The 2009 College Football Most Important Game of the Season Debate – ACC Football Seeks Respect, Leadership

August 10, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument for their most important game of the upcoming 2009 college football season.



If you’re a loyal reader of The Sports Debates (and why wouldn’t you be?) you may recall our recent questioning of the Big East as a football conference and whether or not they deserved an automatic BCS bowl game for their conference champion. That topic generated a great deal of additional debate after the verdict was rendered, and the primary argument from those defending the honor of the Big East was that the ACC sucks too, so, lay off the Big East. While I still do not believe that is a valid argument within the context of the Big East-BCS debate (e.g. “that other guy punched someone in the face so I can punch someone in the face, too”), it is fair to call into question how deserving the ACC is. The facts indicate that the ACC has struggled for respect as a football conference. They have performed below expectations in BCS games, selecting the conference winner is not important enough for fans to actually attend the championship game, and since Florida State’s precipitous fall from grace (both on and off the field) the conference has lacked true leadership from a dominant team.

This season, 2009, is the season that turns that around for the ACC. That’s why the most important game in college football’s 2009 season is on October 17th when Georgia Tech hosts Virginia Tech. These two teams are the best in the Coastal Division, with the best offense and defense in the entire league, respectively. In fact, Georgia Tech’s offense and Virginia Tech’s defense were the talk of the ACC’s media week… and with good reason.

The Rambin’ Wreck are destroying defenses with a “fresh” offensive look, as engineered by second year head coach Paul Johnson (you know, the coach that turned Navy into a respectable team). When executed properly, it is a very difficult offense to stop – especially with all-ACC running backs like the stocky and powerful Jonathan Dwyer and the lightning fast Roddy Jones. Bruising backups Anthony Allen and Lucas Cox, combined with the quick Marcus Wright and Embry Peoples, make for the deepest backfield in all of college football. Any combination of those runners may be in the game at the same time, and all have big play potential. Plus the triple option is a tough offense to prepare for (especially considering I did not even mention quarterback Josh Nesbitt). The media writes entire articles only on a team getting READY to play this offense. (Something to watch for: the triple option may be to the ACC what the spread offense is to the SEC. If teams have a hard time stopping it, look for more teams to run it in the near future.)

The decidedly unenviable task of stopping this multi-faceted attack falls to the Virginia Tech defense, led by the great defensive coordinator Bud Foster. Foster’s defenses are known for toughness and discipline (that whole lunch pail thing), and he’ll need to coach up every last element of each for the Hokies to outlast the Yellow Jackets. The inclination to make a play on defense is a sure-fire way for a player to overrun an option play. Foster must teach discipline and focus in addition to the usual toughness that all of his defenses have. Last year’s defense finished the season with a BCS bowl win over Cincinnati and ranked seventh overall in team defense (ninth in scoring, 14th in rushing and 16th in passing). If any defense can take on the increasingly seasoned triple option attack at Georgia Tech, it’s the Hokies’.

Power in the ACC will shift with the outcome of this game. If Georgia Tech wins, the triple option is the story of the season in the ACC and Georgia Tech is positioning itself as the conference superpower. If Virginia Tech wins, they will further cement their status as the ACC’s benchmark for success and the league’s domain team.

Last year Virginia Tech hosted the game in Blacksburg and won by a field goal. This year the Hokies must go on the road and play in Atlanta in the thick of their ACC conference schedule. This crucial game is sandwiched between Boston College and North Carolina. If the Hokies win, it is a big time, legitimate win on a national scale.

Not only will this be an excellent and compelling matchup within the first six weeks of the season, this game has extremely important ramifications. The winner could go on to dominate the conference and win a BCS bowl game. For the ACC to regain a modicum of respect amongst the college football elite teams and talking heads, they need to field at least one dominant program. No pundit or fan buys the idea that the ACC suffers from excessive balance. The oft-talked balance looks a whole like mediocrity. This game could change the critical tone.

Bottom line, if the ACC proves itself worthy, college football as a whole improves. Sure, Texas will be good, Florida will be good, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State will draw attention, BYU could spoil the BCS party, and Ohio State or Penn State could earn respect this season. But, we all know those teams are good, and will be good for years to come. This is a pivotal year for the ACC as a football conference. They need to earn respect now. Planting the seeds of respect this year will catapult the ACC to respectability. That’s why the “Battle of the Techs” is the most important game in college football this year. It may potentially sound the football death knell for a long established conference, or bring the fight back to the ACC, and respect back to the gridiron – instead of just being the South’s OTHER conference.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Psychology of the Pre-Season Poll Debate – What is the Function of a Pre-Season Poll?

July 30, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that a pre-season poll should forecast how the season will end and Loyal Homer’s argument that it should provide a real-time snapshot of the best teams in college football.



Football is just around the corner. As we wait with bated breath for the release of the college football preseason top 25 rankings, questions abound regarding where the each team will fall.

Florida is a likely candidate for the number one spot, but what about Texas, or Oklahoma? Where does the Pac-10 or the Big Ten come into the equation? How do you rank Southern Cal and Ohio State when they will be playing each other early in September?

With all the speculation swirling around, it makes me wonder how to interpret the pre-season polls once they are released. For example, if Florida does in fact receive the number one ranking, does that mean that the pollsters feel that the Gators are pre-season favorites to win the BCS National Championship, or does it mean that they are just ranked as the best team TODAY, and we’ll have to wait and see if they still are the best team tomorrow?

For the 2008 season, Georgia was named the pre-season number one team, but they finished the season without even making a BCS appearance, instead facing Michigan State in the Capital One Bowl. Does that mean the pollsters were wrong when they filled out their pre-season ballots, or were the Bulldogs in fact the best team in the country at the time of the polling?

In fairness, no one possesses the clairvoyance of Carnac the Magnificent, so predicting the future is impossible. Does that mean that the pollsters get a bye if their preseason pick for number one loses the first three games of the season?

It is for this reason that I look to my esteemed colleagues for assistance.

What is the better philosophy to employ when a developing a college football pre-season poll?

Obviously these are consensus polls, so opinions will differ from one voter to the next. However, shouldn’t the general principle on who to vote for be the same, regardless of the person voting?

With that thought in mind, Sports Geek will argue that the best philosophy when constructing a pre-season poll is to rank the teams in order of which is most likely to win the National Championship. After all, isn’t that who the number one team is at the end of the season?

On the other hand, Loyal Homer will argue that the best philosophy is to vote based on the current state of the teams. Rather than attempt prognostication, a pollster should rank the teams based solely on who they feel the best team is TODAY, understanding that circumstances arise which may change the status of who the best team is TOMORROW.

As I gaze into my crystal ball, I see… a bicycle in the basement of the Alamo! No, wait, I see the winner of this debate. And it is…

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Big 10 Evolution Debate – The Verdict

July 3, 2009

Read Loyal Homer’s argument to add another team to the Big 10 and Bleacher Fan’s argument to avoid another team.



To me, it’s interesting how this debate has evolved. What began a strict question discussing the specific pros and cons and possibilities of the Big Ten conference adding another team for an even 12 evolved into a debate about the value of a championship game.

Being a traditionalist myself, I find Bleacher Fan’s argument to be very appealing. Like many other Sports Geeks out there, this Sports Geek loves the Big Ten and all of the crazy traditions that Bleacher Fan recounted so well. My favorite bizarre Big Ten tradition is the Illibuck Ohio State and Illinois fight over. That’s why it pains me to award the victory for this debate to…

LOYAL HOMER!!!!!

Loyal Homer made THE point of the debate, a point that I haven’t been able to shake while contemplating how to write this verdict: A championship game isn’t solely about money. A business professional will say it is a no brainer to add a team, and a championship game, because the opportunity to make gobs and gobs of money exists. However, is money alone reason enough to potentially change the longstanding, deeply beloved traditions unique to the Big Ten conference? No.

However, Loyal Homer is not making an argument for another team and a championship game solely on the grounds of financial gain. I agree that it’s not a money issue but a respect issue.

For the Big Ten conference to earn the national respect Loyal Homer argues they’ve forfeited because of several consecutive poor BCS showings, adding a championship game helps. One of the benefits for the SEC, for example, is that it is clear in the national picture which team is the conference’s best and belongs in the BCS. Sure, the Big Ten has had at least two teams in the BCS for two consecutive years, and that has earned them a significant payday. Last season, the first team to make it to a BCS game in the Big Ten, Penn State, earned a fat $18 million bucks. The second team to make it to the BCS in the Big Ten, Ohio State, earned a $4.5 million dollar award. That’ll buy a lot of buckeye candy. But money is something the Big Ten has. Respect is what it needs.

In the end, the Big Ten is not forced to abandon all of their traditions, as Bleacher Fan intimates. In reality, some concessions will have to be made. Some jugs and bucks and buckets will not be contested EVERY year, but they won’t be completely forgotten and phased out, either.

The most important aspect of adding a team and a championship game for the Big Ten is supremacy. Not only will a supreme champion receive national publicity and the full efforts of a conference’s marketing power as they enter the BCS, the conference will remain relevant at the end of the season. A major drawback to the current construction of the Big Ten football season is the fact that they disappear as the other major conferences begin to play their most interesting, relevant games. The last Big Ten game of the season is before Thanksgiving with THE Game, while the SEC, ACC, and Big XII all play national, heavily hyped championship games in early December. The Big Ten gains nothing by being absent from the national dialogue, but they gain a lot by playing their bowl game 20-30 days after their season ends, instead of the now customary 40+ day layoff BCS teams have been forced to endure.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.