The 2010 NCAAB Player of the Year Debate – Contenders Cannot Scale the Wall

March 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

It sure is easy to hand Ohio State’s Evan Turner the college basketball national Player of the Year award (especially after Friday’s game-winner), isn’t it? But, if Bleacher Fan is unable to convince anyone of Evan Turner’s greatness, a few sentences of accolades won’t cut it here. The point is, Turner is a great player who had a great season. But he is NOT the ONLY player in college basketball to have a great season – no matter what the talking faces on ESPN and CBS say. While Turner fills up a stat sheet, Kentucky’s John Wall fills up the win column, and is the straw that stirs the drink on a sure-fire number one seed next week.

While Turner’s stats are nice, John Wall has amassed some excellent stats this season as well. He is averaging just under 17 points per game, four rebounds (not bad for a six-foot something guard), and over six assists per game. While he shoots 46 percent from the field, his 33 percent clip from behind the 3 point line is solid, as is his 78 percent accuracy from the free throw line.

Oh, and he’s a 19-year-old freshman in college and the point guard on arguably the best team in the entire country.

Wall’s stats are solid, but his work ethic is too, by evidence of his willingness to use his amazing speed at both ends of the floor. Yes, that’s right, John Wall plays defense. Getting technical for a moment, there is a reason coach’s recruit speed. Wall’s quick lateral movement on the perimeter makes it very difficult to turn the corner on him on a pick and roll, and very hard to beat him back in transition. Going the other direction, Wall is an excellent finisher around the basket in the unlikely event he is not the first person to reach it due to his speed.

Wall makes the other players on the floor better in a way Evan Turner cannot. While Turner is an ISO player for Ohio State – a skill that will serve him well at the next level, especially – Wall makes other players better… and here’s what I mean. It’s not just the direct, easy-to-see stat line where it is super obvious that a player is good for a team based on the number of assists they log. John Wall does not always get the most assists in a game. Often he will make the right pass to start a ball swing to the opposite side of the floor, resulting in a wide open three point shot attempt or an easy entry pass into the post for a high percentage shot. Those types of plays do not show up in the stat line, but they perfectly describe the impact a player like John Wall has on a team.

Wall’s speed and position – point guard – also translate well into a natural leadership role, even for a youngster. Leadership breeds confidence – and confidence breeds clutch shots.

Perhaps the most critical and difficult to replicate aspect of Wall’s game is his ability to make the big play when it matters the most. Wall’s game is not devoted solely to what shots or passes he makes, it is devoted in large part to when he makes them. In short, John Wall is clutch… and not just one time, but many times during the course of the season. Whether it’s a last second layup or a clutch jump shot, Wall does not shy away from the spotlight. He has proven that he is able to make the play when the most is on the line.

Of course Kentucky is a deeper team than Ohio State. Wall definitely has more players with more skills around him that Turner does. Though Wall may not fill up a stat sheet like Turner does, he fills up the coach’s checklist, the win column… and the stat sheet, too.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Most Surprising NFL Move (So Far) Debate – Peppers’ Pick Wrong Kind of Spicy

March 8, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

For me, NFL free agency is the real beginning of the new season. When you grow up rooting for teams that just are not reliably good year in and year out, free agency is a particularly exciting part of the professional football year.

With that take on free agency it may be surprising to discover that, as a lifelong fan of the Chicago Bears, I am seriously disappointed in general manager Jerry Angelo’s signing of defensive end Julius Peppers.

First, the size of the contract is far too large. Peppers is 31-years-old, and Chicago signed him to six year contract valued at $91.5M. It is difficult to imagine the Peppers Chicago signed at 31 will be the same Peppers at 36 or 37-years-old (assuming he’s still playing). Not only are the Bears paying high prices for declining skills a problem with signing Peppers, he has shown a tendency toward being a mercenary. The Charlotte Observer reported Peppers indicated he would have stayed in Charlotte if the Panthers could have come up with an additional six million dollars. Six million dollars!! Chump change to him, but it proves a larger point.

Aside from the clear reach of the contract, its enormous size – even an uncapped year like this one – puts severe limitations on adding other necessary talent to the Bears. The fact is, the Bears did not need a defensive end.

The team invested a great deal of time and money and disruption into acquiring quarterback Jay Cutler. Historically, the offense has relied a great deal on a run-first strategy – in large part because of the wind in the stadium and the inability to consistently pass effectively – and invested accordingly with the offensive rookie of the year two seasons ago, running back Matt Forte. What the Bears currently do not have right now is anyone capable of effectively blocking for the team’s primary offensive strategy. Angelo’s huge contract to Peppers makes investment in a much-needed offensive lineman or two virtually impossible. What’s more, if head coach Lovie Smith really DID want to add a defensive player, the emphasis should have been placed on a defensive back, as the team’s pass defense was terrible last season. With the health of the defensive line improving toward the end of last season (read: Tommie Harris), and the linebacker corps taking a similar turn toward health for the 2010 season, emphasis must be placed on pass defense where an extremely inexperienced group is often exploited. Rather than placing resources behind real need, Angelo has perpetuated the problems on the team and is setting up what promises to be Lovie Smith’s last season as a Chicago Bears head coach.

Plus, an already old Chicago Bears team just keeps getting older. Angelo, either through trades and other moves that create additional financial limitations, made it impossible to get younger or draft a group of players high in the draft because of the salary requirements for that caliber of talent. The Bears need to trade away some of the older talent and accentuate the younger talent. Instead, through coaching staff changes and bad free agent moves, the best players are being marginalized. Tight end Greg Olsen is likely on his way out of town or straight to the bench because he is not the type of tight end who can succeed in new offensive coordinator Mike Martz’s system. In short, the Bears’ best player on offensive is now not important anymore.

As much as Martz’s hiring has distracted the offense from improving in 2010, Rod Marinelli’s promotion to defensive coordinator, and his professional emphasis on coaching defensive lineman, means the free safety and cornerback positions were not addressed despite the fact that established and successful defensive backs were available.

While adding Chester Taylor at running back is pointless without any blockers, the move to add Julius Peppers is pointless and distracting and sure to make the Bears worse for 2010 and well beyond. I hope that Jerry Angelo and the coaching staff is already getting their respective resumes together. It is going to be a long 2010 season in Chicago.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Most Surprising NFL Move (So Far) Debate – Carolina Panthers Football: A Study in Self-Destruction

March 8, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

When Carolina Panthers quarterback Jake Delhomme was informed that he needed to call his head coach, John Fox, he mentally prepared himself for bad news. Delhomme tried to ready himself for a conversation about losing the starting job to upstart Matt Moore. The writing was on the wall that a change was coming. After a six turnover meltdown during a 2008 playoff game against the Arizona Cardinals, followed by an abysmal 2009, Jake Delhomme would have been a fool to think that he was untouchable as the starter in Carolina. But little could have prepared him for the conversation that actually took place. Fox informed Jake Delhomme that the franchise was moving in a different direction, and that they would be doing it without Delhomme’s help.

This is the Carolina Panthers’ single worst decision in franchise history, which is saying a lot for a franchise that drafted Chris Weinke and signed an aging Keyshawn Johnson to a 4-year contract.

Seriously, this is probably the single worst sports-related decision since the NBA began allowing a franchise to be named the Jazz (doesn’t that name just bring to mind the image of spirit fingers?)

The decision just does not make sense. Let’s examine the financial aspect of the move. It is clear that the Carolina Panthers are trying to clear room while cap friendly cuts are being allowed. This is evidenced by their release of virtually the entire defensive line – Julius Peppers, Damione Lewis, and Maake Kemoeatu – and a couple of serviceable linebackers – Na’il Diggs and Landon Johnson. These are moves that would even make Florida Marlin’s officials say, “Wow, those guys are cheap!” Clearly the Panthers are being cost conscientious, but cutting Delhomme does not erase the fact that the franchise still owes him about $12.5M in guaranteed money. Add to that the more than $3M dollars the team has offered to newly tapped starter Matt Moore, and the team is looking at about $15M in salary committed to the starting quarterback position. Is Moore really worth that much? I will just wait until the snickering dies down, but I think we can safely establish that the answer is no. With so much money committed to Delhomme and Moore already, I am betting the Panthers will not make a move to bring in a marquee starting quarterback ahead of Moore. So, now that it appears the Carolina Panthers are putting all their eggs in the Matt Moore basket, what about the backup job?

The Carolina Panthers need a quality backup quarterback. The team probably needs someone with experience to mentor Moore, maybe someone with playoff… or even Super Bowl experience. They should probably find a guy who is a fan friendly, considering owner Jerry Richardson and general manager Marty Hurney do not like divas. Plus the Panthers need a player with presence, a locker room leader. Where in the world will the Panthers find a guy like that? Well I have heard that Michael Vick has shown interest, but that was probably because he heard that the Charlotte Animal Shelter was within walking distance of the stadium. Or maybe the Panthers can dial up Vinny Testaverde for another season… unless the NFL has a “no fossil” rule. Or, and this might be really out there, but how about Jake Delhomme? Oh yeah that’s right, they just cut him.

The Panthers should have thought through this decision through because Jake Delhomme is the best option out there. I am not the only person that thinks so. A group of ESPN analysts have dubbed Delhomme the “best free agent quarterback on the market.” Cutting the best free agent quarterback does not make sense. As one of these analysts, Mark Schlereth, points out that there are several teams that need depth at quarterback – the Buffalo Bills, the St. Louis Rams, and the Arizona Cardinals just to name a few. Certainly the Panthers could have held onto Delhomme and offered him as trade bait for picks, especially since the Carolina brain trust traded away this year’s first round pick. Or, dare I say it, kept him on the roster.

Another supposed benefit of cutting Jake Delhomme is to eliminate the quarterback controversy that might happen if he were to stay, and Matt Moore were to struggle. A brilliant move, because competition has never brought out the best in athletes. And we would not want to have to two decent options on the same team. That would just be crazy.

I realize that Jake Delhomme was not winning any fans over with his large number of interceptions, but cutting him was not the answer. Cutting Delhomme only makes the situation worse. Like putting out fire with gasoline, it only intensifies the situation. I wish the Panthers luck this year, with Moore under center, and the other holes they now have to fill, they are going to need it.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.