The 2010 NCAAB Player of the Year Debate – Contenders Cannot Scale the Wall

March 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

It sure is easy to hand Ohio State’s Evan Turner the college basketball national Player of the Year award (especially after Friday’s game-winner), isn’t it? But, if Bleacher Fan is unable to convince anyone of Evan Turner’s greatness, a few sentences of accolades won’t cut it here. The point is, Turner is a great player who had a great season. But he is NOT the ONLY player in college basketball to have a great season – no matter what the talking faces on ESPN and CBS say. While Turner fills up a stat sheet, Kentucky’s John Wall fills up the win column, and is the straw that stirs the drink on a sure-fire number one seed next week.

While Turner’s stats are nice, John Wall has amassed some excellent stats this season as well. He is averaging just under 17 points per game, four rebounds (not bad for a six-foot something guard), and over six assists per game. While he shoots 46 percent from the field, his 33 percent clip from behind the 3 point line is solid, as is his 78 percent accuracy from the free throw line.

Oh, and he’s a 19-year-old freshman in college and the point guard on arguably the best team in the entire country.

Wall’s stats are solid, but his work ethic is too, by evidence of his willingness to use his amazing speed at both ends of the floor. Yes, that’s right, John Wall plays defense. Getting technical for a moment, there is a reason coach’s recruit speed. Wall’s quick lateral movement on the perimeter makes it very difficult to turn the corner on him on a pick and roll, and very hard to beat him back in transition. Going the other direction, Wall is an excellent finisher around the basket in the unlikely event he is not the first person to reach it due to his speed.

Wall makes the other players on the floor better in a way Evan Turner cannot. While Turner is an ISO player for Ohio State – a skill that will serve him well at the next level, especially – Wall makes other players better… and here’s what I mean. It’s not just the direct, easy-to-see stat line where it is super obvious that a player is good for a team based on the number of assists they log. John Wall does not always get the most assists in a game. Often he will make the right pass to start a ball swing to the opposite side of the floor, resulting in a wide open three point shot attempt or an easy entry pass into the post for a high percentage shot. Those types of plays do not show up in the stat line, but they perfectly describe the impact a player like John Wall has on a team.

Wall’s speed and position – point guard – also translate well into a natural leadership role, even for a youngster. Leadership breeds confidence – and confidence breeds clutch shots.

Perhaps the most critical and difficult to replicate aspect of Wall’s game is his ability to make the big play when it matters the most. Wall’s game is not devoted solely to what shots or passes he makes, it is devoted in large part to when he makes them. In short, John Wall is clutch… and not just one time, but many times during the course of the season. Whether it’s a last second layup or a clutch jump shot, Wall does not shy away from the spotlight. He has proven that he is able to make the play when the most is on the line.

Of course Kentucky is a deeper team than Ohio State. Wall definitely has more players with more skills around him that Turner does. Though Wall may not fill up a stat sheet like Turner does, he fills up the coach’s checklist, the win column… and the stat sheet, too.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Most Surprising NFL Move (So Far) Debate – Peppers’ Pick Wrong Kind of Spicy

March 8, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

For me, NFL free agency is the real beginning of the new season. When you grow up rooting for teams that just are not reliably good year in and year out, free agency is a particularly exciting part of the professional football year.

With that take on free agency it may be surprising to discover that, as a lifelong fan of the Chicago Bears, I am seriously disappointed in general manager Jerry Angelo’s signing of defensive end Julius Peppers.

First, the size of the contract is far too large. Peppers is 31-years-old, and Chicago signed him to six year contract valued at $91.5M. It is difficult to imagine the Peppers Chicago signed at 31 will be the same Peppers at 36 or 37-years-old (assuming he’s still playing). Not only are the Bears paying high prices for declining skills a problem with signing Peppers, he has shown a tendency toward being a mercenary. The Charlotte Observer reported Peppers indicated he would have stayed in Charlotte if the Panthers could have come up with an additional six million dollars. Six million dollars!! Chump change to him, but it proves a larger point.

Aside from the clear reach of the contract, its enormous size – even an uncapped year like this one – puts severe limitations on adding other necessary talent to the Bears. The fact is, the Bears did not need a defensive end.

The team invested a great deal of time and money and disruption into acquiring quarterback Jay Cutler. Historically, the offense has relied a great deal on a run-first strategy – in large part because of the wind in the stadium and the inability to consistently pass effectively – and invested accordingly with the offensive rookie of the year two seasons ago, running back Matt Forte. What the Bears currently do not have right now is anyone capable of effectively blocking for the team’s primary offensive strategy. Angelo’s huge contract to Peppers makes investment in a much-needed offensive lineman or two virtually impossible. What’s more, if head coach Lovie Smith really DID want to add a defensive player, the emphasis should have been placed on a defensive back, as the team’s pass defense was terrible last season. With the health of the defensive line improving toward the end of last season (read: Tommie Harris), and the linebacker corps taking a similar turn toward health for the 2010 season, emphasis must be placed on pass defense where an extremely inexperienced group is often exploited. Rather than placing resources behind real need, Angelo has perpetuated the problems on the team and is setting up what promises to be Lovie Smith’s last season as a Chicago Bears head coach.

Plus, an already old Chicago Bears team just keeps getting older. Angelo, either through trades and other moves that create additional financial limitations, made it impossible to get younger or draft a group of players high in the draft because of the salary requirements for that caliber of talent. The Bears need to trade away some of the older talent and accentuate the younger talent. Instead, through coaching staff changes and bad free agent moves, the best players are being marginalized. Tight end Greg Olsen is likely on his way out of town or straight to the bench because he is not the type of tight end who can succeed in new offensive coordinator Mike Martz’s system. In short, the Bears’ best player on offensive is now not important anymore.

As much as Martz’s hiring has distracted the offense from improving in 2010, Rod Marinelli’s promotion to defensive coordinator, and his professional emphasis on coaching defensive lineman, means the free safety and cornerback positions were not addressed despite the fact that established and successful defensive backs were available.

While adding Chester Taylor at running back is pointless without any blockers, the move to add Julius Peppers is pointless and distracting and sure to make the Bears worse for 2010 and well beyond. I hope that Jerry Angelo and the coaching staff is already getting their respective resumes together. It is going to be a long 2010 season in Chicago.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.