The Best 2010 NFL Draft Week Debate… Mile High Strategy

April 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Success in the NFL Draft is measured and evaluated twice.

The ultimate measure of success cannot be determined until years after the draft has concluded, when we can take a perspective view afforded only by time and then say with certainty “Yes, this player was a successful draft pick” (i.e. Tom Brady), or “No, this player was a bust.”

Because we don’t have the luxury of foresight, we are left to grade the draft only by the standards we know today. There are essentially two questions to be asked in this regard:

First, did the team select players that can effectively fit the team’s scheme? Second, did the team maximize their draft opportunities to get as much value out of those picks as possible?

By those standards, the Denver Broncos CLEARLY had the best draft of 2010. They formalized a specific plan, and they executed that plan FLAWLESSLY.

To begin with, head coach Josh McDaniels sent a clear message to his team and to the league at large, that he is interested predominately in high-character, high-commitment players. With last year’s departure of Jay Cutler, and now Brandon Marshall in 2010, McDaniels is making it known that there is a certain “quality” of player that he wants on his team.

He held true to that philosophy with his first pick of 2010, when he passed on wide receiver Dez Bryant (who was arguably the most talented receiver in the draft) to instead select Demaryius Thomas out of Georgia Tech. Bryant brings with him a great deal of off-field questions, following a suspension which cost him most of the 2009 season and questions about his “attitude.” While Thomas is no slouch as a wide out, he does not bring as much on-field upside as Bryant has. However, Bryant’s upside ON the field seems to have been outweighed by his OFF-field baggage, and that appears to be all that McDaniels needed to know.

Three picks later, McDaniels backed up his high-character initiative by selecting “Mr. High Character” in Tim Tebow.

The Tebow pick, in my estimation, was THE pick of the 2010 NFL Draft, and I think that McDaniels’ decision to go with Tebow was the PERFECT move for his Denver Broncos. Despite ESPN’s ongoing (Kiper-driven) insistence that this was a bad decision – one that many implied COULD cost McDaniels his career if proven unsuccessful – there is little doubt in my mind that Tebow will be successful in Denver.

I am tired of hearing about Tebow’s supposed inability to fit in the NFL. As I wrote in a previous verdict, Tebow doesn’t have to throw the ball conventionally to be successful. He only has to win, and winning is the one thing that has PROVEN he can do better than just about anybody in the 2010 NFL Draft. He just needed an organization to believe in his ability the way that Urban Meyer and the rest of the Florida Gators program believed. As he said during his post-selection interview, he did not need for EVERY team in the NFL to like him. He just needed to prove to ONE team that he would be successful in the NFL.

Fortunately for Tebow, Josh McDaniels agreed.

Rather than listen to the overblown criticism provided by outlets such as ESPN, McDaniels chose the one player that most exemplified the ideals which he himself prized above all others. The result is that Tebow is once again in an environment where he is being called upon because of his intangible qualities (although I never understood how you could question the “tangibles” of a kid with Tebow’s resume). Just as Urban Meyer believed in the special blend of talent, commitment, and character that Tebow possesses, and built a program designed to maximize those qualities, McDaniels has cast his support for the former Heisman Winner, NCAA record-holder, and two-time national champion (it still fascinates me that people will question his tangibles when he has accomplished so much).

Finally, the action that made the Broncos so successful with the 2010 draft was not the fact that they simply picked good players that fit their organization. It was the manner in which they got those players. Thanks to brilliant draft-day maneuvering, the Broncos flitted across the draft board all day long, only stopping to make a pick when they felt it suited their needs best. They essentially decided for themselves when they would pick, and it didn’t matter if it was their turn or not. When they wanted to make something happen, they made it happen. They traded back in the draft, then forward again, all to put themselves in the best possible position to get the players they WANTED and NEEDED without having to overpay.

The Denver Broncos had the best draft of 2010 for one reason – they went into the draft with a clearly defined plan, and they stuck to that plan. While we will not be able to judge the ultimate success or failure of the 2010 NFL Draft for many years to come, one thing is certain – no team executed their plan better than did the Denver Broncos. For that reason alone, I give them an A+!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best 2010 NFL Draft Week Debate… Cunning Cats

April 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

“I just want to tell you (that) you just made the best pick in the draft and I’m going to make you guys proud.” That’s a quote from Jimmy Clausen about being drafted with the 48th overall pick by the Carolina Panthers. And I have to agree with him.

The Panthers entered the 2010 NFL Draft at a definite disadvantage, having traded away their first round pick to San Francisco last year to acquire defensive end Everett Brown during the second round of the 2009 draft. This year’s draft class was teeming with talent especially in the area of quarterback – quite possibly Carolina’s greatest need – but it looked like the elite, difference making players would be gone by the time the Panthers’ first pick came around. Call it fate, divine intervention, or just dumb luck, but the most NFL ready quarterback in the entire draft class was still on the board when the Carolina’s pick came up, and the Panthers pounced on their man – Jimmy Clausen. This kicked off one of the most prolific drafts in the history of the franchise for Carolina and enabled the organization to walk away from the 2010 draft boasting the most talented class of draftees in the NFL.

I admit it seems a little like I am stealing a page from Loyal Homer and pulling for my home town team simply because they are…well, the home town team. But, that could not be further from the truth. Unlike Loyal Homer, I am aware that sometimes the grass, or in this case turf, IS greener on the other side. I entered the NFL draft with the lowest of expectations (the first sentence of my last article serves as proof of that), but I was absolutely blown away by quality of player that Carolina was able to acquire during the draft.

First, credit must be given to the draft savvy of general manager Marty Hurney and company for not panicking. Both Hurney and head coach John Fox came under fire toward the end of last season as the Panthers underperformed. There was even speculation that one or both of them would not return in 2010, but owner Jerry Richardson gave them a vote of confidence, at least for one more season, and it appears to be paying off in a huge way. Not only did the Panthers avoid the temptation of mortgaging the team’s future for yet another year by trading away the following year’s draft pick, as they did in 2008 and 2009, but they were able to capitalize on the mistakes of other teams that passed on an elite stud like Jimmy Clausen. Sure, this may seem like common sense to most, but we are talking about the Carolina Panthers here… a franchise that has been so conservative with early round picks that they have failed to draft a quarterback in the first three rounds since they did so with Kerry Collins in 1995. Considering that Carolina stood by this philosophy through seasons where Chris Weinke and Rodney Peete were taking the majority of the snaps under center, I would say this is a bold move. Ultimately, the Panthers did not trade up to get Clausen, not that they did not try, but they rode out the roller coaster ride of tension and drama and in the end were rewarded for their efforts. The Clausen pick – and the entire Panther’s draft picks in general – have the potential to contribute immediately. That may well have saved the Panthers season as well as the jobs of Hurney and Fox in the process.

From top to bottom the Panthers drafted players that would fill in holes in the team’s major areas of need – quarterback, wide receiver, and defensive end. Not only did the Panthers draft their quarterback of the future in Jimmy Clausen, but they also acquired two other college quarterbacks in Cincinnati QB Tony Pike and Appalachian State QB Armanti Edwards. While Edwards figures to fit in more as a wide receiver, he is still an option for a team that seriously lacked options. The Carolina Panther’s quarterback depth went from nonexistent to crowded in the course of just three days. Before the draft Matt Moore seemed like the heir apparent to the Panther’s starting job, but now his hold on the job is fragile to say the least. Some have suggested that drafting Pike demonstrates the team is unsure about Clausen, but that is not the case. The Panthers lacked legit backup options and Pike provides that in spades. He has big time BCS experience and can lead an offense, so he is a welcome addition to a team that has brought in fossils like Vinny Testaverde in times of need. The 2010 Panthers will be armed and dangerous.

Similarly the Panther’s receiving corps was glaringly thin. Brandon LaFell of LSU, David Gettis of Baylor, and Armanti Edwards figure to change that right away. LaFell plays with a physicality that is already drawing comparisons to a younger Muhsin Muhammed. Edwards brings an athleticism and speed to the Panthers that will allow him to stretch the field opposite Steve Smith, or in the slot, not to mention opening things up in the wildcat formation. I have even heard comparisons between Edwards and another college QB turned wide out – Anquan Boldin. These receivers remind me of the Panthers receiving corps of “Smitty,” “Moose,” and Ricky Proehl… the corps led the team to its only Super Bowl in franchise history. At this point, Gettis is just icing on the cake.

The Panthers also picked up a pass rusher that is desperately needed in Greg Hardy. Since the departure of Julius Peppers, the Panthers have been left without a big play defensive lineman. Greg Hardy could definitely be that guy. He is a sick athlete with a motor that does not quit. Admittedly, he has an injury history, but he has a ton of upside, projecting as a first rounder just a few years ago. I also think drafting a guy like Hardy is smart in these cost conscientious days because Hardy figures to be a much cheaper option than buying a big name in free agency.

In the end these are all great moves, but I feel that after the Panthers’ selected Clausen they sealed the deal for walking out of the draft as the biggest winners in the draft. Make no doubt about it, the Rams have a great quarterback in Sam Bradford, but seeing how Clausen and McCoy were available nearly 50 picks later, I would say they overpaid. Clausen has been touted as the most NFL ready quarterback playing in an NFL type offense at Notre Dame. I am a huge fan of his cocky, gunslinger attitude and I think it is exactly what Carolina needs right now. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Clausen is the future of the Carolina Panthers. I do not think there is another team that gained so much in one single pick. That makes the Cardiac Cats the undisputed winners of the NFL draft.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Biggest Pre-Draft Move Debate… Pre-Draft Story Drought

April 23, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

The NFL Draft kicked off yesterday and I could not have been more lukewarm about it. You have probably heard the expression “No news, is good news”, but that is not really the case for a football fan around the NFL Draft. There just was not that much to get excited about. Aside from, Brandon Marshall’s deal to the Dolphins and Donovan McNabb’s in-division trade to the Redskins, things have pretty much been a total yawnfest. The biggest story leading up to this NFL Draft was the lack of stories leading up to the NFL Draft.

Ben Roethlisberger did more than his fair share to try and stir up NFL storylines and prompt trade talk, but the deal never got done. Although Big Ben did not verbally demand a trade out of Pittsburgh, his actions sure did. After putting himself in compromising situation after situation, the Steelers’ QB made himself increasingly expendable, and when the news broke just days ago that he was going to be suspended for six games during the 2010 season, he really gave the Steelers a reason to let him go. There were plenty of teams who would have benefited from the on-field talents of Roethlisberger under center (and he is sure to keep the local legal team busy with defense cases), but only the Oakland Raiders emerged as serious suitors. It seemed like the Oakland Raiders were a logical match who would surely jump at the opportunity to acquire a quarterback with a Super Bowl winning pedigree, but the two sides could not come to an agreement. Maybe the Raiders thought they could get off cheaper trying to draft a quarterback or maybe they were just trying to protect the co-ed population in the greater Oakland area, but it seems that Big Ben will be back in Pittsburgh in 2010 after his suspension runs its course.

There was hope that things might pick up after Donovan McNabb was traded to the Washington Redskins. Many thought that this was a sign of wilder wheeling and dealing to come, but again… nothing. There There was some minor speculation that Washington might sign free agent Terrell Owens, which is a deal I wish had gone down because it would have been supremely entertaining. Watching McNabb and TO team up again while both are trying to prove they are still elite competitors would have been either an unbelievable comeback story for the once dynamic duo, or a delicious train wreck of epic proportions. Either way the public would have gotten to enjoy the show, but are instead left wondering about what might have been.

Another Redskin, Albert Haynesworth, got the rumor mill going as well this off season, as trade talk emerged about a potential return to Tennessee for the former Titan. Despite cashing in on a huge payday last season signing with Washington, Haynesworth seemed to have no interest in adjusting to the Redskins’ defensive schemes. There was talk that he might make his way back to Tennessee in time to mix up the draft board for the two teams and potentially add some more drama to the draft. But like every other rumored move lately it did not happen. The big man may still rumble back in to the Music City, but he’ll do so after the kickoff of the NFL draft.

I really did not see this wave of inactivity coming. Usually the NFL is abuzz with pre-draft stories and big moves. Picks and players swapping teams set the tone for an entertaining draft, but this year it was all quiet on the football front leading up to draft day.

In the end, the draft itself proved to be far more exciting (with Cowboys trading up to get Dez Bryant and Tim Tebow being drafted above Jimmy Clausen) than any pre-draft story.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NFL Draft Format Change Debate… A Little Change Can Go a Long Way

April 21, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

What an interesting debate this was! It makes me wish I had an extra night to sleep on things before making my verdict…

Because I don’t have that extra night, though, I am forced to make do with the information as best as I can. The winner of this debate is Sports Geek.

Loyal Homer presented some very strong points, specifically with regard to the challenges of airing the first round of the Draft on a Thursday night. Despite Sports Geek’s insistence that this will be top draw on television’s top night, I am not quite as optimistic. Pardon the stereotype, but wives and girlfriends who may be willing to tolerate a little weekend couch potatoing will be much more reluctant to relinquish the remote on a Thursday evening that is loaded with garbage like Grey’s Anatomy and Private Practice (or as Mrs. Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek call it – “The best night on television”) just so their significant others can find out who the Ravens will take with the 25th pick in the draft.

As Loyal Homer accurately discusses, the five-hour marathon that is the first round of the NFL Draft will be too much of an endeavor for many casual fans to commit to on a school night.

Something that Sports Geek DID get correct, though, is the assessment that the Draft is not broadcast for the casual fan. It is broadcast so that the football obsessed Super-Fans out there like me, Sports Geek, Loyal Homer, Babe Ruthless, and YOU can get our quick spring-time fix while we wait for OTAs and Training Camps to open back up.

That, however, was not the determining factor in Sports Geek’s winning argument. The game-winner for this debate was the contested point of whether or not the teams themselves will benefit from this new format change.

Loyal Homer intimated that the teams would not benefit from the extra time they now have between rounds one and two, a point that Sports Geek (and I) wholeheartedly disagree with. When teams are in the heat of competition (and yes, the Draft is just another form of competition), they can lose perspective. Under the pressure of a ticking clock and amidst the swirling drama of blockbuster trades and last-minute surprises, it can be easy to lose focus or to drift off course. Half-time adjustments, time outs, and long, slow walks to the mound all exist to serve one purpose – to take a step back, recompose yourself, assess the situation, and adjust accordingly. This break in between rounds one and two of the draft will serve exactly the same purpose.

Teams that previously had to scramble and rush in a flurry of phone calls and deal-making can now take a full evening to absorb the chaos of the first round, and can re-tool their draft strategy in light of the newly changed circumstances. This new format creates an opportunity for additional analysis, and could incite even more excitement in the “value” rounds, through the newfound opportunity for ongoing negotiations throughout the night.

This change will add excitement and depth to the Draft, and will add a new dimension to the chess game that is played every April among the 32 teams of the NFL. I am looking forward to this Thursday evening, when I get my first opportunity to see the newest twist in Draft strategy play out (only during commercials on “Grey’s”, of course)!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The New NFL Draft Format Debate

April 20, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

The 2010 NFL Draft will take place later this week at the Radio City Music Hall in New York City. This year, however, it will feature a format change.

Previously, rounds one, two and three were all held on a single day, with the remaining four rounds playing out the following day. For 2010, the NFL has decided to instead host its first round as a lone, premier event, adding a third day to the league’s draft process. Now, the top 32 picks will be made on Thursday evening, with rounds two and three taking place on Friday, and the final rounds playing out on Saturday.

This new schedule of events begs the question – Is the format change a good thing for the NFL?

To break down the NFL’s decision, Sports Geek will argue his opinion that the change was right for the league, while Loyal Homer will contest that the previous format was ideal.

The debaters are now on the clock.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Mock Draft Value Debate

April 13, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

It is no secret that my personal opinion of Mock Drafts is not a favorable one.

The plethoric bombardment of guesswork and speculation that is fed to us in heaping spoonfuls by any and every media outlet should be enough to turn anyone off to their nonsensical (and usually errant) projections. Still, they are published with such regularity and given such prominence in the national media that you would think they were actually written by guys named Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John.

And now, a passage from the Book of Mel Kiper, Jr: “Let it be said unto thee that the Lord Goodell hath proclaimed unto me – “With the first pick of the 2010 NFL Draft, the St. Louis Rams select Sam Bradford, Quarterback from Oklahoma!” And there was much rejoicing!

But despite all my rantings and ravings about the lack of substance in these Mock Drafts, even I can be found hypocritically dabbling in the subtle art of prescience as I share my own prognostications on the upcoming NFL Draft with anyone who will listen (although in my defense, I did not start my tarot card readings for the 2010 Draft back in May of 2009, Todd McShay).

So what is it about the NFL Draft that drives the analyst’s penchant for attempting clairvoyance? We ALL know that we will be wrong BEFORE the draft even begins, yet we continue to spew our prophesy as though we actually have an inside track to the future and can tell you precisely which athlete will be playing for which team, and why they were selected.

I suppose it is simply the need for all of us to prove that we know what we are talking about. All it takes is for one gem to be pulled out of the piles of misses we toss out, and we begin acting as though we are the smartest people alive. For example, it did not matter that I was successful in predicting only nine of the Sweet Sixteen teams from the 2010 March Madness, because I got Cornell right. I strutted around town for a FULL WEEK singing “I told you so” at the top of my lungs for having predicted their tournament success.

Putting the psychoanalysis to the side, however, there is a more important question with regard to Mock Drafts which is the topic for today’s debate: Is there value in Mock Drafts?

Simply put, are Mock Drafts worth the time needed to create them? Do they serve a REAL purpose, or is it all just a waste of time and effort?

For the answers to those questions I will turn to Babe Ruthless, who believes that there is indeed value in the Mock Draft, and to Loyal Homer, who will argue to the contrary.

It is a Mock Trial of Mock Drafts – let the mockery begin!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Mock Draft Value Debate… Mock Draft Mania

April 13, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Life is often unpredictable, and so are sports. If I told you six months ago that Donovan McNabb was going to be traded within the NFC East, Butler would be playing for the NCAA Championship, and Tiger Woods was going to ditch the PGA Tour and lose a large number of endorsement deals you would have thought I was crazy, but that’s exactly how things transpired. No one can predict the future, yet each year fans still seem to have an insatiable drive to study insider information, expert analysis, and of course mock drafts.

Today’s debate attempts to answer the question, are mock drafts valuable? Of course they are. They serve multiple purposes. Mock drafts entertain and inform us. They bring order to disorder. They give us subjects for water cooler discussion, Monday morning quarterbacking, and of course – sports debates.

The problem is there are way too many mock drafts out there and those doing the prognosticating take things way too seriously. Mock drafts seem to be as prevalent as Tiger Woods jokes right now. Everybody seems to have one. Some of them are good, some of them are funny, and some just do not make any sense at all. Between ESPN, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo!, and other sports media outlets too numerous to list, someone could easily be overwhelmed by all the research, insider information, and expert analysis.

Mock drafts are a lot like women. No, I don’t mean that all mock drafts are out to take your money and suck the life out of you slowly. I mean that there are different approaches to them. Some guys want to experience as many mock drafts as possible. Some guys focus on one mock draft that they like, know, and trust. Although mock drafts can be confusing and frustrating (not to mention mock drafts are poor drivers… HeyOh!) we still need them.

Sure, mock drafts can make life nerve-racking. As if our blood pressure levels weren’t high enough on draft day – what with the future success of our favorite teams riding on the line and all – we are further stressed out by the non-stop barrage of commentary that seems to contradict every mock draft we have studied. The solution is simple, accept mock drafts and analysis for what they really are – someone’s educated guess.

While it is true that draft rankings are based off of quantifiable statistics and measurable categories (like position need, college success, combine performance, and scouting reports), they are still ultimately opinions. And opinions can be wrong. Just like anything else in life, you can put a lot of stock or very little into an opinion based off of how much you trust the source. Mock drafts are no different. Each year I check out a few, but I usually stick with just one. In the end it makes no difference in the long run because Commissioner Goodell reads the names teams submit to him, not what is listed on a mock draft. So what’s the point?

Mock drafts allow us to control that which we otherwise could not. They give fans temporary resolution between the end of one season and the beginning of the next. When a player retires, gets traded, or leaves via free agency it usually creates a hole on the roster that needs to be addressed. Fans want to know how that team is going to address the need, but there is a long time to wait between the Super Bowl in February and pre-season football in August. That is where mock drafts come in handy.

While there is absolutely no assurance that a team will draft who the experts say they should, fans are often afforded peace of mind knowing that there is a logical solution out there. For example, the Carolina Panthers need to address vacancies at quarterback, defensive line, and wide receiver. As a fan, I get panicky considering what the Panthers will do in the upcoming draft. But with a quick glance at a few mock drafts I have learned that most sources tend to believe Carolina will address needs at wide receiver when their first selection rolls around. While I may not agree with that call I at least know what to expect, even if it is more disappointment (for the love of all that’s right, draft a quarterback!)

It is all really a mental thing. Not to get all psychological on you, but the human brain wants to resolve things. For example, let me demonstrate something I learned in college. If I were to sing, “nuh nuh na na, nuh nuh na na, hey hey hey…” your mind would probably resolve the missing line “goodbye.” I am willing to bet you probably finished the phrase in your mind. Why? Because your brain wants resolution. It is simple human nature. Mock drafts give us the satisfaction of resolution, at least until the draft happens.

In the end, this debate is an open and shut case. Mock drafts have value. Fans may not like that the predictions start rolling before the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl is over, but you do not have to follow each draft. Just check out one or two that you trust a few weeks out from the real deal and you will be happier for it.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NCAAB Declaring for the Draft Debate… The REAL Prize from Kentucky

April 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

In the question of who will be the most highly coveted prospect as the 2010 NBA Draft rolls around, there is little doubt that John Wall of Kentucky will be the answer. In fact, it was not until midway through the basketball season that I learned his REAL first name was John, and not “Projected-Top-Pick-Of-The-NBA-Draft.”

Wall is a very talented point guard who will surely provide value to whichever team is fortunate enough to be drawn first in the upcoming NBA Lottery.

If you want to talk about which upcoming draftee will provide the best IMMEDIATE impact to a team though, Wall is not the answer. Instead, it will be his former Kentucky Wildcat teammate, DeMarcus Cousins.

To begin with, the 19-year old Cousins is already six feet eleven inches and 270 pounds. He should have no problem at all banging around under the hoop with the big boys (literally) on an NBA court. Because of his size, he dominated both on offense and defense for Kentucky, ultimately establishing himself as the top “big man” in the country coming into this NBA Draft.

In 38 games for Kentucky this season Cousins accounted for 20 double-doubles, leading to an AVERAGE of 15.1 points and 9.8 rebounds per game. Because of the combination of his size and his strong perimeter shooting (he shot 55.8 percent from the field last season), he was by far the best overall producer on one of the top teams in the nation. That is not bad considering the fact that he was criticized for a lack of conditioning and maturity on the court.

He may not be able to compete with the speed of other draftees such as Wall, or Ohio State’s Evan Turner, but let’s face it, there are already enough speedy guards in the NBA. The reason that Cousins will provide an IMMEDIATE impact is the simple fact that he is physically big enough and strong enough to hold his own at the highly prized position of power forward.

The one weakness that Cousins brings with him to the NBA is his temper. Because of his reputation for retaliation he could become a liability late in games if he is unable to keep his emotions in check. The last thing that any NBA team wants is to deal with technical fouls that mount up and ejections in the closing minutes of competitive games. Fortunately, as the season wore on, Cousins seemed to show some increased maturity on the court. In a league of Ron Artests and Latrell Sprewells, I think it is safe to say that most general managers would be willing to overlook the occasional temperamental reaction in exchange for the immediate game-readiness that Cousins has demonstrated.

He possesses all of the qualities prized by an NBA team looking to acquire a dominant physical presence up front. He is big, strong, and has great footwork for a kid his size. He is a consistent shooter both inside and out, and is not afraid to mix things up under the rim if he needs to in order to pull down a rebound.

DeMarcus Cousins may not be drafted ahead of his Kentucky teammate, John Wall, but in terms of playing time, you can count on him being the first to make a REAL contribution, right off the bat, wherever he ends up!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Tim Tebow as a Pro QB Debate… Winning May Not Be Everything, But it is Something

March 31, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

If sporting events were played on paper, rather than on the field, then we would be getting ready for a Final Four that, besides Duke, also featured Kentucky, Syracuse, and Kansas. Instead we are all getting ready to watch one featuring Butler, Michigan State, and West Virginia. Projection is an inexact science, and as Babe Ruthless points out in his argument, analysts get it wrong just as often as (if not more than) they get it right. Likewise, the challenge of projecting an unproven athlete’s success is just as much guesswork as it is science.

That is why debates such as these are so much fun. There is no right or wrong answer when it comes to prediction and projection, there is only speculation. Only Tim Tebow can ultimately decide if he will be a successful NFL quarterback. All the breakdowns and analysis in the world will not change that inevitable outcome. Still, it does not stop us from trying our hardest at predicting the future!

With that in mind, Loyal Homer is absolutely correct. College success is not a predictor for NFL success. However, it should also be noted that having an unconventional throwing motion is also not a predictor for failure. Just because a quarterback entering the NFL is not considered a pure “passer” does not mean that he will fail.

Bernie Kosar, one of the most successful quarterbacks of the 1980s had a side-arm delivery when he threw the ball. If I were coaching Pop Warner and I saw a kid trying to mimic Kosar’s motion, I would a) cringe, and b) work with him in trying to correct it. However, Kosar made it work.

Another more recent example of a quarterback who has found success in the NFL without relying on a strong passing game is Ben Roethlisberger.

When the Steelers won the Super Bowl in 2005 it was not on the arm of Roethlisberger. During the season, he threw the ball only 268 times that season. By comparison, there were 25 other quarterbacks in the NFL that season with more than 300 passing attempts, led by Brett Favre who had more than 600. Of those completions, Roethlisberger accounted for only 2,385 passing yards (behind 20 other quarterbacks) and 17 touchdowns (behind 13 other quarterbacks).

Even though Roethlisberger was not called upon to be a “passer” in 2005, he helped lead his team to the Super Bowl and is now considered one of the most successful quarterbacks in the game today.

I am not trying to draw comparisons between Roethlisberger and Tebow (I actually think that is the LAST person Tebow would want to be compared with right now). I am simply bringing up the point that a quarterback can be successful without having to rely on a fundamentally “sound” passing game.

It is for that reason that I am awarding the debate to Babe Ruthless.

As Babe Ruthless points out, Tebow possesses other intangible qualities that CAN translate from college into professional success. Namely, he is a WINNER and a proven LEADER (qualities that many people in the NFL severely lack).

You can coach a player on how to change his throwing mechanics. You can help him to study film and learn how to read defenses better. You can teach him how to change his grip on the ball to allow for a cleaner release. But you CANNOT teach him how to be a winner or a leader.

Is Tebow a good fit for EVERY team in the NFL? No, but what quarterback is? That does not automatically mean he is a BAD fit for every team. It may take a few years before he is ready to actually run an NFL offense while he perfects his new and improved throwing style, and that is okay. Aaron Rodgers did not start right out of the gate and he has been one of the best quarterbacks of the past two seasons. However, when the time finally does come and Tebow walks out onto the field one Sunday afternoon, the coach can be confident in the fact that his quarterback knows how to win.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.