The NFL What to Watch For in 2010 Debate… The Contract Crisis

September 13, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

The NFL is sick. There is an epidemic of infectious attitudes that sweeps the league, and if left unchecked, the results could be deadly. Deadly to the future of promising players, and perhaps even the popularity of the sport and the league.

I’m referring, of course, to all the holdouts and contract shenanigans which continue to plague the league.

More and more players are engaging in highly publicized squabbles with their teams about contracts they want, or contracts they want out of, and it could not come at a worse time. As most Americans wrestle with the worries of where the mortgage payment will come from in the worst economic recession in recent history, there isn’t a great deal of sympathy for men who get paid millions of dollars to play a game for a living. With a potential lockout looming right around the corner, the last thing the NFL can afford right now is to leave a memory of prima donna players flaunting their selfishness as the image the public has to remember the sport by during a hiatus that fans don’t support either.

While last year certainly wasn’t the beginning of all this craziness, it serves as a great starting point. With the tenth overall pick in the 2009 draft the San Francisco 49ers selected touted rookie receiving phenom Michael Crabtree. In theory, it seemed like a great match for both sides. Despite doubts about his durability, due to an injury prior to the draft, Crabtree had been taken with a very high draft pick and figured to receive a very lucrative deal, and the 49ers desperately needed another target to open up the passing game. Things became complex however when Crabtree decided to hold out for more money.

Crabtree wanted his contract to exceed that of fellow rookie wide receiver Darrius Heyward-Bey, who signed a five year $38.25M contract with the Oakland Raiders. The problem, however, was that Heyward-Bey was taken three spots higher with the seventh overall draft pick. This demand defied conventional logic and ultimately kept Crabtree off the field for months. In the end, the 49ers relented and handed Crabtree the monster deal he “deserved” – a six year $32M deal with incentives that could boost his salary up to $40M and allow him an early exit after year five. This is crazy considering he never took a single snap in the NFL, yet he was primed to make more money per year that the all time receiving leader, Jerry Rice, ever did… prompting many to call for intervention.

Fast forward to 2010, and similar problems abound in the NFL. But, not just from immature rookies like Crabtree. League veterans, like the Jets shutdown corner Darrell Revis and San Diego wideout Vincent Jackson, dominated much of the pre-season headlines as they held their respective teams hostage with contract demands. Revis just recently came to terms on a massive new deal with New York to the tune of four years and $46M, $32M of which is guaranteed… but it doesn’t necessarily mean the problem is fixed. Revis revealed to a NBC analyst that he could envision himself holding out again for bigger better deal in the future should he feel his ability exceeds the worth of his compensation.

Vincent Jackson has taken holdout drama to unbelievable heights this season as he and the Chargers stalemate continues to evolve. One might expect Jackson, who was set to start this season with a three game suspension following his second DUI conviction, would be happy to simply have a job still playing in the NFL. But obviously not. Jackson has held out seeking a five year $50M contract (with $32M in guaranteed pay), and has even threatened to sit out the entire 2010 season if his demands are not met. A trade has not materialized thus far, and it appears that the issue will go to arbitration. But the story still may have a messy ending yet.

With stars both rookie and veteran ignoring the validity of contracts, the NFL could be taking a terrible turn for the worse. When stars like Randy Moss take their contract disputes to the media it usually means that someone is going to lose – the team, the fans, the NFL, but, usually not the star. Something has to give. Whatever happened to a man’s word being his bond? It seems that the NFL has lost control and the inmates are running the asylum. This is certainly not the image the NFL wants to project during this pivotal time. The league must do something to take the power back, but with the player’s union holding the all important leverage with a work stoppage, who knows how this will play out. It will be a story worth following, but it probably won’t end with “and they all lived happily ever after.”

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Most Overrated Team in the NFL Debate… Don’t Believe the Niner Hype

August 27, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

Every season there are a handful of teams that believe they will be able to make some noise in the league. The so-called experts hype these teams, and many of these teams get a lot of early love from pre-season prognosticators. One of these teams is the San Francisco 49ers, and I am most definitely not buying the hype.

The competition is obviously less than stellar in the NFC West. And that was before Kurt Warner retired. Now things appear to be up for grabs as far as the division title goes, with St. Louis just being plain awful. I don’t see how the 49ers are the trendy pick to reach up and grab that title.

Don’t get me wrong. I am a Mike Singletary fan. I love the intensity he brings to the sidelines and the discipline he likes to instill in his players. I appreciate the fact that he wants winners (a very underrated coach’s rant). Look at this team. Does he have winners?

Look at the quarterback, Alex Smith. I wrote recently that he was the quarterback who had the most to prove in the NFL. I stand by that statement. What has he done to prove that he is capable of leading a team to ten wins and into the post-season? His main accomplishment as a football player is what he accomplished as a senior at Utah. Maybe he’ll go out and prove me and all the naysayers wrong by having a Pro-Bowl season. Well, never mind… that’s never going to happen!

When healthy, running back Frank Gore is good and capable. He is, however, inconsistent at times, which is maddening for fantasy football players. He went through a ten game stretch last season where he carried the ball at least twenty times just once. He also tends to get nicked up quite a bit, as he hasn’t played a full 16 game schedule since 2006. That’s begs the question ,“Is Frank Gore durable?”

Vernon Davis is an outstanding tight end and an up and coming star. I also believe that Michael Crabtree has the potential to be an outstanding wide receiver. We all saw what he could do in college. Now in his second season (first full season), we need to see it carry over. But he’s at a disadvantage. For starters, look who his quarterback is. Second, look who the current number two receiver is in the 49ers’ offense? It’s Josh Morgan. Ted Ginn, Jr. may pass him on the depth chart at some point, but that’s how it is right now. Does Josh Morgan strike fear into opposing defenses?

Can someone please explain to me how the San Francisco 49ers are getting all this love? What part of the team screams “playoffs?” I just don’t see it. If you do, by all means, leave me a comment and convince me!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate – A Playoff Atmosphere Returns To The Bay

October 9, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument about which game they believe is the best of the weekend.



After recently pronouncing the San Francisco 49ers visit to the Minnesota Vikings as the best game of a weekend, the 49ers find themselves in another important, sure to be well-contested game – the best game of THIS weekend.

The 49ers have shown tremendous promise this season under flourishing head coach Mike Singletary. If not for last minute heroics from the resurgent Brett Favre in Minnesota, the 49ers would be sitting at 4-0. As of right now, they are completely in control in a weak NFC West. They have already defeated every other team in their conference, and the only thing standing between the team and a 4-1 record heading into the bye week is the Atlanta Falcons.

Both teams share some similar traits. For example, both are struggling to run the football on offense. The 49ers would be fine running the football if not for an injury to star running back Frank Gore. Rookie Glen Coffee has been adequate in a week of service as Gore’s replacement, but the team needs to run the ball better to play the style of football Singletary believes will succeed and results in a playoff appearance – play great defense and run the ball to own the clock. The Falcons have had changes up front to the offensive line and the result is less running room for last season’s break out player, running back Michael Turner. The Falcons average just over 92 yards per game, well off their pace from a year ago.

Another common trait is that both teams also boast stingy defenses. The Falcons are eighth in the league in total defense allowing 17.7 points per game while the 49ers are second allowing just 6.5 points per game. Excellent defense.

The teams also share difficult stretches in their respective schedules. The Falcons are coming out of a bye week off of a stinging 26-10 by the New England Patriots. Now Atlanta travels to San Francisco before returning home to face a tough Chicago Bears team before a two game road trip where the team plays Dallas and New Orleans in back to back weeks. The 49ers will enter the bye week after this weekend’s match up with Atlanta, and emerge on the other side to travel to Houston then Indianapolis, host Tennessee, host Chicago, and then travel to Green Bay.

Each team also has a great deal to prove. Both teams must prove they are effective in the running game, that they can perform consistently week to week, and that they can finish games.

The Falcons may have slightly more to prove in the game, however. Matt Ryan has yet to put up the numbers he did a year ago. Turner is struggling to run the ball, and the defense is still trying to find their identity after losing long time leader linebacker Keith Brooking to free agency. The Falcons must prove they are a contender not only for the playoffs in general, but that they can challenge division favorites New Orleans.

The 49ers, despite the drama the organization could have spiraled into, has largely avoided distraction. Even the prolonged holdout from rookie wide receiver Michael Crabtree did not result in a distraction to the team. The team has played well and competed hard in every game. The 49ers must also prove they can stand up and take a talented, good and desperate team’s best shot. For Singletary, the 49ers must prove they can function in a playoff type atmosphere as excitement returns to the Bay.

Both are talented, tough, well-coached teams – the ingredients necessary for excellent football. The Falcons must avoid .500 while the 49ers must prove they belong in the same category as the league’s better teams. No matter what the outcome is, this game is the cannot miss, must watch, best game of THIS weekend.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Value of Hazing Debate – Thank You Sir, May I Have Another?

September 29, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the practice of rookie hazing does not hold any value.



The term ‘hazing’ today carries a very negative connotation. When people hear the word ‘hazing’ most immediately envision the cruel (and often illegal) TORTURE of some poor college student who is simply seeking acceptance into a fraternal society.

Hazing to that extent is bad, and should be condoned by no one!

There are times and places, though, where hazing (in moderation) can be perfectly acceptable and can actually ADD value to an organization. Most often, that value comes in the form of increased camaraderie and team unity.

I will say again that duct-taping a rookie to the goalposts and leaving them there overnight is not what I am referring to.

The REAL intention behind the practice of hazing is to instill within a newcomer the idea that no single person individually is more important than the team collectively. There are certain organizations and groups (such as professional sports teams) where teamwork and unity are VITAL to the success of the team.

The best way for me to describe the value of hazing is to share a personal (and positive) experience of my own.

While still a student in high school, I had the privilege and opportunity to work within the local Fire Department within my city. Nowhere is teamwork and unity more important than among that very brave and honorable group of men and women.

Within the particular station-house that I was working (‘Station No. 4’), the team adopted a unique method of hazing that I found to be very positive, productive, and successful. That was the requirement that rookies (usually they come in groups) personally hand-wash all of the station vehicles, such as the ambulance and fire engine.

First, it should be noted that hand-washing the vehicles is a task performed regularly by the department. The vehicles must be properly maintained, and since they will not fit through a normal carwash, it must be done by hand. Also, it is not the rookies’ responsibility to perform this task EVERY time it is needed until the next batch of rookies is welcomed. Instead, this is a one-time experience that is used to teach an important message to rookies on their first day in-house. Then the responsibility is once again shared by everyone.

It is a form of hazing that helps drive home the point that no individual is above the others. There are menial tasks that must be done, and you might as well get used to having to do things you do not like from time-to-time. The next time you do this “we will be working right beside you, helping you along the way.”

In addition to that message, it is also a very educational form of hazing. It helps the rookie learn firsthand the equipment they will be working with (by teaching them how to properly disassemble and reassemble any mechanisms that must be removed in order to be used/maintained), and it also helps instill a sense of greater pride for the organization. The number on the station house (and its vehicles) is the symbol that you, as a Fire Safety Officer, represent. When a ‘Station No. 4’ rig drives by, you should be PROUD that you are a part of that group, and you should strive to be a represent that group in a positive manner.

Even though I was in high school at the time, I was not exempt from this rule, and so I (along with one other rookie) spent a day doing “the housework.” To this day (nearly 15 years later), I still proudly boast any time I see ‘Station No. 4’ that it was behind THOSE doors that I worked with some of the finest men and women in our city! That pride started on day one, when I was taught to appreciate the value of being a part of that team.

While professional sports are considerably less serious a profession that Fire Safety work, the necessity of teamwork is no less vital to the success of that organization. It is very important for a player within a football team to understand right away that they are not individually more important than the team collectively.

Michael Crabtree could use that lesson right about now, huh?

The level of ego in professional sports is completely ridiculous. There are athletes who believe they are above everyone else (including the law, sometimes), and who operate with such an overblown sense of self-worth and entitlement that they believe they alone are worthy of walking this earth, and the rest of us should feel grateful to even have the opportunity to breathe the same air that they do.

Professional sports could use MORE hazing like that of the Fire Department, not less. It provides an opportunity for positive reinforcement, education, and develops a sense of team unity and pride. It sends a clear message that no one is more important than the team.

Check your ego at the door, because we are all in this together and no one can succeed individually until we all learn to succeed as a team!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Michael Crabtree Holdout Leverage Debate – Time To Move On

September 24, 2009

Read the debate intro, Sports Geek’s argument that the 49ers should cut ties with Michael Crabtree and Bleacher Fan’s argument that the 49ers should sign Crabtree .

I get the feeling that the majority of people think Michael Crabtree has lost his mind.

Sports Geek thinks that it’s time for the San Francisco 49ers to cut ties with Crabtree. Despite his accomplishments at Texas Tech, Sports Geek argued that adding him to the team at this point would do more harm than good. Sports Geek points out that head coach Mike Singletary is working with a team that has been through rookie camp, OTAs, training camp, preseason, and the first part of this season. Adding Crabtree at this point would be disruptive because Crabtree, being a rookie, has too much to learn. Sports Geek also touches on the fact that 2010 will likely be an uncapped year in the NFL, thus freeing up more funds for the 49ers.

Bleacher Fan argues that the San Francisco 49ers should still make every effort to sign Crabtree, pointing out the struggles of the offense and the lack of depth at some offensive positions. Bleacher Fan also correctly points out that some of the more talented players in the NFL today didn’t start or play much at all in the NFL during their rookie campaign. How’d that turn out for Tom Brady so far? Three Super Bowl championships later, I’d say it’s turned out fairly well. Bleacher Fan uses those examples to highlight the fact that, if signed, the rest of this year can be used for the development of Crabtree’s skills.

After reviewing the case and taking a closer look at the points both parties made in their arguments, I am awarding the verdict to Sports Geek!

This was a closer case than I originally thought it may be. Bleacher Fan makes a good case in pointing out the current players who were non-factors their first year, but this Crabtree situation is a different cookie. The players Bleacher Fan mentioned didn’t hold out their rookie season because they disagreed with the contract their team was offering. They didn’t miss all of training camp and preseason and all of the regular season (to this point). I’m convinced by Sports Geek that adding Crabtree onto a 53-man roster at this point would be detrimental to the 49ers organization. It’s difficult enough to make it in the league and fit into a locker room as a rookie. Add to that the circumstances regarding Crabtree’s absence and it equals a recipe for bitterness, jealousy, and controversy.

Agree or disagree? Post your comments below. We’d love to hear from you. Check back later today for more debates!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Michael Crabtree Holdout Leverage Debate – Nobody Likes a Quitter!

September 23, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the San Francisco 49ers are better off just letting Michael Crabtree go.

Every neighborhood has a quitter.

You know who I’m talking about. The quitter is the kid who pouts when things in a game don’t go their way, so they just throw a tantrum and quit playing. Nobody liked the quitter, and the quitter ruined the game for a lot of other people.

That is exactly what the San Francisco 49ers will be if they walk away from rookie wide receiver Michael Crabtree now – QUITTERS!

I can imagine that it is frustrating for the 49ers organization and fans to see their top draft pick continue to go unsigned because he is demanding more money than the organization thinks that he is worth. That is no reason to just pack up your toys and go home, though. The worst thing that the 49ers could do right now is give up. Then they would have truly wasted their draft pick, and would have absolutely nothing to show for it.

It doesn’t matter that they have started the season at 2-0. It ALSO doesn’t matter that it is likely too late for Crabtree to make any kind of contribution on the field this year. As Loyal Homer points out in the debate intro, the 49ers are 32-64 over the last six seasons. It is a bit premature to say that the 49ers don’t need Crabtree anymore, just because they won the first two games of the 2009 season.

The team has very limited depth at many offensive positions. Running back Frank Gore is undoubtedly the best player for the 49ers, but his ability to stay healthy is a concern for the team. Gore’s backup, Glen Coffee, has the potential to become a key player in San Francisco’s offense, but he, like Crabtree, is unproven. The quarterback and wide receiver positions are largely populated with veteran players that don’t have too much gas left in the tank, and tight end Vernon Davis has been very underwhelming in his performance to date.

Michael Crabtree is an exceptionally talented player, and he will most likely be very successful at the wide receiver position, no matter where he signs on. Head coach Mike Singletary and general manager Scot McCloughan have the responsibility of creating the best opportunity for the 49ers to be successful. While this year is very important, it is not the sole focus of that development process. Singletary and McCloughan have to also be concerned about the long-term viability of the San Francisco organization.

Crabtree WILL add value to the organization. It just won’t be this year.

Kellen Winslow Jr, Tom Brady, Willie Parker, Larry Johnson, and Aaron Rodgers are all examples of current players who did not contribute much (if anything) during their rookie season, but then went on to provide outstanding contributions to their respective teams. Even Hall of Fame quarterback Steve Young sat on the bench at the beginning of his career. Just because a team is unable to take advantage of a player during the rookie year of his professional career, it does not mean that the player is a bust.

If anything, the 49ers can use their current position as leverage to press the issue further with Crabtree. The fact that they seemingly are able to compete WITHOUT him on the team takes the pressure off of them. They can now continue to pursue signing him from a position of greater leverage than if they had lost their first two games.

The important thing for the 49ers to remember is that they may not NEED Crabtree, but they can definitely USE him. He will be a very productive player in the NFL. The 49ers just need to make sure that it will be for their organization!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Who Should Have Signed Michael Vick Debate – If You’re Going To San Francisco…

August 17, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that Minnesota was the best fit for Michael Vick and Bleacher Fan’s argument that Tampa Bay was the best fit.



If you had your television or computer on at all this weekend, or if you have been conscious at any point since Thursday night, you know that “free agent” quarterback Michael Vick has signed with the Philadelphia Eagles. You have also probably seen the footage of him practicing at Eagles camp, and you have probably read the quotes from head coach Andy Reid and from Eagles players about how much he brings to the table. Whether or not he is a good fit in the city of Brotherly Love has been debated over and over. Will he be a backup to Donavan McNabb? Does the West Coast offense maximize his potential? Can offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg create plays for him to showcase his talent? The list goes on and on. The Sports Debates is glad Vick is back in the league. He brings buzz to football, and we are excited to see #7 do what he does best. But, instead of debating his situation, we are going to step back and debate which team should have signed Vick. What team is truly the best fit for him? Sports Geek will argue Minnesota is the best fit, while Bleacher Fan will argue Tampa Bay would have been the best fit for the artist formerly known as Ron Mexico. I will argue San Francisco should have done their best to get Vick.

Being in the southeastern part of the country, I do not hear a lot about the San Francisco 49ers anymore. Obviously, I used to back in the 1980’s and 1990’s, during the heyday of the organization. The days of Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, and Steve Young are gone. These are the days of Shaun Hill, a way past his prime Isaac Bruce, and a hot-headed Vernon Davis. In fact, look at the depth chart. Does that team intimidate you? Does it have that buzz factor? The buzz surrounding the 49ers these days is the ridiculousness of Michael Crabtree. Adding Vick to the team would be a spark to the organization and give the team the league wide buzz they need since being on the west coast the 49ers sometimes seem to get lost in the shuffle.

On the field, his addition would be huge. Where he is a clear backup quarterback in Philadelphia behind Donavan McNabb, he would have had a chance to battle Shaun Hill and Alex Smith for the starting quarterback position. Imagine Vick teaming up with Crabtree (assuming he signs eventually). That could have been a potent combination. Even if he were not named starter, he still could spruce up the offense though. By all accounts, Vick appears to be in excellent shape and he claims to still have the same speed. Also, head coach Mike Singletary is trying to rebuild the 49ers and change their image and attitude. While the expected protests by the Humane Society and various animal rights groups would happen (and they will happen in Philly, also), I think that signing Vick would have taken the organization forward. He would not be expected to be a life saver because the 49ers are not that far away from being a playoff contender. They showed strides in the second half of the season (they went 5-4) under Singletary as he tries to find players that he can win with (as opposed to “Can’t Win with Them”).

While he may end up being a good fit in Philadelphia, I feel like he would have been better suited for San Francisco. The media and fan scrutiny in Philly is going to be off the charts, and he is going to be thrown right into the heat of arguably the league’s most competitive division – the NFC East. Dallas, Washington, and New York all promise to bring more scrutiny than Arizona, Seattle, and St. Louis would have!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The NFL Rookie Pay Scale Debate – A Pay Scale in the NFL is Un-American

August 12, 2009

Read the debate intro, Loyal Homer’s argument in favor of a rookie pay scale in the NFL and Bleacher Fan’s argument against it.



The NFL is very conscious of their image. Several factors lead an analytical person like me to this conclusion. One, the commissioner, Roger Goodell, cut his teeth in the NFL in the public relations part of the business. Two, the league seems to care a great deal about making a public show of punishment for the players who fall outside of their new conduct policy. Three, they enforce community service (hey, it is not always BAD to be image conscious). Four, the players are (well mostly receivers).

It is that general self-awareness the league touts that makes this issue of a rookie pay scale so bizarre. If the league cares so much about their perception, why would they have a backwards system of rewarding unproven players with massive contracts? It defies logic because the players are being rewarded for what they hope are “future truths” or “trust me” contracts. Considering the value of the contracts, that is no small act of faith on the part of the organization. That is why the general manager gets fired so much. They simply cannot afford to be wrong more than once.

As for the debate, good points are made on both sides. Loyal Homer is correct in his fan-driven head-scratching when considering the backwards logic of professional contracts to rookies. But, the basis of Loyal Homer’s argument is that the players who enter the draft are unproven. While it may be true that the players are unproven at the professional level, the gap between high-quality college football and low quality professional football is not that wide. In fact, that is probably why so many college players are not judged on their talents in the collegiate ranks but on their potential in the pros (though that is likely a debate for another day).

Despite the reluctance on the part of fans to accept a holdout and sign a rookie to a huge future truth contract, it is a practice that works for both the players and the teams. As Bleacher Fan points out, the teams do a good job of evaluating talent in general and assume the risk if they misread a player. If a draft pick is a bust that is a responsibility of the organization, not the player. The organization assumes the draft rights and the burden of signing a player. It is well within the realm of reason to let the market dictate the value of a player – proven or not. It is the same principle as free agency, only with inexperience players at the professional level. Instituting a pay scale for rookies is a double standard in the league, and a double standard that penalizes the veterans – something the league is not likely to do.

Though I am awarding the debate win to Bleacher Fan, I feel like there is a compromise here. Bleacher Fan makes a very thorough, researched point about the relative success of player evaluations and contract value for picks inside the top ten of the draft (they cannot all be good picks… the league still has the Bungals in it). As the talent dwindles with each passing pick on draft day, it makes sense for a pay scale to kick in at some point. Does the 20th player selected really need to hold out for a few extra dollars of guaranteed money? No. If a pay scale does ever come to fruition, limiting it to the players who fall outside of the top ten in the draft makes sense. Market forces can play out with the cream of the crop, but with the remaining players, heavily incentive-laden deals under a predetermined structure could make sense for players and organizations alike.

On the surface it sure seems like any rookie hold out situation sucks, especially from the fans perspective (the most important perspective, by the way). But it is a reflection of the American economic principles of fair market value and the guidance of the invisible hand, and it is what is best for talented players and risk-taking teams.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The NFL Rookie Pay Scale Debate – Stop the Madness and Set the Salary

August 11, 2009

Read the debate intro and Bleacher Fan’s argument against implementing a rookie pay scale.



In these tough times, don’t you get tired of hearing about financial issues on the news? Not only is it bad on Wall Street but it is rough in sports, also. Franchises and organizations are cutting back on expenses and eliminating jobs. Attendance is down at sporting events, and revenue is down across the board.

Apparently, NFL rookies do not watch CNN or ESPN!!

Let me go ahead and get this out of the way. I am not in favor of holdouts period. Not by rookies, not by veterans. Just last week, Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Roddy White held out for a week. Fortunately for the Falcons (and really for White) he agreed to a lucrative (and perhaps excessive) contract over the weekend. Veterans have their own reasons for holding out, and though I may not agree with the concept, I guess I can see their point of view.

But, what leg do rookies have to stand on when holding out? What good really comes out of it in the long haul? They miss a lot of training camp, get way behind in learning the playbook, and miss bonding with their new teammates. You know how it takes you awhile to get to know the new guy in the cubicle next to you at work? The same concept applies in football. It takes time for that work chemistry to work. Holding out endangers that whole process. I cannot imagine how a rookie holding out endears himself to his veteran teammates.

A set rookie salary scale will alleviate these problems. The contracts that Matthew Stafford signed this year, and that Matt Ryan signed last year, are just ridiculous. I am not the only one who thought Ryan’s contract was “disheartening.” To eliminate these contracts, the NFL needs to come up with a rookie salary scale, similar to what the NBA does. The league and the players union can negotiate to come up with an appropriate scale based on a variety of factors. The number one pick would have a predetermined salary. Michael Crabtree would have a set salary, so he would not be able to hold out for a better contract. This would be welcomed by most veterans of the league, many of whom believe in earning money before becoming one of the richest guys in a league. When the contract is up after three or four or however many years, then the player is eligible to sign a big extension. If a player is unable to reach an agreement with a team, then they are free to test the open market. The NBA has proven that this system can work. I think it could work in the NFL.

Do you think it is fair for Matthew Stafford to be making more than Albert Haynesworth at this point in Stafford’s career? Maybe Stafford plays incredibly well over the course of the contract and it ends up being a bargain contract. But you cannot say that at this point without him ever having taken a snap. The madness has to stop! Stop it now! Scale it down before it is too late! It is only going to get worse!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The NFL Rookie Pay Scale Debate – Does the NFL Need to Regulate Rookie Salaries?

August 11, 2009

Read Loyal Homer’s argument in favor of a rookie pay scale in the NFL and Bleacher Fan’s argument against it.



San Francisco 49ers first round draft pick, wide receiver Michael Crabtree, is making quite a fuss. Crabtree, drafted tenth overall in the 2009 NFL Draft, is seeking a rookie contract worth more than $23.5M in guaranteed money. When the Oakland Raiders took Maryland wide receiver Darius Heyward-Bey with the seventh overall pick, the 49ers undoubtedly believed they had the leverage they needed to get Crabtree into camp on time. Heyward-Bey would sign the first wide receiver contract, and the Crabtree’s would fall in line behind it.

But, that is not exactly how events are transpiring. Crabtree is apparently expecting a contract value higher than that of the seventh overall pick, given his (and his agent’s) belief that he was the best wide receiver in the draft. Does that logic make sense? Maybe only to an agent… and a cousin. Crabtree’s cousin/advisor, David Wells (no, not that one) has informed anyone within earshot that Crabtree is so put off by the 49ers inability to award him seventh overall-type money that the receiver is willing to sit out the entire 2009 season and re-enter the draft in 2010. Brilliant, right????

Sure, it is the age old problem with rookies and agents. They place their value higher than the league does AND they fail to understand that, on rare occasions, NFL teams draft according to NEED, not to the frustratingly subjective “talent.” But, I digress.

What Crabtree’s situation does put into perspective is the oft-discussed rookie pay scale in the NFL. This type of situation would not arise if rookies in the NFL were each paid according to the position they were drafted. The NFL would control the scale, and it would be increased year by year according to the changes in the salary cap, revenue sharing agreements, so on and so forth.

Crabtree’s situation is not unique, either. Number one overall pick Matthew Stafford is getting $41.7M in guaranteed money from the Detroit Lions. For perspective, that’s $0.7M more than proven, game-changing defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth is getting from the chronically overpaying Washington Redskins. Huge rookie salaries and rookie contract hold outs are as certain as an August gathering in Canton.

The NFL chief punisher/commissioner, Roger Goodell, assured college football players last December that a rookie pay scale would not be instituted until 2011, at the earliest. But, it appears it is an option on the table – at least in New York. Goodell “officially” favors a system that affords rookies all a predetermined contract level plus the opportunity to renegotiate their deal once they have proven themselves. Since team owners are known for their good natured benevolence, it seems certain this approach would work. (I sure hope you readers are picking up on this sarcasm.)

What our fearless debaters will address today is…

Does the NFL need a rookie pay scale?

Loyal Homer will argue in favor of a rookie pay scale regulating all NFL rookie salaries to a set level while Bleacher Fan will argue against the need for a rookie pay scale.

Gentlemen, you are on the clock.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.