reality TV. Really, I am. And not just the mainstream shows that most people watch as guilty pleasures, like American Idol, Big Brother, and the Amazing Race, either. I probably qualify as a hardcore reality TV junkie who is willing to watch the weirdest, trashiest, and saddest shows imaginable (i.e. Who Wants to Be A Superhero?, Real Chance of Love 2: Back in the Saddle, I Know My Kid’s A Star). You know how there are those shows that prompt people to ask “who watches this garbage?” I do! So you can bet if the call ever came asking for Babe Ruthless to be on one of these shows, I would be there in all my cut-throat, win-at-all-cost glory. And you know the Babe would make for some dramatic TV, because I would be the dirtiest player in the game.

But, I digress. The point is, if I was ever asked to participate in a show like Survivor (the holy grail of all reality shows) it would be a dream come true… at least until I checked with my boss. If I asked for a month off from my job to play a game, I would be the laughingstock of the office. So when faced with a similar question, should the NHL release their players to participate in the Olympics, no overtime shootout is necessary. The answer is a resounding no.

This debate was all Bleacher Fan. Bleacher Fan’s argument had one great point after another, proving the NHL has far too much at stake to let their stars continue to participate in the Olympics. Bleacher Fan very astutely explained that, to the NHL, players are investments which need to be protected. He went on to explain that the threat of injury could mean disaster for an NHL team in the championship hunt, not to mention the potential legal nightmare over player negligence that could ensue. I am reminded of Aaron Boone’s injury in a casual game of basketball which put his career as a Yankee, and his entire baseball career, in jeopardy. That too was an unnecessary legal risk. Probably the most meaningful aspect of the winning argument was his assertion that although being a part of the Olympics is an honor, it is not a requirement, like meeting the obligations of one’s NHL contract.

Loyal Homer focused the counter-argument on the “why not?” side of things. He reasoned that the free promotion of NHL players on the grand stage that is the Winter Olympic Games could outweigh potential pitfalls. I agree on that point, but that is about it. Loyal Homer’s analysis that shutting down the NHL season once every four years is only a minor sacrifice is completely off base. As I pointed out in the introduction to this debate, the time that the NHL gives up for the Olympic Games is hugely important. The only other major competing sport during this prime time is the NBA, which allows the NHL to shine a great deal more in a less competitive sports market. Loyal Homer also pointed out that players, such as league MVP Alexander Ovechkin, have indicated they will represent their country regardless of the ramifications. While I admire their national pride, I despise the complete disregard for their commitments and contractual obligations. Whatever happened to a man’s word being his bond? If they honestly want to play in the Olympics then they should, but they should ask to be released from their contracts first instead of holding the league that actually pays their bills hostage. These players’ ultimatums are indeed hostage negotiations, and last time I checked, the U.S. does not negotiate with terrorists.

It honestly would have been fairly easy for Loyal Homer to have convinced me that the patriotic thing to do would be to put your country first. But, unfortunately that route went unexplored. In the end, I say let the NHL play on and the Olympics proceed as normal. But these players must make a choice. In light of recent news, it seems that the NHL is close to making their choice – prohibiting players from participating in future Winter Olympics. The NHL is justified in requiring their players to skip the Olympics considering they have already established a precedent of doing so in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Plus the investment the league has in players like Alexander Ovechkin is far too important to intentionally put in danger for potential exposure. That is why this debate is awarded to Bleacher Fan.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NHL and the Olympics Debate – Ice, Ice Maybe?

February 16, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.



Olympic hockey. For most Americans those two words immediately conjure up images of the unforgettable American victory over the Soviets during the 1980 Lake Placid Olympic Winter Games, more fondly remembered as the Miracle on Ice. But for the NHL, Olympic hockey has begun to evoke feelings of stress and apprehension over the potential nightmare situations involving NHL season interruptions and injured stars.

For quite some time NHL players have been able to participate in the Olympics despite their non-amateur status. In recent years, the NHL has put everything on hold to allow its players to represent their native countries during the Olympic Winter Games. This is a huge gesture considering the NHL was giving up prime exposure during a time when the only other competing major domestic professional sport is the NBA. The NHL provided work stoppages – in the interest of good will and cross promotion – for the Olympic Winter Games in Nagano, Japan in 1998 and again in 2006 during the games held in Turin, Italy. But NHL officials are wondering just how much publicity they are getting by allowing their players to participate in games halfway around the world (though Vancouver is a little closer this year).

This issue becomes an even bigger deal when you consider that the NHL’s collective bargaining agreement is up for renewal soon, and players are already demanding their release for the 2014 Olympic Winter Games in Sochi, Russia. Several prominent Russian NHL players have voiced their desire and intention to play in the 2014 game, whether they have the league’s blessing or not. (Wouldn’t you know it? Communism is over and the Russians are still causing problems for us.) Currently the NHL features four Russian players who were among the league’s best scorers last season, including the 2008-2009 MVP Washington Capitals winger Alexander Ovechkin.

The protesting Russians are joined in support by Jacques Rogge, the President of the International Olympic Committee, who has spoken out in support of the NHL players’ participation in future Olympic Games, stating, “I think it’s important for the NHL to have their stars shine in the Olympic Games. If you look at the audience of the final game of the Olympic hockey tournament, it matches the final of the Stanley Cup. That is a good promotion for hockey in North America.” NHL team owners may not be inclined to agree.

Enter today’s great debate: Should the NHL suspend operations and release players to participate in the Olympic Games at the expense of the league?

Loyal Homer will extend his regional loyalties to the national level as he argues in favor of suspending the NHL season and letting players represent their native countries. Bleacher Fan, on the other hand, will point out why it should be inarguable for the NHL to suspend the season in order for players to participate in the Olympics.

Who will win this cold war? We will soon learn when our competitors face off at center ice. Remember, make your arguments like me – big, flashy, and, of course ruthless.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.