The MLB Playoffs Home Field Advantage Debate… Proof Is In the Stats

October 11, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Does home field advantage matter in the MLB playoffs? The Rays and Rangers would argue “absolutely not.” The Giants and Braves would argue “probably not.” But I’d like to use more than anecdotal evidence to make my argument that home field advantage does not really matter in the MLB playoffs.

Sports like football and basketball appears to give the fans a significant amount of influence on the outcome. Many of us have seen occasions in a football or basketball game where noise generated by the fans in attendance directly affected play on the field or the court. In football, crowd noise can affect anything from the ability of the offense to hear the quarterback’s audible to the ability of the defense to communicate. In basketball, the crowd noise can often be quite personal due to the proximity of the fans to the court. Many players are affected by hearing all sorts of unspeakable things yelled in their ears at close proximity and high volume. If somebody was shrieking in your ear, would your thought processes – let alone your jump shot – be totally normal?

Baseball, however, doesn’t seem to be as directly influenced by crowd noise. Well beyond the anecdotal evidence of the first several MLB playoff games, baseball does not have well-defined times in the game where nearly everyone in the crowd knows, “If I cheer now it could have a direct impact on the game.”

Sure, when the opposing team is down to its last strike the fans of the home team are screaming their head off. But, in reality, what impact does that have? Does the cheering make it difficult for the home team pitcher to focus on the pitch he needs to throw to get the hitter out? Does it impact the hitter at the plate? Does it impact both the pitcher and batter to some extent? It’s difficult to tell. I’m sure it gives the home team players warm fuzzies to hear fans screaming their head off, but does it really help? I wasn’t sure, but while I was researching this article I was thinking, “Eouldn’t it be great if someone did a study on this so that I could present empirical evidence that home field advantage in baseball doesn’t matter?”

As it turns out, my prayers were answered.

I found a blog post on improvementguru.com that cited writings by Dr. Ray Stefani of California State University. Dr. Stefani’s work expressed home field advantage as a percentage arrived at by subtracting home losses from home wins and dividing that number by total games. Based on that calculation, Major League Baseball finished dead last. Basically, according to Dr. Stefani’s research, there is no sport where home field advantage matters less than Major League Baseball. I recommend a visit to improvementguru.com to read the complete post – it’s interesting.

Basically, I am not sure I can provide a more compelling argument than Dr. Stefani’s statistical analysis. I can tell you that the Twins lost their first two at home, that the Giants split their home games, that the Rays lost their two home games, and that the Rangers lost their two home games. While that may be compelling to some, it is just a snapshot of a few days of baseball. For a game in love with statistics and history, isn’t it fitting that a historical, statistical analysis shows that it doesn’t really matter where a MLB playoff game is played?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Biggest Winner at the MLB Trade Deadline Debate… Rangers Enjoy Texas-Sized Upgrades

August 2, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Babe Ruthless.

The MLB trade deadline has come and gone though teams can actually still make moves by passing players through waivers. I actually found myself watching TV at 4p Saturday to see what last minute deals would take place. It was one of the perks of actually having the deadline take place on a Saturday this season! After scanning the market, and looking at the deals that took place, I’m convinced that the Texas Rangers come out as the biggest winners.

Before the trade deadline even approached the Rangers acquired ace Cliff Lee. But, since that trade occurred over three weeks ago, I won’t even address that move. The same goes for the Bengie Molina acquisition from the Giants at the end of June. But even without those moves, I still think the Rangers tremendously improved their club at the deadline.

Jorge Cantu is a solid acquisition for a club that needed a first baseman. Despite some recent struggles, he still had a .262 average with 10 home runs and 54 RBI at the time of the trade. He is a proven run producer with 100 RBI last season and 29 home runs in 2008. He very well could flourish in the boom box known as Rangers Ballpark in Arlington. He can also play third base, so that gives manager Ron Washington some options.

Another move that perhaps went under the radar a bit was the acquisition of another N.L. East player, Cristian Guzman. Guzman fell out of favor in Washington, a team that is obviously going through a youth movement, as he lost his starting shortstop position in the Spring. But he showed his true value by spending time at second base, shortstop, and right field. He’s a two-time All-Star and another guy who provides some options for Washington.

What makes these moves all the more remarkable to me is that the Rangers essentially did them using MLB’s credit card. The Rangers are currently going through bankruptcy proceeding that very well could put Texas sports icons Nolan Ryan and Mark Cuban in a bidding war. Yet, somehow, the Rangers were able to improve the club considerably over the past month.

I commend the Rangers for not standing pat. The Rangers currently hold the majors’ biggest division lead at eight games, and probably could have cruised into the playoffs with the A.L. West title. But there’s still two months to go and it’s a well known fact that the August heat often wears down the Rangers. The team needs all the fresh bodies it can get and acquiring versatile players like Cantu and Guzman provide a big lift. Plus, there’s a general consensus that the American League championship goes through the A.L. East, and Texas is out to disprove that theory.

The Yankees, as Babe Ruthless argues today, may have made the higher profile moves, but the Rangers made the better “team” moves. It could prove beneficial when October rolls around.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 MLB Trade Deadline Target Debate… Getting It Dunn in October

July 23, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

Don’t hold your breath about a very exciting MLB trade season as the deadline approaches.

Realistically, I expect 2010 to be one of the more lackluster seasons we have seen in recent history regarding trades. There are plenty of teams in the league right now who are either holding on to slim leads in their division or are within striking distance for a playoff spot. All of them could use some real help to stay in post-season contention.

The problem is that there is an absolute dearth of pitching talent on the market, putting all of the emphasis on offense (and that pool isn’t much deeper).

As far as the pitching talent that IS available, Roy Oswalt COULD make for some interesting trade conversations, but the latest reports of his very high demands may have diminished his appeal somewhat. And when you consider the fact that Cliff Lee was dealt to the Rangers two weeks ago, the depth of available pitching talent is just not what it has been in recent seasons, when guys like C.C. Sabathia, Cliff Lee (the FIRST time around), and Roy Halladay were sitting on the block.

As for hitters, Prince Fielder is one who could certainly make a team in need of offense happy, but the latest out of Milwaukee seems to be that he is not going anywhere this season.

That really only leaves one viable trade option, and that is Washington Nationals first baseman, Adam Dunn.

The Nationals’ slugger has already notched 23 home runs on the season, tying him for the second most in the National League. Along with those homers Dunn has also knocked in 61 runs (the tenth most in the N.L.) and has a slugging percentage of .565 (the third highest in the N.L.).

While the Nationals have publicly expressed a desire to keep Dunn on the roster, the reality is that he will command far too hefty a salary as a free agent, and I doubt an organization that is five games away from crawling out of the basement WITH him on the payroll would be willing to ante-up as much as $60M, which is reportedly Dunn’s asking price.).

The Nationals are in a classic small-market pickle, and while it may not be an ideal situation, it is the perfect formula for a big-deal trade.

The likelihood of Dunn staying on in Washington after this season is very slim, so the Nationals are going to want to get some value for the slugger, rather than just watch him walk away. There are plenty of potential suitors out there, such as the Giants, Angels, and the White Sox, who would love to see Dunn’s bat added to the lineup. All three teams have expressed an interest in upgrading at the plate, and all three currently are either preserving or chasing very narrow leads within their respective divisions, likely serving as motivation to pull the trigger in order to stay on top.

The question boils down to how much the Nats are going to hold out for before they are willing to make a deal.

Washington’s general manager, Mike Rizzo, understands the value that Adam Dunn brings to the table, and I think he also understands the fact that they currently hold the rights to one of the only viable trade targets of the season. He will do his part to make sure the price tag for Dunn remains as high as possible, but in the end Dunn should wind up as a great mid-season acquisition for a lucky team who was looking for a little post-season insurance.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 MLB First Half Surprise Debate… Rangers Shine Amid Uncertainty

July 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Sports Geek.

For me it has been a fun first half of the season in Major League Baseball. The Braves are in first place in the N.L East (which is surprising) and there have been five four no-hitters, including perfect games by Armando Galarraga, Roy Halladay and Ubaldo Jiminez. If you take a look at the standings, there are some real shockers – both in a positive way as well as a negative way. Two of those will be highlighted by my colleagues today. I don’t know if anyone expected the Phillies to be in third in the N.L. East, and I’m pretty sure hardly anyone expected the Angels to be 4.5 games back at the All Star-break. But the team I have my eye on for the biggest surprise in the first half of the season is the Texas Rangers.

The Rangers, despite the turmoil involving ownership (including a rumored bid by a group that includes Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban), the team currently leads the A.L. West by 4.5 games. I must say I am shocked. I know Nolan Ryan was saying all the right things in the off-season about how he expected the Rangers to be right there in contention for the division title, but I chalked that up to the usual run of the mill off-season optimism. I know the team won 87 games in 2009. But, not only have the Rangers been in contention, the team has dominated the division for much of the season – even after a recent stretch when they dropped seven of ten. The record still currently stands at 50-38.

Remember when it was reported in the off-season that manager Ron Washington tested positive for cocaine during the 2009 season. I actually thought he could be one of the first managers to go if the Rangers started out the season poorly. Now, I think he’s one of the favorites to be the American League Manager of the Year.

It’s relatively easy to have a good offense at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington. The ball jumps out of the park, and the batter’s eye is very hitter friendly. That has led to outstanding seasons by Josh Hamilton and Vladamir Guerrero, who are two of the Rangers’ five All-Stars (six counting recent acquisition Cliff Lee). Hamilton, who is currently hitting .346 with 22 HR and 64 RBI, hit an amazing .454 in the month of June, causing him to be named the A.L. player of the month. Guerrero, who was discarded by the Angels at the end of last season, returned to the Vlad of old and is currently second in the majors in RBI with 75. The middle of the infield features two All-Stars in Ian Kinsler and the exciting youngster Elvis Andrus.

The Rangers knew the hitting would be good, but the pitching staff has been a nice surprise with the team currently posting an ERA under four, at 3.97. It’s a number that will probably improve with the Lee acquisition. So far the rotation has been led by Colby Lewis and C.J. Wilson (Go ahead and say it… who?). The bullpen, led by All-Star Neftali Perez, has provided more closure than fictional Texas Ranger Cordell Walker. The bullpen has posted an ERA of 3.39 to this point.

It’s going to be tough to catch the Rangers in the West. The Angels may make a run, but if Hamilton and Guerrero stay hot then the rest of the American League – including Babe Ruthless’ beloved Yankees – better watch out.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The MLB 2010 Best First Half Player Debate… A Texas Ranger Who Hits Harder Than Chuck Norris

July 5, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Babe Ruthless.

Now that the 2010 MLB All-Star rosters have been announced, who among them is THE All Star of the All Stars? That’s easy – Texas Rangers outfielder Josh Hamilton.

While Hamilton may not boast the “most” home runs or the “best” batting average to this point in the season, he has turned in the best overall hitting performance of the first half, not just in the American League, but in all of the Majors.

Most impressive was his absolute tear through the month of June. Beginning on June 1, Hamilton proceeded to collect 49 hits in only 108 at bats for an average of .454. He also ripped nine home runs and 31 RBI, for a slugging percentage of .815.

Those totals propelled him onto the leaderboard for every single major hitting category, something that no other starting All-Star can claim (Detroit’s Miguel Cabrera COULD have claimed this, but he was edged in voting by the Twins’ Justin Morneau).

Here is a breakdown of where Hamilton’s hitting ranks today:

    Batting Average: .339 (fourth in both the AL and the Majors)

  • Hits: 106 (third in the AL and fourth in the Majors)
  • Home Runs: 20 (second in both the AL and the Majors)
  • RBI: 61 (fourth in the AL and fifth in the Majors)
  • Slugging: .617 (second in both the AL and the Majors)
  • OPS: 1.001 (third in both the AL and the Majors)

Along with those dominating totals, Hamilton has also racked up 23 doubles (only two behind the AL leaders), two triples, and has an on-base percentage of .385.

It is a performance worthy of the most fan votes for any American League outfielder, and it earned Hamilton his third consecutive starting nod.

But the REAL All-Stars aren’t just those who turn in big individual performances. Instead, the REAL All-Stars are those who not only perform exceptionally well, but they always seem to step it up a notch even further when their team needs it. After all, baseball is a TEAM sport, and individual accolades mean nothing if they are not in support of the team.

And that is precisely what Hamilton did. His Ruthian performance during the month of June may have added some value to his personal resumé, but the TRUE value of that performance was realized by the entire Texas Rangers organization.

As the month of May closed, the Rangers were riding a four game losing streak and they sat in second place in the AL West, one game behind Oakland. But when the calendar turned, and the Rangers began the month of June with a series against the Chicago White Sox, Hamilton kicked his performance into high gear.

He started off the month with a “quiet” 3-5 performance against Mark Buerhle, as the Rangers ended a four-game skid by beating the White Sox 9-6. That was just the beginning, as Hamilton’s bat would ultimately lead the Rangers on to a 21-6 record during the month, including an 11-game win streak during Interleague play against the top teams in the NL East (much to Loyal Homer’s chagrin).

And when the calendar flipped again as June rolled into July, the same Rangers team that started June on a losing slide finished it with a 4.5 game LEAD over the rest of their division.

The Rangers managed that impressive run by way of offensive explosion. During the month the team would go on to outscore opponents by a combined 173-100. It was Hamilton who led that offensive charge.

Being an All-Star is not just making yourself look good, it is making your TEAM look good by providing exactly what the rest of the team needs exactly when they need it most. Josh Hamilton did that.

He has proven to be the league’s best all-around hitter, and he stands poised at the All-Star break to now lead his team to its first postseason appearance since 1999.

That is what makes Hamilton the Most Valuable Player from the first half of 2010.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Early MLB All-Star Voting Start Debate… A Royal All-Star Game?

April 29, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Another season, another desperate promotional crawl toward the MLB All-Star game this July. And, of course, if you promote something enough through various media outlets then it simply MUST be important, right? That’s the only possible explanation. Well, if that’s the rule you live by, I hope you’re enjoying your Furby and Pet Rock. I have some GREAT Snake Oil I’d like to sell you, too.

Too often sports marketing becomes about repetition of message and not quality of product. No example better illustrates this fact like Major League Baseball’s promotion of All-Star voting for fans. Fans are asked after a short three weeks of actual baseball to vote on which players deserve to play in the All-Star game – you know, that game that decides home field advantage for the World Series. Sure, it is an exhibition game, but it is also a game designed to award the best league with home field advantage. Are you ready to pick those players in April, knowing full well that those players might be deciding if your team gets home field advantage in the World Series? I know I’m not.

This debate depends entirely on context. What is the context for the fans voting in the All-Star game? Are fans expected to pick the best players across the league to represent their preferred league in the All-Star game? Or, are fans simply voting for their favorite players? It seems that there is a substantial disconnect here. Fans are voting based on popularity in the current structure. Allowing fans to vote after three weeks of actual games is absurd because fans have very little sample size to go off of. The kicker is, of course, that the All-Star game is a game fans and players alike want to win.

So, to recap. Fans want to vote for their favorite players early and often. A smaller faction of fans, coaches, and players want to win the game to secure home field advantage in the World Series… a goal that the best players are required to accomplish. The equation simply does not add up, and the early voting perpetuates the problem. Any democratic situation requires the electorate be informed, but in this case the electorate is misinformed with bad information with a small sample size.

Popularity dictating the vote does not seem to make sense, then, because, popular players are not always the best players. And, the inverse is true also in that the best players are not always popular. The problem is, the best players a few weeks into April will not be the best players still after June 1. Consider this very real scenario, folks. If voting were ended right now here is a likely starting lineup for both sides:

American League
1B Miguel Cabrera, Detroit Tigers
2B Robinson Cano, New York Yankees
3B Ty Wiggington, Baltimore Orioles
SS Yuniesky Betancourt, Kansas City Royals
LF Scott Podsednik, Kansas City Royals
RF Shin-Soo Choo, Cleveland Indians
CF Franklin Gutierrez, Seattle Mariners
C Joe Mauer, Minnesota Twins
P Francisco Liriano, Minnesota Twins
DH Vladimir Guerrero, Texas Rangers

National League
1B Albert Pujols, St. Louis Cardinals
2B Martin Prado, Atlanta Braves
3B Pablo Sandoval, San Francisco Giants
SS Ryan Theriot, Chicago Cubs
LF Andre Ethier, L.A. Dodgers
RF Kosuke Fukudome, Chicago Cubs
CF Michael Bourn, Houston Astros
C Ivan Rodriguez, Washington Nationals
P Mike Pelfrey, New York Mets
DH Ryan Braun, Milwaukee Brewers

Do those lists showcase the best talent in MLB, across the board, that is most deserving of an All-Star game apperance? No. Some of the players deserve recognition, but many will likely fade after the adrenaline of April wears off. And frustrated All-Star managers will be left holding the bag. I mean, do the Royals REALLY deserve that much All-Star attention? As a business issue – are fans going to PAY to see the stars from ROYALS? No, but then we’re back at the popularity scenario where the best players are not guaranteed a roster spot. The entire conundrum can be avoided easily if fan voting does not begin until a reasonable amount of baseball has been played.

Plus, if the World Series home field advantage depends on this game, why aren’t the selected managers able to build the type of club they want in order to win the game? Taking fan voting completely out of it, there is potentially a great deal at stake. It doesn’t make sense to put every manager in a difficult situation by forcing underqualified players on them in a playoff series that is a must win should their team reach the World Series.

If fans must be included in the voting, at least recognize that there is no baseball value in beginning the vote this early. It is an effort to pander to fans – an effort I find both insulting and useless. There are some aspects of the game that should be taken seriously, like contracts and championships. Opening the vote even earlier to fans makes a mockery of contracts by triggering All-Star incentives in contracts for players that do not deserve them, and by forcing less skilled players on managers charged with the responsibility of winning a game.

Allowing fans to vote at all is enough. Opening the vote up after three weeks into the season just stuffs the roster with questionable players and works against the goal of the game being taken seriously. Restore pride in the All-Star game… or just don’t bother.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 MLB Division Strength Debate… AL Strength Goes West

April 5, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

Real insight happens is gained when you dig beyond the obvious. The obvious signals show that the AL East and the NL East are supposed to be great because that is where the media, and my colleagues, are focusing most of their efforts as the 2010 MLB seasons gets underway today. Beyond the obvious lies the surprising, understated American League West – the division I believe will be the strongest in baseball for the 2010 season.

If you look at the Spring Training standings it probably seems as though the AL West is not what I boldly proclaim it to be. After all, Seattle and Texas were two of the overall worst teams in all of Spring Training. According to Spring Training results the team that promises to be the divisions worst, the Oakland Athletics, was the best – at 11-12.

It’s a good thing Spring Training doesn’t matter, eh (can you tell I disagree agree with this verdict?)?

Seattle Mariners
Seattle may win 95 games this season. Does that sound farfetched? It shouldn’t. The team has shrewdly traded for Cy Young winner Cliff Lee. The depth of the rotation behind a newly re-signed Felix Hernandez, a rejuvenated Ian Snell, and a surprisingly tough Ryan Rowland-Smith, is easy to see. Rowland-Smith has a live arm and a career sub-3.70 ERA. He is the fourth starter in a newly deep rotation where Hernandez and now Lee do not have to win every time they take the mound. The offense is also much bigger and better, too. While Ichiro is the table center and the anchor for the offense, center fielder Franklin Gutierrez was a revelation last season, batting .283 and knocking in 70 runs. The offense has plenty of speed now with the addition of second baseman Chone Figgins. The 1-2 punch at the top of the order is much like the Florida Marlins team that featured Juan Pierre and Luis Castillo – only far better. The primary negative is the new presence of troubled Milton Bradley. But the fact that Bradley isn’t the anointed savior of the offense removes the debilitating pressure that cripples him. The presence of DH Ken Griffey, Jr. will likely help, too. Few command respect like Griffey.

Los Angeles Angels… of Anaheim
The Los Angeles Angels are also very good. While the rotation subtracted Jon Lackey, it added lefty Scott Kazmir and righty Joel Pineiro. Two solids for one great is a worthwhile trade off. The bullpen has always been solid, but Fernando Rodney adds more fire to the back of the bullpen. The depth of the team is stronger with the addition of Hideki Matsui at DH. You know, the Matsui who was last season’s World Series MVP. THAT Matsui. The breakout season from Kendry Morales, and the late season push from Howie Kendrick, proves that the offense will bounce back this season and be its usual productive success. Again, depth in the pitching staff, the strength of Brian Fuentes at the back of the bullpen, and the balance of a potent offensive lineup promises more success for one of the Major League’s most consistent teams from season to season.

Texas Rangers
When manager Ron Washington isn’t hitting the pipe, he’s quite a talented baseball manager. Of course, maybe anyone could coach this team with the offense Washington enjoys watching from the dugout. Josh Hamilton, Michael Young (whose last name seems quite descriptive of his offensive stamina), Ian Kinsler, Vladmir Guerrero, and the list goes on. Not to mention David Murphy, Nelson Cruz, and Chris Davis. See? The list DID go on. Of course the rotation is still, season after season, the team’s most obvious weakness. Fragile Rich Harden is supposedly the team’s ace. The no-name, rag-tag bunch in the starting rotation just is not good enough to win the ten-plus games over 80 that the offense will not be able to win.

Oakland Athletics
Every division has one, and the A’s are the AL West’s “one.” Without sugar-coating it, the A’s are not going to be very good this season. In fact, for the other three teams in the division to win as many games as they will this season, the A’s, truthfully, have to be bad. They surely will not disappoint with a group of players that embody unfulfilled expectations. Right fielder Jake Fox, third baseman Kevin Kouzmanoff, and first baseman Daric Barton are all players that are supposed to have fulfilled expectations by now. A rebuilt Ben Sheets – fresh off a one year vacation – is being relied on to anchor a starting rotation that is sure to struggle. The bullpen is not deep or strong, and will likely blow one unlikely lead after another. Count on the A’s to be a part of the division’s strength by being an easy out for divisional opponents.

While it is true that the A’s will not be good, the other three teams in the division will be excellent, and finish tiered according to overall team strength. The Rangers have the best offense and no pitching. The Angels have solid offense and pitching. But the Mariners have potentially elite pitching and an elite offense. The East does not have all the stars and all the pitching. Expect the AL West to surprise a lot of folks this season. Well, a lot of folks… but not me.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Sign Stealing Debate – It’s not just for juvenile delinquents and political activists!

June 17, 2009

Read the debate intro and Loyal Homer’s opinion.



I give Loyal Homer credit for accurately defining the word “steal” and showing the reasons why some believe sign stealing should be against the rules.

Well, let’s continue that line of logic. Sign stealing is bad because it’s “stealing,” and all stealing is bad. Signs aren’t the only things in baseball that are stolen, though. You also have BASE stealing. If the term stealing implies that some unethical or improper action is being followed, then we can’t just stop at sign stealing… my new call to action is to rid baseball of the crime that is base stealing!

I’m being facetious, of course. But, the argument Loyal Homer presents for why sign-stealing should be against the rules is flawed. Just because it has the word “steal” in it doesn’t make it a bad thing.

Now, let’s consider the intention behind sign stealing. Sign stealing is an attempt by one team to intercept and decode secret communications that may help interpret their opponent’s strategies and put them in a more advantageous position. Is that any different from studying film, or scouting reports, or any other type of analysis performed in preparation for an upcoming game? You’re collecting information – based solely on observation – and attempting to interpret it in order to be better prepared for an opponent.

If the New York Yankees paid someone from the Texas Rangers organization to tell them what each and every nuance of a catcher’s glove position meant, or used advanced technology to record signs, then rules have been broken. I am not speaking of this type of sign-stealing. However, if members of one team recognize the trends and patterns of an opposing player and accurately interpret them, then no rule-breaking has taken place. It is just the mental aspect of the game of baseball. Also, if the Rangers know that A-Rod once knew their signs (for example), then shame on them for being so stupid as to use the same signs now that he is their opponent.

Here’s a hypothetical situation. Let’s say A-Rod notices that whenever a certain batter assumes their batting stance, if they open their stance up they usually pull the ball into left field. After seeing this a few times, he recognizes the pattern. The next time he sees it he tells the outfielders behind him to shift more towards that direction. Is there anything wrong with that? I don’t think so. So, why is it any different to indicate to a batter what pitch you think is coming? You could still be wrong – you’re just trying to analyze the game.

Now consider this – why does a team feel like it has to SEND hidden or secret messages?

Have you ever seen the comedy that is a third base coach signaling his batter instructions? It looks like a cross between my drunken cousin Ted trying to do the Electric Slide at a wedding and a guy swatting at a fly while wiping pudding off of his face and uniform. It’s completely ridiculous, so why go through it?

They must because they’re trying to secretly communicate information based on situations and positioning that THEY see, and want to gain an advantage over THEIR opponent. The intention is exactly the same. You are trying to hide your strategy from them, so they are entitled to try and guess that strategy.

I argue that sign stealing is nothing more than a case of “the pot calling the kettle black.” If one team is allowed to take measures in concealing secret messages back and forth from coach to player, then their opponents are equally entitled to observe and analyze those messages to try and divine meaning from the madness. Both are secretive, and both are intended to give one team an advantage over the other.

If you don’t want your signs to be stolen, then don’t use them!


The Sign Stealing Debate – Should Baseball Punish Offenders?

June 17, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s opinions.



There’s been a great deal of uproar and attention paid lately to the issue of sign stealing in Major League Baseball. As usual, our buddy/”lightening-Rod-for-controversy” (get it???) – New York Yankees third baseman Alex Rodriguez – is again in the middle. As first reported by the New York Daily News’ Mark Feinsand, ESPN baseball color commentator (and former Chicago Cubs starting pitcher) Rick Sutcliffe took up airtime to accuse A-Roid (sp??) of verbally feeding Yankees first baseman Mark Teixeira the location of a coming pitch. This, friends, is what we call stealing signs.

Sign stealing, or “tipping pitches” isn’t illegal… technically. It is, however, extremely taboo. It takes pre-planning, forethought, and, in the eyes of some, a willing disrespect for the game of baseball. Perhaps between the “admitted” steroid use and yelling “I got it” while rounding the bases in hopes of messing up the opposing team, A-Roid (sp??) has demonstrated a general disrespect for the game of baseball. Is it that much of a reach to believe he is also tipping pitches for his teammates? Selena Roberts of Sports Illustrated doesn’t think so. In fact, she devoted an entire portion of her book about A-Roid (sp??) to his pitching tipping ways when he was with the Texas Rangers.

The history of tipping pitches is long and storied. Here’s how it works. You just doubled off the wall in left-center (good job!) and are taking your lead off second base. The right handed batter that follows you in the lineup looks out at you after the pitcher agrees to the sign. You saw it was a fastball. So, you grab the bill of your cap with your right hand and take your lead with a slight lean to your right, third base. The batter immediately understands that he’s getting an inside fastball – extremely helpful information! This explanation, though complex, is exactly how sign stealing works. It’s usually subtle (unless you’re A-Roid… sp??). Given that fact, it’s impossible to believe a player when they claim they had no idea they were tipping pitches. If you believe a player when they deny tipping pitches, you may as well believe the NCAA takes recruiting violations seriously or that Artie Lang will be booked on the next episode of Joe Buck Live.

However, the real question for this debate isn’t whether someone did, or did not (yea right), tip pitches. The real question is:

Should sign stealing and pitch tipping be considered cheating by MLB and punished?

Loyal Homer will argue that sign stealing should be considered cheating, and MLB should levy serious punishment to deter it.

Bleacher Fan will argue that sign stealing should not be considered cheating, rather part of the game as a whole. After all, can’t the pitcher and catcher devise a sign sequence the opposition can’t figure out?

Enjoy this debate and weigh in with your opinions. Do you believe sign stealing should be illegal?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.