The Risky Draft Declaration Debate… Reward Outweighs Risk

January 17, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

Last Saturday was the deadline for underclassmen to declare for the NFL Draft. As usual, the list contains names of future stars in the NFL. While some decided to chase fortune and glory immediately, others – notably Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck – chose to return to college. What makes things interesting this year is the extremely unstable NFL labor situation that is quickly arising, and it certainly has all of us fretting over what our fall Sundays would be like without football. Nonetheless, it is a very real possibility, and that possibility is at the core of our debate today. What are the chances (or likelihood) of a lockout making it risky for all the underclassmen to go ahead and declare? But, you know what? I say it’s worth the risk.

It does appear that no single player is going to get guaranteed money like players of recent drafts. The translation is for the high draft picks not to expect to get Sam Bradford or Matthew Stafford money, with signing bonuses approaching $50M in guaranteed money. For the record, I think that’s a good thing and certainly hope that is a part of the new collective bargaining agreement. Who knows what a so-called rookie pay scale will be (similar to what the NBA currently has in place), but we do know it’ll be much more than what you’d make by playing another year in college. [Insert Cecil Newton jokes here]. Many are saying that it’s too risky financially. Please tell me why.

The NFL still plans on holding its draft on April 28 at Radio City Music Hall in New York City. That means we’ll still get to hear obnoxious Jets fans scream and yell when their team picks. These draft picks will eventually be able to sign their contracts. Underclassmen like Da’Quan Bowers and A.J. Green will be drafted and will eventually sign their rookie contracts. You can bet their agents will find a way to make sure they don’t go hungry, even through endorsements, autograph opportunities, or cash advances. These are all things that couldn’t be done if the kids were still lacing them up on Saturdays.

The same rookie pay scale that is likely going to be in place for the 2011 NFL season will be in place for next year’s crop of rookies also. So, the way I look at it is, this year’s guys are getting a head start. They are getting that rookie year out of the way, collecting that check, and perhaps more importantly, getting a year closer to that first free agent contract.

Then there’s always the risk that you either have an unproductive senior year or have an injury to curtail those NFL hopes and dreams. This time last year, it was almost a given that Jake Locker was going to be the top quarterback in this year’s draft, much the same way we are looking at Luck in regards to next year’s draft. Well, what happened? An up and down 2010 campaign for Locker cast serious doubt on his ability to play at the next level. Now he’s certain to be drafted behind underclassmen like Blaine Gabbert and Ryan Mallet. He essentially lost MILLIONS by returning to school and getting that degree.

It’s a cliché, but I am going to write it anyway. There’s risk in everything you do. But these guys have long had the dream of playing in the NFL and couldn’t pass up the opportunity. Many of the guys come from urban areas where they didn’t have much growing up and felt like they couldn’t pass up the big pay day. Now, they have to believe that the NFL labor situation will be resolved soon and they will become professional football players with bigger bank accounts. The reward certainly outweighs the risk in this situation.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Heisman Trophy Purpose Debate… Heisman Poses Interesting Debate

July 22, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

The Heisman Trophy is touted as the most prestigious award in college football for a reason – it IS the most prestigious award in college football!

The award recognizes the accomplishments of the best of the best. Its importance is undeniable. It is comparable to the various MVP awards of professional sports leagues.

The award offers recognition of achievement on a national scale for both the player and the team. That’s why they give away two trophies, one to the athlete and one to the program that developed him. Analysts start projecting winners long before the season begins because winning the award can be a big boost to a player’s draft status, or it can give universities a big chip to dangle before prospects during the recruiting process. What player wouldn’t want to go to a program that has proven it can produce Heisman trophy winners? I firmly believe that the significance of the award speaks for itself, but today’s debate questions whether it has become just a popularity contest.

In truth popularity plays a large role, but it does so for a reason. Talent leads to popularity. The best players develop huge fan bases. Since the award recognizes the most talented college players it is logical to conclude that they would also be among the most popular.

Admittedly players and universities have begun posturing for the award earlier and earlier, but that doesn’t negate its importance. Instead, it highlights it. Teams know what’s riding on the line and how hard it is to get noticed in the sea of college stars, so they are forced to toot their own horns. In terms of sheer numbers of competitors, selecting the best player in the pros doesn’t even compare with picking the best college player. Plus, standing out among the various college conferences proves challenging enough.

Teams must let the voters know what makes their star special. There is no uniform scheduling committee for college football that ensures parity among every school’s schedule. So, boasting about a stud player is good if their performance is put into perspective with a strong schedule. Similarly, there is not really collaboration among college teams in terms of scheduling games so each voter can watch on TV. These challenges actually encourage players and teams to lobby for the recognition and I can’t blame them.

Since Sports Geek is doing the judging on today’s debate, I feel it is important to include a data-driven intellectual aspect to my argument. To that end I would like to point out that campaigning has become an increasingly necessary evil because of flaws in the balloting system.

The current system lends itself to sectional factionalism. The vast majority of votes, 870 of the 926 total ballots, are cast by members of the media throughout the country. Votes are divided equally among amongst six regions – Far West, Mid Atlantic, Mid West, North East, South, and South West. Although each region receives an equal allotment of 145 votes, the system apportions more votes to the states containing the most media outlets.

That means that states with large populations, and therefore more media outlets, will dominate the voting. This, not surprisingly, gives larger states like California and Texas a decided advantage. Sure the balloters are expected to be somewhat objective, but that really is impossible considering they are making a subjective decision. Seriously, if it were not a subjective decision then why wouldn’t we just let BCS computers make the call? The BCS point may not help my cause, but you get my point – formulas and computers could make a more objective call.

Regional sectionalism is bound to creep into any subjective decision. My opponent’s name, Loyal Homer, is proof of that. Teams from smaller states really have to campaign to overcome sectional loyalties. Our Founding Fathers understood that concept and that’s why we have two houses of Congress – the Senate based on equal representation and the House of Representatives based on representation by population (see this article is educational… even if you don’t agree with it you can at least say you learned something). Schools from smaller states have to advertise early and often to level the playing field. Take Jake Locker for example, he plays for Washington and must contend for votes in the Far West region against a plethora of voters from California. His East Coast campaigning is his best weapon to contend for votes. It may not sit well with some, but if it helps him compete with bigger markets can you really blame him?

The Heisman is still important if for no other reason than the urgency with which it is sought. Players want the recognition as the best player there is, not the most liked or popular player. The award keeps us glued to our television watching games we might not otherwise care for because there are Heisman competitors on the field. The award honors the best today as it has for so many years, the campaigning doesn’t hurt the award’s credibility, rather bringing attention to its importance.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of the THIS Weekend Debate – Could Lightning Strike Twice?

September 18, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument for what they believe is the best game of the upcoming weekend.

It was a brisk September day in the upper Northwest. Southern Cal was preparing for a game they were all too happy to be playing. Their confidence was riding high after just defeating top ten ranked Ohio State the week before. All of the college football experts around the country were handing them a spot in the BCS national title game. The running game was clicking and the defense looked as solid as it ever had since Pete Carroll first took the coaching reigns.

Sounds like 2009, right? Wrong. That is a description of the week after USC beat Ohio State in 2008. You know, the week of game preparation leading up to their surprising defeat at the hands of the Oregon State Beavers.

The Trojans were confident after dismantling what was believed to be the best team in the country early in the 2008 season in Ohio State. But, they were surprised in Corvallis, Oregon by a well coached, fast team led by a little (he is 5’7”) and little known running back named Jacquizz Rodgers. Rodgers slashed and dashed his way to 186 yards against the Trojans and a pair of scores en route to a 27-21 victory on the strength of a big first half.

Southern Cal’s trip up to the Pacific Northwest must feel familiar to Carroll, even though most of the defense and his young freshman quarterback Matt Barkley do not remember last season. The Trojans are taking on a Washington Huskies team in Seattle on Saturday that has put up 65 points in its first two games this season. The Huskies bear some resemblance to last season’s Beavers, too. The Beavers scored 59 points in their final two games before taking on the Trojans last season.

The Huskies are led by the multi-talented/rarely healthy Jake Locker under center. Locker has already throw five touchdown passes in two games and is completing 60 percent of his passes. What makes Locker such a difficult player to handle is that he is also the team’s second leading rusher with 69 yards and a touchdown in two games.

Like Rodgers last season, Washington has a small (5’11”) and speedy running back that could catch the Trojans off guard. Freshman tailback Chris Polk has already rushed for 170 years and a touchdown on the young season, and has the skills to do some damage against the Trojans.

Washington is also coached by former Trojan offensive coordinator Steve Sarkisian. Sarkisian knows the Trojan’s tendencies and their offense inside and out.

The best game of THIS weekend is Southern Cal visiting the Washington Huskies not because of the great history or the high rankings. It is because the third ranked Trojans are a good possibility to get defeated on Saturday by a smart coach with an edge and a group of highly motivated players. Sounds like the ingredients for a delicious upset, and a great football game.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.