The Best Champion of 2009 Debate – Steel City’s Snow Bird are 2009’s Best Champs

January 1, 2010

Read the arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan about which champion they believe was the best from 2009.



What does it mean to be a champion? In some sports the actions of a single individual can merit a championship, because of the design of the sport. Tennis, golf, etc. are all sports where an individual can rightfully and impressively earn a championship.

But, there is something about a team winning that is just extra impressive. A collective conscious, individuals united by a common purpose, striving for a championship. Stripped down from the flowery language… it is friggin’ HARD to motivate a team of professional athletes – not to mention the entire organization – to make every decision in their job through a prism that evaluates, “will this help the team win?” Championship teams not only must have the right personality mixture and complementary skills, the entire organization – every employee – must but all in, they must all believe.

In 2009, no championship team was better than the Pittsburgh Penguins. For fans, the Stanley Cup Trophy the team earned this year was not only a dream come true by defeating the very team that thwarted them in 2008, the Detroit Red Wings, but because of who is running the organization… how the championship was won. Pittsburgh favorite son, hockey Hall of Famer, and former Penguin great Mario Lemieux owns and runs the team.

In 2006, the team had fallen on hard times. That is, until then new owner Mario Lemieux declared, “It is time to take control of our own destiny.” At the time he was referring to the potential move out of Pittsburgh. History now teaches that Lemieux was negotiating a stay in Pittsburgh, a battle he won. Then the team used the first overall pick in the draft to pick up Sidney Crosby, “Sid the Kid.” Lemieux offered to let the young 18-year old live in his basement rent free (not that the rent free mattered too much). Just two seasons later the Penguins were in the Stanley Cup Finals, winning in 2009. The journey to win was long and hard, full of potential issues seemingly bent on destroying the team’s future. But, the entire organization found a way to prevail.

The 2009 Stanley Cup Finals series itself was very entertaining. The series went to all seven games with the Penguins eventually beating the Red Wings – the franchise that is synonymous with hockey… actually playing in “Hockey Town USA” – on a Maxime Talbot goal midway through the second period, one of two he scored on the night.

The series victory was more than just as single championship, too. New York Times hockey writers Jeff Klein and Stu Hackel decided the victory was a changing of the guard atop North American hockey, from the historically dominant Red Wings to the new, younger, faster, and equally tough hockey played by the Penguins. This Penguins team is built for speed and scoring, unlike the old board-hawking days of hockey’s yesteryear. The new game is cleaner, more open, and perfectly represented by the Penguins and star players Sidney Crosby and this year’s Conn Smythe winner Evgeni Malkin. Sure, power and toughness are still important – but speed and skill wins the championships, now.

The act of winning, actually achieving the trophy, is the primary element of a great championship. But, what else is there? A coach will say that even after winning a championship, it is difficult to enjoy because the mind immediately wanders to whatever is next. Who should the team draft? What contracts need renewal, what contracts should be allowed to expire? How in the world does a coach motivate a group of players that already have achieved the highest reward available in the sport?

What makes the Penguins so impressive is the team’s ability to sustain success, playing at a high level all the time without taking games off. Sure, the team loses, but it does not lack effort night in and night out. After reaching the Finals and losing in 2008, the team won in 2009, and is building another impressive resume for 2010. The team is third in points and second in the division to New Jersey, already having survived an injury stint from star Malkin. Crosby is again near the top of the NHL in goals scored, and goalie Marc-Andre Fleury is second in the league in wins.

The Penguins underwent a major rebuilding effort and still won. The Penguins are still playing like a champion, unlike their Steel City counterparts who took a few games off and may have lost the opportunity to repeat as a result. A champion not only wins one time, a champion wants to win again and again and again.

Few sports are as fluid as hockey, requiring every player to be tuned in and ready to go on the ice at any moment, to give up their body in front of a puck, to showcase individual skills, and to never take a stupid penalty that puts the team in a bad situation. These are the traits of a champion, and these are the traits of the best champion of 2009 – the Pittsburgh Penguins.

The Pittsburgh Penguins were the greatest champion of 2009 not just for the tough slog of a series they won against the Red Wings, but because of what the team represents for hockey, and for life. Hard work pays off, and the Penguins are changing the way the game is played to a formula for success now, and for the future.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NHL on Versus Debate – It Is All About the Loons

October 21, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the NHL made a mistake in agreeing to a television contract with the Versus Network.



The NHL has never been mistaken as a television-friendly league. Although hockey is one of the most exciting sports to watch in person, there is something left to be desired when watching the game at home. Innovations such as Fox’s “Puck-Tracker” have been tried over recent years, all in an attempt to enhance the television experience. But, the success of those innovations has been very limited. When matched up against the NFL, NBA, or MLB on television, the NHL does not stand a chance.

Then the lockout of the 2004 season came along. For a league that already lacked substantial television revenues, the last thing the NHL could afford was to cancel an entire season of play because of a labor dispute. That is exactly what took place, though. The NHL teetered on the brink of falling into obscurity. During the lockout period it was very easy for casual fans of the sport to forget about hockey altogether. Unlike the MLB strike of 1994, or the NBA lockout which took place in 1998, the NHL lacked a broad enough fan base to keep the game relevant. As a result, when the labor dispute was finally settled in 2005 the NHL had very little bargaining power for how its games would be televised.

The Comcast-owned Outdoor Living Network (OLN), which at the time was striving to stake a claim as a major competitor in sports broadcasting, saw an opportunity to capitalize on the NHL’s situation and made a very lucrative offer to the NHL for the broadcasting rights to its games. In response, ESPN president George Bodenheimer, declined to match OLN’s offer, saying that “given the prolonged work stoppage and the league’s TV ratings history, no financial model even remotely supports the contract terms offered.” Basically, Bodenheimer implied that OLN (which would eventually become the Versus Network) was offering the NHL more than it was worth, and that this deal was the best that the NHL could hope for.

Although the league failed to achieve the same ratings levels it did while partnered with ESPN, the NHL has seen steady and consistent growth in viewership while partnering with Versus. Since returning to play in 2005, the NHL on Versus has resulted in regular season television ratings of 0.2 for the 2005 and 2006 seasons, and 0.3 for the 2007 and 2008 seasons. For the Stanley Cup, ratings have doubled from 0.9 in 2005 up to 1.8 in 2008, a number that is very impressive when you consider that the mighty NBC only earned a 1.6 rating during the 2007 Stanley Cup matchup between the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim and the Ottowa Senators. The most positive indication that the NHL-Versus partnership is successful came during the first round of the 2008 NHL playoffs, when Versus realized an increase in viewership of 26.7%.

Despite the growth, it is hard to deny the negative impact that will be felt by the NHL as a result of DirecTV’s dispute with Comcast, the parent company of the Versus network, especially if it continues for any substantial length of time. Undoubtedly ratings for the NHL will decline. What is most important to keep in mind, however, is that the Versus deal was right for the NHL at the time that it was made (and subsequently extended). The drop in ratings which is felt by the NHL as a result of this dispute will be short-lived. Upon resolution of the disagreement, the drop will be immediately corrected and the ratings will return instantly to their consistent growth. In the worst-case scenario – if DirecTV and Comcast are unable to resolve this dispute (an outcome that I believe is HIGHLY unlikely) – then the NHL has the option of seeking a new agreement with another broadcast partner (such as ESPN). That does not guarantee the NHL will find a BETTER offer.

The deal with Versus has been very beneficial for the NHL. The league has never truly been successful in the television marketplace, and after the lockout of the 2004 season, the league had very low expectations for its return to play in 2005. Thanks in part to the eagerness of a fledgling cable network the NHL was still able to land a very beneficial television deal which has since resulted in sustained growth for the viewership of the league. They took the best offer on the table at the time, and it has rewarded them with consistent success ever since.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NHL’s Best Under 25 Debate – Ovechkin Has No Rivals

October 12, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument about who they believe is the best NHL player under the age of 25.



In a league that increasingly lauds speed and skill over teamwork and toughness, Alexander Ovechkin gets a standing “O.” I agree with Sports Illustrated’s recent conclusion that Ovechkin is the best hockey player under the age of 25, and the rightful winner of this debate (please vote). In fact, SI fails to go far enough. I believe Ovechkin is the best player in the entire league. However, for the purposes of this debate framework, I will relay several reasons why Ovechkin is the best player under 25 in the NHL.

The righty is listed at a generous six feet tall and a solid 212 pounds. Despite the smallish frame, Alexander Ovechkin embodies excitement. Every time he sets foot on the ice he has an excellent chance to score. His colleagues and the media agree. In just four NHL seasons in his career, Ovechkin has already won the league MVP twice. Not only is he a good bet to score a goal when he is on the ice, he has a 50-50 shot at winning the league MVP. How many other players in the history of the NHL – or sports in general – have started their career that way? Zero. Not Wayne Gretzky, not Bobby Hull, not Patrick Roy. Ovechkin is the only player with that distinction, and he has earned it.

Ovechkin’s statistics are impressive, obviously. He is already on the list of the top 50 active goal scorers. Again, Ovechkin is in his fifth season in the league. This season he is in vintage form, already tied for the league lead in points and is second in goals… just five games in. Through those five games Ovechkin has averaged a goal and a point per game. How is that for consistent greatness?

Ovechkin has an impressive trophy closet, too. If you are curious about all of his trophies, read his Wikipedia page. But heed this warning, Ovechkin’s greatness cannot be contained by a Wikipedia page.

Ovechkin is great because of firsts… NHL firsts, not just sports firsts like that nifty MVP achievement. He is the first player in the history of the league to win the Art Ross Trophy (NHL leader in points for a season), the Maurice Richard Trophy (NHL leader in goals scored), the Lester B. Pearson award (NHL MVP – as chosen by the NHL Player’s Association), AND the Hart Memorial Trophy (NHL MVP – as chosen by the Professional Hockey Writer’s Association… yea, there is one). He currently holds the record for most goals scored by a left-winger in a single season (65), the most points by a left-winger as a rookie (106), and the award for the fastest overtime goal in the history of the NHL – six seconds. There are other all-time NHL records Ovechkin holds – already. It is logical to conclude that Overchkin may go on to have the greatest career of any NHL player ever. It is a very real possibility.

Greatness loves company, too. Great company. By a show of hands, readers, who among you believes LeBron James is the best player in the NBA ? That is a lot of hands! Like LeBron, Alexander Ovechkin – the first overall pick in the NHL draft in 2004 – is another once rare example of a first overall draft pick that actually lives up to the sensational hype. LeBron and Ovechkin are also fans of each other.

There is greatness besides Ovechkin in the NHL, too. In fact, it is the presence of other outstanding contemporary players like Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin that make Ovechkin’s accomplishments appear so amazing. While Crosby and Malkin – as my esteemed colleagues will boast – have won a Stanley Cup ring, they also are supported by an excellent goalkeeper in Marc-Andre Fleury. A solid goaltender enables players like Crosby and Malkin to take risks up ice, pass more aggressively, and turn their skates up the ice sooner because Fleury has proven his ability to play at a high level. Ovechkin is unable to take as many risks, but he has proven to be a more effective scorer than either Crosby or Malkin.

If Ovechkin has one flaw it is that his worst scoring day by far throughout his career is Sunday. Of his 224 career goals, he has scored only 17 on Sunday. Shameful. But, do not play him on Saturday, where he has scored a career high 51 goals (along with an impressive 49 assists).

No other NHL player combines the speed, skill, instinct, and surprising power of Alexander Ovechkin. If you refuse to take my word for it, let your eyes feast on a highlight reel unlike any other in the league.

Case closed.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The U.S. Soccer Respect Debate – The Verdict

July 1, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that U.S. soccer is overrated, and Bleacher Fan’s opinion that it’s not.



Quite an interesting debate we’ve had this time. Probably more interesting than most of you thought, right?

Sports Geek argued that there really just isn’t a feeder system here in the United States and I totally agree, though I sure haven’t seen many of these soccer ball magnets that Sports Geek is referring to. Ask yourself… how many kids do you know that play soccer?

Now take your answer to that question and compare it to this one:

How many kids do you know who play football, baseball, and basketball? (Sorry I’m leaving out hockey… and for a reason!)

Bleacher Fan almost got me pumped with his depiction of USA soccer! I appreciate the fact that he watched the game with a room full of soccer moms!!
As far as the momentum built by the recent success, I think it was built… for maybe a day. No one is talking about it anymore! Has anyone at your work place mentioned it this week? Granted, there are other stories in sports (and national) news, but dare I say that soccer is already on the back page again… just 48 hours after the final ended with a nearly monumental victory for the U.S. side in the world of soccer.

If you haven’t already guessed by now, I am siding with…

SPORTS GEEK!!!!!

I was, however, really surprised Sports Geek didn’t bring up David Beckham. Remember when Mr. Posh Spice signed that big contract with the Los Angeles Galaxy back in 2007? He was supposed to make soccer relevant in the USA. Heck, I even rode by the Beckham estate when I was visiting relatives in California that summer. He was a star and the sport had all kinds of momentum when he entered the country!

But, here we are, two years later. The star has fizzled. The back and forth nature of the negotiations with Real Madrid has shown that even Beckham isn’t convinced soccer will gain more popularity in the U.S. Bottom line, soccer is still irrelevant, for the most part, in this country. And despite the feel good story of the past ten days, I just don’t see it changing.


The U.S. Soccer Respect Debate – Talent Gap is Still Substantial, U.S. Soccer Overrated

June 30, 2009

Read the debate intro and Bleacher Fan’s opinion.



Okay, before folks kill our comments with hateful diatribes directed at me, allow me to preface the following piece with a simple statement: I’m a big fan of the United States Soccer team.

For me and all the Sports Geeks I represent, being a big fan means understanding the context – and realities – that are a part of U.S. Soccer.

Soccer is still a sports afterthought in the U.S. It’s a fun recreational pastime for kids (it must be, or those soccer ball car magnets wouldn’t be EVERYWHERE), and an enjoyable game to play in high school, too. Two main factors contribute to the gap in talent between the U.S. team and other international clubs.

First, soccer is played in the majority of playgrounds in virtually every other country in the world. This is no small fact. Instead of pick up games of soccer, our version of football, baseball, basketball, softball, etc. trample the grass in American parks. Soccer just doesn’t have much of a draw from fans here, despite the fact that the U.S. plays a distinctive style built on power and strength.

Second, it’s the feeder system. Because the U.S. has so many popular sports for kids to play, the talent pool gets diluted, something that doesn’t happen to the same degree in other countries. In Brazil, Italy, and Spain, for example, all of the best athletes want to be soccer players. In the U.S., the best athletes may want to play baseball, football, basketball, hockey, etc. The lack of attention soccer receives in the U.S. also contributes to a passion vacuum – something other countries have in spades.

One more point on the feeder system – the only real chance a talented, soccer-loving youth has to learn soccer and become great in the U.S. is at the collegiate level. U.S. colleges and coaches are great for teaching some technique, but the style they teach emphasizes physical strength and discipline. Brazil, for example, has a style distinct for creativity and technique. That creativity (and the aforementioned passion) is a missing piece for the U.S., as the discipline of the Europeans and the creativity of the South Americans (Brazil, Argentina) leaves the U.S. in the dust. That style difference is keeping talented up and coming U.S. players squarely on the bench at their club teams, furthering the development gap when the players return to home to don their country’s colors.

Now, the Fifa Confederations Cup final was a very nice outcome for a hard working U.S. team. But, their flaws were exposed in the tournament, too. Let’s not forget this is the same team that allowed a goal in the first 10 minutes of three of their first four matches. The U.S. is not an explosive side, so playing from behind doesn’t favor their style. Granted the U.S. suffered some injury-related setbacks, but they barely squeaked out of round play losing to Italy 3-1, and 3-0 to Brazil before soundly beating Egypt and the miracle victory against Spain.

Any modicum of success on an international stage – like, say, being the runner up in the Confederations Cup – will start a massive piling on of expectations from an undereducated U.S. soccer fan base. It isn’t realistic right now to assume that the U.S. will make the final four at the World Cup next year. But, that won’t stop the expectations train from leaving the station. And, when the U.S. plays well – but not at an elite level (yet) – any momentum the train had will be gone. It’s those massive expectations that come in the blink of an eye to perpetually leave U.S. soccer overrated.

Now, I’m not saying U.S. soccer is terrible. Far from it. They are one of the best 20 sides in the world, no doubt about it. But the gap between the elite teams and everyone else is still significant, and the US is still rightly lumped in with “everyone else” – a place they’ll remain until they can find the discipline, creativity, and passion their elite competition has.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.