The Biggest Game of THIS Weekend Debate – A Good, Present and Future ACC Battle

October 23, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument about which game they believe are the best of the upcoming weekend.

A big part of me does not want to pick an ACC football game as the best of the weekend. An even bigger part of me does not want to choose a game that appears very lopsided on paper (or on a computer screen… let’s face it, the clock is ticking on the whole “paper” metaphor thing). The biggest part of me does not want to pick a game that includes the Clemson Tigers, a team that seems to always generate buzz just so the fall from grace hurts so much more.

Despite those obvious drawbacks, I believe the best game of THIS weekend happens in Miami when the eighth ranked Hurricanes play host to the Clemson Tigers.

Clemson still has a chance to win the Atlantic Division in the ACC. It seems hard to believe, but the math is clear. Clemson trails Boston College by a half-game in the ACC Atlantic division right now. And, the teams that bookend Clemson in the ACC Atlantic division are the teams Clemson has beaten and owns a tie break over, Wake Forest (a 38-3 cathartic stomping last weekend) and Boston College. The remaining teams in the division – North Carolina State, Florida State, and Maryland – have a combined one conference win. Obviously that is not very good. While anything can and seems to happen in the ACC, Clemson is in the ideal position to play its way into the ACC championship game. A win over Miami certainly helps the team’s cause.

Even though Miami is playing this game at home, the program historically has very little home field advantage. The school has a lot of fans across the country because of the national exposure the program has gotten from its dominant seasons in the 1980s, but fans in Miami have not turned out in droves for the team. Therefore the home crowd may not become a big factor in rattling the Tigers’ young starting quarterback.

Speaking of which, just as both teams are playing for a common goal (the ACC championship game appearance), both teams share many similar traits. For example, both teams have young quarterbacks. Clemson’s redshirt freshman starter, Kyle Parker, has shown grit, toughness, and some leadership – but has failed in intense situations when trying to lead his team back in the waning moments against Georgia Tech. Miami’s true sophomore quarterback Jacory Harris has shown athleticism, a strong arm, and precision in execution – but failed on the road against Virginia Tech to mount anything resembling a pulse under center.

Both teams also have tough defenses. Clemson allows an ACC second best 270.2 yards per game while Miami allows a fourth best 305.7 yards per game. Clemson also leads the ACC with a total of 10 interceptions as a team. Miami has a league low three team interceptions. It appears, from the statistics at least, that if any team has a better shot at overcoming defensive pressure it is Clemson’s offense.

Both teams blitz a lot on defense, and both teams have the opportunity to force the opposing offense’s quarterback to make the plays necessary to win the game, regardless of team interceptions. The defenses are good, perhaps even SEC caliber. The defenses will set the tone for what is sure to be a low scoring game.

So, when two teams are entering a game that is expected to be low scoring, what is often the deciding factor? Good job, you guessed it – special teams. No program in the ACC has a more “special” player than Clemson running back C.J. Spiller. Spiller leads the league with three special teams returns for touchdowns already this season… two kick offs and one punt return. Spiller may be the deciding factor in this game.

This game is interesting because, as important as it is to both teams involved, it is also an even match up on offense and defense. Clemson is 2-2 in the division and Miami is 2-1. Both teams need to win to gain some separation in their division and take command on their own destiny so the teams may be able to meet again in Tampa this December. If you are a football fan that likes good defense, big plays, and surprising endings… this is the best game of THIS weekend.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate – Norman, Thy Name is Intrigue

October 2, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s arguments for the games they believe are the must watch events of the upcoming weekend.

Up here in the great state of Ohio, where I have just turned the heat on in the office, the briskness of Fall is beginning to creep in through the single-paned windows. That is a signal that football is starting to get good. REALLY, good. Conference play is starting in earnest in college football, and though non-conference snooze-fests are beginning to wind down, one rare remaining meeting bears special attention this weekend – the University of Miami’s visit to Norman, Oklahoma to take on the Sam Bradford-less Oklahoma Sooners.

This game is very important for the Sooners. Reigning Heisman Trophy winner Sam Bradford still is unable to start this weekend while recovering from his shoulder injury. That means Landry Jones (that is a football name if I have ever heard one) will again be under center as the Sooners struggle to preserve their shot at a BCS bowl game. The week one loss to BYU SEEMED as though it would spell the end of the Sooners BCS hopes. But, in the “expect-the-unexpected” nature of modern college football, many teams above the Sooners have lost and the door is open yet again for a BCS game. Thought Miami was trounced a week ago in Blacksburg by Virginia Tech, many still consider Miami a good team. If the Sooners win this game, the team will have reasserted itself as a force in college football with a schedule friendly to BCS re-emergence.

On the other side of the field, there is another week, and another shot at ACC redemption. The ACC is given more opportunities to prove its collective football value each year, and no conference squanders those opportunities like the ACC. This week the conference’s hopes rest on the shoulders of true sophomore quarterback Jacory Harris. Coming off of a dismal and surprising performance last week against the Hokies where Harris committed two turnovers and scored no touchdowns, he told the Associated Press that he alone would shoulder the blame for the loss. Impressive poise apparently is not solely for inside the pocket.

However, Harris is not, in fact, the only ‘Cane to blame for last week’s embarrassment. The ‘Canes missed a whopping 17 tackles last week. If Miami tackles better this week, the Sooners could find their renewed BCS hopes again dashed.

The game will not be easy for the Hurricanes. Not only do they have to travel, they are likely suffering from “really good opponent fatigue.” This weekend’s game will be the team’s fourth consecutive game against a ranked opponent. Not easy for any team or any group of players. It is a particularly grueling schedule for its national visibility, too. A loss hurts Miami’s reputation – and by extension the reputation of the entire conference. A win and the ACC is respected again with Miami as the league’s top dog.

Oklahoma is desperate to hang on to an important victory in their annual March toward playing in the BCS. Miami has more to prove now after last week’s drubbing than ever before. This will be an entertaining game full of big plays and big hits. This is the best game of THIS weekend.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Big East in the BCS Debate – Big East, or Big Least?

July 15, 2009

Read the debate intro, Loyal Homer’s argument that the BCS does not deserve an automatic BCS bowl bid, and Bleacher Fan’s argument that it does.

Well, nothing brings out passion like a nice college football debate, and this debate is no different. Even before the first argument was published, folks were all “atwitter” about whether this was a valid debate topic. When reviewing the Big East’s record from recent seasons, it’s obviously a debate topic.

This is a difficult verdict, because the debaters concentrated on one year, 2008, by which to judge the Big East’s contribution to the BCS and college football. This approach further reinforces the “what have you done for me lately” mentality that plagues American sports culture, and college football fandom. So, for this verdict, I’ll acknowledge recent history, then add in some historical context.

Bleacher Fan brought up last year’s bowl season, claiming that the Big East was impressive because 75 percent of their football schools (six) made bowl games. I completely reject this as a valid metric for two reasons. First, there are 34 – 34!!! – bowl games on the docket for the 2009-2010 season. That means 68 teams need to be “eligible” for bowl games. Plus, even Conference USA had 50 percent of their teams bowl eligible. It is not a stretch to discern that many of the teams who played in bowl games year were not deserving. Second, the ACC had 10 bowl teams last year, and many of the Big East defenders who have commented here and on our Twitter timeline are claiming that the Big East is not as bad as the ACC. However, “they suck, so we can suck to” is not a valid argument.

Last season did not yield many quality non-conference wins for the Big East, either. The only true quality win by anyone in the Big East was South Florida’s win over then-ranked #11 Kansas. A good win. But, compare that to the other top teams in the conference:

  • Cincinnati: The conference champ lost to ACC winner Virginia Tech and #5 ranked Oklahoma, their only two opportunities for quality non-conference wins all season.
  • Pittsburgh: Opened their season with a non-conference loss to Bowling Green and needed four overtimes to defeat a 3-9 Notre Dame team.
  • West Virginia: Their only quality non-conference opportunities were Colorado and East Carolina… both of which they lost.
  • Rutgers: Another Big East bowl eligible team lost to Fresno State, North Carolina (their only quality non-conference opportunities) and even lost to Navy.

Contrast that mess with what a non-automatic BCS bid conference like the Mountain West did. Their champ, Utah, defeated an Oregon State team that the week prior beat #1 in the country Southern Cal, and defeated Alabama – handily – in a BCS bowl game. Ouch to the Big East. Not a good recent record for the conference to make a stand.

But, it can’t all be about 2008… though it’s hard to deny that the Big East is not just following a trend.

Some history. How has the Big East done through the history of the BCS (read: quality non-conference games). Here’s the list since the inception of the BCS in 1998:

  • 1998 Conference Champ: Syracuse (8-3) loses to Florida 31-10 in the Orange Bowl. 0-1
  • 1999 Conference Champ: Virginia Tech (now ACC) (11-0) loses to Florida State 46-29 in the Fiesta Bowl. 0-2
  • 2000 Conference Champ: Miami (now ACC) (10-1) beats Florida 37-20 in the Sugar Bowl. 1-2
  • 2001 Conference Champ: Miami (now ACC) (11-0) beat Nebraska 37-14 in the Rose Bowl. 2-2
  • 2002 Conference Champ: Miami (now ACC) (12-0) loses to Ohio State 31-24 in the Fiesta Bowl. 2-3
  • 2003 Conference Champ: Miami (now ACC) (10-2) beats Florida State 16-14 in the Orange Bowl. 3-3
  • 2004 Conference Champ: Pittsburgh (8-3) loses to Utah 35-7 in the Fiesta Bowl. 3-4
  • 2005 Conference Champ: West Virginia (10-1) beat Georgia 38-35 in the Sugar Bowl. 4-4
  • 2006 Conference Champ: Louisville (11-1) beats Wake Forest 24-13 in the Orange Bowl. 5-4
  • 2007 Conference Champ: West Virginia (10-2) beats Oklahoma 48-28 in the Fiesta Bowl. 6-4
  • 2008 Conference Champ: Cincinnati (11-3) loses to Virginia Tech 20-7 in the Orange Bowl. 6-5

One national championship is pretty good. But, the Big East has never – NEVER – received an at-large BCS bid for one of their teams. To contrast, the Big 10 (seven), SEC (five), Big 12 (four), Independent (three), Pac-10 (two), WAC (two), and Mountain West (two) have all received them. The only other conference with an at-large goose egg is the ACC.

And the overall 6-5 historical record is average, and far below average when considering that three of those wins (including the championship) belong to a program that is no longer in the conference.

The resume is unimpressive from the Big East, both recent history and a deeper dive into the BCS. Is it enough to jettison the conference from the ranks of the BCS automatic qualifiers? Yes. So I must award the victory to…

LOYAL HOMER!!!!!

While Bleacher Fan offered many, many excuses for the Big East, Loyal Homer had one valid point that stood out: Attendance figures are dwindling for Big East football programs. Though a small but steady slide is apparent, recent performances, combined with a poor history against the best competition in college football, has not won fans back. Attendance is important because it translates to the strength –and willingness to travel – in the diehard fan base. Additionally, losing the heart and soul of Big East football tradition to the ACC has completely reversed expectations for Big East football. When Connecticut does well (starting last season 5-0) the collective national voice is “surprised.” There is no team that is expected to dominate year in and year out – a respect requisite in college football.

When the BCS charter expires in 2014, the committee must take a long look at whether the Big East belongs among the ranks of the automatic bids. According to the arguments presented here, they don’t.


Digg!

Blog Directory

Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Add us to your technorati favorites

My Zimbio


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.