The Most Interesting 2010 NFL Matchup Debate… Rematch Grows To Rivarly

September 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

The most exciting game of the 2009 season was not the Super Bowl. It was the NFC Championship. It was a classic battle that ended in a dramatic overtime victory for the New Orleans Saints. At the center of this game was a quarterback showdown which could serve as the symbolic passing of the torch from the old to the new breed of gunslingers.

During the game Brett Favre was 28 for 46 with 310 passing yards, but it was his two interceptions – including a late-game bad decision which essentially cost the Vikings the game – that defined his game. Meanwhile, the Saints’ Drew Brees – who completed only 17 passes for less than 200 yards – managed to hook up for three touchdowns and no picks in a performance that propelled his team into the Super Bowl.

It was a thrilling game that helped bring an outstanding close to the 2009 football season.

So, what better way to kick off the next season than with a rematch?

If that one interception thrown by Favre at the end of the game really was the only reason that Minnesota lost, then they now have a chance to prove it, and stake a claim as the team to beat in the NFC (perhaps even the NFL).

After a not-very-surprising “holdout,” Favre has decided to return once more and play football (news that I’m sure the Medicare people were disappointed to find out). And with a supporting cast that is formidable even without Sidney Rice, Favre and the Vikings should once again be in the hunt for the Lombardi Trophy.

The Saints are fresh off of a whirlwind tour as reigning Super Bowl champions, where the players and coaches enjoyed all the fruits of victory. Brees is on the Madden ’11 cover, the team has visited the White House, and the city of New Orleans has held a six month party in the team’s honor.<br.

But the time for fun and games is over.

Winning one NFL championship is difficult enough. Winning consecutive championships is nearly impossible, and the schedulers have seen fit to make sure that the Saints are no exception.

The final piece to the puzzle, which pushes this game from being one of intrigue to being the game to watch for the entire season, is simple – it is the season kickoff.

Let’s face it, this has been a very slow summer for sports. The World Cup ended two months ago, LeBron has announced where his talents will be, and unless you are lucky enough to live in a city such as New York, Tampa Bay, or Atlanta, you probably lost interest in baseball somewhere back in late July.

We have been patient long enough, and it is time we all got a taste of the good stuff once more.

America’s favorite sport is about to get underway, and it launches its 2010 campaign with a superstar repeat of the best matchup from last season.

ARE YOU READY FOR SOME FOOTBALL?!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Football Overtime Debate – College is Ahead of the Pros on This One

February 2, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless about whether college football or the NFL has a better system for overtime.



It is the end. This has quietly been an issue for sometime now, really ever since the NCAA introduced its current set of overtime rules back in 1996. The argument picks up steam every time a key NFL game goes into overtime. It happened after the first round of the playoffs when Arizona beat Green Bay in overtime (though not as big of an issue since the Cardinals returned a Packer fumble for a touchdown). It became an even bigger issue after the NFC Championship game between New Orleans and Minnesota when the Saints defeated Minnesota by a field goal to advance to the Super Bowl, despite being thoroughly dominated on the stat sheet by the Vikings. After watching that game, I was even more convinced that the best form of overtime used in football is the system used in college.

It is not that I believe that the college overtime system is perfect. It is definitely not. I think starting at the 25-yard line of the opponent is too easy. But when comparing it to the sudden death format showcased in the NFL, it is easy for me to choose the college way.

In the past decade, 158 games went into overtime in the NFL, including playoff games. Of those 158 games, 96 of them were won by the team that won the coin toss, meaning the coin toss winner also won the game 61 percent of the time. My South Georgia education tells me that the loser of the coin toss only won 39 percent of the time. I think that is a decided advantage. I would take those odds. It also makes the coin toss at the beginning of overtime one of the biggest plays in the game. There is a good chance one team is not going to touch the ball, which is exactly what happened in the NFC Championship game. How fair is that?

Meanwhile, in college, both teams get AT LEAST one chance to touch the ball. They have AT LEAST one chance to score. The way the current system is set up, each team is actually in field goal position when they begin their respective possessions in overtime. The games often go into extra frames of overtimes and that adds to the excitement.

To this day, one of the most thrilling games I have ever watched on TV took place in 2001. I was in college at Valdosta State University and was home on a Saturday night watching football with my buddies. We sat on the edge of our seats watching a seven overtime game between Ole Miss and Arkansas. None of us had any rooting interest in either team, but we sat in amazement as Arkansas finally won 58-56 in a game that actually was a defensive struggle through four quarters.

The bottom line is that the overtime system in college football gives both teams a chance to win. It is not without flaws but it beats the alternative presented by the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Ideal Super Bowl Matchup Debate – A Clash of Styles Leaves Us All With Smiles

January 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer about which teams they believe would create the best possible matchup for the 2010 Super Bowl.



What is the secret to a Super Bowl Championship? The age-old adage is that defense wins championships, but what if that defense is pitted against one of the most explosive and dynamic offenses in the league?

A Super Bowl between the New Orleans Saints and the New York Jets would answer that question. In a classic matchup of vastly different styles, this potential pairing would go a very long way to salvaging one of the most BORING playoff seasons in NFL history!

The New Orleans Saints are led this season by the NFL’s top rated passer, Drew Brees. In 2009, Brees threw for 4,388 yards and a league-leading 34 touchdowns. Most impressive is that Brees can spread the ball around the field to many different receivers. Where most of the quarterbacks who top the passing charts have a teammate who tops the receiving charts (Matt Schaub and Andre Johnson, Peyton Manning and Reggie Wayne, Tom Brady and Wes Welker), the Saints’ top receiver (Marques Colston) BARELY cracks the top 20 in receiving yards.

With the ability to share the offensive love with so many weapons on offense, Brees and the Saints would present a very unique problem that the Jets may not have an answer for on defense.

The Jets have clearly been the most dominant defense in the league all season, which is the primary reason for their postseason success. The Jets have been able to shut down some of the best offenses in the league, including the San Diego Chargers last weekend.

Their formula is a simple one – they play fundamentally sound defense, and force opponents to play perfect football. When combined with the amount of pressure they exert on opposing offenses through an endless barrage of blitzes, playing perfect football becomes very difficult. Philip Rivers found that out the hard way, when he threw an interception to Darrelle Revis late in the last weekend’s game. With that interception, the Jets had all the opportunity they needed, capitalizing on that mistake (like they have done all season), and finishing off the Chargers.

Revis has been the clear leader on the Jets defensively, and has been such a dangerous playmaker in the secondary that he has been able to eliminate the top receiving threats for any opponent. But, the Saints do not really have a top receiving threat. If Revis covers Colston, then Devery Henderson is available, or Robert Meachem.

I mean no disrespect to the rest of the Jets defense, which also features outstanding players like Bart Scott and Lito Sheppard, but Revis is only one guy. As much as he can be a game changer for the Jets, he cannot be everywhere. The Saints might, MIGHT, have enough options to overcome the combined onslaught of blitzing and Darrelle Revis’ secondary presence.

I would LOVE to see the Saints and Jets face off against each other in Miami two weeks from Sunday, because it would truly be pitting the league’s best offense against its best defense.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.