The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Peyton Manning: The Greatest Player Who Ever Lived

February 5, 2010

Read the arguments by Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

 

If children dream of being NFL players, then what do NFL players dream of being? I’ll tell you. They dream of being Peyton Manning.  This year’s Super Bowl only further cements his legacy as the greatest NFL player of all time.

For those who doubt my assertion that Peyton Manning is the best football player ever, I suggest you take a look at his credentials. Most of Manning’s detractors point to his lack of Super Bowl championships as their entire case against his greatness (“Rings? Rings!? He don’t need no stinking rings!”), even though Peyton Manning already has one Super Bowl ring from 2007. He is ranked among the top in every quarterback statistic that matters (passing yards, touchdowns, wins, etc.) and has an unprecedented four league MVP awards as well. While even the biggest Manning-haters will at least admit he is among the best quarterbacks today, I say that he is making a campaign for the greatest player of all time, and I’m not alone. Sports Illustrated writer Ross Tucker points out that Peyton’s accomplishments exceed those of Dan Marino, John Elway, Brett Farve,  Joe Montana, and Tom Brady…and I could not agree with him more. Marino never won a Super Bowl - This Sunday Manning attempts to win his second. Two Super Bowl victories would tie those of Elway, and would surpass Farve.

Tucker also makes the argument that Montana played for a stacked 49ers team that preceded the days of free agency, and that Brady benefited from the genius of Bill Billichick’s defenses and strategies. On top of all this, Tucker points out something I covered here on TSD last month, Peyton Manning’s success this year came without the assistance of his usual all-star supporting cast. Manning carried his team to the Super Bowl and he did it without Tony Dungy’s brilliant leadership, or Marvin Harrison’s seemingly ageless hands. Few would doubt the fact that Manning is the brains behind his own success, because his tireless hours of film breakdown and an ability to read defenses and play call at the line of scrimmage are unparalleled. While each of aforementioned quarterbacks are legends in their own right, Manning’s resume boasts superior accolades.  

This year’s Super Bowl puts him Over The Top like Lincoln Hawk (don’t tell me you don’t remember the 1980s arm wrestling movie staring Sylvester Stallone, who played a trucker competing for a new big rig and his son’s love).

 His greatness transcends the game. Some celebrities’ fame makes them the national face of their city, but Mr. Manning’s relationship the city of Indianapolis even exceeds the wildest of expectations. Like a benevolent Mussolini he controls the education system and makes the buses run on time. Seriously! Peyton Manning controls the opening and closing of schools Indianapolis, a power usually reserved for the weather and natural disasters. Want proof? In 2007 the Indianapolis Public School system actually had to cancel school because of the celebrations of Peyton’s first Super Bowl ring. Apparently the raucous celebrations left the bus drivers so wiped out they could not even drive their routes that day. This year the school district is on a two hour delay. I think all the elementary school students should have to write thank you cards for their extra two hours of Manning Break. 

His celebrity is not embraced just regionally, but around the country. As Rod Tidwell might say, “he is an Ambassador of Quan”. He has the love, respect, community, and the dollars too…the Quan. Manning continues to become a cultural icon, but better. He is like Ellen DeGeneres - He makes us laugh and cry, but instead of giving away free stuff he gives away unforgettable moments. The next memorable gift is scheduled for delivery this Sunday during the Super Bowl.

This game holds exceptional meaning and value for the legacy of Peyton Manning. New Orleans is in many respects Manning’s home, and it holds special meaning to the Manning family.

The Manning family, which appears to pass on a genetically enhanced football gene (some have even suggest that Archie Manning be cryogenically frozen in order to produce enhanced players in the future…true story) continue to have a profound connection to New Orleans. It was the stomping grounds for Peyton’s father, Archie Manning, when he played for the Saints. Peyton and his brother Eli have stayed invested in the area as evidence by their assistance with Hurricane Katrina relief. Now so many years later, New Orleans seeks to defeat one of its favorite sons, and in the Super Bowl no less. This is sure to be a big, emotionally charged game for Peyton Manning, to which he usually responds with big outings. Who can forget his decimation of the Saints at the Superdome in 2003 where he put up 6 scores in just 3 quarters, just one shy of the NFL record. He was certainly motivated then by all the attention of a nationally televised game against his father’s old team in his old home town. I think this year’s Super Bowl will just be another benchmark in the storied history of the greatest player the game has ever known.

This debate is supposed to be about the Super Bowl’s biggest winner, and it is abundantly clear that the marquee story is Peyton Manning. Peyton Manning’s legacy will shine that much brighter, not if, but when he leads his Colts to a victory over his father’s Saints in Super Bowl XLIV.

But I think at least on some level, the Super Bowl itself wins because it can feature the greatest player the NFL has to offer—Peyton Manning.


The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Reggie Bush Can Take That Next Step

February 5, 2010

Read the arguments by Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Hopefully by now you’ve gotten an invitation to a Super Bowl party. Surely, you have your Super Bowl squares all lined up (unless you’re Bleacher Fan, who seemingly can’t find enough participants in Ohio).

As for the game itself, it should be an excellent, high-scoring affair. Outside of the winner (and hopefully me in my Super Bowl squares contest), the biggest winner Sunday night could the legitimacy of Reggie Bush’s career.

I met some USC fans from California over the New Years holiday and let me tell you, they think their Trojans hung the moon. Of course, they also had bad things to say about Lane Kiffin at the time (this was before Kiffin’s hire). But they really believe Reggie Bush is the greatest thing since sliced bread. This is despite the trouble that Bush might eventually get USC into, and despite the fact that, for the better part of his professional career, he has quite simply been a bust. Some may say that’s harsh, but I don’t.

As a number two pick back in 2006, much was expected of him after a record-breaking collegiate career. Still, he has yet to have that breakout year with the Saints. This past regular season, he had only 70 carries for the Saints, and he’s a player I will likely never touch in fantasy football. But he’s fit into a nice role down in New Orleans. He compliments that team well and has become a Dave Meggett-like back. He is still a force returning punts when given the opportunity, and if I’m a defensive coordinator, I would still shiver at the thought of Bush running free in the open field.

He has shown signs of breaking out this postseason. He had perhaps his best game as a pro in the divisional round against the Arizona Cardinals, rushing for 84 yards on just 5 carries and returning a punt 83 yards for a touchdown. Watching the game that afternoon, I thought to myself, “This is the Reggie of old.” That’s certainly the type of performance that Saints fans are hoping for on Sunday night. A big game on Sunday, and the hype for #25 will build all over again. I think the opportunity is certainly there for him Sunday, as the game is expected to be a high scoring shootout.

Let’s be real folks. He is beginning to be known as the guy who dates Kim Kardashian, and that’s not a good thing if you are a football player. You want to establish yourself as a professional, and Bush has not yet fully managed that. Quite simply, he is still getting by on the things he accomplished as a USC Trojan.

A big game Sunday could elevate him, though. He would be forever worshipped in the Big Easy, and his reputation around the league would improve dramatically.

The stage is yours, Reggie. You’ve played in big games before. Let’s see what you’ve got!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Big Win for the Big Easy

February 5, 2010

Read Babe Ruthless’ and Loyal Homer’s arguments about who they feel the biggest winner of the Super Bowl is.

It is every football fan’s dream to one day get their hands on a pair of Super Bowl tickets. After all, who wouldn’t want to be in Miami on Sunday evening as the Colts battle the Saints for the Super Bowl Championship? I’ll tell you who – ME (but only this year).

As exciting as it would be to actually have the opportunity to attend a Super Bowl game, there is one place THIS year that I would much rather be – New Orleans! In a city already known for their ability to have a great time, just imagine the excitement and the atmosphere as the fervor of support for the New Orleans Saints mingles with the already abundant party-goers on Bourbon St. It will be the perfect party storm.

Obviously, a win on Sunday night will raise the citizens of NOLA to fever pitch, but even a loss by the Saints will still mean a BIG win for the city.

New Orleans has hosted the Super Bowl before, and reaped the economic benefits of being a host city. In those years, though, the circus left town on Monday morning, and all the money left with it. Things will be slightly different for the ‘Who Dat?’ nation this year, however. The after-effects of having their own beloved Saints actually reach the NFL’s championship game will be felt in that city long after the clock ticks to 00:00.

I have witnessed first hand the benefit that a successful sports team can have on a struggling city. Cleveland transforms on game night for the Cavaliers from an industrial ghost town into an overcrowded mecca of #23 jerseys, #33 jerseys, and even a few #11’s thrown into the mix. Likewise, the city was flooded with tailgaters and bar-crawlers during the 2007 Browns season, and THAT was just because the Browns won 10 games that year (they didn’t even make the playoffs). From the sale of merchandise in the stores to the turn out at local bars and eateries throughout the city, people are always happy to spend money in support of a successful team.

Casinos, restaurants, and bars alike will be packed to the hilt in New Orleans on Sunday night, and for many Sundays to come. The thrill of having reached their first ever Super Bowl will not die down after the game ends. Instead, it will feed a contagious buzz that will fester and grow throughout the entire offseason. Having finally received a taste of the good life, the city of New Orleans will be giddy with anticipation for more. That excitement will spill over into summer time training camp, and will carry throughout the 2010 football season.

If the Saints are fortunate enough to continue their success into next season, the excitement (and corresponding benefit) will be amplified exponentially.

Whether or not the Saints are able to cap off their season with a championship on the field, the city of New Orleans will be shining like gold on Sunday night!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Football Overtime Debate – College is Ahead of the Pros on This One

February 2, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless about whether college football or the NFL has a better system for overtime.



It is the end. This has quietly been an issue for sometime now, really ever since the NCAA introduced its current set of overtime rules back in 1996. The argument picks up steam every time a key NFL game goes into overtime. It happened after the first round of the playoffs when Arizona beat Green Bay in overtime (though not as big of an issue since the Cardinals returned a Packer fumble for a touchdown). It became an even bigger issue after the NFC Championship game between New Orleans and Minnesota when the Saints defeated Minnesota by a field goal to advance to the Super Bowl, despite being thoroughly dominated on the stat sheet by the Vikings. After watching that game, I was even more convinced that the best form of overtime used in football is the system used in college.

It is not that I believe that the college overtime system is perfect. It is definitely not. I think starting at the 25-yard line of the opponent is too easy. But when comparing it to the sudden death format showcased in the NFL, it is easy for me to choose the college way.

In the past decade, 158 games went into overtime in the NFL, including playoff games. Of those 158 games, 96 of them were won by the team that won the coin toss, meaning the coin toss winner also won the game 61 percent of the time. My South Georgia education tells me that the loser of the coin toss only won 39 percent of the time. I think that is a decided advantage. I would take those odds. It also makes the coin toss at the beginning of overtime one of the biggest plays in the game. There is a good chance one team is not going to touch the ball, which is exactly what happened in the NFC Championship game. How fair is that?

Meanwhile, in college, both teams get AT LEAST one chance to touch the ball. They have AT LEAST one chance to score. The way the current system is set up, each team is actually in field goal position when they begin their respective possessions in overtime. The games often go into extra frames of overtimes and that adds to the excitement.

To this day, one of the most thrilling games I have ever watched on TV took place in 2001. I was in college at Valdosta State University and was home on a Saturday night watching football with my buddies. We sat on the edge of our seats watching a seven overtime game between Ole Miss and Arkansas. None of us had any rooting interest in either team, but we sat in amazement as Arkansas finally won 58-56 in a game that actually was a defensive struggle through four quarters.

The bottom line is that the overtime system in college football gives both teams a chance to win. It is not without flaws but it beats the alternative presented by the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Super Bowl Week Debate – The Only Time it is COOL to Throw a Party for Squares!

February 1, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek about what the best part of the week leading up to the Super Bowl is.



I like being a casual sports fan.

I can sit down and watch pretty much any sporting event and enjoy myself. Why? Because I enjoy the nature of competition, and I love to watch people as they strive to be the best in whatever they do. While I may “like” being a casual sports fan, I absolutely LOVE IT when I have much more at stake than idle curiosity about finding out who the winner is.

I suppose that is why I (and so many others out there like me) love Fantasy Football so much.

Without Fantasy Football, I am truly interested only in the success of my favorite team. Only one game each week would get my undivided attention, and if my team has nothing left to play for, I would most likely find something else to do with my day. Sure, I MAY watch another football game from time to time, but it is in no way with full attention.

Adding Fantasy Football to the mix, though, I suddenly find myself fixated on every play of every game. Where I may have otherwise been indifferent to the Week 13 matchup between the Carolina Panthers and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, I now have a personally vested interest in the outcome of the contest. Each event that would otherwise be insignificant could now directly help or harm my fantasy team.

Unfortunately for most football fans, by the time the Super Bowl has rolled around Fantasy Football is over, as is the real football season for 30 out of 32 of the NFL franchises. That equals to 93 percent of the league whose fans have no personal stake in the championship. And although this season’s matchup between the Indianapolis Colts and the New Orleans Saints has the potential to be one of the most explosive and high-scoring affairs in Super Bowl history, most people outside of Indianapolis and New Orleans will only be watching the game with the casual interest of simply wanting to find out who the champion is.

Sure, those casual fans may have a preference for who they want to win, but that is in no way comparable to having a personal interest, such as being a true fan of one of the teams involved, in the outcome.

Enter Super Bowl Squares!

As is the case with Fantasy Football, Super Bowl Squares give everyone a chance to become more than a simple bystander. Instead of watching the game just because it is the Super Bowl, people with no direct allegiance to either team can still become passionately involved in every play of the game.

For those who are unfamiliar with Super Bowl Squares, the premise is simple. A 10×10 grid is created, resulting in 100 possible “squares.” Each square is randomly sold for a flat rate, usually ranging from $1 – $100 per square (although I have heard rumors of $1,000 or more for certain parties). Once all 100 squares are sold, the numbers 0-9 are randomly assigned to each row and again to each column, creating coordinates for each square.

At the end of each quarter, if the last digits of each team’s score matches the coordinates of the square you own, you win a prize (usually 25 percent of the total pot). That means that in a $5 per square pool, each winner receives $125.

Suddenly, thanks to the addition of Super Bowl Squares, the game takes on a whole new meaning. Instead of simply wanting one of the teams to win, you are hoping for certain combinations of scoring plays. You may want the Colts to win, for example, but only by kicking a field goal.

Some places go all out for Super Bowl Squares, making them a bigger feature than the game itself. Often you will hear about waiting lists, just to buy a square, and extravagant parties where a portion of the money raised by the sale of the squares goes towards expensive catering, etc. Usually, those are for very high-dollar contests, where the prize money from these squares can be more than $10,000 per quarter.

Whether you are playing for $1 or $1,000 Super Bowl Squares are great because they give you a REAL reason to watch the game, and football is always more exciting when you have something extra riding on it – whether that extra something is pride, bragging rights, or (as I like it) for some cold hard CASH!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Super Bowl Climate Debate – Snowball fights or Summer Nights

January 28, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer about whether or not the Super Bowl should continue to be hosted only in warm weather or domed stadiums.



This year’s Super Bowl is just about ten days away, and will be held at Sun Life Stadium in tropical South Florida. If all goes right, the warm Miami night will be the perfect backdrop for an epic matchup of explosive offenses. But is this the way the Super Bowl should be? That is exactly the question that this debate explored.

Bleacher Fan made a case for a cold weather Super Bowl, debunking several popular explanations for why the NFL snubs northern cold weather venues. Specifically, the interesting points made were how a cold weather Super Bowl somehow puts warm weather teams at a disadvantage, that sloppy conditions lead to a poor quality game, and that a white out could equal a wipe out the big game. Bleacher Fan did a masterful job of providing counterpoint to these popular theories, proving them to be misconceptions. His most compelling argument was that a snowy Super Bowl would be a fan favorite, and I tend to agree. From snow ball fights to snow angel celebrations, excitement would most definitely be in the air.

Loyal Homer argued that a cold weather bowl would never fly, that the frigid, snowy weathers of the North would not be the proper venue for what is arguably sports most important championship game. Loyal Homer also pointed out that the suits and the powers that be – who can actually afford Super Bowl tickets – would be none too thrilled to endure the freezing temperatures of one of the less desirable locations, citing several examples of potentially arctic locations for the Super Bowl, like Buffalo or Wisconsin.

For me the debate was pretty easy to decide, and it seemed tailor made for Bleacher Fan. The opening sentence of his argument was direct. To paraphrase “There really aren’t any good reasons why the Super Bowl must be played in warm weather venues and domes.” The game should belong to the fans the diehards who are there rain or shine and make every game that leads up to the big night possible. The Super Bowl is about competition at its highest level so who cares if the conditions are not “ideal.” Unpredictable conditions make the game that much more exciting to watch. And for those reasons I am awarding the “W” to Bleacher Fan.

The Super Bowl should be for all fans not just those blessed with warm weather. The NFL should spread the wealth when it comes to its premier event, and show some love to the cold weather locations.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Super Bowl Climate Debate – Should Climate Control Come Standard?

January 27, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer about whether or not the Super Bowl should continue to be hosted only in warm weather or domed stadiums.



The Super Bowl has become a fair weather game. All the Super Bowls of the modern millennia have been played in warm locations. Specifically, Florida, Arizona, California, Texas, Louisiana, and Georgia. The only exception came in 2006, when the Super Bowl was held at Ford Field in Detroit, an indoor stadium that does not exactly qualify as a cold weather venue. There are a lot of positive aspects to hosting the game in a warm, and sometimes tropical, location. Warm weather games are clearly more fan friendly. No body wants to shell out huge amounts of money for Super Bowl tickets only to say, “The weather was lousy. I was miserable the whole time.” Good weather is a plus for the media, who have millions of dollars invested in covering the most watched sporting event of the year, and do not wish to worry about snow and sleet impacting the halftime performance. Aren’t Mick Jagger and the other fossils they dig up for the halftime performances brittle enough without having to worry about the cold?

But cold weather venues also offer certain unique experiences which capture the ruggedness and unpredictability that make the NFL so exciting in the first place. The 1967 National Football League Championship between the Dallas Cowboys and Green Bay Packer – more popularly known as “The Ice Bowl” – is one of the most memorable games in professional football history. There is something special about two teams meeting in an epic clash, staged upon a chilly backdrop of negative 40 degree wind-chill temperatures. Whenever I see footage of a white field in Foxborough or Green Bay I always stop and think, “Man, I wish I could see a game like that!”

So, which venue is best for the game? That is the issue that today’s debate will attempt to resolve. Should the Super Bowl be played in a cold weather climate?

Bleacher Fan will argue that true fans of the game want to see the Super Bowl played in its harshest and most challenging environment – outside, during the Winter in the North. Loyal Homer will argue that the sensible and responsible thing to do is keep the game in the warmth and comfort of a Southern climate.

Should the NFL tip their caps to the purists and diehard fans that would surely be thrilled to see a blizzard bowl? Or is the smart money on keeping the game out of the frigid wastelands and maintaining a vacation atmosphere the better plan?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Super Bowl Climate Debate – Debunking the Myth

January 27, 2010

Read the debate intro and the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.



Can someone PLEASE give me a VALID reason why the Super Bowl is only played in domes and warm weather climates? I know what people SAY the reasons are, but allow me to debunk those myths right now!

Myth #1 – Cold weather could create a disadvantage for “warm-weather” teams.

WHO CARES?! Nobody seems too concerned about an open-air team that has to play within the confines of a dome for the Super Bowl. Likewise, nobody is crying that Indianapolis and New Orleans, two dome teams, have to play this year’s Super Bowl in (gasp) an open-air stadium.

Do you really expect me to believe that trained professional athletes who play in Cleveland (okay, bad example for a Super Bowl discussion, but you get my point) are affected any less by snow and cold than people who play in Phoenix? The Clevelander may be more tolerant of the cold, but their body still reacts in exactly the same way.

Football is a sport played NATIONWIDE from the months of September through January. That means there is cold weather EVERYWHERE. If the San Diego Chargers, for example, are so one dimensional that they can only win a game if played when the temperatures are above 50 degrees, and there is no precipitation, then THEY DO NOT DESERVE TO BE IN THE SUPER BOWL!

Being a dome-team did not seem to bother Indianapolis in 2006 when they had to win a playoff game in Baltimore, and then when the team defeated the Chicago Bears during the monsoon Super Bowl that took place in Miami several weeks later.

The fact is that a championship football team will win games no matter where they are played.

Myth #2 – Bad weather equals bad games.

Super Bowl XLI proved two things. First, that even so-called warm weather cities like Miami can have horrible weather, and second, it proved that football is a game that was designed for play in any climate.

The game, which was played in a very chilly rain from start to finish, pitted the domed Indianapolis Colts against the cold weather Chicago Bears. If the myths were to hold true, then Indianapolis would have no chance of winning the game, and the final score should have been 9-3.

What ACTUALLY happened was a very entertaining game that ended with a 29-17 Colts victory. The Colts, who (according to the myth) should have been far too delicate to handle anything other than a dome’s climate-controlled perfection, amassed 430 total yards of offense, including 239 passing yards on 38 attempts.

Myth #3 – A blizzard could shut down a cold-weather Super Bowl.

I have news for you on this one: Blizzards affect THE CITY, not the stadium. So how is it that the NFL had no problem scheduling Super Bowls in Detroit and Minneapolis, but will not schedule one in Foxboro or New York? Detroit and Minneapolis get hit with blizzards all the time! Just because the stadium is under cover does not mean that the city would be operational. If a blizzard had hit Detroit on February 5th, 2006, there would NOT have been a Super Bowl XL. The fact that Ford Field is under cover would have done NOTHING to save the game, because that same cover does not protect the rest of the city.

Myth #4 – Bad weather is not fan-friendly.

Allow me to speak with authority on this particular myth.

Living in Cleveland, Ohio, I have been to football games when it was 80 degrees, and I have been to football games when it was five below zero. In all my years as a season-ticket holder, my best experience as a fan was at a game that took place on December 16th, 2007. In that game the Browns played the Buffalo Bills in a literal white-out. Winds were blowing up to 40 miles per hour, and there were times when the snow was so heavy that you could hardly make out the field. (It was so cold and snowy that my hoodie literally froze around my head. By the end of the game, the hood had frozen into a sort of hood-helmet!)

Still, the game was played in front of more than 73,000 screaming fans (check out this YouTube video for a little taste of the experience), all of whom were having the times of their lives!

Likewise, nearly 69,000 flooded the gates of Foxboro Stadium three weeks ago as the New England Patriots played host to the Baltimore Ravens for a Wildcard matchup, and another 63,000 filled the seats at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati for their Wildcard game.

If 79,000 raucous New Yorkers are willing to pack Giants Stadium on January 3rd for a regular-season week 17 matchup between the New York Jets and the Cincinnati Bengals, I think that the Super Bowl Committee could comfortably trust that they will not have any problems selling Super Bowl tickets at the same stadium one month later.

Although there are many stated reasons why the Super Bowl is never scheduled in a cold-weather city, the facts of history continue to prove over and again that those reasons are completely invalid. It is time to reconsider the current Super Bowl model and let the fans from Chicago, Green Bay, Denver, Cleveland, and New York (for example) have their chance to stage football’s greatest game. To paraphrase a famous saying: Neither rain, nor sleet, nor heat, nor gloom of night will keep football fans from travelling en masse to the single biggest sporting event of the year!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Ideal Super Bowl Matchup Debate – A Clash of Styles Leaves Us All With Smiles

January 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer about which teams they believe would create the best possible matchup for the 2010 Super Bowl.



What is the secret to a Super Bowl Championship? The age-old adage is that defense wins championships, but what if that defense is pitted against one of the most explosive and dynamic offenses in the league?

A Super Bowl between the New Orleans Saints and the New York Jets would answer that question. In a classic matchup of vastly different styles, this potential pairing would go a very long way to salvaging one of the most BORING playoff seasons in NFL history!

The New Orleans Saints are led this season by the NFL’s top rated passer, Drew Brees. In 2009, Brees threw for 4,388 yards and a league-leading 34 touchdowns. Most impressive is that Brees can spread the ball around the field to many different receivers. Where most of the quarterbacks who top the passing charts have a teammate who tops the receiving charts (Matt Schaub and Andre Johnson, Peyton Manning and Reggie Wayne, Tom Brady and Wes Welker), the Saints’ top receiver (Marques Colston) BARELY cracks the top 20 in receiving yards.

With the ability to share the offensive love with so many weapons on offense, Brees and the Saints would present a very unique problem that the Jets may not have an answer for on defense.

The Jets have clearly been the most dominant defense in the league all season, which is the primary reason for their postseason success. The Jets have been able to shut down some of the best offenses in the league, including the San Diego Chargers last weekend.

Their formula is a simple one – they play fundamentally sound defense, and force opponents to play perfect football. When combined with the amount of pressure they exert on opposing offenses through an endless barrage of blitzes, playing perfect football becomes very difficult. Philip Rivers found that out the hard way, when he threw an interception to Darrelle Revis late in the last weekend’s game. With that interception, the Jets had all the opportunity they needed, capitalizing on that mistake (like they have done all season), and finishing off the Chargers.

Revis has been the clear leader on the Jets defensively, and has been such a dangerous playmaker in the secondary that he has been able to eliminate the top receiving threats for any opponent. But, the Saints do not really have a top receiving threat. If Revis covers Colston, then Devery Henderson is available, or Robert Meachem.

I mean no disrespect to the rest of the Jets defense, which also features outstanding players like Bart Scott and Lito Sheppard, but Revis is only one guy. As much as he can be a game changer for the Jets, he cannot be everywhere. The Saints might, MIGHT, have enough options to overcome the combined onslaught of blitzing and Darrelle Revis’ secondary presence.

I would LOVE to see the Saints and Jets face off against each other in Miami two weeks from Sunday, because it would truly be pitting the league’s best offense against its best defense.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Ideal Super Bowl Matchup Debate – Favre Versus Manning…You Know You Want It!

January 22, 2010

Read the arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.



For the past two weeks, I have stated my love of the NFL playoffs. Both the wild card weekend and the divisional round weekends really get me excited. But conference championship games are a whole new ball game. You can bet I will be glued to the TV from 3p until roughly 10p Sunday (the weather forecast is calling for a lot of rain in Georgia on Sunday, so that enhances my chances of being able to watch more football!) Both of the games should be very entertaining for different reasons, though being more of a fan of great offense than great defense, I am personally looking more forward to the Saints/Vikings game. But as far as what I think would be the ideal matchup for the Super Bowl in two weeks, I think it is a no-brainer that it would involve the Indianapolis Colts and the Minnesota Vikings.

We have done a lot of debates since our inception that have included Brett Favre in some sense. At the end of 2009, Bleacher Fan wrote that the Brett Favre saga was the story of the year. I wrote an argument awhile back about how I was sick and tired of hearing about that Favre guy!!! Months later, I must admit I have changed my tune a bit on number four. I find myself kind of rooting for the guy. Obviously I rooted for him last week against the hated Cowboys. But in general, it has been fascinating to watch a 40-year-old roughneck come back from retirement (AGAIN) and put a team up on his shoulders and lead them to great things. What this guy is doing is amazing! I think the Vikings have a real shot at closing this season out in style in South Florida. The Vikings are obviously a ratings draw with Favre and I do not think the NFL would have any opposition to Favre being in another Super Bowl, even if it still makes me turn my head sometimes to see him in something other than a Packer uniform.

The Colts, meanwhile, have another guy at quarterback that you may have heard of. Peyton Manning, along with Favre and Tom Brady, are in my mind the face of the NFL and have been for the past decade. With all the hoopla surrounding coach Jim Caldwell’s decision to rest his starters at the end of the regular season, I think it is quite awesome for Caldwell – by nature a quiet person – to be able to stick it to all of his critics. Manning, in my opinion, is one of the most likable guys in sports these days, and it is really hard to root against him. You get the feeling that he really needs another Super Bowl to add to his legacy also.

How awesome would it be to see a Favre versus Manning showdown in Super Bowl XLIV in Miami at newly named Sun Life Stadium? I think it would set records as far as ratings go and yeah, I know we would all probably get tired of the hype leading up to the game. But Manning and Favre, two future Hall of Fame gun slinging quarterbacks that would be trying to win their second Super Bowl each, would be a dream matchup. I sincerely hope it happens! You know you want it too!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.