The Future of the Home Field Advantage Debate – Home is Where the Heart REALLY Is

August 26, 2009

Read the debate intro and read Bleacher Fan’s argument that games should move to other venues to bring in more revenue .

If there was ever a debate that fit my persona, this is it. Don’t you agree? My name is Loyal Homer, and I want the games in my home stadium!!! Duh!

Georgia and Florida battle it out in Jacksonville, and major SEC East implications, if not national title implications, are on the table almost every year. The same goes for The Red River Shootout (excuse me, the Red River Rivalry) between Oklahoma and Texas. Increasingly each year, Georgia (possibly because they have lost 16 of the past 19 to the Gators at a “neutral” site) has suggested they would not mind having the game rotating between Athens and Gainesville, just like any other conference game. As a true “Homer” this is the best option to me.

College football is meant to be played on a college campus or at a university’s home stadium. It is not meant to be played at a neutral site. This is not the Super Bowl! Often times, these games have major implications, both nationally and within the conference.

College football is a huge revenue machine not only for the university. Each team represents the city, and often times a small community. Yes, there are some universities – like USC and UCLA – that are located in or around big cities. But, often time’s universities are located in smaller towns. Schools are the bread and butter of what makes these towns relevant. Would anyone know anything about Stillwater, Oklahoma if it weren’t for Oklahoma State? How about Athens, Georgia (University of Georgia)? Gainesville, Florida (University of Florida)? Corvallis, Oregon (Oregon State)? Lubbock, Texas (Texas Tech)? The list goes on and on. These towns somewhat shut down when their teams are playing on Saturdays in the fall in their town. If you are not at the game, you are at a local sports bar watching the game or you are grilling out at a friend’s house with the game on the big screen (just typing this makes me ready for Opening Week!!!!!!!!)

After the game many fans go out to eat with the family to celebrate the big victory. Maybe a group of buddies heads over to High Street after an Ohio State game to discuss the game and have a cold beer. It is that “hometown” feel that you do not necessarily get when playing in a foreign city at a neutral site.

A home site also gives each team a better chance to win, at least every other year. I am not convinced that Florida has a better chance to win the World’s Largest Cocktail Party just because it doesnot have to travel as far. Both teams sleep in foreign beds the night before the same game. I am similarly not convinced Texas has a better chance to defeat Oklahoma just because Austin is closer to Dallas than Norman. What playing at home does do, however, is give each team a significant advantage every other year. When Florida travels to Athens, Georgia has the advantage. Conversely, when Georgia traveled to Gainesville, the Gators have the advantage.

The point is that each team deserves to play in front of its home fans AT home for every home game. Home truly is where the heart is. And the heart of each college football team is at HOME! The hometown deserves it. The hometown needs it. And most especially, Loyal Homer wants it!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Keeping Rick Pitino Debate – Recruits + Wins = Tenure

August 18, 2009

Read the debate intro and Bleacher Fan’s argument that Rick Pitino should be fired.

It is the middle of April 2009 and the air is colored by a sense of urgency and remorse. A usually slick and confident Louisville head men’s basketball coach Rick Pitino is sitting at a desk with his head in his hands, disrupting his normally carefully placed black and gray locks. Lying on the desk is a rolodex and a cell phone. Pitino is in cleansing mode. He is making a series of phone calls he now has to make. He calls the University of Louisville’s president, then the athletic director. He calls his former pupil cum University of Florida national championship coach, Billy Donovan, and asks Billy to add his son Richard to the staff in Florida. He knows he has to tell the truth. The truth… that he made a mistake. According to his story – a story he has been forthcoming with (in certain circles) since April of this year – Pitino engaged in consensual sex with a woman in a restaurant. Now he is alleging that the woman in question, Karen Sypher, is trying to extort $10M from him. (I would the link the story, but it is not that hard to find.)

The problem with the Pitino story is that it is more than just a sleazy affair in a restaurant (really… Pitino… a restaurant?). It is hypocrisy. Rick Pitino claims to be a practicing Catholic, brings a priest on road trips with the team, and was even pictured in last season’s media guide with the Pope. Sypher alleges he provided her with money for an abortion, money that he claims was for her health insurance. Depending on which story checks out, that is another potential layer of hypocrisy.

But, here is the rub, folks. None of that matters. None of it. It is all smoke and mirrors and pomp and circumstance. It is a well-choreographed public relations/lawyer circus. Here is how public relations works. The sooner the story gets out, the sooner it is replaced in the news cycle by something more juicy or important. The sooner the truth comes out from the source of the scandal – taking control of the information – the sooner it blows over. Those are tried and true tenants of crisis management. Pitino and his other “team” completed an alley-oop on the crisis management. Now all they have to do is wait for the next scandal. And there will be another scandal. When that happens, Pitino’s restaurant tryst will become simply an “affair” and the alleged abortion will not be talked about at all.

The only thing that matters is winning. Rick Pitino is a winner. If Louisville wants to keep their basketball program on top – and the revenue flowing into the institution – they will keep their prized possession, legendary author and coach Rick Pitino.

As long as Pitino is winning he has tenure. His record is impressive. His all time college coaching record is 553-191. His two most successful coaching stops, at the University of Kentucky and now at Louisville, yielded amazing records of 219-50 and 200-72, respectively. He is a winner, and he is a winner because he gets good players to play hard for him. Recruiting is a key to his success (which is a “Choice” if you read his book).

The primary argument detractors will spew down upon a suddenly human Pitino is that he will be unable to retain his recruiting. “Players, and player’s families, will be unable to stomach what Pitino has done,” they will say. “No parent will let their child play for such a morally backward man,” others will say. Saying and doing are very different. Recruits are doing – that is, they are standing by Pitino. All of them.

Lawrence High School star center, 6-foot 10-inch Michael Chandler, features a picture of him and Pitino as his profile picture on his Facebook page. He told the AP, “My commitment is very strong.” That is important because it is a verbal commitment from a junior – a member of the 2010 class.

The “Big Four” – the incoming freshman that Pitino recruited to fill out his roster in the ultra-competitive Big East basketball league – are not only committed, but have already started taking classes. That recruiting class ranks 21st nationally. An important piece of the class, guard Peyton Siva, said on his Twitter account, “Yo I ain’t leaving. Rick(‘s) personal life is his life. He’s here to coach me and is the best teach of hoop to me! So like the fans say, ‘Go Cards.” That is the perfect summation of Pitino as he begins to orchestrate his exit from the scandal. I can hear him talking to a family in a living nine months from now saying, “I am not a perfect man, and I will not pretend to be. But I am an excellent basketball coach. If your son wants to play for the best, win, and have an opportunity to continue to play in the NBA – another league I’ve coached in – I’m the best teacher for him.” It is a strong pitch because his basketball record is strong.

The 2009 class is a good recruiting foundation for Pitino to continue to build. And build he will. Basketball players like to play for winners, not perfect men. Pitino is admired for his ability to coach and motivate. Those things are unchanged… just like his status at Louisville will also remain unchanged.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Should the NCAA Pay Athletes Debate – The Death of College Sports

July 28, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that college athletes should receive compensation while playing.



Today, The Sports Debates is teaching a lesson on how to ruin college football (or any college sport).

Lesson number one, pay the players.

There is no more sure-fire way to ruin the game of college football than to turn it into a simplified version of professional football.

The NCAA has one simple rule for its athletes – they cannot, “Use his or her athletics skill (directly or indirectly) for pay in any form in that sport.” Failure of an athlete to comply with that rule means that they are not eligible to participate in NCAA sanctioned events.

The instant that rule is lifted, all athletes within the NCAA become professionals, and what would follow is a series of events that would destroy college sports altogether.

Using football as the example…

In order to maximize their newfound professional status, the NFL’s eligibility rule of a minimum age requirement would be challenged, and most likely overturned. Since these are no longer amateur athletes we are discussing, the NFL would have no grounds to enforce their rule. The moment a “young” player under this proposed pay-for-play college format is denied access to the NFL, they can respond that they are already getting paid to play, and just want access to the greater funding provided by the NFL. How can the NFL justify that these players are too young to play professional football when they are ALREADY playing professional football? I’ve got news for you… they can’t!

The result would be to see the level of talent within the NCAA ranks substantially decline as players flood the NFL ranks. Don’t agree? Well answer this question – why would an athlete play football for the Miami Hurricanes and receive a $100 per day stipend (for example), when they can play football for the Miami Dolphins and potentially receive millions? The answer – they wouldn’t, and for the very select few who nobly state they would stay “for a college education,” those players would only serve to justify the reason NOT to compensate players.

The NCAA, no matter what the compensation structure looked like, would not be able to compete with the salaries offered by professional organizations. Therefore, the players that were NFL-caliber would immediately leave the NCAA, and only the sub-standard talent would be left behind. That would seriously weaken the NCAA talent pool, essentially transforming it into a “minor-league” or “semi-pro” format, where only the players who couldn’t cut it in the big-leagues were playing.

For those players left behind, the question of how they would be compensated then must be answered. While there are countless details that would have to be negotiated (and I have no interest in delving into that minutia), consider for simplicity’s sake that there are two primary theories on how to offer compensation and funding:

  1. Provide equal funding to all schools and all athletes, regardless of performance, to ensure equity across the board.
  2. Provide funding and compensation in direct correlation to performance, recognizing that some people/schools perform better than others.

Both of these options create issues, and both would have long-lasting, negative impact on the sport. Choosing the first option would essentially take recruiting power away from the “big schools,” thus affecting their ability to continue and generate the revenue they are accustomed to. The second option, however, would seriously cripple the “weaker schools” in their ability to provide any kind of real funding, creating even further separation between the “haves” and the “have-nots.”

As a final point, for the very large majority of college athletes, the compensation of receiving a college-level education complete with books, tuition, and room and board is more than enough. For the very small percentage of college athletes that actually go on to compete professionally, they eventually receive more equitable funding for their playing time on the field. The rest of the college athletes willingly (and happily) use their athletic ability as a means to fund their college education.

The average debt for a college student, as of 2007, was listed at $22,700, but when you factor in the implied advantages that a college education brings, which includes access to higher-paying jobs, the “real” value of a college education becomes MUCH greater. Some studies have shown that college graduates can expect to make as much as $1 million – $2 million more in salary over the course of their lifetime than a high school graduate. That sounds like some pretty fair compensation to me, all at the cost of playing a game for a few years while you study!

If you still disagree, and feel like the financial burden of attending college is not that big of a deal, then send me your address so I can happily forward my student loan bills to you every month, and you can pay them off for me!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The College World Series Debate – The Verdict

June 19, 2009

Read Sports Geek and Loyal Homer’s arguments.



After reading the arguments and many comments on this topic, I came to a realization. There doesn’t seem to be much middle ground when it comes to opinions about the College World Series. You either love it, or you just don’t care.

To Sports Geek’s point, there are fans of the event, like our friend Ryan, who believe that the College World Series actually presents more for a fan to love than March Madness or Bowl Week. He commented that college baseball carries with it an inherent purity that is lacking from some of the more commercially marketed events. In contrast to that, as Loyal Homer argues, there are many out there who feel that the College World Series is lacking something (besides fans).

Unfortunately for Sports Geek, it was that same realization which led me to the conclusion that the winner of this debate is…

LOYAL HOMER!!!!!!

Despite the mass commercialization and often questionable motives wrapped up in college basketball or college football, both carry with them a universal appeal. Even Mrs. Bleacher Fan fills out a March Madness bracket!!! College World Series just does not possess that same allure, as proven by Loyal Homer’s challenge to name the 2 teams who played in the finals of the 2008 CWS. Did you know the answer? I didn’t.

To Sports Geek’s credit, there are definitely moments of excitement and inspiration wrapped up in the CWS. Those moments can lead to some very dramatic games. While I cannot deny the existence of that drama in the CWS, I also have to acknowledge that the same drama exists in any sport or competition. THAT’S what makes competition so great. Whether lacrosse, bowling, or darts… EVERY competitive event presents an opportunity for drama, excitement, and a chance to root for the underdog. The CWS does not solely own that magic.

There are likely many reasons why the CWS is unable to attract a mass fan base. Sports Geek accurately points out that the collegiate basketball and football programs provide a much more transparent avenue into professional athletics. Another comment, posted by our friend 4thquarterpunts, brought up the fact that college baseball fails to appeal to the Midwest and Northeast regions of the United States. With such little participation from conferences such as the Big 10 and schools from NY, Philadelphia, or Boston, a very large and vocal college sports fan base has no vested interest in the event.

Whatever the reason, there is one point which was universally agreed upon – the CWS must answer the question of how it can better appeal to fans. Until then, it will always be third best.


The College World Series Debate – If a Game is Played and Nobody Watches, Does it Count?

June 18, 2009

Check back today to read Sports Geek and Loyal Homer’s arguments.



March Madness is, arguably, the single best sports competition in America.

Bowl Week is a chance to see the college football powerhouses face off in separate but (mostly) equal battles for bragging rights.

Both of these post-season college events, orchestrated by the NCAA, are designed to play out as the epic climax of their respective sports following a build-up of drama, upsets, and excitement over the course of each regular season. Because these are college events, run by the NCAA, there is no money on the line. (And, if you believe that, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.) These events are all about bragging rights, the opportunity to earn glory for your beloved employer (I mean university).

The amount of money generated by these events is astounding. Both command national media attention, and both are coincidentally timed with some of the highest absentee rates in all of Corporate America!

The popularity of these events is enough to rival even the Super Bowl, which is generally accepted as the king of sporting events and is often regarded as an unofficial national holiday.

But wait a minute… aren’t we forgetting something? Like Macaulay Culkin in Home Alone, the scrawny, geeky, often overlooked College World Series (CWS) is left behind while it’s bigger and much cooler brothers get to run all over the country, creating excitement wherever they go.

The College World Series (which is going on right now, in case you needed reminding – I’m not joking, here’s some proof), contains the exact same formula for success that March Madness and Bowl Week have. Collegiate-level athletes, competing in a national tournament, complete with Cinderella Stories, all building up to the spectacle that is (or SHOULD be) the College Baseball National Championship.

So, where does the national championship take place this year? Who’s the favorite? Which teams are the likely Cinderella stories this year, and which teams are destined for a rude and painful fall from grace?

For those of you who know the answers to those questions (thanks for all your support, Moms and Dads of the players!), you can attest to the excitement that goes on at the CWS. To the vast majority of the population, though, you probably have no clue as to how those questions should be answered.

How is it that in this country where baseball is considered the national pastime, that the College World Series seemingly fails so miserably at attracting the excitement and fascination that March Madness and Bowl Week are able to realize? Thank goodness we have Sports Geek and Loyal Homer on our side to help us find out the answer to these types of questions.

The question we are debating today:

Is the College World Series the best sporting event with the fewest viewers?

Sports Geek will argue that the College World Series is the best sporting event with the fewest viewers, and that it commands the same excitement and drama as its basketball and football counterparts do with drama that many sports fans are missing.

Loyal Homer will argue that the College World Series, despite a formula for success, is just not that appealing. He will take the position that there are other sporting events out there which deserve the media attention more than the CWS, and that the fans know exactly what they are missing – they just don’t care.

So if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got Game 10 of the Bracket 2 Super Regional to watch, because my whole office pool is riding on a potential upset!!!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.