The Pat Riley Taking the Heat Debate

November 30, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Loyal Homer.

You know that saying about history repeating itself? Well, there’s a good reason that saying exists. Just ask Stan Van Gundy.

In 2006 the Miami Heat had a bunch of promise. The team had two certifiable superstars in Dwayne Wade and Shaquille O’Neal. But, head coach Stan Van Gundy was not performing to the standard his hall of fame general manager, Pat Riley, expected. So, several games into the 2005-2006 season, Riley fired Van Gundy and took over the head coaching job.

The Riley takeover was a whole lot of drama that would have been terrible, if not for the fact that the team won the NBA championship that season. Seems like Riley knew what he was doing.

But, would he know what he was doing a second time, should he decide to jettison embattled coach Erik Spoelstra? That’s where today’s debate topic comes in: Is it time for Pat Riley to assume the head coaching duties in Miami?

Optimist Prime will argue that it is time for Pat Riley to take over the Heat while Loyal Homer will argue that Riley should stay out of it and let his young coach figure it out.

Riley’s legacy is on the line, but would jumping in to the fire help or hurt? The debate will settle it. Begin!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Pat Riley Taking the Heat Debate… Heat Must Live Life of Riley

November 30, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Unless you’ve been living under a rock you are aware that LeBron James took his talents to South Beach over the summer, choosing to team up with current Miami Heat player Dwayne Wade and former Toronto Raptor Chris Bosh. The idea was to form an NBA super team that was to dominate the Eastern Conference and win somewhere between 70 and 80 games.

As you might have heard, things haven’t quite worked that way for King James and his court. LeBron and his subjects (or is it Wade and his subjects?) are off to a pedestrian 10-8 start due to dysfunctional play on the court.

The one part of the Heat that appears to be in full working order is the leak machine, however. Rumors are running rampant that players don’t trust Eric Spoelstra and/or they don’t like him and/or they think he’s an idiot and/or they think he thinks they’re idiots. When you have stories about your presumed championship basketball team (in November) that start with, “sources tell ESPN…” this is not a recipe for regular season success – let alone playoff success. There are innumerable articles online detailing ways to fix the Heat, but I believe I have a way to fix the Heat. They need to put Pat Riley behind the bench – showtime will be back.

If you’re an informed NBA fan, the first thing you’ll say is, “But I heard Dwayne Wade expressly stated that he does not want Pat Riley to coach the team.” While we the fans are trying to decipher that by parsing statements to the press and guessing on the veracity of anonymous blog posts, our suspicion is that there is probably something to that statement. It’s the old, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

But, smoke… fire… it doesn’t matter. Wade is a competitor, arguably one of the grittiest competitors in the NBA. While he may initially bristle at Pat Riley as head coach, that will go away if the team starts winning. And they will under Riley. Say what you want about Pat Riley, and people have, but the man is a winner. He boasts a career winning percentage of .636, nine conference championships, and five NBA championships. He won with “showtime” and he won with the rough and tumble New York Knicks. Can he adapt his team’s style to the modern NBA? Absolutely.

The bigger question, however, is will the players adapt to him? That requires a level of psychoanalysis that I am not qualified to perform, but I think it comes down to a simple question: Will the team bend to the will of the competitor (Dwayne Wade) or the will of the supposed fun-loving “king” (LeBron). I think, when the chips are down, the team and LeBron will cede whatever control they have because ultimately losing isn’t fun. Even LeBron, though he’s shown somewhat of a distaste for rising to challenges presented to him, knows that losing isn’t fun. The Heat’s current headless, freewheeling style will not lead to winning games. Something must change, and Riley is that positive change.

Most importantly, Pat Riley is too proud a man to watch the team he built to go down in flames. Even if he and Spoelstra are close (and word is that they are), winning is all that matters to Riley. He put a bit of his legacy on the line building this super team during the off-season, and men like him don’t cede their legacy to the whims of players or sportswriters. They mold players and teams to their will and live to succeed. The Miami Heat will be winners, but only with a strong-willed, brilliant basketball mind like Pat Riley at the helm.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Pat Riley Taking the Heat Debate… Keep the Hair Gel in the Bottle

November 30, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Optimist Prime.

It’s no surprise to me that the Miami Heat are struggling somewhat, and their current status in the NBA standings indicates that they are indeed struggling. I thought it would take some time for the evil trifecta to gel, and that’s been the case on many nights. But 10-8? That’s a record I thought would belong to a team like the Atlanta Hawks, a middle of the road team with no real shot of advancing deep into the playoffs. These struggles have led to the popular opinion that Eric Spoelstra is squarely on the hot seat and rumblings have been coming out of South Beach that Spoelstra , or Spo (as LeBron calls him) is losing the confidence and trust of his players. It’s just speculation that current Heat president Pat Riley may come down from the front office, put a fresh batch of hair gel in, and return courtside. But, with all due respect to what the Zen Master thinks, count me among those who don’t think that would be such a good idea.

Don’t get me wrong. Pat Riley is widely regarded as one of the greatest coaches in NBA history. He has won five NBA championships, including one in 2006 with a Dwyane Wade-led Heat team. That was then. This is now. Riley is now 65 years young. Not old by an means, but old enough to be the grandfather of some of these Heat players.

I’m hearing the critics say, “Well, Pat just won a title four years ago. He hasn’t lost it.” Well, in my mind, Pat Riley had something to prove that season. Yes, he came in and saved the day for Superman (Shaq) and won a title. But he also had to prove to himself, and maybe to the rest of the league, that he could win without the great Lakers teams on the court in front of him. You see, all of his previous championships were won during the Showtime Era . He was able to win with the Heat and for that, he was awarded a lifetime supply of hair gel, probably.

Lest we forget, however, what happened during Riley’s last season in Miami, which was the 2007-2008 campaign. He went a forgettable 15-67, which was the worst record of his career. Maybe that’s fresh in Wade’s mind when Wade is supposedly secretly not in support of Riley coming back courtside. If Riley wouldn’t have the support of Wade, then why even make that move if you are the Heat? Isn’t that where you are now? Isn’t there a coach in charge who supposedly doesn’t have the support of the players? D-Wade’s quote of, “I’m not going to say he’s my guy, but he’s my coach, you know” certainly is interesting, considering Spo was already on staff when Wade was drafted.

It’s not realistic to think Riley could come down out of coaching retirement on his little white stallion and wave the magic wand and all of a sudden make the troubles of the Heat go away. Some of these troubles are going to have to be worked around (the lack of a true center and the dubious distinction of having a member of the Fab Five on the team, some 19 years after he first stepped on campus in Ann Arbor). Who is to say Riley could fix this mid-season, especially since he has been out of coaching for two and a half years?

There are just too many unknowns with Riley. Yes, he has the experience, but after telling the James-Chris Bosh-Wade during the off-season that “Spo” was the man, would he have the respect? That’s questionable, and that makes Riley’s possible return courtside a questionable decision.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Sport You’re Most Thankful For Debate… Hope Springs Eternal in the NFL

November 24, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Babe Ruthless.

Happy Thanksgiving!

This is without a doubt my favorite holiday (and that is only PARTLY because of the feasting)! Personally, I have been very blessed over the past year, and have much to be thankful for. The list of those things I am thankful for includes all the staples – family, friends, health, and the like… as well as some unique privileges that I am very grateful for, such as sharing this space each day with a group of people who are not only great writers, but who have also become great friends.

What can I say? Things are nice at Casa del Bleacher Fan!

So as I tuck in to a little lot of deep fried turkey (yes, it really is THAT good) with all the fixin’s, let me tell you why I am thankful for the NFL…

First, from a personal standpoint as a fan of Cleveland sports, this was a tough year for basketball and baseball. The Indians decided after about only 15 games that they were going to just mail in the 2010 seasons. And as for basketball, well, I’d rather not talk about it (although I must admit that there is something cathartic in the knowledge that LeBron James isn’t having any fun). But then the Cleveland Browns season started, and it became a wonderful distraction from all the other garbage.

It is not a distraction because the Browns are successful on the field. In fact, they are only 3-7 right now. The reason why the Browns are able to provide a distraction to Cleveland fans is the very same reason why fans across the country should be thankful for the NFL.

Unlike baseball or basketball, where seasons can essentially be scripted before the first actual play ever unfolds, the NFL is the one sport where “Worst-to-First” is not only possible, but it is actually PROBABLE. You see, every season in the NFL is a fresh start for every team. It doesn’t matter that your team only won four or five games last season because, in the NFL, last season is ancient history. THIS season, your team is just as good as last year’s Super Bowl champion.

Take a look at the NFL standings. Of the eight division leaders, four finished last season with losing records (Kansas City, Jacksonville, Seattle, and Chicago), and NONE of those teams that won the division last season are currently sitting atop the leader board.

Likewise, two of the pre-season favorites to contend for a Super Bowl bid, the Dallas Cowboys and Minnesota Vikings, share a combined six wins, while last season’s worst team, the St. Louis Rams, are only one game out of first place.

Now, compare that parity to the NFL’s college counterpart. In the NCAA ranks, a team must not only win games to be successful, it has to also convince voters. So a team like Boise State, which has not been beaten since December of 2008, could still miss out not only on the national championship game, but may not even get a BCS invitation if TCU also continues to win games.

Or compare it to a sport like Major League Baseball, or the NBA, where championships can be bought and sold like commodities on the free agency market.

But as the countdown to the 2010 NFL season continued over the summer, who could have guessed that Michael Vick would be the most exciting quarterback in the league, that the Kansas City Chiefs and Seattle Seahawks would be leading divisions, or that the head coaches for two different pre-season Super Bowl contenders would be unemployed before Thanksgiving?

The NFL system provides a proving ground where all 32 teams enter the fray on truly equal ground. With each season comes the mystery of the unknown. As each season plays out we are treated to a rollercoaster of surprises, excitement, and drama that is unparalleled in the fan experience for any other sport. Every fan can enter a fresh season with legitimate hope that, “This will be the year.” There is no subjectivity, and wins are the only currency that can buy a team a shot at the championship.

So, from a jaded, beaten, and broken down Cleveland sports fan, I say “THANK YOU” to the NFL! With each new game and each new season you give every fan, regardless of the team they follow, a reason to tune in and watch. That is an accomplishment no other sport can duplicate.

Thank you, NFL, for giving me hope!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Trading Carmelo Anthony Debate Verdict

August 27, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

Deciding what to do about the future of Carmelo Anthony is a problem which must weigh heavily on the minds of the Denver Nuggets’ organization and fans. Any path the Nuggets take is sure to draw criticism. If he is traded for prospects the team will draw fire for giving up on competing for a championship. Denver will be forced to commit to one of the most heinous and unpopular acts a successful franchise can commit – rebuilding. But if Carmelo stays and Denver fails to win the NBA championship, the organization will be ridiculed for walking away with nothing. Cynics will point to this critical juncture – the decision not to trade Anthony – as the pivotal moment when Denver mortgaged the future of the team because of misguided, foolhardy optimism. While this may very well be a make or break moment for the franchise, it is a far easier decision for me to make.

Bleacher Fan made a passionate plea for making the conservative choice, dealing Anthony to ensure the Nuggets don’t end up empty handed. He drew scathing comparisons between Anthony and several other high profile athletes he deemed unscrupulous in pursuit of a change of scenery. He went as far as to call out Darrelle Revis, Chris Paul, and of course LeBron James, by name. This, however, seems like an unfair comparison because unlike Revis and Paul, Anthony is not demanding a trade before his contract expires. Admittedly, there are conflicting reports fueled by friends, family, and the media about Anthony’s stance on a potential trade. But he is not certainly forcing the Nuggets to deal him. It is rather Denver’s dilemma about what to do with him.

While I highly disagree with his diatribe of athletes seeking better deals in free agency, we did find common ground on the belief that Anthony holds a considerable amount of leverage if he should seek a deal with a new team. The deck is stacked in his favor because with free agency lurking around the corner, the potential of ‘Melo leaving the Mile High City without a championship – and getting nothing in return – could have Denver execs running scared. The fear of such a scenario playing out was enough to prompt Bleacher Fan to suggest the two sides part ways now.

Loyal Homer, on the other hand, was not so convinced. He believes in the talent surrounding Anthony in Denver. He stated that the only wisdom in keeping ‘Melo for another season is to be competitive now. Loyal Homer wrote that Anthony’s friend and teammate, Chauncey Billups, could be a difference maker in the upcoming season, not to mention the corps of players like Kenyon Martin, J.R. Smith, and Birdman Anderson. With a talented roster and the return of dynamic head coach George Karl, the Nuggets have to be considered legitimate playoff contenders. With that in mind, the urgency to move ‘Melo is substantially diminished.

Similarly, my gut tells me that the Nuggets aren’t likely to acquire anyone in a trade for Anthony that would fill his shoes. The void created by ‘Melo’s departure could not easily be filled, and the team’s ability to compete may be compromised for years. These conclusions led Loyal Homer to support the risky decision to hang onto Anthony for one more run.

I simply could not disagree with Loyal Homer’s logic. A championship could entice ‘Melo to stay and attract more stars to the Nuggets. Loyal Homer implied that keeping Carmelo Anthony for the 2010 season is a calculated risk, but one that could pay off in a big way, and for that reason I’m awarding the victory to Loyal Homer.

Many teams consider Carmelo Anthony the next best thing to LeBron James. So why would a team in pursuit of a championship give a player of that quality up before they had to? In the wake of LeBron’s decision drama it is easy to suggest the Nuggets should take whatever they can get for ‘Melo before it’s too late. But that would mean completely writing off the chances of a playoff-ready team solely on the basis of worst case scenarios.

While I understand that a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, I simply cannot support any move that knowingly hurts a team’s immediate competitiveness. The last time I checked, the object of the game is to win. And the object of the season is to win the championship. Any move that hinders that pursuit is not true to the ultimate goal of the sport.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Is LRMR Good For the NBA Debate… A Cautionary Tale for the NBA

August 3, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

If history repeats itself, NBA Commissioner David Stern, and the owners he represents around the league, better start brushing up on Boxing History 101.

The Decline of Boxing

The sport of boxing, which was once considered one of the premier sports in the United States, has been diminished almost to the point of irrelevance. While there are many factors that have contributed to the sport’s slip into obscurity, one of the key issues that has threatened the viability of boxing is the selfish “pay-day” mentality of its athletes.

The history of boxing has been always been defined by its great fights: Ali versus Frazier, Joe Louis versus Max Schmeling, Sugar Ray Leonard versus Marvelous Marvin Hagler, The Rumble in the Jungle. These were all fights slated to determine which fighter was the best, and the sport thrived as a result. Nowadays, fighters like Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather allow contract disputes over paychecks and other trivialities to get in the way of those potentially great battles, the types of battles that would benefit EVERYONE in the boxing world.

Boxing promoters such as Don King, Bob Arum, and Lou DiBella have helped to facilitate a shift in focus for the sport, and a greater emphasis has been placed on the fighter at the expense of the event. These “super fighters” have become more important than the “super fights” by usurping the authority of the boxing sport. Now, boxing is driven by the whims of its biggest stars, not the needs of the sport.

What is important to the sport has been superseded by what is important to the athlete.

Premier bouts were moved first from network to cable broadcasts, and then from cable to pay-per-view. Why? So the fighters and promoters could draw bigger paychecks. The problem is that the move to pay-per-view has restricted the accessibility of the sport, and the general public has lost interest because it cannot easily (or affordably) view the greatest matches.

Boxing condoned a system where the athletes and promoters were allowed to be self-serving and focus on their personal benefit, rather than the benefit of the game. Selfishness and greed have completely changed the sport of boxing, and it is all bad.

Boxing’s journey is the history lesson the NBA needs.

LRMR Marketing, the brain-child of LeBron James and his high school buddies, has essentially become a boxing promoter in the NBA. It has started to shift the focus of the sport away from the most important event – the game – and onto the athletes themselves.

Celebrity over Substance

LRMR has already orchestrated countless scenarios where pre-game and pre-season activities are becoming a bigger spectacle than the games. From choreographed pre-game introductions and LeBron’s puff of baby powder to “The Decision” and the fiasco that was the 2010 free agency season, LRMR has successfully placed their premier athlete on a pedestal above the league itself.

The result of these actions? The future of the NBA (at least for the next several seasons) has been scripted through back-room deals between selfish players rather than on the court, where it SHOULD be determined. LRMR, behind the free agency of LeBron James, has staged a coup where IT (and not the competition of the league) has set the course of events for the NBA. LRMR’s machinations have also cheapened the value of ESPN, an organization that claims to be a legitimate sports NEWS source. LRMR hijacked the network and turned it into yet another tool for self-promotion.

First, a full hour was reserved… dedicated prime-time coverage (with almost no notice) so that LeBron could make a 30-second statement. This statement was not that he would be running for Congress, or that he was retiring from the game, or any other sensational news story that would normally warrant this kind of attention. No, he was just announcing the team he intended to sign a basketball contract to play for. And he took a FULL HOUR!

Then, last week, an article was published on ESPN.com that highlighted the escapades of LeBron as he threw a lavish Las Vegas party. However, the article (which portrayed LeBron James in a less than favorable light) magically vanished from the website just minutes after it was published.

Those incidents have cheapened the value of ESPN as a viable organization by giving the appearance that it is nothing more than an extension of LRMR Marketing. Rather than risk the ire of a sports celebrity and get on his bad side by remaining UNBIASED in reporting, ESPN has sold its agenda to the latest pop-culture star.

The Snowball Effect

LeBron is not the lone stud in LRMR’s stable of celebrity talent. New Orleans Hornets point guard Chris Paul (who happens to be another buddy of LeBron’s) has joined the three-ring circus at LRMR Marketing, and cast aside the seemingly sound (and successful) advice of his previous representation to get his moment in the sun.

Following the lead of the league’s newest prima donna, Paul feels he is OWED a championship, and with the help of LRMR has attempted to force a trade so he can join his own version of an All-Star roster.

Although no charges or allegations have been made regarding specific actions, warnings have been issued across the league against tampering.

The league does not usually issue a tampering warning when a player wants an early out from their current contract, so why issue one in this case? If you read between the lines, the implication behind that warning is very straightforward – LeBron and LRMR Marketing have already proven once that they are willing to negotiate the future of the NBA in closed-door, back-room deals, and it is assumed that they will do it again.

All of these actions by LRMR Marketing, and the two athletes whom it represents, have done nothing but cheapen the value of the NBA. They have chipped away at the competitiveness of the league in an attempt to take (rather than win) a championship via the path of least resistance. They have demonstrated that player collusion (whether permitted by the rules or not) to use to manufacture an ideal situation. They have shown that their motivation is self-service, even if it comes at the expense of everyone else in the league.

I am not advocating a system where a player should have no say in their future. However, a delicate balance must be maintained between the two. In the battle between teams and players, if either side assumes “control” over the other it is bad for the league.

The NBA is a league centered around TEAM competition. The interests of the league are best served when the overall competition of the league and its TEAMS (not players) are protected. When individual players begin to chip away at the level of competition in the league, all in the pursuit of self-service, it is bad for everyone involved.

The NBA should learn from the state of boxing as it exists today. The more control that individual players have over the game, the more the viability of the league is eroded away.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Is LRMR Good For the NBA Debate… LRMR Spells Collaborative Empowerment

August 3, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

This whole LRMR thing is getting out of hand.

The problem is people don’t know what LRMR is and what it is here to do. So please allow me to clarify. Contrary to popular belief, it is not an enemy of the state. It’s not a seedy crime syndicate. And it’s not an evil force out to destroy the world.

So now that we know what LRMR isn’t – the Taliban, the mafia, or Justin Beiber – let us try to establish what LRMR is.

It is a marketing agency, plain and simple. A marketing agency that is trying to strengthen the brand of those it represents through collaborative endorsement, not undermine basketball.

Think about the Michael Jordan brand. On his own MJ is one of the most marketable sports stars in history, but somewhere along the lines he discovered that his brand was stronger and more valuable when it was supported by a broad network of stars. Today, names like Derek Jeter, Jason Taylor, and Carmelo Anthony all represent the Jordan brand in different sports and cities, now the Jordan symbol is truly iconic and transcends basketball. That’s similar to the approach that LRMR is implementing, but it is not just limited to a player’s brand. Now players seek to establish control over their careers and where they will play by working together. This collaborative empowerment is not a threat to basketball, but is simply the next logical step in the progression of the game. LRMR is leading the way though the journey is not without its fair share of struggles.

At the very heart of the issue is the simple fact that LRMR is a marketing agency that is ironically experiencing a bit of bad publicity. The focal figure of the agency is the talented and controversial LeBron James. The company was built by, for, and around King James and his brand. That means as goes the public perception of James, so goes that of LRMR. Despite being nearly a month removed from “The Decision” there is still a significant backlash against James, and not surprisingly the negative feelings carry over to LRMR.

But what has the company actually done wrong? I say, “nothing!” LRMR has put its clients in the driver’s seat to their future. It has driven up value through collaboration with other stars. Nowhere is that more apparent than with James’ decision to join with stars and friend Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh. Clearly James and his agency believed that his worth as part of a super team was even greater than being the biggest fish in a small pond. The fact that it wasn’t just LeBron choosing, but James and Co. deciding where the best opportunities exist for everyone speaks volumes of this new collective player empowerment.

Some critics may attack this strategy and decry it as collusion, but that’s far from accurate. Collusion refers to a secretive agreement, which James decision to consult with other free agents certainly wasn’t. Near the end of the playoffs James seemed to be telling anyone that would listen that he felt that he and other free agent stars could reshape the NBA landscape by collaborating on where to go and how that could impact the NBA for the better.

This is somewhat of a paradigm shift for the NBA and sports in general. It demonstrates how owner’s control over players and the league is continually eroding as players demand more control. James’ decision was so shocking in part because it was one of the few times in sports where a player decided something besides money – owners’ biggest bargaining chip – was their biggest priority. Make no mistake, this was no fluke. It was a benchmark in the evolution of player empowerment.

It has been happening for a while. From free agency to no-trade clauses, players have slowly been assuming more control over their own careers. This is yet another milestone in that journey. Just as factory workers demanding more money, better conditions, and a shorter work day was once unfathomable it became a reality through cooperation and worker unity. So, too, is the case for modern athletes. By no means am I saying they are underpaid or ill-treated, but they have discovered that they are stronger together than they are apart.

My opponent for this debate, Bleacher Fan, will no doubt point to the actions of New Orleans guard Chris Paul. Despite two years remaining on his contract with the Hornets, he has attempted to force a trade since signing with LRMR. I will concede the point that it is neither ethical nor wise for players to try to void their legal commitments with a team in order to further their worth and brand. But Paul is an extreme case which really hasn’t worked out. If anything, his attempts at forcing a trade illustrate an isolated incident of the growing pains the league faces as players attempt to test the boundaries of their new found power.

Right now LRMR may not be liked. It is certainly not like by those who stand to lose the most when players gain power – the owners. But it is just part of inevitable progress. No one is asking the owners or media to like it… just accept it. I would be foolish to think I could persuade today’s judge, Sports Geek, into thinking LRMR is the greatest thing to hit basketball since the three point shot, but it is progress. It is an undeniable example of athletes taking ownership of their career, just as any worker would want to do in their respective field. Professional athletes are some of the most handsomely rewarded workers in the world, but they are workers nonetheless. We should not be surprised that they are following a historical path to progress. The LRMR is not the enemy. It is the future.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest NBA Free Agency Mistake Debate… “King” Leaves His Court in Disgrace

July 16, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

The biggest mistake of the NBA free agency period had nothing to do with the signing of a player, the loss of a player, or a contract given to a player.

Instead, the biggest mistake was the decision of LeBron James to announce the decision of LeBron James to the whole world on a televised hour-long special that became the worst decision of them all.

When Mark Cuban is the person calling you out for poor media relations you KNOW you screwed up!

Perhaps if LeBron James had taken his two words of advice and undergone some “media training” he would not have seen his celebrity stock drop as much as it has. And don’t let yourself be fooled by the things that LeBron says, he cares MUCH more about being a celebrity than his words may lead us to believe.

If he DIDN’T care about being a celebrity he would have never scheduled the hour-long “Decision” on ESPN in the first place. Likewise, he would not have made such a spectacle out of his free agent status for the past two years.

Ironically, it is that one thing that he had hoped to boost the most through this whole fiasco that is the one thing to suffer the greatest.

While LeBron’s stock as a basketball player may remain exceptionally high, his stock as a celebrity superstar has PLUMMETTED since his foolish announcement into a prime-time special. The announcement of this prime-time special drew immediate backlash from fans and the media alike, and people who were already growing tired of the overblown coverage and obsessive scrutiny of LeBron James’ every action were finally pushed fully into the realm of disgust.

Where He Went Wrong

LeBron’s FIRST mistake was to entrust his larger-than-life persona wholly to a group of buddies rather than to consult with trained professionals who have been involved in exactly this type of situation HUNDREDS of times. This is not an episode of Entourage we are talking about, after all. This is the NBA, and as Mark Cuban implies, there are certain people who are more qualified to navigate this situation than others.

As much as Richard Paul, Maverick Carter, and Randy Mims (the “R”, “M” and “R” of LRMR Marketing) may have LeBron James’ best interests at heart, this was one time where friendship should NOT have superseded the need to make a sound BUSINESS decision.

There is a reason that no athlete before LeBron had ever tried to pull of the publicity stunt that he did – it is a TERRIBLE idea. Perhaps if he had employed some people with the actual experience of having been in this situation more than once in their lives – or had at least solicited their advice – he could have avoided one of the biggest publicity screw-ups of all time.

LeBron and his own versions of Turtle, E, and Johnny Drama allowed their egos to cloud their judgment. They believed they knew better than everyone else. Which, after all, is why LeBron fired his “professional” agent. He wanted to entrust his most important asset – his brand – to people whose only qualification was that they sat next to LeBron in algebra class.

What he and his pals failed to recognize is that it is a bad idea to string six different professional franchises (and MAJOR markets) along for two years so that you can then break almost ALL of their hearts via a self-aggrandizing television “event” that serves only the purpose of self-service and self-promotion.

It is simple common sense -if you must upset more people than you will make happy, you should do so DISCREETLY.

Honestly, what did he EXPECT to happen? That folks in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Cleveland (his own home town) would actually stand up and CHEER?!

And the reaction that he received following “The Decision” should not have been a surprise. The almost IMMEDIATE public backlash to the announcement of his upcoming announcement (it sounds stupid to even DESCRIBE it) was a clear indication that this was going to be a bad idea. But instead of reading the writing on the wall and changing his mind to possibly salvage the situation, he tried to cover up the mistake by hiding behind a charity.

Perhaps he thought the token gesture of allowing all the proceeds to go to the Boys and Girls Club would make up for (or COVER up) all the pomposity he had demonstrated up to that point.

He was wrong.

The Cost

LeBron James went ahead as scheduled. Hidden in a room many miles away from the millions of hearts he was about to break, cowering behind the cover of a room full of children, he announced his decision with a statement that matched the arrogance he demonstrated all along.

The result became the biggest media blunder to take place since Howard Dean’s infamous scream cost him his candidacy for President of the United States.

While he will almost certainly get his beloved championship, it will come at many costs, including his celebrity status and his legacy as a basketball player.

Once considered the darling of the NBA this prized athlete, who had the potential for limitless success on AND off the court, now finds himself viewed as a pariah. The public has soured so much towards LeBron James that he even chose not to attend the ESPY awards earlier this week – which turned out to be his first wise decision in a while. At the awards ceremony, a chorus of “BOOs” followed nearly every mention of his name. The subject of his “Decision” was the focal point of much parody throughout the evening, also.

If that was his reception at a sports-related event in Los Angeles, just imagine the perception in Cleveland.

As far as his basketball legacy is concerned he can forget about ever being considered the “Greatest Player of All Time.” How can he catch up with Michael Jordan’s legacy when he will now always be trailing Dwayne Wade’s?

Think about it: If LeBron James goes on to surpass Jordan by winning seven championships, that means that Wade will have won eight.

LeBron James will never be considered “the man” in basketball again. He is now going to be forever remembered as being on “the team.” His singular accomplishments will always be overshadowed by the fact that he required the assistance of other All-Stars to get the job done.

I hope the championship is worth it, because it cost LeBron his home, his reputation, and his legacy.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Dan Gilbert Tirade Debate… The New King of Cleveland

July 14, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

After LeBron James’ spectacular “Screw-you” to the city of Cleveland, Cavaliers’ owner Dan Gilbert published a letter to Cavalier fans (a.k.a. Clevelanders), lambasting LeBron’s classless and shameful display of self-glorifying betrayal, then reaffirming his commitment to them with a pledge that was loaded with spite, malice, and just a hint of implied vengeance.

It was petty, it was ill-advised. And it was PERFECT!

Make no mistake. This was not a knee-jerk reaction kicked off in a passionate fit of rage. It was a calculated tactical maneuver, and it accomplished much more than just an airing of grievances. Most importantly, it was Gilbert’s only REAL option.

Dan Gilbert may be a part of the NBA, but he ultimately answers to the Cleveland fans. The rest of the NBA can be as mad at Gilbert as they want to be. It is Cleveland that gets Gilbert’s focus and concern.

It does not matter what the various sportswriters around the country, or Jesse Jackson, think about Gilbert’s letter. It does not matter what LeBron James thinks about Gilbert’s letter. They don’t have to deal with the people of Cleveland. Dan Gilbert does.

And although those people are tired of being perpetual “losers” in sports, that is not the real source of their frustration. There is a giant chip on Cleveland’s collective shoulders, and when LeBron announced – and then followed through with – his hour-long special telling the world that he was leaving Cleveland… it was the final straw.

What REALLY upsets Clevelanders today is being the butt of everyone else’s joke.

Many people may not understand that, including Browns’ owner Randy Lerner and Indians’ owner Larry Dolan. Lerner has been criticized in Cleveland as being an absentee owner who cares more about his British soccer team than he does his NFL franchise. Dolan is often viewed as a clueless, careless saboteur whose only priority appears to be keeping payroll at a minimum.

Dan Gilbert, by contrast, gets it.

When LeBron James made a public spectacle out of the suffering of the good people of Cleveland, turning heartbreak into an hour-long television extravaganza, Gilbert fought back. He stood up for the fans of his beloved team, and used his position of power to tell the world exactly what the people of Cleveland felt.

He not only spoke on behalf of the people of Cleveland, he spoke directly to them. On a night which was intended to be a victory for LeBron James, it became a victory for Cavs fans. Dan Gilbert managed to steal the spotlight, and the event that was supposed to be all about LeBron became instead the night that Cleveland struck back. It secured not just one, but several victories for Gilbert.

First, it made Gilbert into the new “King” of Cleveland sports. Many different athletes and sports figures have claimed to understand the fans, but Gilbert was the first to stake his reputation on it in a very long time. Rather than remain politically neutral, as so many in the sports world are apt to do today, Gilbert drew a line in the sand. He knew that his comments would upset some people, but accepted that as a small price to pay to demonstrate where HIS loyalties really lie.

His comments were not selfish, and they were not patronizing. They were raw, emotionally charged, and GENUINE sentiments that eloquently verbalized what all of Cleveland was feeling. They were also a little bit crazy (just like many of us).

For once, a major sports figure made the choice to stand WITH Cleveland, and Clevelanders will forever love him for that. That love has already begun to manifest itself in the public outpouring of support from Clevelanders who have even gone as far as offering to help foot the bill for their owner’s $100K fine.

Second, it helped Gilbert (at least in the short term) salvage the “business” of the Cavaliers.

LeBron James sells tickets, there is no way around that fact. Now that LeBron is gone, Gilbert is left with a franchise that must find a way to still sell those tickets. He needs to give the fans a reason to come and watch games, because, in all honesty, wins have officially become a lot harder to come by for the Wine and Gold.

Gilbert’s VOW to beat LeBron in a race to a championship may be far-fetched, but it serves as motivation. It lets fans know that he is not quitting on them, so they should not quit on him. It gives fans a glimmer of hope, and that glimmer will be enough to ensure the Cavaliers do not fall into obscurity.

Once more, a Cleveland franchise must brace itself for rebuilding, and Gilbert let those fans know that there is a light at the end of that tunnel. He has demonstrated a full commitment to doing everything in his power to make each of his franchises successful in the past (unlike Lerner and Dolan), and the fans genuinely believe him when he promises an even greater commitment moving forward.

It is small consolation, but it is enough to keep the Cavaliers relevant.

There is also a superstitious victory.

Cavaliers fans have dealt with their own “curse” for many years now. We have tried every way to break the curse, except one. That was the one thing that Gilbert just did – he put the maloik on someone else. Who knows, maybe all that the curse was waiting for was a new home.

The NBA may have fined Gilbert $100K for his comments, and outside the city of Cleveland Gilbert may have lost some respect and/or credibility. But those are small prices to pay. The cost of a token fine and some bad PR outside of Cleveland are nothing compared to what he gained amongst his constituents INSIDE of Cleveland – where it ACTUALLY matters to him.

It doesn’t matter what folks in Seattle, New York, or Poughkeepsie think about what Dan Gilbert does or says. Dan Gilbert’s world is Cleveland, and today he is her favorite son.

Victory – Gilbert!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Dan Gilbert Tirade Debate… What’s Eating Gilbert’s Grape?

July 14, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

The world has been wondering “What was Dan Gilbert thinking?” when he typed up the now famous Open Letter to Cavaliers Fans.

Well, I will tell you this much: He wasn’t thinking about the damage he was doing to the future of his fan base. He wasn’t thinking about how insulting the intelligence of the people of Cleveland could come back to bite him. And he certainly wasn’t thinking about the damage he was doing to his credibility. The $100,000 fine imposed by NBA commissioner David Stern should be the least of Gilbert’s worries right now. He should be concerned about how much more despondent and depressed Cavs fans are going to be when they finally wake up and realize they’ve been lied to by the one man they should have been mad at all along.

I am sure that the Cavaliers faithful will ardently disagree, but it’s true. The people of Cleveland have no one to blame for LeBron James leaving Cleveland EXCEPT for Dan Gilbert. To prove my point briefly examine the reasons LeBron left. It obviously wasn’t for the money. The Cavaliers were offering him the most cash and longest contract, and all those inflated projections of him earning the biggest payday from endorsements in New York obviously did not have enough sway to win LeBron either. It clearly wasn’t a lack of love and fan support in Cleveland. Cavs tickets holders and viewers were ravenous in their fanaticism for James. Bleacher Fan himself openly admitted that every usable inch of the city was dedicated to LeBron love in Cleveland’s campaign to stay. I seriously doubt he would get that much loyalty anywhere else. So, it pretty much boils down to exactly what LeBron has been telling everyone for quite some time – he wants to win championships.

Gilbert knew what LeBron wanted, but failed to deliver. He could have gone after a Dwayne Wade or Chris Bosh himself if he wanted to do everything in his power to get James to stay. Even making a deal to sign a star, like Amar’e Stoudemire or Carlos Boozer, the way the Knicks and Bulls did in their pursuit of James would have been better, but Gilbert didn’t. Are we really to blame James for leaving, when he publicly stated he would like to win championships, and even went as far as to indicate interest in playing with guys like Wade? No! Gilbert failed to put the Cavs in position to retain LeBron and he should shoulder the blame for his leaving. But he doesn’t even do that, instead he points all the blame on LeBron in a temper tantrum of dramatic middle school girl proportions.

The self-indulgent rant does far more long term damage than good. It promises things Gilbert and the Cavs can’t possibly backup. Guaranteeing the people of Cleveland a championship before LeBron wins one may feel like a good thing to say, but it is irresponsible at best. It’s like losing your job and then telling your depressed wife and kids, “It’s going to be alright, I’m going to win the lottery!” Sure, making such a promise may dry up the tears if the family is desperate enough to believe it, but sooner or later when the cash doesn’t show up the fear and hurt comes back tenfold, and the family learns that daddy is a liar. That is exactly what Gilbert has done to the people of Cleveland, except winning the lottery may be a more realistic goal than the Cavs even sniffing the playoffs without LeBron James for the next five years.

Gilbert’s thoughtless words should not be praised as the work of a caring owner or even a business strategist that gave his people hope after a huge loss. Rather his statement should be interpreted for what is – a cowardly attempt to focus the blame on someone else. Gilbert’s letter should insult the intelligence of the people of Cleveland. He is clearly trying to give the city a common enemy, someone besides himself to serve as the scapegoat, and LeBron fits the bill. It is an age old strategy. Redirect people’s anger and fears into hate for a mutual enemy. It’s a cheap trick that appeals to the basest side of human nature. Hitler used the same hatemongering theatrics to turn the Germans’ frustrations after World War I into power and support for himself. Before I start drawing Jesse Jackson comparisons for statements on the LeBron situation that border on lunacy, no, I am not calling Dan Gilbert Hitler. I am merely pointing out that he is using old tricks that the people of Cleveland shouldn’t fall for.

Gilbert’s actions and words have absolutely destroyed his credibility. The man’s comments about LeBron never winning a championship until he does “right” by Cleveland more closely resemble a gypsy curse than they do a public statement by an NBA owner. How can he be taken seriously as an owner or businessman when he releases letters with the validity of Miss Cleo fortunetelling?

Even though Gilbert has temporarily closed his mouth, the drama lives on in his propaganda. His recent claims, that he is rejecting the good people of Cleveland’s offers to pay his $100,000 fine, prove as yet another self serving media ploy. He even panders for the alleged donations to go to the Cavaliers’ Youth charity because there is nothing to defuse an ugly situation like philanthropy. He is spinning a punitive action which was intended to teach him to give pause before turning public statements into a campaign for Cavalier love for their owner. We don’t even know if these donors truly exist, and if they do they have obviously sipped way too much of the Gilbert’ Kool-Aid. (FYI – it comes in two new flavors, Lunatic Lies and Unfulfilled Promises. The latter is harder to swallow.)

The letter may temporarily buy Gilbert some time, but when the smoke clears, Cavs fans will realize his promises were empty. When they finally call on Gilbert to deliver, it will be much worse than if he simply acknowledged LeBron’s contributions to the city and helped the people move on.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.