The Biggest Story of the World Cup Debate… Fate Controlled by the Whims of the FIFA Gods

June 28, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Sports Geek.

There are two things that sports fans in America hate.

The first thing we hate is poor officiating. Blown calls by officials, especially at pivotal moments in high-profile matches, fall under the classification of intolerable by the American sports fan. As painful as it may be to lose justifiably at the hands of an opponent on the field, it is nonetheless acceptable. However, when victory is UNJUSTLY robbed thanks to the mistake of a trained professional who is supposed to PROTECT the integrity of the game, it is an outrage.

The second thing that American’s hate in sports (for the most part) is a boring game with no scoring and no resolution. To the average sports fan, offense equals points, and points are what equal excitement.

One of the biggest criticisms that sports fans in America have for soccer is the lack of scoring that takes place. For fans who enjoy seeing basketball scoreboards lit up with triple-digit figures in just 48 minutes of actual competition, a 90-minute marathon that ends in a 0-0 tie is just something that we as offense-crazed junkies simply cannot fathom.

What do you get when you put those two things together? The World Cup!

Now that more Americans than ever before are caught up with World Cup fever, the biggest story from the tournament has been the horrible officiating of the FIFA crews, wrongfully perpetuating low scores by disallowing perfectly legitimate goals.

It is no wonder that soccer is not more popular in the United States. Even the goals that ARE scored aren’t allowed to count! If this is the very best that soccer has to offer – artificially manufactured scores from a competition that fails to recognize and fully reward the best play – then maybe soccer is not as good as it is cracked up to be.

In a sport that is already criticized for having too little scoring you would think that the FIFA directors would want to do everything in their power to make sure that every possible point is LEGALLY put on the board, especially during the biggest tournament of any sport in the entire world. Instead, what we have learned is that they are actually content to let the on-field officials strip goals away on a whim.

Forgive my American egotism, but at least OUR sports organizations (the NFL, NBA, MLB, etc.) take active measures to ensure that the game is decided by the PLAYERS on the field as much as possible. I know I am just a dumb American who doesn’t understand soccer, but isn’t that why the game is played, to see which TEAM is better? Instead, the FIFA officiating crews have usurped the player’s right to play the game, and their opinions have determined the outcome far too many times.

And it is not like this is a rare occurrence that happens only once in a very great while.

The United States alone fell victim to two such instances within a five-day span, once versus Slovenia and the other against Algeria, both of which could have cost the American side the opportunity to make it out of its group. In both cases, the United States scored perfectly legitimate goals, but was not rewarded. Instead, the goals were not counted because some official simply SAID that a rule was broken. They couldn’t TELL you which rule was broken, there was no EVIDENCE of a broken rule, and review of the tape confirms that both goals SHOULD have counted. Still, the American side was not rewarded.

The U.S. was are not alone, either. Many nations have suffered injustice at the hands of this horribly mismanaged and poorly implemented system. Yesterday featured two MORE games that were both marred by game-changing blown calls.

While trailing 2-1 against the Germans, England scored a goal which would have tied the match. The ball hit the cross-bar, bounced INSIDE the goal (again, review of the tape CONFIRMS this fact), then was grabbed by the opposing goalkeeper and quickly kicked away. That goal was not counted, and Germany remained ahead on the scoreboard 2-1.

In the second match, the refs got it wrong the other way by actually allowing a goal that should not have been. Argentina scored a goal from a player who was BLATANTLY offside, but the officials counted it.

It seems like the only goals that count at the World Cup are the ones that are scored while VIOLATING rules.

In fairness to the World Cup officials, this is not a new problem in soccer. During World Cup qualifiers, for example, Ireland was eliminated from qualification thanks to a blown call by the officials. In that case, French striker Thierry Henry committed an intentional handball en route to assisting a game-winning goal that cost the Irish an opportunity to play in South Africa.

Once more, a team was cheated out of what they had rightfully earned, all at the hands of officials who perpetually get it wrong.

I don’t mean to diminish the role that the officials play on the field. With 22 different players running around, kicking each other and then theatrically flopping to the ground (there is an ad before the video starts… be patient, it’s worth it!) as though they had just broken every bone in their body, all hoping to draw a penalty, officials have a very difficult role to fill. Added to that responsibility is the fact that the entire world is literally judging their every decision.

Their task is not an enviable one, and I do not blame the individual officials for the problem that exists. Instead, I blame FIFA.

Those within the FIFA organization KNOW the kind of scrutiny that the games are subjected to, and they KNOW the difficulty that the officials have to fairly call a match, and yet they still send their crews out to the wolves, armed with nothing more than a whistle and two plastic cards.

I have written it before, and I will write it again – if the technology exists to support the officials in their mission to PROTECT the integrity of the game, then it MUST be used. Failure to do so results is willing permission of one of the greatest injustices that can occur in sports, which are supposed to be governed by the principles of FAIR play.

While the problem of poor officiating extends to all sports, the frequency and apparent tolerance of it at the World Cup has made a mockery out of what is supposed to be the greatest sporting event in the entire world.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Toughest World Cup Grouping Debate… The Group of Death

June 11, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

It is finally here!

The biggest sporting event of the summer kicks off today, as Host South Africa takes on Mexico to officially kick off the 2010 FIFA World Cup.

In the question of which World Cup grouping is the toughest, though, that question is EASILY answered by three words – Group. Of. Death.

There really isn’t much of a debate to this one, as much of the soccer-loving world (i.e. much of the world) already has unofficially dubbed the teams of Group G with such an ominous moniker, and I think it is almost impossible to argue with them.

Why is it the ‘Group of Death’? Group G claims two of the top five teams in the nation (Brazil and Portugal), as well as the Ivory Coast (arguably Africa’s best hope for a title contender in this tournament), and North Korea. Each of the Group G Squads claims their own superstar talent, and the two teams that survive this first round of games (no matter who they are) will be the two most battle-tested teams alive in the tournament, and both will be legitimate contenders to make a deep run in their chase for the Cup.

Sitting in the top-seeded spot (although that is only by technicality) is the Brazilian team, who are ranked number one in the World according to the FIFA World Rankings. This team, who last year beat the U.S. in come-from-behind fashion to claim the 2009 FIFA Confederations Cup, already has five World Cup Championships to their name, and is led by one of the greatest players in the game today, the man simply known as Kaka.

Kaka, the 2007 World Player trophy winner, has one of the toughest shots in the game, and will certainly be a threat to score often during this 2010 World Cup tournament.

Standing in Brazil’s way, though, is the team from Portugal, who would have been clear favorites to win any of the other Groups in the tournament, had they not drawn so unfortunately. Currently ranked third in the World standings, Portugal claims their own star-studded roster, including Kaka’s Real Madrid teammate, Portugal’s team captain Cristiano Ronaldo. Ronaldo, whose speed on the field makes him nearly impossible to defend, claims what is likely the most dangerous foot in soccer.

Not far behind Portugal and Brazil, though, sits the Ivory Coast, who will be all too happy to pounce on the first mistake made by either of the Groups two favorites. Many have pegged the Ivory Coast as a dark horse contender who may even challenge for the cup, but of course, that would mean either Brazil or Portugal had failed to make it out of the first round.

Adding to the challenges for Ivory Coast is the recent injury for their star forward, Didier Drogba, whose return is not yet certain after having had surgery on his fractured arm last week. Drogba, who also leads England’s Chelsea club in Premier League play, netted an astonishing 44 goals last year in combined competition, and his presence (or lack thereof) on the field could be all the difference in the life or death of the Ivory Coast team.

Rounding out the Group is the North Korean team, who play the unfortunate role of longshot in this Group. Relatively untested, the North Korean team emerged as one of four qualifiers from the AFC, and will certainly have their work cut out for them if they hope to challenge in this first round of games.

Group G is called the Group of Death for a reason. Even the so-called favorites within the Group (whose rosters collectively comprise a who’s-who list of soccer’s elite) cannot be perceived as such when matched up against their competition.

Scoring will be high and the competition will be fierce. There are no free rides in Group G, and the squads that emerge victorious will certainly have earned their stripes in this one, as they will have already conquered legitimate cup contenders just to survive the first round.

This will be fun to watch!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Coaching Authority Debate Verdict

June 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Coaches have a great deal of responsibility heaped onto their shoulders.

While they do not actively participate in the on-field action, they are nonetheless responsible for the outcome of the game. That responsibility comes partly in the way of developing strategy and evaluating in-game situations to determine the best approach for execution of the strategy.

More importantly, though, it requires the coach to prepare their athletes, both mentally and physically, for the rigors of the event they are about to undertake. Coaches are required to train and develop their team, constantly challenging them to be better today than they were yesterday, and as the level of competition increases, so does the level of expectation that must be met by the athletes.

Fabio Capello, manager for England’s National Soccer Team, has banned sexual activity for his athletes, and plans to enforce that ban through surveillance technology. His intention is to keep his team physically focused, and minimize the exposure of extra-curricular physical activity. Based on the arguments presented through debating whether or not Capello’s actions are acceptable, I am awarding this verdict to Babe Ruthless.

As pointed out by Babe Ruthless, policies prohibiting fraternization are not new to athletics. In fact, this anti-fraternization policy may not be as rare as you think. Is this really any different from training camp, where many (if not all) teams require that their athletes bunk together in dormitories, leaving their families behind for extended periods of time?

While the prohibition of sex with their significant others at training camp may not be explicitly stated, often times it is nonetheless implied and enforced as a byproduct of each athlete’s forced seclusion from their families.

Socializing of any kind is often perceived as a distraction, and the coach has the responsibility to limit distraction as much as possible.

To Loyal Homer’s point, Capello’s decision to enforce the ban through the use of surveillance comes off a bit creepy. Creepy, however, does not equal inappropriate.

As athletes climb the ranks of competition and reach higher levels of play, they must consequently make greater sacrifices, both in their commitment of time, and in the transparency of what they do.

When an athlete has committed to compete at a level that requires the absolute highest degrees of human athleticism, they are obligated to take every possible measure to ensure that they maintain their peak physical condition.

While Bob, the second-baseman for your work softball team may get by with no practice, a bad diet, and exercise that falls somewhere in the range of sparse and non-existent, that regimen simply would not cut it for the world class athlete.

Where Bob’s training may involve a Philly Cheesesteak, two beers, a Marlboro, and five jumping-jacks (accompanied by pained wheezing, panting, and profuse sweating), the world class athlete must spend HOURS in the gym every day. Once the gym time is complete, drills and practices are executed, and that is followed by film study. Adding to the physical demands is a specially customized diet that is designed to maximize the athlete’s health, strength, and stamina.

To ensure compliance with all those regulations, the athlete is supervised and tested while they exercise and study. They are measured and weighed, poked and prodded, all in an effort to validate the success or failure of that athlete’s commitment to training and development.

Likewise, drug use and steroids are prohibited, and enforcement of those policies can be far more invasive than simply using a camera to check in on what the team is doing.

Capello’s use of camera technology is just a hi-tech version of knocking on his players’ doors and peering in. He is not using the cameras in any covert manner, his players are aware that they are being monitored, and they have not been asked to comply with any illicit or illegal requests. Capello just wants to make sure that his team is in the best possible condition, as they will be representing their entire country in front of the whole world in sports single greatest competition.

The ban and its enforcement may seem extreme, but so is the level of expectation that these athletes must meet. If Capello, as coach and leader for the team, feels that enforcement of this ban will help make his team better, then he is well within his rights to implement it.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Coaching Authority Debate

June 8, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Distractions can be a bad thing to a team, especially as they prepare for a major game or tournament. Part of the head coach’s job throughout that preparation, therefore, is to help their team remain focused through prevention and elimination of as many distractions as possible.

During the 2010 ACC and March Madness Basketball Tournaments, for example, Georgia Tech coach Paul Hewitt banned the use of cell phones with his team to eliminate just such a distraction.

Whether the cell phone ban had any direct impact on their performance or not may never be proven (although they were relatively successful throughout the postseason), but it surely couldn’t have hurt anything.

So as Soccer Teams from around the world continue their preparation for the 2010 FIFA World Cup, it should be expected that coaches around the world are also doing their parts to minimize distractions from the game.

But can that effort be taken too far?

For the English team, head coach Fabio Capello has actually banned sex for his athletes.

To support that ban, he has restricted the amount of fraternization time that his players are permitted with their wives, girlfriends, and significant others to no more than one day, upon the conclusion of each match they play. He has also promised, should his team progress deeper into the tournament, that the restrictions will increase, and fraternization time will be further limited.

Taking that ban a step further, it is reported that he will actually use the televisions in his athlete’s hotel rooms for surveillance, spying on them to ensure enforcement of his no-sex ban.

All of this brings us to our question of the day – Is this level of coaching authority providing too much control for a coach?

To what limits should a coach be allowed to control the off-field actions of their teams?

Babe Ruthless will argue that this level of control is completely acceptable, and that ball-handling should be reserved strictly for the field (hey-oh!), while Loyal Homer will argue that Capello has gone too far, and that some boundaries have to be set even for coaches.

I guess cold showers just aren’t good enough anymore!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Coaching Authority Debate… Feels Great When You Wait

June 8, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

With the World Cup just days away, England’s manager, Fabio Capello, has his team on a lovemaking lockdown. That’s right, in efforts to reduce distraction and exhaustion, Capello is limiting player visits with girlfriends and wives (and let’s be honest about it… mistresses too) to the night following matches with no overnight stays permitted. The coach has prohibited sex for the duration of the tournament.

To enforce the ban, Capello plans on observing the players sex lives, or lack thereof, via high-tech two way television sets in his players’ hotel rooms. Aside from ensuring that Big Ben Roethlisberger will never play soccer for the English, the policy will also provide the coach 24-hour access to his squad, and will assure him the best On Demand movie channels in the hotel.

I, for one, tip my cap to Mr. Capello. He is one of the few coaches that actually gets it -specifically by ensuring that the more his player don’t “get it”, the better they will play. Sure the room cameras may seem a little peeping tom-esque, but it is all in the name of winning for his country.

British sprinter Linford Christie stated that knocking boots (or in his case track shoes) took its toll on him. He described the side effects as making his legs feel like lead. The guy obviously must have been onto something because he was dominant on the track, where he won gold medals at the Olympics, World Championships, European Games, and Commonwealth Games. Muhammad Ali was known to abstain from sex six weeks before a fight, and I think it worked out pretty well for him. Seriously, would you want to climb into the ring with a mean Muhammad Ali who’s been sexually frustrated for more than a month?

In the movie Rocky, Rock’s trainer Mick gave him words to live by that ring especially true for this debate–“women weaken legs!” It’s true. I don’t care what the “research” says, fooling around before the big game is not a good idea. It is just something that a lot of guys have a gut feeling about, which has to count for something. Seriously, when else do you hear men voluntarily avoid sex? I do not think so many guys would support the notion if it did not have some validity. Ultimately, if it was good enough for Rocky Balboa, then its good enough for me.

Although I am sure my competitor for this debate, Loyal Homer, will try to argue that research is on his side, it really is not. The research supporting sex before a big game is ambiguous at best.

For the most part there was a general consensus that making the beast with two backs mere minutes or hours before a sporting event was a bad idea, but the issue became admittedly more debatable when the time frame was bumped back to the night before an event. But for every article I found which stated that pre-game sex held no negative side effects for athletes, there was usually a concession that abstinence also held benefits.

For example, a study which suggested that sex prior to sports could provide benefits by relaxing the participants also conceded the fact that abstinence could also help improve athletes’ focus. Similarly, the same study suggested that sex helped to fight muscle pain (specifically in women), but I also found counter arguments that strenuous positions during sex may actually strain muscles. I even found reports which contradicted the widely held notion that sex increased the amount of testosterone athletes produced, stating that there was no difference. So in the end, because the research tended to lean both ways, you have to go with your gut and I firmly believe that abstinence is the key.

One interesting thing that I learned while researching this debate is that there seems to be a lot of sex taking place at the Olympic Games. In fact Durex, the official condom provider of the Olympics (I promise I’m not making this up) actually keeps up with how many birth control devises they distribute. During the Sydney games the Cuban delegation burned through their allotment faster than any other country. They also finished 8th in the total medal count with only 29 total medals, less than a 1/3 of the medals won by the USA. So perhaps they could have benefited from a little bit of self restraint and abstinence.

Capello’s rule is not unheard of. In fact similar pleasure proliferations can be traced back to the ancient Olympic Games. Capello is just trying to ensure his team gets enough rest with as few distractions as possible. Athletes at this level should understand that they are going to lose some of their right of privacy due to the notoriety which comes from playing for the national team and all the drug screening they undergo. And as for having to keep their hands off of their women, it shouldn’t even be that big a deal for the English team. They should be used to keeping their hands to themselves, because it is not like they can use them in soccer anyways.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Summer’s Best Event Debate… World Watches for a Reason

May 10, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

The entire world will tune into Johannesburg, South Africa, on June 11 as the 2010 FIFA World Cup officially kicks off. Over the following 30 days, 32 teams, each representing 32 different nations, will participate in the single greatest sporting tournament in the entire world.

Even with the global passion for this sport, the single most populous nation that is represented in the 2010 World Cup – the United States of America – ironically does not carry the same level of passion as does the rest of the world. Whatever the reason, the United States does not show nearly the same fervor as is seen elsewhere.

So for all of you American sports fans out there, here are three reasons for why the World Cup is the best sporting event of this summer. And, more importantly, why you should watch it.

REASON #1: 6.5 BILLION People Can’t Be Wrong

Soccer is the most popular sport in the world. It is played by young and old, women and men, and in countries from Canada to Zimbabwe to Japan. There must be a reason that people from the Arctic North share the same passion as those from the Rainforests of South America, the Saharan Desert, and the Australian Outback. Yet, many Americans remain ignorant of the game, and consequently fail to capitalize on an opportunity to BOND with our neighbors.

It makes me think that we are missing out on something!

Reason #2: There is Nothing Wrong With Fitting In

To put it into terms that many Americans can understand… think about the last time you played fantasy football with a guy who doesn’t actually follow the NFL or college football. You know who I’m talking abou, the guy who takes a kicker in the first round of the draft and doesn’t know the difference between Steve Smith of the Giants and Steve Smith of the Panthers.

You probably wouldn’t have even invited him, except that you work with him and he overheard you talking to a couple of guys about it, so you felt guilty about excluding him. But now your draft is loaded with awkward pauses, dirty looks, and a group of ten other KNOWLEDGEABLE football fans who are getting frustrated while you explain the difference between a forced fumble and a fumble recovery.

You don’t mean to judge, but you just can’t help it. You think less of this person, and ultimately end up avoiding them around the office, so as not to be associated with them anymore.

Well, in soccer terms, the United States is THAT avoidable guy. We are the ones that the rest of the world talks about behind our backs. We were only invited to play because our parents were friends with their parents, and so they were FORCED out of guilt to include us, but it is clear that we are just not part of the “cool” crowd. And the real shame is that they would happily welcome us into their group if we just shared something in common with them by paying a little more attention to soccer.

Reason #3: The U.S. Has a Shot

The United States soccer team has the potential to be very successful in this tournament.

In no way am I suggesting that the United States would (or should) be a favorite to win. However, they are also much more than simple underdogs. I would instead like to think of them as a dangerous sleeper (like Butler in the NCAA Basketball tournament) who CAN beat any team, including the best in the world, on any given day.

Their grouping in the first stage includes a suspect English team that has shown a propensity for choking on the big stage when the game matters most, and is rounded off by Algeria and Slovenia (both of whom required last minute heroics against very long odds just to reach the round of 32).

Meanwhile, the United States has played some of the most consistent and impressive international soccer of recent years. Last year the team actually reached the championship match of the FIFA Confederations Cup, which included a stunning 2-0 victory over Spain (the then top-ranked team in the world), and carrying a lead late into the championship game against Brazil (the CURRENT top-ranked team in the world). They have competed in the last three championship matches for the international confederation they belong to (the CONCACAF Gold Cup), winning two out of those three.

Currently ranked number 14 in the world, they have proven the capacity to beat the very best, and could very easily find themselves moving into the second stage of this tournament. From there, ANYTHING is possible!

All of those reasons point to the same conclusion: The 2010 FIFA World Cup will be the best sporting event of the summer, EVEN for American sports fans.

In just one month, 32 teams will represent their respective 1.5 BILLION compatriots in a competition before the eyes of more than SIX BILLION fans, and when all is said and done, one team will stand victorious as the greatest team in the world’s greatest event.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The U.S. Soccer Respect Debate – USA! USA! USA! USA!

June 30, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s opinion.



There are a lot of soccer haters out there… apparently Sports Geek is one of them!

For the first time in history, a United States Men’s Soccer team reached the final game of a major international event. That was not by accident.

Last week, the U.S. Men’s team defeated #1 ranked Spain by a score of 2-0 in the FIFA Confederations Cup Semi-Final match. A Spanish team, by the way, which was coming off of a 2008 UEFA Euro Cup Championship, and came into the semis riding both a 35-game undefeated streak and a win streak of their past 15 international games. Once again, it was no accident that the United States won.

In no way is the U.S. Men’s team considered a top-tier program. In fact, they came into the FIFA Confederation Cup as the 14th ranked club in the world. What Loyal Homer is asking, though, is whether or not their performance at the FIFA Confederation Cup was enough to build momentum for men’s soccer. I think the very clear answer to that question is – YES!

Soccer has never been mistaken as America’s national pastime. That does not, though, mean it is destined to an eternity of obscurity. You see, American sports fans are a relatively easy-to-please group, especially when it comes to international competition. All we ask for is drama and an opportunity to tell the rest of the world that we have maybe found something else we are better than you at. You may call it arrogance, I call it national pride.

Loyal Homer noted the fact that 2.1 million viewers watched the FIFA Championship. I am happy to say that I was a part of that group, sitting on my living room floor with about 20 other people, all cheering for the Red, White, and Blue!

What the U.S. Men’s team proved by reaching the FIFA Championship was that the nation they proudly represent DOES care about them, and WAS proud of what they accomplished. Moreso, the nation whose colors they wear was eager to cheer them on to even greater heights. They proved that American sports fans only need a reason to watch.

Does that mean that the troubles of poor viewership and support for US soccer are gone? No. The U.S. team will still be considered an underdog in many of their matches, but they have proven they deserve to compete on the same field as the international best.

Consider their recent results internationally:

  • They reach the 2009 FIFA Confederation Championship by defeating #1 Spain 2-0, and playing a VERY close Final against a Brazilian team which, on paper, was far superior.
  • They are two-time defending CONCACAF Gold Cup Champions.
  • In the 2008 Beijing Olympics, they defeated Japan and played the Netherlands (ranked #2 in the world) to a draw, before losing to the eventual silver medalist Nigerian team 2-1.

That’s not the resume of an overrated team.

The critics, like Sports Geek, will argue that the CONCACAF is a second-rate league, lacking of any serious competition. I wonder if Sports Geek would also argue that the Memphis Tigers college basketball team is overrated because they play out of Mid-Major Conference USA, or the Gonzaga Bulldogs, who plays out of the West-Coast Conference? Just because you play in a weak division/league does not mean you are a weak team. The CONCACAF is an international league, and the United States dominates it… that is a fact.

The nay-sayers, like Sports Geek, will argue that luck, not talent, brought the U.S. team to the FIFA Championships, and that they are overrated because of American hype. I wonder, though, if Sports Geek would argue that the 2008 Super Bowl Champion New York Giants got lucky in their game against the then undefeated New England Patriots, since they were only a wild card team, and that they, too, were overrated. Or the Orlando Magic, a lowly three-seed, who SCHOOLED the #1 seed Cleveland Cavaliers in the 2009 NBA Eastern Conference Finals… are they overrated, too?

The evidence shows that the United States is demonstrating a legitimate ability to successfully compete on an international stage against the best competition the world has to offer. American sports fans are responding in kind, showing that they are ready to get behind a U.S. team, and cheer them on as they try to slay the international goliaths of the game.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.