The Kevin Kolb Career Debate… Vick’s Not The Answer

September 21, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

With everyone so high on Michael Vick right now it’s tough to imagine he was one of the most despised men in America just a few years ago. His actions caused former fans to burn his jersey and made him the punch line of countless jokes. Yet with two good performances on the books in the 2010 NFL season, everyone seems ready to forgive and forget his antics. I am not be so hasty.

Appearances May Be Deceiving

Contrary to popular belief, Michael Vick still can’t run with the big dogs. What, too soon? Well it’s true. He is completely overrated, and it is an absolute shame that Michael Vick had such a great game Sunday, because now Philly fans will expect outings like that all the time, and there is no way he keeps it up. Seriously, he just can’t do it.

Last Sunday Vick threw for 284 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. Projecting stats like those across the rest of the season Vick would have to throw for 3,976 yards and 28 touchdowns in the remaining 14 games. Those stats are completely implausible for Vick. Those numbers surpass his career bests (2,936 yards in 2002 and 20 passing touchdowns in 2006) by miles. Vick played a ridiculously great game… for Vick. But even that has to be put into context. Michael Vick was playing against the Detroit Lions. You know the same team that has only won two games in the last two seasons. So Vick’s numbers were somewhat inflated. It was one really good week playing a below average team that was getting his first start in years. While he is certainly a more than capable backup, he’s not the long term answer. Just like his Atlanta days, teams will figure him out, and when they do his numbers will come down to Earth… and Philly fans will eat him alive (a fitting punishment if I do say so myself).

You Can’t Teach An Old Dog Beater New Tricks

Expecting Michael Vick to behave is like expecting Kanye West to not be a jerk. It simply isn’t going to happen. Give Vick enough rope and he’s going to hang himself. How many second chances was he given in his Atlanta days before he ended up behind bars? Long before Vick’s dog fighting ring days he was making headlines for stupid actions which jeopardized his future with the team.

First there was the infamous herpes case, where Vick was accused of knowingly giving a sexual partner a sexually transmitted disease that he kept quiet about (Editor’s Note: Also inspiring Sports Geek’s fantasy football team name, Ron Mexico’s Puppy Farm.). And to think he didn’t try to parlay that into an endorsement deal. Then, he made headlines again for surrounding himself with friends that included former drug traffickers. He was even implicated in a scandal involving the theft of a very expensive watch and his posse of world class losers. Despite meetings with team officials about making good decisions for himself and his team, he continued to act irresponsibly. Later, Vick came under scrutiny for connections to drugs in 2007 after trying to sneak drugs past TSA agents in a Florida airport. While these actions may seem like small potatoes in comparison to his piece de résistance – his dog fighting ring – it proves that Vick has a long track record of being a world class loser. Vick’s track record has shown no signs of overcoming his character flaws even after his time in the slammer, so why should Andy Reid trust him to be better when he can’t even throw a birthday party without people getting shot. To trust him with the ball and the future of the Eagles’ organization makes about as much sense as hiring Lindsay Lohan as a motivational speaker.

Kolb is Still the Man

Everyone loves a winner and Vick’s wins have made it hard for fans to remember that he is still just a backup quarterback. Andy Reid is no fool. He was willing to deal Donovan McNabb, within the division no less. because he had faith in his starter – Kevin Kolb. Similarly, there is a reason that Andy Reid was willing to entrust the lesser experienced Kevin Kolb with the starting gig over the more experienced Vick. Clearly Reid likes what he saw in the sporadic playing time Kolb has had over the past few years. There is no doubt that his pocket passing ability will serve him well in Reid’s offense, which is made stronger by the acquisition of guys like DeSean Jackson and Jeremy Maclin.

There is no controversy here. Vick himself admits he is okay with being Kolb’s backup, so all this hubbub is much ado about nothing. Andy Reid should not just discard all his plans because of one uncharacteristically good start by a backup, and one untimely concussion to his starter (and I’m not alone in this belief).

Taking nothing away from Vick, who is a more than capable backup quarterback and has the potential to be a starter elsewhere in the league, he just isn’t the guy the Eagles need right now. And for that matter, until he proves he is trustworthy (which his birthday blowout proved once again he’s not) he’s a risk for any organization for which he plays. Kolb was made for the Philly offense. The smart money is on the young man with a lot of upside, and both Andy Reid and Michael Vick have to know this.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Kevin Kolb Career Debate… Common Sense, or Kevin Kolb?

September 21, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

I am going to assume that you travel the same way to work every day.

Let’s pretend that one day your normal route is closed due to construction, and you have to take a detour. But you find as you take this detour it is actually a faster route to take. It saves you time and money, and allows you to completely bypass traffic. So when the day comes where your “normal” route is opened back up, do you return to it just because that is what you had said your route to work was? Or do you stick with the new route, which has proven to be more successful today?

Obviously, you would choose the route that has PROVEN to be better, but that seems like a bit of common sense that passed Philadelphia Eagles head coach Andy Reid by.

Reid had a PLANNED offense that would rely on Kevin Kolb as the starting quarterback, and a PROVEN offense that has found success behind Michael Vick.

Kevin Kolb has a career passer rating of 67.8. Michael Vick’s passer rating since returning to the NFL is 103.3 (and is 76.8 over his career).

Kolb has played in 13 total NFL games, started only two of them, and has a career record of 1-1. Vick has played in 88 games, starting 68 of them, and has a career record of 38-28-1.

Kolb, over his career, has thrown only 140 passes. Vick has completed more than 140 passes in four out of his six seasons as an NFL starter.

Kolb has thrown for only four touchdowns and seven interceptions in his career. Vick has, in only one and a half games this season, thrown for three touchdowns and zero interceptions (and has 75 TDs and only 52 interceptions in his career).

Kolb is an unproven backup, recently promoted into a starting role simply on prospect and practice performance. Vick is a three-time Pro Bowler with both regular season and post-season success under his belt.

Should I continue? I didn’t think so.

It seems ridiculous that this would even be a question, yet Andy Reid was foolishly risking his own job by insisting that Kevin Kolb remain the starter.

I completely understand that Kevin Kolb is an exciting prospect in the Reid’s eyes. I also respect Reid’s desire to avoid a messy quarterback controversy, and my intention is not to knock Kolb for his limited opportunity, or to imply that he will be a failure in the NFL. But is it really a controversy when there is such a clear one-sided favorite? Reid is actually CREATING the controversy by keeping Vick on the sidelines.

Facts are facts, and the reality for Andy Reid is that he is right now choosing to stick with a quarterback who is essentially no more experienced than rookie Sam Bradford, and who has performed as an average (at best) quarterback when he HAS played… even when he has a guy sitting on the sidelines who has proven that he is ready to not only compete, but actually WIN in the NFL.

So what sense could it possibly make to keep Vick on the sidelines?

Andy Reid made a gutsy call this off-season when he let Donovan McNabb go. That decision immediately put him on the hot seat, especially playing in a city like Philadelphia where the fans demand nothing short of their own versions of success. Although Reid had said he believes Kolb is the future of the Eagles franchise, Michael Vick right now is not only playing better than Kolb, he is playing better than all but the most elite of quarterbacks in the NFL.

That is like turning down a free cut of filet mignon because you heard that the vegan menu might be better for you in the long run.

So far this season, Vick has thrown for 459 yards (the 11th most in the NFL, on a full half less playing time than everyone else on the leaderboard) on 43 completions, for four touchdowns and no picks. He has also rushed for 140 yards.

His 105.5 passer rating so far this season is fourth best in the NFL. There are also only nine quarterbacks with more touchdown passes than Vick, and only one of those nine (Peyton Manning) can also boast no interceptions.

Michael Vick has started the season as one of the top quarterbacks in the league. The decision to keep his PROVEN success on the bench, just because some THINK Kevin Kolb will be better, is one that SHOULD cost you your job. Every day that goes by where Reid sticks with Kolb put him one day closer to that inevitability.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate… Lion(s) Share of Questions

September 17, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Sports Geek.

It is only week two of the NFL season and we already have a matchup between two backup quarterbacks.

Unfortunately, that is only the start of the issues facing the Philadelphia Eagles and Detroit Lions on Sunday. Both teams find are in the extremely rare situation of entering the second game with MORE questions than were faced on opening weekend.

Let’s start with the Eagles.

For the last decade the Eagles have been led on the field by quarterback Donovan McNabb. In the off-season, though, the team made a strategic decision to look toward the future by trading McNabb to the division rivals Washington Redskins. The young and highly anticipated prospect, Kevin Kolb, was given the keys to the kingdom.

So how did that decision pay off in week one? In less than two quarters of playing time, Kolb struggled under the pressure provided by the Packers defense and he went 5-10 with only 24 passing yards. Then, to make matters worse, he was knocked out of the game with a concussion.

Replacing Kolb, Michael Vick (yeah, THAT Michael Vick) finally got his opportunity to once more lead an NFL offense as THE quarterback, and he never looked back. Even though the Eagles lost the game, Vick looked spectacular playing like he hasn’t missed any time at all since his pre-prison Pro Bowl days. During his time on the field Vick was 16-24 for 175 yards with one touchdown, and he added another 103 rushing yards to the mix… just for some variety.

And with Kolb not passing his concussion test until yesterday (he failed his first try on Wednesday), it looks like Vick will get another shot to prove that he deserves more than just a supporting role in the NFL.

Then, the Lions.

If ever there was a rock bottom in the NFL, the Detroit Lions found it. The Lions went a pathetic 2-30 over the last two seasons and were coming into 2010 with no place to go but up. The team was entering 2010 with some very real expectations for genuine improvement, with Matt Stafford and Calvin Johnson coming back to lead the offense along with explosive rookie running back, Jahvid Best.

And to the delight of the fans, the Lions showed signs of improvement during the week one matchup with the Chicago Bears. But a controversial call at the end of the game cost the team victory. Like Kolb, Stafford was knocked out of the game, only Stafford’s injury was in his shoulder.

If the news of Stafford’s injury wasn’t bad enough for Lions fans, the name of his doctor surely must be –Dr. James Andrews (although Dr. Andrews stated that Stafford would not need surgery, which had to ease the blow at least a little bit).

So now it is up to Shaun Hill to try and continue leading the development of the Lions’ offense.

Neither of these teams want to start the season off at 0-2, but with so many questions sitting unanswered right now, it is virtually impossible to try and predict a winner.

Will there be a new quarterback controversy in Philadelphia?!

Is Matt Stafford REALLY that valuable to an NFL franchise, and are the Lions REALLY improving?!

Did Calvin Johnson go back and study the fundamentals of completing a reception?!

Will Rocky and Bullwinkle find the missing ingredient for the rocket fuel formula?!

Be with us Sunday for “Eagles Come, Eagles Go,” or “The Goal Lion Stand!”

Editor’s Note: Sigh.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NFL Training Camp Hottest Coaching Seat Debate… Reid’s Hopes Pinned on Eagles’ Wings

July 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

Andy Reid tried to get by without Donovan McNabb once before.

How did that work out for him? Backup quarterback Kevin Kolb passed for only 73 yards, zero touchdowns, and two interceptions on 23 passing attempts. Reid immediately went back to McNabb the following week, and McNabb responded by leading the Eagles through the rest of the season and into the NFC Championship game.

Now Reid and his Philadelphia Eagles have once again made the decision to put their franchise in the hands of Kolb, only this time Reid no longer has McNabb as a safety net. Should Kolb – who despite some impressive numbers in his few career starts is still an unproven quarterback – prove to be a bust as the full-time starter in Philly, the responsibility falls squarely on Andy Reid’s shoulders.

The problem for Reid is that Kolb used to be the insurance policy. Donovan McNabb was the face of the Eagles franchise for the last decade, and he was extremely successful during his time in Philadelphia. During his ten seasons in Philly McNabb was a six-time Pro-Bowler and he lead his team to eight different playoff appearances, including five NFC Championship games and one Super Bowl.

There can be little doubt that McNabb was a bit time contributor in Philadelphia and is due much of the credit for their successes over the past decade.

Now that McNabb is gone, Kolb is no longer the insurance policy. And the situation at the quarterback position is MUCH different today.

Last season the Eagles touted a quarterbacking corps that was envied around much of the NFL. At starter was a Pro-Bowl quarterback with a very serviceable back up and a former superstar who is trying to break his way back into the league. This season, however, the Pro-Bowl quarterback is out of the equation and the team is left simply with a recently promoted (but still unproven) starter, and a guy who has essentially not played substantial football since the 2006 season.

In fairness, Kolb is not set up for failure with the Eagles. He will have some of the brightest young talent in the league at his disposal with guys like DeSean Jackson, LeSean McCoy, and Jeremy Maclin. All three of those weapons are extremely fast and athletic. Kolb, who has demonstrated very solid passing accuracy, should have no problem in getting the ball to them in open field.

This is a franchise where the leadership (and fans) have grown accustomed to the playoffs, and the fact that Donovan McNabb is no longer the quarterback will not be considered an acceptable excuse for failure.

The Eagles reside in one of the most competitive divisions in the NFL, and during this most recent off-season the head coach sent the superstar quarterback to play for a division rival, which happens to now be coached by a two-time Super Bowl Champion (something that Reid himself has yet to accomplish).

It is now up to Andy Reid to prove that he made the right decision, as his future in Philadelphia hinges on the success or failure of an untested, unproven Kevin Kolb.

Seats don’t get much hotter than that!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Tiger at the Master’s Debate… The Truth Shall Set You Free

April 8, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Tiger Woods has chosen the Masters to mark his infamous return to golf. If the comments of Augusta National’s Chairman, Billy Payne, are any indication of how the rest of the golf world feels, his return will not be a positive one.

There is a right way and a wrong way for an athlete to return to competition once they have been involved in ignominy of any kind.

Or perhaps I SHOULD say there is a right way and Tiger’s way.

In returning to competition the “right” way, the focus of the athlete’s return is not on the scandal itself, but it is instead on the athlete’s performance in the game. Michael Vick’s return to the NFL was a great example of the “right” way to come back.

When Vick finally returned to the game of football, the focus was not about his dog-fighting scandal, because there were no questions left to ask about his actions. In the time leading up to his return, he was very transparent in his behavior, making himself accessible to the media whenever they wanted to chat. More importantly, though, was the fact that his apologies and actions POST-scandal all seemed to be genuine and heartfelt.

Sure, there were protests surrounding his return, but those protests were not a focal point any more. The voices of dissent had already been heard, and because they had nothing new to protest, and there were no unanswered or unresolved situations to further fuel their fire, their complaints were considered yesterday’s news.

Vick had taken back control of the situation by giving the press and the public what they wanted. He partnered with the NFL in the build-up to his return, and they cooperatively organized his transition back into competition. He answered all the questions, no matter how unpleasant it may have been for him, and the general public seemed to be satisfied with his responses. In doing so, his return was not about what he DID, but instead was about finding out what he will DO now that he is back.

As a result of that positive and cooperative effort, both the NFL and Vick benefitted from his return to the game. Instead of Vick’s presence on the field being a DISTRACTION, he became one of the most intriguing characters of the previous NFL season.

Tiger Woods and the PGA should have taken a page from Vick’s book.

Where Vick was open and accessible, Woods has been reclusive and inaccessible. Where Vick gave the appearance of genuine sincerity, Woods has portrayed resistance and after his seemingly insincere apology, the only SINCERE regret I believe he feels is that he was caught. The result of his foolish commitment in trying to avoid the scandal (which ironically appears to be the only commitment he CAN honor) is that the unsatisfied public will continue to dig and question until they get what they feel are satisfactory responses. Just ask guys like Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, or Mark McGwire about how easily the public forgets.

Sure, the scandal was set off by off-the-course indiscretions that had no bearing on the PGA Tour, but now there is speculation of possible HGH use, which would have impacted his play ON the course. As the scandals surrounding Woods continue to swirl unchecked and unaddressed, they will increasingly draw attention FURTHER from the game of golf.

This whole situation has already been a major distraction from the PGA Tour, and Woods wasn’t even playing. Just imagine the damage that will be done if he begins to win tournaments again amid speculation that he may have used HGH. Because Woods’ credibility has been damaged, and he has failed to portray a SINCERE act of contrition with regard to his peccadilloes, the public is less likely to believe his denials of HGH involvement. A snowball effect ensues, where the layers of doubt build higher and higher.

The public’s quest for the truth will ultimately supersede any interest in the competition that will take place on the course. While the officials at Augusta may be able to exert some influence over the media during the Masters, they cannot extend their control beyond the confines of this one tournament. The Woods saga will eventually become a distraction to the PGA Tour, and as each day passes that questions go unanswered (or new accusations arise), the press will become more insistent on seeking information.

This situation cannot be swept under a rug, and it will not just go away. If anything, the American public is forgiving, but until Tiger addresses the elephant in the room and portrays a SINCERE attempt at repentance, the general public will not be willing to forgive, and they will CERTAINLY not be willing to forget.

The PGA may need Tiger Woods back in competition, but they need a Tiger Woods who is not mired in controversy even more.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Trading an Eagles Quarterback Debate… Guarantee a Return on Investment

April 2, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

There are many reasons to make a trade.

Sometimes it is to dump salary. Other times it is because the personnel is not a good fit. For the Philadelphia Eagles, it is a problem of overcrowding.

As of today, the Philadelphia Eagles have three quarterbacks on their roster who each believe they can be starting, and each are hoping to get paid thusly – Donovan McNabb, Kevin Kolb, and Michael Vick. Although for very different reasons, the Eagles can make a very legitimate argument for keeping or trading every single one of them.

In evaluating each of their options, though, the only trade that makes sense for the Eagles is to deal Donovan McNabb. While it is true that McNabb has been the face of the Eagles franchise for the past 12 seasons, he is also the only quarterback that will fetch true value for the Eagles.

Michael Vick, although once a Pro Bowl caliber quarterback, has yet to demonstrate that he can once again carry the load of leading an NFL franchise for a full season.

Kevin Kolb, although a very talented prospect who may be ready for the big time, is still unproven as a starter.

The fact is that McNabb is the only quarterback whose value is proven, and in this offseason where bona-fide quarterbacks are at a premium, the Eagles will be able to get top dollar in a deal that involves the Pro Bowler.

Just look at the collection of free agent quarterbacks still on the market today. When Kyle Boller, Mark Brunell, Daunte Culpepper, J.P. Losman, and Josh McCown are the “marquis” names on that list it is hardly a buyer’s market. I know that there are also a couple of potentially exciting names that will go high in the draft next month (namely Sam Bradford and Jimmy Clausen), but the reality of the situation is that none of those names holds the market value of Donovan McNabb.

Last season proved to be one of the best of McNabb’s already impressive career. He cashed in his third-best passer rating (92.9), fourth-best touchdown total (22), and threw fewer interceptions than most of the other “great” passers playing the game today, including Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, and Tom Brady.

The other element that McNabb brings to the table that no other “available” quarterback does is experience. He has led the Eagles to the playoffs in one of the NFL’s toughest divisions – the NFC East – eight of the last ten seasons. His record during the playoffs is an impressive 10-8, and he has made five different NFC championship appearances with one Super Bowl. He is a five-time Pro-Bowler who continues to respond positively to adversity.

McNabb continues to perform as one of the top quarterbacks in the NFL. The only genuine criticism of him is that the majority of his career is already over. Even if he makes a Favre-esque run late into his thirties, he does not have an additional 12 years left in the gas tank.

Kevin Kolb was selected by the Eagles as the future of the Philadelphia franchise. While McNabb may have been the very prominent past, now is the time to change Kolb’s status to become the Eagles’ present. The only reason NOT to stick with Kolb is if the Eagles still don’t believe he is ready to start full time in the NFL. Since that does not appear to be the case, then the Eagles MUST trade McNabb now while his value is high. Failure to do so could ultimately cost Philadelphia McNabb AND Kolb, who will certainly be looking for a starting job elsewhere if he does not get his opportunity soon in Philadelphia.

The resumé McNabb boasts, combined with the likelihood of four to five more highly productive years in the NFL, makes him a prized target for many QB hungry teams in the NFL during an offseason where successful quarterbacks are virtually non-existent. Now is the time for the Philadelphia Eagles to sell high, and maximize the value of Donovan McNabb.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Trading an Eagles Quarterback Debate… Not Sold On Kolb

April 2, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

Kevin Kolb is like the world’s fanciest unicycle. Someone wants it, but it just does not seem like a useful, sound investment.

By the end of last season the Philadelphia Eagles appeared to boast unrivaled quarterback depth with the triumvirate of Donovan McNabb, Kevin Kolb, and Michael Vick. The team’s depth chart more closely resembles the caliber of talent found in a stacked pitching rotation rather than a list of starters and backups. Last season’s depth was both a rarity and a luxury. While having all three of these quarterbacks on the roster last season helped Philly survive some injury woes (like Donovan McNabb’s cracked ribs after week one’s thumping of the Carolina Panthers), carrying all three players into the 2010 season is neither practical nor probable. At this point in the off-season it seems like it is a foregone conclusion that the Eagles will part with longtime starter Donovan McNabb, but the wiser move would be to trade away Kevin Kolb.

Trading Kolb may seem counter intuitive to most because he is younger, cheaper, and has the most upside of any of the three QBs that Philadelphia is hording on its roster. But now is the time to strike. Upside does not last forever. Kolb is benefiting by comparison to his to fellow Eagle quarterbacks. He certainly does not come with the baggage that fallen star and media pariah Vick brings, and he does not carry the injury prone label that McNabb does either. Kolb is benefiting from the criticism of his competition.

Kevin Kolb is largely unproven. In two starts last season he threw for 718 yards, four touchdowns, and three interceptions. He also has a one yard rushing TD to his credit. Although he has not made an absolute mess of things, he has not posted any outings that would warrant his immediate rise to the top of the depth charts, either. He led the Eagles to beat up on a very weak Kansas City Chiefs team, and was routed by the eventual Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints. It is like gauging your boxing skills by saying you could destroy Richard Simmons, but that you would definitely lose to Manny Pacquiao. It does not reveal a whole lot about ability.

Rather than risk the unknown on a risky play in Kolb, the Eagles could profit from capitalizing on his marketability right now. Remember all the buzz surrounding Matt Leinart when he landed in Arizona? Now what has become of him? If the Cardinals had traded him for players or picks as soon as they found new life in Kurt Warner who knows what they would have gotten for him.

I know that this is a football debate, but the Yankee fan in me cannot fail to mention the Johan Santana trade that dominated the 2008 off-season. The Yankees desperately needed an ace to anchor the rotation, and the Minnesota Twins wanted to get as much value for their hurler before he became a free agent. The two teams were close to a deal but the Yankees were unwilling to give up two of their top three prospects in Philip Hughes and Ian Kennedy. The deal never got done and the Yankees missed their first post-season since 1993. Entering the 2010 season Philip Hughes is scraping to earn the fifth spot in the Yankees rotation and Ian Kennedy is a complete non-factor in the Yankees plans. While it is true that hindsight is 20/20, we can see that the Yankees failed to capitalize on the upside of their prospects.

What’s my point? Upside isn’t everything. To use another cliché, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Teams like the Eagles cannot count on what Kolb might evolve into, especially when they have proven not one, but two, proven veterans on their roster now. The clock is ticking on Kolb’s value. A few years ago the Eagles believed McNabb to be worth at least two first round draft picks. Is there any team out there that would even come close to that for him now? No. Philly can get maximum value out of a trade for Kolb now because he seems to be a hot commodity, but if they wait it could be too late. The Eagles can cling to what might be with Kolb or they can count on what they know they can get out of McNabb and Vick.

McNabb and Vick bring multi-faceted approaches to the quarterback position while Kolb’s game is more one dimensional. Although Kolb scrambled some during his days in Houston, I don’t know that he can compare with either of the other two quarterbacks’ ability to stretch the field. Similarly, I would not think that Eagles head coach Andy Reid is willing to abandon all the plays and schemes that utilized McNabb’s legs. On paper Kolb figured to excel in a West Coast offense, but his two starts last season did not reveal anything stellar. Still, Kolb has the potential to contribute in an offensive scheme that utilizes a somewhat mobile passer, and that should add to his trade value.

I do not think McNabb or Vick will catapult the Eagles to the next level, but I certainly do not feel that Kolb is the answer either. Kolb’s marketability makes him the biggest prize on the Philly trading block.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Starting the Back Up Quarterback Debate – Kolb is The Future… and the Present

November 25, 2009

Read the arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan about which current NFL back up quarterback should be the starter.



It is always said that the most popular guy in town is the backup quarterback. I certainly hear it everywhere. I even hear it at the high school level. We all hear it often at the collegiate level (this has been going on in Athens, Georgia for much of the season with the 6-5 Georgia Bulldogs). Of course we hear it at the professional level. Backups often get to play due to injuries to the starting quarterback, as was the case this week in the NFL with the Pittsburgh Steelers having to go to Charlie Batch after an injury to Ben Roethlisberger (Editor’s note: Now Batch is out for six weeks). Matt Leinart also took over for Kurt Warner out in Arizona after Warner took a blow to the head. There were other injuries, too. The point is that backups are very valuable and there are some backup quarterbacks who deserve a shot at starting. This is evident in the city of Brotherly Love with current backup quarterback Kevin Kolb.

Remember the stink that was made when Kolb was drafted with the 36th pick by the Eagles? I sure do. I was one of the ones making the stink. I thought it was too high to draft a backup quarterback and one who many experts were not as familiar with, for the most part. Plus, I was not sure it sent the right message to Donavan McNabb. Fast forward two years later… I have changed my mind.

Kolb, in his third season, deserves the chance to start. It is hard to say McNabb needs to be benched at this point, especially after a comeback win over the Bears last Sunday night. Kolb made his first start earlier this season in week two against the Saints, due to an injury to McNabb. Yeah, the Saints won big 48-22, but Kolb still threw for 391 yards and completed 31 passes. He followed that up by throwing for 327 yards and two touchdowns in a 34-14 victory over the Kansas City Chiefs in Week two. Kolb is the only guy in NFL history to throw for at least 300 yards in his first two career starts. He has since been confined to the bench as McNabb has remained healthy and effective. But in his time as a starter he proved he has what it takes to be successful in the NFL.

Benching McNabb is not the answer. But, can you imagine Kolb’s gun slinging arm with the exciting duo of DeSean Jackson and Jeremy Maclin. That would be quite a show. As it is, that possibility may not happen. But, I compare Kolb to Matt Schuab who sat on the bench behind Michael Vick with the Falcons for three years before finally being traded to the Texans. He has since, quietly, established himself a capable quarterback, when healthy.

Kevin Kolb deserves a shot. He has too good of an arm to be sitting on the cold bench in Philadelphia. Hey NFL teams, please give him a shot soon!!!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Vick as a Spokesman Debate – As A Spokesman, Brands Should Not Bark Up the Vick Tree

October 8, 2009

Read the debate intro, Sports Geek’s argument, and Loyal Homer’s argument about whether or not a major marketer would be wise to use Michael Vick for a celebrity endorsement.



In discussion of this topic, both Sports Geek and Loyal Homer presented valid reasoning for why a company should or should not consider Michael Vick as a spokesman. His past, as argued by Loyal Homer, has sullied his reputation, and companies could be wise to steer clear so as to not be associated with him. On the other hand, Sports Geek brings up the fact that Vick has been able to use his past as a platform to advocate change and has taken strides to be a positive example of redemption, which can make for powerful marketing.

Although Sports Geek correctly identifies the value of being able to market an “underdog” story, I am awarding the debate to Loyal Homer. It is correct that many people are inspired by underdogs, and as Sports Geek stated, “fans eat up the underdog comeback story.” I have a hard time accepting Sports Geek’s assessment, however, that Vick qualifies as an underdog.

I wonder if Sports Geek would consider Adam ‘Pacman’ Jones an underdog, whose situation of suspension and reinstatement into the NFL was very similar to Vick’s (up to the point that Jones got himself suspended again).

An underdog is a person or team that is universally perceived as weak, or who is the anticipated loser in a struggle (David, when he faced off against Goliath). Michael Vick is neither of those things. Being contrite, apologetic, and asking for acceptance after committing a crime does not automatically make someone an underdog. Keep in mind that Vick’s repentance, no matter how sincere it may or may not be, is also a requirement for his continued participation in the NFL. I do not mean to diminish the sincerity of Vick’s words, but they MUST be taken with a grain of salt. No one can say for certain how sorry Vick REALLY is, because the alternative of being unremorseful would most certainly mean Vick could never play in the NFL again. His appearance in the media as being sorry for his sins is just as much a manufactured façade, intended to help him gain access again in the NFL as it may be a genuine display of regret and forward progress.

It all comes down to credibility.

For every person who perceives Vick as being genuinely regretful, there is another person who thinks he is simply saying the things that he thinks the public will want to hear. That distrust of his sincerity can cast doubt on his credibility, which is a necessity for successful endorsement of a product. Vick’s credibility is not yet fully restored, and he cannot afford to be perceived as attempting to capitalize financially on the fact that he created a negative situation. A corporation, therefore, cannot afford to be perceived as condoning his attempts to profit from that same situation. In order for Vick to maintain his sincerity, it must be done without the taint of corporate involvement (at this time). If Vick were to walk onto the stage at a Humane Society function with a secondary motive of promoting Nike, as Sports Geek suggests, it would diminish his credibility as an advocate for that organization, which would subsequently diminish his credibility as a viable spokesperson for the corporate sponsor.

What ultimately won the debate for Loyal Homer, though, was in presenting the doubt still cast on Vick’s ability to successfully perform on the field at this point. I disagree with Loyal Homer’s statement that Vick has not made a successful return to the NFL (he earned reinstatement, was signed to a potential multi-million dollar contract, and has an opportunity to once again compete in the NFL… I would call that success so far). But, I do agree that his performance on the field has not qualified him for superstar status once again. Vick has apparently answered the question of whether or not he is sorry for his crime, and has also shown a dedication to improving himself. He still has not, however, proven that he has returned to the superstar celebrity status that he once enjoyed.

Ultimately, major brands are looking for major stars to promote their product. At this point, the jury is still out on whether or not Vick is truly “back.” I think that his efforts to use his personal experience as a platform to advocate more noble causes are extremely admirable, and I hope he is sincere. None of that translates to success on the football field, though, which is ultimately what corporations seek from their endorsements. They want to be associated with proven success, like Tiger Woods, LeBron James, Derek Jeter, or Roger Federer.

It is too soon to consider Michael Vick for celebrity endorsement.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Michael Vick as a Spokesman Debate – Money Talks, Attitude W… is Irrelevant

October 7, 2009

Read the debate intro and Loyal Homer’s argument that Michael Vick should not be a spokesman for a major brand.



We all knew it would come to this, right? Michael Vick, the Philadelphia Eagles quarterback, has and seems able to continue to say and do the “right things” – finally. He is contrite. He is a team player. Heck, he is even articulate in discussing how his poor decision making has impacted his life and the lives of his family members. When listening to him speak to the media, I am not hearing a player with a sordid, despicable past in danger of rearing its ugly head again. I hear an athlete who has completely come to terms with mistakes and past transgressions with a demonstrated willingness to right the wrongs. So, it is easy to see why Nike – or any brand – is considering Mike Vick as a spokesperson.

Vick is now a rare combination. He is a super athlete with substance. He is no longer flash and fluff, he is a real human being. Why is that compelling to marketers? Emotion! Marketers are always striving to create situations where their brand makes emotional connections to consumers. That is the tail the marketing dog perpetually chases. How does that translate to sports? Simply, why do sports fans root for underdogs? Because they have developed an emotional connection.

The thing about people is that we have all made mistakes (like Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan do when they fail to choose my argument as the winner). When Mike Vick admitted his mistakes and acknowledged his poor decisions, he became the underdog – despite his once enormous talent. Vick transformed himself into someone fans WANT to see do well (take notes, A-Rod…).

The other funny thing about underdogs… people pay to watch them. They pay a lot. Whether fans are choosing to purchase tickets and attend games, gather at bars and parties to watch, or watch a game on television (complete with advertising breaks), fans eat up the underdog comeback story.

Advertisers love underdog stories because they inspire emotionally eliciting ads – whether the ad creative is shooting for joy, frustrating, anticipation, or any human emotion. Ad in an emotional element and they have a much better chance of doing well with an emotionally charged audience… i.e. the kind of audience that loves a good underdog story. And, the emotional investment keeps the fans talking the next day at the water cooler – and the brand in the emotional consumer’s minds the next time they open their collective wallets.

Vick is in many ways the ideal spokesperson. Once an athlete many admired – with moves few can replicate – Vick is now humbled, another human being just like the rest of us. It is just that we all know who he is, now. Fame, rightly or wrongly, has its advantages.

Nike – or any brand – is wise to take a chance on Vick. He is a household name. He is appealing to common fans and people. He still has the aura of a player with incredible athletic gifts (even if we have not yet seen them since his comeback commenced). He is in a major market. And, he is a regular on the speaking tour, preaching the perils of a life that leads to jail. Could Nike benefit if Vick is wearing their apparel during a speech, or a work out with local kids? Yes. Could Nike benefit if Vick dons a Nike Swoosh cap for a post game interview? Yes, since the media is falling all over itself to get more access to Vick.

Nike signing Vick is not poor taste, it is good business. Nike needs to sell stuff, and leveraging willing players with influence to help them sell stuff is good business. Vick is one of those players.

Does Mike Vick attract attention? Yes. Does attention equate to revenue in business? Yes (it is called brand awareness). Since the answer to both of those questions is a resounding yes, the answer to whether a brand should sign Vick as a spokesperson must also be yes.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.