The Tiger at the Master’s Debate… The Truth Shall Set You Free

April 8, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Tiger Woods has chosen the Masters to mark his infamous return to golf. If the comments of Augusta National’s Chairman, Billy Payne, are any indication of how the rest of the golf world feels, his return will not be a positive one.

There is a right way and a wrong way for an athlete to return to competition once they have been involved in ignominy of any kind.

Or perhaps I SHOULD say there is a right way and Tiger’s way.

In returning to competition the “right” way, the focus of the athlete’s return is not on the scandal itself, but it is instead on the athlete’s performance in the game. Michael Vick’s return to the NFL was a great example of the “right” way to come back.

When Vick finally returned to the game of football, the focus was not about his dog-fighting scandal, because there were no questions left to ask about his actions. In the time leading up to his return, he was very transparent in his behavior, making himself accessible to the media whenever they wanted to chat. More importantly, though, was the fact that his apologies and actions POST-scandal all seemed to be genuine and heartfelt.

Sure, there were protests surrounding his return, but those protests were not a focal point any more. The voices of dissent had already been heard, and because they had nothing new to protest, and there were no unanswered or unresolved situations to further fuel their fire, their complaints were considered yesterday’s news.

Vick had taken back control of the situation by giving the press and the public what they wanted. He partnered with the NFL in the build-up to his return, and they cooperatively organized his transition back into competition. He answered all the questions, no matter how unpleasant it may have been for him, and the general public seemed to be satisfied with his responses. In doing so, his return was not about what he DID, but instead was about finding out what he will DO now that he is back.

As a result of that positive and cooperative effort, both the NFL and Vick benefitted from his return to the game. Instead of Vick’s presence on the field being a DISTRACTION, he became one of the most intriguing characters of the previous NFL season.

Tiger Woods and the PGA should have taken a page from Vick’s book.

Where Vick was open and accessible, Woods has been reclusive and inaccessible. Where Vick gave the appearance of genuine sincerity, Woods has portrayed resistance and after his seemingly insincere apology, the only SINCERE regret I believe he feels is that he was caught. The result of his foolish commitment in trying to avoid the scandal (which ironically appears to be the only commitment he CAN honor) is that the unsatisfied public will continue to dig and question until they get what they feel are satisfactory responses. Just ask guys like Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, or Mark McGwire about how easily the public forgets.

Sure, the scandal was set off by off-the-course indiscretions that had no bearing on the PGA Tour, but now there is speculation of possible HGH use, which would have impacted his play ON the course. As the scandals surrounding Woods continue to swirl unchecked and unaddressed, they will increasingly draw attention FURTHER from the game of golf.

This whole situation has already been a major distraction from the PGA Tour, and Woods wasn’t even playing. Just imagine the damage that will be done if he begins to win tournaments again amid speculation that he may have used HGH. Because Woods’ credibility has been damaged, and he has failed to portray a SINCERE act of contrition with regard to his peccadilloes, the public is less likely to believe his denials of HGH involvement. A snowball effect ensues, where the layers of doubt build higher and higher.

The public’s quest for the truth will ultimately supersede any interest in the competition that will take place on the course. While the officials at Augusta may be able to exert some influence over the media during the Masters, they cannot extend their control beyond the confines of this one tournament. The Woods saga will eventually become a distraction to the PGA Tour, and as each day passes that questions go unanswered (or new accusations arise), the press will become more insistent on seeking information.

This situation cannot be swept under a rug, and it will not just go away. If anything, the American public is forgiving, but until Tiger addresses the elephant in the room and portrays a SINCERE attempt at repentance, the general public will not be willing to forgive, and they will CERTAINLY not be willing to forget.

The PGA may need Tiger Woods back in competition, but they need a Tiger Woods who is not mired in controversy even more.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Suspending Tiger Woods Debate – Caging a Tiger

March 3, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

What is a professional sports organization to do when its biggest star has fallen?

Tiger Woods has been the single greatest draw in the PGA since he burst onto the scene in 1996. His superstar status, combined with a pristine public image, placed him at the head of the list of America’s wealthiest athletes (a prestigious list to headline).

The fact is that Tiger Woods became the biggest name in American sports. But you know what they say – the bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Loyal Homer discusses the problems that Tiger has brought on himself since his indiscretions became public. He has already lost in millions from sponsorships and endorsements, and may be losing his family. Whether or not you believe they are warranted, those are pretty stiff penalties to pay for cheating on your wife.

Loyal Homer also asks the question “What law did Tiger Woods break?”
The answer to that question is ‘None’. Tiger did not commit a single crime. So why are all of his sponsors dropping him? If he didn’t break any laws, they have no need to distance themselves, right?

WRONG!

Sponsors are severing ties with Tiger for one reason – he is no longer a positive ambassador to represent their organization. And just as sponsors are taking measures to distance themselves from Tiger in the interest of protecting their brands, I am awarding the verdict to Babe Ruthless for accurately highlighting the responsibility of the PGA to protect its brand first.

As Babe Ruthless points out, the PGA has established itself as a “gentleman’s game”. Honor and respect are a MAJOR factor in a sport where the athletes are expected to report their own violations and keep their own scores (for example). There can be no more dishonorable perception than the one currently held by Woods, and the PGA must take action to address that problem.

There can be no denying that Tiger’s scandal has become a huge distraction to the Tour. There can also be no denying that his return to the game will create a brand new media frenzy, which will become another major distraction. The problem with the situation is that right now, Tiger Woods still controls all the cards.

He is clearly not willing to publicly partner with the PGA in dealing with the carnage from this scandal. Rather than take the responsible steps of working WITH the PGA in transitioning himself back into the game, he has become a recluse. He has withdrawn completely from society, only popping his head up out of the sand when he wants to make a public statement, refusing to answer ANY questions in the process. He continues to try and dictate exactly what happens around him, with little to no regard for how it affects others (a trait he appears to have mastered through his infidelity).

When he ultimately decides to return to competition, one can only assume he will attempt to handle it in the same controlling and selfish manner. He will hold a press conference to announce his return to the game, likely having given no forewarning to Tour officials, and the PGA will be left to negotiate the logistics of a press circus that was unanticipated, but will most certainly ensue at that first tournament.

Tiger needs to understand, though, that he is not bigger than the PGA Tour. The PGA does not exist to cater to each of his whims and desires. While he has become a major financial draw for the organization, it existed just fine BEFORE he came along, and it will continue to plug along after he has left the game.

There is no way to avoid the many problems for the PGA and its OTHER players (who SHOULD be the PGA’s primary concern right now) upon Tiger’s inevitable return to the game. The PGA can take measures, however, to PREPARE for it by setting their own terms for his return. It would allow them to regain control of the situation, which is necessary to help protect their brand.

By suspending Tiger Woods, the PGA can send a very clear message to Tiger that his actions were not acceptable for an ambassador of the game of golf, and that it will not tolerate distractions as grand as his from the game. It is the Professional GOLFERS Association, not the Professional TIGER WOODS Association. The PGA needs to act in the best interest of ALL of its members. 

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Suspending Tiger Woods Debate – FINALLY, A Tiger Woods Debate That Pertains to SPORTS

March 2, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

You may not have heard anything about this, but someone mentioned to me the other day that there is some golfer named Tiger Woods who apparently cheated on his wife, Elin Nordegren. The media hasn’t done much to cover the story, but from what I can tell this Tiger fellow has admitted to several affairs, and has since withdrawn from further play in the PGA to attend “rehab”.

At least the PGA won’t be affected by this…

And today’s lesson in sarcasm was brought to you by “Tiger Watch!”, the 24-hour news source which has already brought you such groundbreaking reports as – “Elin put gas in her car WITHOUT wearing Tiger’s ring!” and “Elin took Tiger coffee today!” (GASP!)

Seriously, this has gotten WAY out of control!

ESPN.com has even gone so far as to commit a full section of their golf page online to the “Tiger Tracker”. Now, in addition to finding out about the PGA schedule, players, statistics, etc., golf fans can also get a full complement of dedicated media coverage strictly focused on Tiger Woods. Some of the Pulitzer-worthy headlines from this so-called news source are “Finchem: I should have briefed players on Tiger”, “Tiger apologizes, unsure about return”, and “Tiger’s caddie: Heckling won’t be tolerated.”

My personal favorite, though, is “Faith can bring Tiger discipline, Dalai Lama says”!

I’m not making that up – Not only has the Dalai Lama weighed in on “Tiger-Gate”, but ESPN has actually seen fit to follow it as a newsworthy story. The situation is absolutely ABSURD!

The sad reality is that Tiger’s philandering has soaked up far too much of our time and attention. It wouldn’t surprise me to find out that more people know about Tiger’s sordid affairs than they do the Toyota recall, a much more important and RELEVANT issue going on in America right now.

As for the PGA, this scandal has been covered more than all of the league’s other headlines combined. For example, did you know that the PGA has already had EIGHT different tournaments take place this year? And although most folks could not tell you a single tournament winner so far in 2010, I’d be willing to bet that EVERYONE knows about Tiger’s “apology” offered during a press conference where no questions were allowed, only a few cameras were invited along, and Tiger simply read a statement that he would not yet be returning to golf.

Which brings us to our question of the day – Should the PGA suspend Tiger Woods?

Clearly, this media frenzy has become a distraction in the PGA. From the scandalous story itself to the aftershock effects of misplaced media focus, the PGA has lost their biggest star and all attention has left the game to instead follow the tabloids in a Paparazzi-esque hunt for the next shocking headline. Still, it must be pointed out that Tiger’s actions had nothing to do with the game of golf. He did not cheat in any way (on the game, that is), and he was not acting on behalf of the PGA during his peccadilloes.

So what is the PGA to do?!

Babe Ruthless will argue that Tiger Woods should be suspended upon his return to golf, while Loyal Homer will take the position that Tiger should not be penalized by the PGA for this situation.

I’ve gotta run, though, because I just heard on TV that Tiger cut the cheese twice during his workout this morning, and I don’t want to miss the rest of the story!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Winter v. Summer Olympics Debate – A Winter Wonderland

February 19, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.



I am an Olympics junkie!

Summer or Winter Games, I love them all! There is just something special about watching athletes who have dedicated four years of their lives all as build up to a window of only three to five minutes. Watching as the chosen few who vault into the legendary status of “greatest in the world” get to celebrate the triumphant completion of a life’s work is truly one of the finest payoffs that a sports fan can hope for. When that glorious moment just so happens to be for a compatriot, then all the better!

In the debate of which is better between the two, though, there is no question – the Winter Olympics are unparalleled.

The Summer Olympics may offer a greater variety of games, but it is during the Winter Games that fans are treated to the greatest speeds and highest risks (for all you extreme sports fans), making for the most exciting and entertaining of competitive events.

From Bobsled and Luge to Downhill Skiing to Speed Skating, every one of the events during the Winter Games is designed to test the human ability to master the ice and snow. Often, that mastery manifests itself in jaw-dropping demonstrations of extreme speeds and stunts. Many of the Winter events feature high-flying acrobatics, break-neck speeds, and gravity-defying aerial demonstrations. The Summer Olympics offer none of that (except maybe in Olympic Trampolining – Ooooohhhhh!).

During the Summer Games, the events are usually about who can throw the farthest, or run and jump the best. While those events make for great competition, they simply cannot compete with the thrill that comes from watching your fellow natives sail down a snow-capped mountain at greater than 70 miles per hour. The sharp turns, steep slopes, and lightning speeds create an adrenaline rush that the Summer Games simply cannot compete against. That is what the thrill-seeker in all of us hopes to see – the daring few who are brave enough to push themselves to the limits of safety (and sanity).

As tragic as the death of Georgian Luger Nodar Kumaritashvila is, his accident punctuates the very real danger that exists for those competing during the Winter Olympics. And although fans would never hope for a tragedy such as the one that occurred last Friday, it cannot be denied that the thrill of watching these athletes test themselves (and the laws of physics) in such a death-defying manner creates an added level of attraction. When we see athletes who masterfully execute seemingly superhuman feats, all at the risk of their own well-being, we as fans develop a much greater appreciation for the truly remarkable skills that those athletes possess.

Finally, the Olympics are considered “special.” Why? Because the Olympics are a rare-occurring opportunity for all of the world’s top athletes to congregate in a single exhibition that honors the very best. They are meant to create a sense of “You don’t want to miss this!”… because you know it will not come back any time soon. Yet, it is the Winter Games that seem to embrace the sense of specialness much more than its Summer counterpart.

Perhaps it is because the marquis Summer events are more mainstream. Events like basketball, tennis, volleyball, soccer, baseball (although it will not be included in future Olympics), track and field, and now golf all seem to receive a great deal of attention in American culture. Fans of those events already have ready access on a yearly basis to watch the best in the world compete. Leagues and organizations such as the NBA, FIFA, MLB, PGA, and the ATP World Tour are permeated with international talent, and it is those same athletes who then participate in the Olympic Games, they just wear different shirts.

If I miss the Olympic Basketball tournament, I can still see those same athletes compete against each other in a couple months. Likewise, if I miss the soccer events I have organizations like the MLS, Premiere League, UEFA, or the FIFA World Cup in order to “get my fix” long before the Olympics roll around again. With the exception of hockey (which may be returning to “amateur only” status after Vancouver), the Winter Olympics presents the only real opportunity for fans to see many of these athletes compete together. If I miss out on watching Speed Skating, Downhill Skiing, or Freestyle Moguls as they unfold, I will not get another chance to see that level of elite competition take place for another four years. I will have missed something special.

These athletes may go on to participate in world championships, but the Winter Olympics is the only time when they get to take center stage. After they are done competing, Shani Davis, Lindsey Vonn, and Apollo Ohno will slip into obscurity for another four years, and it will not be until 2014 that these rarely seen (but nonetheless revered) superstars will resurface for another shot at Olympic gold.

The Summer Olympics may offer quantity, but it is the quality of competition that earns the gold medal for the Winter Games. The Winter Olympics present the perfect combination of athleticism, adrenaline, and rarity to let you know that you are watching something great!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Is Phil Mickelson a Cheater Debate – Cheating is in the Ping Eye of the Beholder

February 10, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer about whether or not Phil Mickelson should be perceived as having cheated in golf.



Cheating is a very strong accusation, especially in the world of golf. Considered a “Gentleman’s game,” golfers pride themselves on honor and integrity. It is one of the only sports where self-governing play is expected. Players keep their own scores and are expected to assess their own penalties when necessary.

Phil Mickelson, who is generally considered one of golf’s good guys, does not seem to be a cheater. But here we are, discussing a scandalous accusation that Mickelson is manipulating the rules to put himself at a position of advantage over his competition. That is also known as, cheating.

Loyal Homer states that the Ping Eye2 wedge that Mickelson uses creates a ten-percent greater rate of spin on the ball than clubs with “approved” groove patterns. This increased spin can give a greater level of control on chip shots out of the rough, which could make the difference between a birdie and a par. As a result, Loyal Homer claims that Mickelson gains a distinct advantage over those following the rules.

Where Babe Ruthless disagrees, a point that ultimately earned the verdict today, is in pointing out that Mickelson does not have an advantage over the rest of the pool. In fact, EVERY player has the ability to use the same club that Mickelson does. Whether other players choose to use that club or not is their decision, but at the end of the day, they CAN use that club.

Mickelson may be taking advantage of a loophole in the system, but he is not cheating. An example of cheating would be kicking the ball a little closer to the hole when no one is looking, or picking up your ball to improve a lie in the rough. Using a club that everyone else can use is just playing the game.

The real problem here, as Mickelson himself points out, is in the vague presentation of the rules. Blaming Mickelson for using a club that is permitted in play is like getting mad at someone on the highway for driving five miles-per-hour slower than the speed limit. In both cases, people interpret the rules differently, but nobody is actually violating the rules. Just because you do not like getting stuck behind someone driving 50 in a 65 mph zone does not mean they are bad drivers (Editor’s note: Bleacher Fan drives like a grandma.), or that they are doing something wrong.

Accusing Mickelson of cheating is misdirected attention that distracts from the real problem. If the use of this club truly affects the how level the playing field is then it is the responsibility of the PGA to prohibit it. Until that takes place, play on, Phil!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Is Phil Mickelson a Cheater Debate – There may be a Cheater in Golf, and it is NOT Tiger?!

February 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer about whether or not Phil Mickelson should be perceived as having cheated in golf.



If I asked you what one word BEST described Mark McGwire, Jose Canseco, and Alex Rodriguez, what word comes to mind? Most people would say, “Cheater.” Yet, when McGwire, Canseco, A-Rod – and a host of other so-called “cheaters” – used steroids there was no penalty for the use of those particular substances. Still, they violated the spirit of the rules prohibiting the use of illegal substances in baseball, and are perceived as cheaters.

So if I asked you for one word to now describe one of golf’s favorite sons, does the same word come to mind? Well, it does if we are talking about Tiger (HEY-OH!), but he is not who I am referring to today. I am actually talking about Phil Mickelson, and there is at least one person out there who HAS accused Mickelson of cheating in the game of golf.

Twenty years ago, the United States Golf Association (USGA) passed a rule banning the use of certain wedges because of the groove pattern they used. The ruling, which was adopted by the PGA, was created because the groove pattern on these wedges produced a greater amount of spin that what was considered acceptable in competition play.

A caveat to this rule, though, was the grandfathering in of clubs that were manufactured before April 1, 1990. Because the USGA and the PGA feared negative backlash from major manufacturers of clubs (and the players who used them), they applied the rule only to those clubs produced after the rule was in place. If a player was using a club manufactured BEFORE April of 1990, they would be allowed to continue using that club, despite the newly banned groove pattern.

Phil Mickelson’s Ping Eye2 wedge is one of those clubs.

Several players on the PGA Tour have voiced concerns about the use of clubs such as Mickelson’s Ping Eye2, but it was not until last week, when fellow Tour member Scott McCarron boldly referred to it as “cheating,” that it became a heated topic.

Although McCarron has since apologized for his accusations, under the threat of legal action from Mickelson for slanderous statements, the words are out there. Enter, The Sports Debates.

Under the current rule structure, is Phil Mickelson cheating if he continues to use his Ping Eye2 wedge?

Mickelson is technically not breaking any rules with the use of the wedge, but many feel that he is violating the spirit of the rule which bans that groove pattern, and is unfairly taking advantage of a loophole in the system in order to give himself a competitive edge that his opponents do not take advantage of.

Loyal Homer will argue that Mickelson is cheating, despite the loophole in the rules which technically permits the use of his wedge, while Babe Ruthless will argue that he is not.

As for Bleacher Fan, I will be contemplating the sad state of current affairs for the PGA Tour which, without Tiger’s storied feats on (and apparently off) the course to talk about, has nothing better to focus on than the groove pattern of Mickelson’s wedges. Is that REALLY the biggest story that the PGA has to offer now? What’s next – a scandal about Padraig Harrington, dimple counts, and repairing divots?!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Usain Bolt vs. The World Debate – Faster than a Speeding Bullet

August 25, 2009

Read the debate intro and read Sports Geek’s argument that Bolt is not the most dominate athlete of all time .



Superhuman speed is defined as having the “ability to move at speeds much faster than a normal human.” Superman, one of the more famous superheroes that has been around for nearly eighty years, is often said to be “faster than a speeding bullet.” Well guess what folks? Superman never ran against Usain Bolt. He is that fast. He really does have “superhuman speed.” Bleacher Fan is asking Sports Geek and I to determine if Bolt is the most dominant athlete ever. After reviewing the dominance of other athletes in history like Tiger Woods, Roger Federer, and Muhammad Ali (who famously claimed he was the greatest), I think that Bolt is easily the most dominant ever! USAIN is INSANE!

“Lightning Bolt,” as he is often called, is a 23-year old Jamaican sprinter who has won gold medals and world records, often breaking records that he previously broke. Seriously, folks, have you seen how fast Bolt is? If you have not, take a look at this. If that does not convince you, then maybe this
video will. My goodness, it is almost like he was literally shot out of a cannon.

As far as his dominance goes, let’s just evaluate his most recent performances at the Berlin World Championships. In facing American and rival Tyson Gay in the 100 meter dash in Berlin, he had a chance to get the attention of millions across the world. He was already well-established as a sprinter, due to his accomplishments in the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing. Let’s face it – when you beat an American in an event, and a known one such as Gay, you get extra attention in the USA. Y.E. Yang has certainly elevated his status after defeating Tiger Woods at the PGA Championship a couple of weeks ago.

Not only did Bolt defeat Gay in the 100m dash, but he defeated him rather convincingly, setting a 100 meter world record by running it with a record time of 9.58 seconds. Gay ran a 9.71, which is good enough for third all time behind Bolt’s 9.58 and Bolt’s 9.69 then record setting run in Beijing. You may think that shaving off over a tenth of a second is not that impressive. But, in a sport where every millisecond is of the utmost importance, it is beyond impressive. Not resting on his laurels, Bolt next ran in the 200 meter final. He finished with a time of 19.19, obliterating the previous record. He won the race by the biggest margin in World Championships history.

What makes Bolt the most dominant is the fact that he has not been beaten on the grand stage. Not only has he not been beaten, but he has won convincingly, and set records, and then broke his own records along the way. Without question, Tiger Woods is dominant in the game of golf. But he was recently defeated at the PGA Championship by a player previously ranked 110th in the Official World Golf Ranking. Lance Armstrong, while impressive, did not win the 2009 Tour De France. Michael Phelps totally dominated at the 2008 Summer Olympics, but he did lose earlier this year. Roger Federer is dominant in the sport of tennis, but he has shown that Rafael Nadal is his kryptonite, losing three times to him in the past eighteen months in grand slam finals (2008 French Open, 2008 Wimbledon, 2009 Australian Open). How can you be the most dominant if you have lost in a big event? Usain Bolt has no Kryptonite. Maybe he is faster than a speeding bullet. Maybe that would be more of a competition than him racing against mortal humans.

Plus, he has a really cool name!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The USGA Betting Debate – A Little Blustering Never Hurt Anyone!

July 21, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the USGA was justified in their decision.



(editor’s note: Bleacher Fan is on vacation. Sort of.)

Greetings from the deck of the S.S. Badger! If you ever get a chance, take a ride across Lake Michigan on one of the famous “carferries” – you will not be disappointed!

However, after a trying journey to my vacation destination I’m a little tired and crabby. So, I feel like I’m in just the right mood to tell the USGA what I think about their decision to revoke Dusty Schmidt’s amateur status. IT STINKS!

Schmidt, who had recently returned to the game of golf after recuperating from a heart-attack five years earlier, decided to issue a “Million Dollar Challenge.” You see, Schmidt was also a professional poker player, and he saw an opportunity to combine the things he enjoyed – golf, poker, and competing for money – and offered $1M to any person who could beat him both at 72 holes of golf AND several hands of heads-up poker.

Well, nobody took him up on his offer, so the challenge went dormant, or so Schmidt thought. Apparently, the USGA felt that his challenge, which never materialized and is therefore nothing more than idle conversation, was “in violation of the spirit of the game.”

So the question I have for the USGA is… “What about his actions was so wrong?”

Was it that he made a public offer looking for competition in a proposition game? I’ve got news for the USGA – that’s what a Skins competition is. When two people play the same hole, and the person with the best score wins prize money, THAT’S proposition golfing. So it’s okay for a professional to play a proposition game when the prizes are funded by sponsors, but an amateur is not allowed to put up his OWN money in a proposition game? That doesn’t seem fair to me!

Was it the fact that Schmidt brought the “seedy” element of gambling into this fine, upstanding gentleman’s game, besmirching the good image of this noblest of sports? Before I hear an answer to that question, let me be clear on something – John Daly, a PROFESSIONAL golfer, can publicly admit to drinking, gambling, and drug addictions. He can be charged with domestic violence, can physically assault fans of the sport – DURING PLAY, no less – and be charged with public intoxication… and he only receives a six month suspension from the PGA. But, an amateur who does nothing more than offer a prize to anyone who can beat him at both golf AND poker is acting inappropriately and should have his status revoked?! Where’s the consistency?!

I understand that the USGA and the PGA are two different organizations, but they represent the same game, and so fans will naturally associate the two as a single body. If the interest of the USGA is to protect the image of the game of golf, they are going about it the wrong way. Especially when you consider the fact that friendly wagers in private golf games happen every day!

Instead, the USGA should partner with the PGA to identify what type of behavior is REALLY unbecoming of a golfer – such as committing a crime – and let the guys who just want to have some fun playing the game they love have their fun.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The John Daly Debate – The Not-So-Loveable Loser

June 15, 2009



Golf is an honorable game with a storied tradition. That tradition should NOT include John Daly!

There have been many feel-good stories throughout golf’s history. Tiger Woods is one of those feel-good stories. Whether discussing his 2006 season, where he racked up 6 consecutive tournament victories following the death of his father, Earl, or the 2008 U.S. Open where he limped his way to victory over Rocco Mediate on a severely injured knee, Tiger has been a part of recent examples that will surely be remembered in golf lore for years to come.

There’s the story of Payne Stewart, golf’s all-around good-guy. Stewart is remembered for several notable moments, including a 15-foot putt at Pinehurst to close out the final hole of the U.S. Open in 1999. There is the time when he won the Tournament at Bay Hill in 1987 and donated the entire sum of his winnings – $108,000 – to the Florida Hospital Circle of Friends in memory of his father, Bill, who passed away from cancer. Most notable is the ghostly image of a bag-piper crossing a fog-covered green at the Tour Championship in Houston in October of 1999, and the sight of many of Stewart’s friends playing the next day in plus-fors as homage to their beloved colleague and friend whose life had tragically ended in a plane crash one week before the event.

There’s Jack Nicklaus, the “Golden Bear.” Nicklaus made a promise to his son, Craig, who was dying of a rare type of bone cancer at age 11. He said he would wear yellow at every tournament he played in, which he proudly did for his son. Fast-forward to 1986 at Augusta National where Nicklaus, still wearing yellow, embraces another of his sons and his caddie, Jackie, as he claimed his record sixth Green Jacket at the age of 46.

There are many magical stories with many wonderful thoughts and sentiments attached to them.

Compare those to the story of John Daly. A man who has been charged multiple times with multiple offenses, including a most recent incident where he was arrested outside of a Hooters Restaurant for appearing intoxicated in October of 2008. This incident led to his third suspension from golf. His first suspension resulted from a domestic-violence charge, and the second stems from an incident at Kapalua Golf Course where he just picked his ball up off the course on 11 and skipped to the 12th tee in 1993.

Daly is an admitted alcoholic and drug user who has also confessed to a gambling addiction. He has been involved in embarrassing incidents both on and off the course. Consider his run-in with a spectator during the opening round of the Australian Open in 2008, where he smashed the spectator’s camera into a tree.

John Daly’s presence on the PGA Tour has resulted in numerous black marks on a game which prides itself on honor and dignity. Daly’s behavior has been anything BUT honorable and dignified.

Now, the golfing world holds its collective breath as Daly makes yet another return to the game which he has disgraced many times over. Has Daly truly seen the error of his ways? Will he take steps to make up for all the wrong he has done, both personally and professionally? My answer to those questions is – who Cares?! John Daly has had more than his fair share of mulligans. I cannot name one quality that I find endearing, and can’t fathom actually cheering for him as he sets foot on the tee-box at a major tournament. He has exhausted any good will that I might have for a man in his situation.

I do not feel that he is worthy of the fans support, especially in a game where so many good and honorable things have happened throughout history.
If you want a REAL player worth cheering for this year at Bethpage Black, site of this year’s U.S. Open, it’s Phil Mickelson. Mickelson has been one of the PGA’s great ambassadors during his career. He has sponsored or founded multiple charities, and always carries himself in a way befitting the dignity of a golfer. Now Mickelson faces a new challenge, supporting his wife, Amy, who was recently diagnosed with breast cancer. The U.S. Open will mark his second tournament since the discovery of her disease. I’ll be watching and cheering for Mickelson AND his family because they truly deserve all the support they can get.

Read the debate intro and Loyal Homer’s opinion.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.