The Football Feast Winner Debate – SEC Recruits Future Wins From the ACC

November 30, 2009

Read the arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer about which teams or conferences won the Thanksgiving football feast over the long weekend.



It’s good to be the SEC right now. National title hopes? Check. Multiple spots in the highly-lucrative BCS games? Check. Dominate the other regional conference? Check. Winner of Thanksgiving 2009’s Football Feast? Check!

Every rabid college football fan knows how important recruiting is. Sure, some college football writers like Sports Illustrated writer Stewart Mandel have indelicate names for these rabid fans, but I call them smart. These types of fans are tuned in; they understand not just how to win game to game but how to build a sustainable program. True fans believe in program building. Fair weather fans worry about games or select seasons. It’s the difference between rooting for a football team and rooting for a football program.

Every rabid college football fan knows that the SEC wiped the floor with the ACC over the Thanksgiving holiday, further complicating the ACC’s attempt to climb back to national relevance with powerhouse recruiting. Most importantly, all of the recruits that were visiting those home SEC games, those intrastate rivalry games, would be fools to choose the ACC school.

The ACC had three opportunities over the weekend to assert itself as a conference that rivaled the talent level and energy of the SEC, and all were extremely important within each state. At each of these games the cream of the recruiting crop in each state was in attendance and observed an SEC whooping.

The first game took place in South Carolina where a 6-5 South Carolina team was hosting an 8-3 Clemson team that already clinched its division and has an opportunity to take a run at a BCS. Clemson had the record, the momentum, and the star in running back CJ Spiller. But the entire team laid a massive egg in a 34-17 loss. The inability to stop the run (223 yards allowed on the ground) and the inability run the ball (net 48 rushing yards) taught an important lesson to lineman and skill player recruits in attendance – if the game is won in the trenches, one team can win and one team cannot. South Carolina’s finest no doubt took note. A seemingly down and out SEC team with a bad record beat an ACC division winner.

Virtually a carbon copy of the South Carolina game emerged in Georgia. The seventh ranked Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets saw senior night ruined at the oldest stadium in college football in the famed rivalry, “Clean, Old Fashioned Hate.” Georgia racked up a 30-24 victory and gave Tech a taste of its own medicine, limiting the Jackets to just over 200 yards on the ground – well below the team’s average – and amassed 339 against the Jackets’ defense. Georgia is one of the premier recruiting states for high school football with two established and elite programs in the state. As good of a coach and a recruiter as Tech head coach Paul Johnson is, it is a tough sell sitting in the homes of some of the elites in Georgia when a clearly inferior Georgia team dominated a supposedly superior Tech team.

Last, in a game I actually believed would be good, Florida dismantled a bad Florida State team. Yet another talent-rich recruiting state – probably the best of the three – saw the SEC team in the rivalry completely destroy the ACC counterpart, this time 37-10. In keeping with the running theme, Florida ran for 311 yards to FSU’s 83.

In all three cases the SEC had a more dominant offensive and defensive line than the ACC did. For the ACC to catch up with the SEC in terms of talent, it has to show improvement between the hash marks, not just at the skill positions. The ACC showed it still has a long, long way to go.

It does not matter that the ACC is better than the Big East, or that some teams in the ACC are better than others as we learned last weekend. There are few weekends – few opportunities – each football season for the ACC to prove to the SEC and the world that it is equal or better than the SEC, and begin balancing out the one-sided recruiting contest. The ACC had a massive opportunity in important, in-state chief rivalry games, and the entire conference blew it. Know the lesson that was taught now, see the results of the lesson on the first Tuesday in February.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Monday Morning Referee Debate – Be Transparent Or Sacrifice Fairness

October 13, 2009

Read the debate intro and Bleacher Fan’s argument that there is no need for college football conferences to publically acknowledge a blown call by a referee.



For fans, there are few occurrences in sports as irksome as a blown call by a referee. Fans have all of the technology during a broadcast, the instant replays, and the “expert” analysis at our disposal that aid in our evaluation of a particular play in college football. Sitting helplessly in our living room as a referee or an officiating crew blatantly blows the call on what appears to be an obvious play is downright maddening. For me, it does not even matter if a play was in my team’s favor or not. It truly bugs me if the refs get a call wrong, period – regardless of which team the blown call benefits.

The definition of “getting a call wrong” goes beyond the possibility of a ref simply calling a receiver out of bounds when they catch the ball inbounds. Getting a call wrong can mean the referee has subjectively interpreted a rule too loosely or too strictly. Consider, for example, the situation in the SEC a couple of weeks ago, and presented so concisely by Loyal Homer in the intro. Georgia standout wide receiver A.J. Green made a very impressive catch, then ran to his teammates to for the standard high fives and jumping that come with any touchdown these days. The referee decided it was time to call a penalty for “excessive celebration” – despite the fact that many agree there was nothing excessive about Green’s actions. A 15-yard penalty was called, and the penalty was enforced on the kickoff – giving LSU outstanding field position and a short field to drive to tie the game.

Now, any coach worth a salt will refuse to admit that one bad call from an official can influence the outcome of a game. Those coaches are correct. Many factors go in to determining the winner and loser of any game. However, this bad call gave LSU the opening it needed for a short field and a very manageable shot to tie the game. The fan rightfully dismisses the coach speak and correctly identifies that the call had a significant impact on the game. Thank goodness for fans.

The SEC could have easily turned a blind eye to a potentially ugly situation and hoped it would go away. It seems rational that the conference would want to stand by an official’s decision, too. The conference must protect its own employees, right? Thankfully… wrong. Instead, the conference and its leadership did the right thing. The SEC’s Director of Officials, Rogers Redding, publicly acknowledged the poor judgment exhibited by the league’s official, calling it a “teachable moment.” The move helped to quiet some of the a growing fan discontent and restored a sense of fairness to college football.

On the surface it may appear as though referees are now in the doghouse and that the entire sports-loving culture thinks they are a bunch of schmucks that deserve to be hung out to dry if the slightest mistake it made. While referees may not like the new paradigm, it is essential for fans. Conference leaders must make decisions on the belief that officials are human beings. Pretending they are perfect, in the age of 15 replays per play and YouTube, is not longer acceptable.

Sports are simple to digest. They are also entertaining – but, they are also controlled. The rules are well known, and it is bothersome when they are not followed. Without delving too deeply into sports psychology, one of the many elements of sports fans love is the sense of fairness. There is a clear right, and a clear wrong. With the many factors that are difficult to control in our own lives, sports are an area where right and wrong matter – and where they are enforced. When officials blow a call in an obvious way, and the conference fails to acknowledge the blown call, the sense of fairness in sports (and life) begins to erode. A lot of erosion leads to shrinking ticket sales… all because a foundational moral of sports – and life – has been violated.

College football, perhaps more than any other sport, generates fan craziness en masse. Mix that special and inherent craziness with bad calls and a lack of fairness… and explosive, anger filled situations are created. These tenuous situations are entirely avoidable. Refs are human. They will make mistakes. Because every play is so heavily emphasized in college football, those mistakes often grow into national sports events. But, when a conference fails to at least put out a statement when a blatant bad call changes or influences the outcome of a game, fans’ collective intelligence is insulted in a potentially dangerous way – something a conference must try and avoid. Consider that if fans will turn over police cars, burn couches, etc. when their team wins… imagine what can happen when they unjustly lose?

The danger for college sports, and for sports in general, is when that formerly strong anger and outcry from the masses of fans becomes apathy. That is when ticket sales stop, programs wilt, and conferences die. For the good of college football, for the good of conferences, for the good of sports, keep acknowledging bad calls, conference leaders. What may seem very uncomfortable in the short run is in reality the best thing for conferences and fans alike.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate – SEC Versus Big XII Continues!

September 4, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s argument about which game they feel is the most important game of the upcoming weekend.



I have already spent some time this week researching and writing about how I believe the Big XII is a better overall conference than the SEC. Surprisingly, many of our readers did not agree (please take note of the heavy sarcasm). College football fans do not have to wait long to recharge this conference debate, as high rankings and expectations invade Stillwater, Oklahoma Saturday as #13 Georgia visits #9 Oklahoma State in the best game of the upcoming weekend.

This game is important for many reasons. First, one of the biggest stories for college football this season involves which conference is the best conference, and the only two legitimate participants in that debate to begin the season are the SEC and the Big XII. Last season the SEC was a touch better than the Big XII, especially in bowl games as Ole Miss defeated Texas Tech in the Cotton Bowl and, of course, Florida crushed Oklahoma in the BCS national title game. But, 2009 is a new season and fans and pundits alike are focusing on this game as the first impression and benchmark to judge if the balance of power in college football has begun to shift.

But this game is more than just conference versus conference. Each team is also struggling for recognition within their respective divisions and conferences. Georgia is living in the shadow of their cocktail cohorts, Florida. Oklahoma State is overshadowed not only by their intrastate rival Oklahoma, but by virtually every other team in the Big XII South (sorry, Baylor). A win for either team changes the way their opponents and the media perceives them. For Georgia, it would be a significant road win against a tough opponent to start the season. There may be more pressure on Oklahoma State to win this game since it is a home game, and since the Cowboys return a powerhouse trio of skill players in junior wide receiver Dez Bryant, senior quarterback Zac Robinson, and junior running back Kendall Hunter.

While Oklahoma State returns important skill players, Georgia is looking to replace several. Gone are starting quarterback Matthew Stafford and starting tailback Knowshon Moreno. Enter Joe Cox and the oft-injured running back Caleb King battling with the impressive new name running back, Richard Samuel.

In short, Oklahoma State – and by extension the Big XII – is expected to win the first big contest of the season. The most pressure is on the Cowboys, and it is becoming obvious. Head coach Mike Gundy this week banned his players from speaking to the media. While I believe sometimes the media gets more bent out of shape that they should about a coaching decision that limits their access, the story does give some insight into the mindset of the coach steering the program. Sports Illustrated’s Andy Staples called Gundy’s decision a “classic pucker move.” The decision places even more public pressure on Gundy. Fans do not mind odd behavior from their coach – as long as the team is winning.

Each team shares the spotlight on the first afternoon of college football in the 2009 season. A win is important for the immediate future of each program. If Oklahoma State wins, they are considered legitimate contenders in the Big XII, and Oklahoma is a little more concerned about Bedlam. If Georgia wins in an upset the team gains much needed confidence, not only in more experienced offensive in defensive lines, but also in a new starting quarterback. Winning an important road game against a major conference opponent is a big deal, and a very good way to start the season.

Each program has the opportunity this Saturday to set the tone for their teams, their conferences, and their seasons. Not only will this be the best game of the weekend, it will be the most interesting when considering the far-ranging conference versus conference implications.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Psychology of the Pre-Season Poll Debate – What is the Function of a Pre-Season Poll?

July 30, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that a pre-season poll should forecast how the season will end and Loyal Homer’s argument that it should provide a real-time snapshot of the best teams in college football.



Football is just around the corner. As we wait with bated breath for the release of the college football preseason top 25 rankings, questions abound regarding where the each team will fall.

Florida is a likely candidate for the number one spot, but what about Texas, or Oklahoma? Where does the Pac-10 or the Big Ten come into the equation? How do you rank Southern Cal and Ohio State when they will be playing each other early in September?

With all the speculation swirling around, it makes me wonder how to interpret the pre-season polls once they are released. For example, if Florida does in fact receive the number one ranking, does that mean that the pollsters feel that the Gators are pre-season favorites to win the BCS National Championship, or does it mean that they are just ranked as the best team TODAY, and we’ll have to wait and see if they still are the best team tomorrow?

For the 2008 season, Georgia was named the pre-season number one team, but they finished the season without even making a BCS appearance, instead facing Michigan State in the Capital One Bowl. Does that mean the pollsters were wrong when they filled out their pre-season ballots, or were the Bulldogs in fact the best team in the country at the time of the polling?

In fairness, no one possesses the clairvoyance of Carnac the Magnificent, so predicting the future is impossible. Does that mean that the pollsters get a bye if their preseason pick for number one loses the first three games of the season?

It is for this reason that I look to my esteemed colleagues for assistance.

What is the better philosophy to employ when a developing a college football pre-season poll?

Obviously these are consensus polls, so opinions will differ from one voter to the next. However, shouldn’t the general principle on who to vote for be the same, regardless of the person voting?

With that thought in mind, Sports Geek will argue that the best philosophy when constructing a pre-season poll is to rank the teams in order of which is most likely to win the National Championship. After all, isn’t that who the number one team is at the end of the season?

On the other hand, Loyal Homer will argue that the best philosophy is to vote based on the current state of the teams. Rather than attempt prognostication, a pollster should rank the teams based solely on who they feel the best team is TODAY, understanding that circumstances arise which may change the status of who the best team is TOMORROW.

As I gaze into my crystal ball, I see… a bicycle in the basement of the Alamo! No, wait, I see the winner of this debate. And it is…

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.