The 2010 NFL QB Insurance Debate… Clausen’s Reliable In A Pickle

July 27, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

The Carolina Panthers enter the upcoming season with one of the most unproven quarterback units in the NFL. With the departure of longtime signal caller Jake Delhomme, a 25-year old Matt Moore ascended the top of the depth chart and will more than likely begin the season as starter. Still wet behind the ears, Moore must transition from young gun to veteran while he breaks in a receiving corps undergoing changes as well. While rookie receivers Brandon LaFell and Armanti Edwards figure to breathe new life into the seemingly stagnant Carolina passing game, they could also pose hurdles for a young quarterback struggling to come into his own. So, despite being armed to the tooth with stellar weapons on offense – such as the one-two punch of DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart, plus perennial standout Steve Smith – the Panthers could struggle without an experienced leader under center. But have no fear Panther fans, because the Cardiac Cats have an ace-in-the-hole with rookie quarterback Jimmy Clausen.

Clausen serves as the best insurance quarterback in the NFL for a number of reasons. He’s confident, motivated, and supremely talented. That is a killer combination of attributes for a young quarterback to possess. The Panthers obviously believe in him, too. In fact, Carolina general manager Marty Hurney even tried to trade up in the draft to acquire him even earlier. He is in a great spot in Charlotte. His skill set and the team’s needs seem to be a match made in heaven. Clausen is without a doubt the future of Carolina, but in the meantime he is a terrific backup plan for Matt Moore.

Since Clausen is the future of the team he is obviously more than just a flashy stopgap. For starters, the Panthers appear to be committing to his long term development by allowing him to grow before immediately taking the reins. John Fox and the gang are easing him into the position and are not rushing him into the starting gig prematurely.

Matt Moore led the Panthers to four victories in the last five games in 2009. His emergence as the projected starter for this season allows Clausen to focus on his own development rather than a position battle. It buys the rookie precious time during a crucial stage in his maturation. Currently, the former Notre Dame star sits third on the depth chart behind Moore and former practice squad quarterback Hunter Cantwell. This placement should minimize some of the external pressures that Clausen might feel from the organization to shoulder the team immediately. But, Clausen being the competitor that he is means that he is bound to put plenty of pressure on himself to contribute an succeed right away.

In all likelihood Clausen will surpass Cantwell for the primary backup gig by the end of the pre-season. The team is currently allowing him to progress outside of the spotlight. So far it appears to be paying off. He is already showing signs of maturity and poise. Critics have often labeled his confidence as cockiness, but recently he has avoided the headlines and focused on developing his skills and simply fitting in with teammates.

Of equal, or perhaps even greater, importance to Clausen’s value are the talents and experiences he brings to the position. On a team where experience is in short supply – only eight total NFL starts among all QBs (all of those belong to Moore) – Clausen’s playing time at Notre Dame serves as a valuable substitute. While he may never have played an actual down in the NFL, he did pass through former head coach Charlie Weis’ pro style offense. That should help improve the rookie’s learning curve and make him an even more valuable backup. Mix that with the fact that Panthers’ offensive coordinator Jeff Davidson was a former assistant to Weis, and the kid’s future starts to look even brighter. Clausen said of the transition, “Being in the system with coach Weis, and with coach Davidson coaching with him in New England, it’s the same terms and everything. It definitely helps me a lot.”

I am sure it did not seem like it on draft day, but Clausen could not have found a better home than Carolina.

Of course all the praise remains completely preliminary until he actually plays a down of real NFL football. But, the writing for success is on the wall. That type of upside makes for a stellar backup plan and insurance for an unproven quarterback such as Matt Moore.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best 2010 NFL Draft Week Debate… Cunning Cats

April 26, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

“I just want to tell you (that) you just made the best pick in the draft and I’m going to make you guys proud.” That’s a quote from Jimmy Clausen about being drafted with the 48th overall pick by the Carolina Panthers. And I have to agree with him.

The Panthers entered the 2010 NFL Draft at a definite disadvantage, having traded away their first round pick to San Francisco last year to acquire defensive end Everett Brown during the second round of the 2009 draft. This year’s draft class was teeming with talent especially in the area of quarterback – quite possibly Carolina’s greatest need – but it looked like the elite, difference making players would be gone by the time the Panthers’ first pick came around. Call it fate, divine intervention, or just dumb luck, but the most NFL ready quarterback in the entire draft class was still on the board when the Carolina’s pick came up, and the Panthers pounced on their man – Jimmy Clausen. This kicked off one of the most prolific drafts in the history of the franchise for Carolina and enabled the organization to walk away from the 2010 draft boasting the most talented class of draftees in the NFL.

I admit it seems a little like I am stealing a page from Loyal Homer and pulling for my home town team simply because they are…well, the home town team. But, that could not be further from the truth. Unlike Loyal Homer, I am aware that sometimes the grass, or in this case turf, IS greener on the other side. I entered the NFL draft with the lowest of expectations (the first sentence of my last article serves as proof of that), but I was absolutely blown away by quality of player that Carolina was able to acquire during the draft.

First, credit must be given to the draft savvy of general manager Marty Hurney and company for not panicking. Both Hurney and head coach John Fox came under fire toward the end of last season as the Panthers underperformed. There was even speculation that one or both of them would not return in 2010, but owner Jerry Richardson gave them a vote of confidence, at least for one more season, and it appears to be paying off in a huge way. Not only did the Panthers avoid the temptation of mortgaging the team’s future for yet another year by trading away the following year’s draft pick, as they did in 2008 and 2009, but they were able to capitalize on the mistakes of other teams that passed on an elite stud like Jimmy Clausen. Sure, this may seem like common sense to most, but we are talking about the Carolina Panthers here… a franchise that has been so conservative with early round picks that they have failed to draft a quarterback in the first three rounds since they did so with Kerry Collins in 1995. Considering that Carolina stood by this philosophy through seasons where Chris Weinke and Rodney Peete were taking the majority of the snaps under center, I would say this is a bold move. Ultimately, the Panthers did not trade up to get Clausen, not that they did not try, but they rode out the roller coaster ride of tension and drama and in the end were rewarded for their efforts. The Clausen pick – and the entire Panther’s draft picks in general – have the potential to contribute immediately. That may well have saved the Panthers season as well as the jobs of Hurney and Fox in the process.

From top to bottom the Panthers drafted players that would fill in holes in the team’s major areas of need – quarterback, wide receiver, and defensive end. Not only did the Panthers draft their quarterback of the future in Jimmy Clausen, but they also acquired two other college quarterbacks in Cincinnati QB Tony Pike and Appalachian State QB Armanti Edwards. While Edwards figures to fit in more as a wide receiver, he is still an option for a team that seriously lacked options. The Carolina Panther’s quarterback depth went from nonexistent to crowded in the course of just three days. Before the draft Matt Moore seemed like the heir apparent to the Panther’s starting job, but now his hold on the job is fragile to say the least. Some have suggested that drafting Pike demonstrates the team is unsure about Clausen, but that is not the case. The Panthers lacked legit backup options and Pike provides that in spades. He has big time BCS experience and can lead an offense, so he is a welcome addition to a team that has brought in fossils like Vinny Testaverde in times of need. The 2010 Panthers will be armed and dangerous.

Similarly the Panther’s receiving corps was glaringly thin. Brandon LaFell of LSU, David Gettis of Baylor, and Armanti Edwards figure to change that right away. LaFell plays with a physicality that is already drawing comparisons to a younger Muhsin Muhammed. Edwards brings an athleticism and speed to the Panthers that will allow him to stretch the field opposite Steve Smith, or in the slot, not to mention opening things up in the wildcat formation. I have even heard comparisons between Edwards and another college QB turned wide out – Anquan Boldin. These receivers remind me of the Panthers receiving corps of “Smitty,” “Moose,” and Ricky Proehl… the corps led the team to its only Super Bowl in franchise history. At this point, Gettis is just icing on the cake.

The Panthers also picked up a pass rusher that is desperately needed in Greg Hardy. Since the departure of Julius Peppers, the Panthers have been left without a big play defensive lineman. Greg Hardy could definitely be that guy. He is a sick athlete with a motor that does not quit. Admittedly, he has an injury history, but he has a ton of upside, projecting as a first rounder just a few years ago. I also think drafting a guy like Hardy is smart in these cost conscientious days because Hardy figures to be a much cheaper option than buying a big name in free agency.

In the end these are all great moves, but I feel that after the Panthers’ selected Clausen they sealed the deal for walking out of the draft as the biggest winners in the draft. Make no doubt about it, the Rams have a great quarterback in Sam Bradford, but seeing how Clausen and McCoy were available nearly 50 picks later, I would say they overpaid. Clausen has been touted as the most NFL ready quarterback playing in an NFL type offense at Notre Dame. I am a huge fan of his cocky, gunslinger attitude and I think it is exactly what Carolina needs right now. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, Clausen is the future of the Carolina Panthers. I do not think there is another team that gained so much in one single pick. That makes the Cardiac Cats the undisputed winners of the NFL draft.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best League of 2009 Debate – The NFL Wins In All Aspects

December 28, 2009

Read the arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan about which league they believe had the best 2009.



Another year, another dominant performance by the NFL. One of the world’s best businesses (even the bad teams make money), it is easy to see why the NFL always captures so many eyeballs nationally (and internationally, if we are counting those games played in Wembley Stadium, London).

The NFL is one of those rare parts of society and life that equally appeals to the brainy and brawny folks. Complex week 15 playoff scenarios, the off-the-field news stories, the draft scenarios per team, and the in-game strategy are all examples of aspects of the NFL that appeal to brainy people (like, say, for example… sports geeks…). “People hit hard, fall down” is an example of why the NFL appeals to brawny folks (uh, not sports geeks).

The NFL has an amazing ability to be in the news – and create positives out of potentially negative news situations. Consider the case of former Cleveland Browns wide receiver Donte Stallworth. He struck and killed a pedestrian while driving intoxicated – a terrible tragedy with the ability to cast a large shadow of negativity over the league. Instead, the NFL’s punishment of Stallworth turns out to be more effective and harsh than the penal system. And, out of the this incident is berthed the official “NFL Conduct Policy” – a legacy of active commission Roger Goodell. The NFL is the first league to put a stake in the ground and muddy the lines between personal and professional lives. If the penal system fails to punish, the NFL will not. Tough.

The NFL is also about brand… about creating and protecting an image. While the Stallworth situation conveyed toughness, the idea of toughness was born and now thrives in the locker rooms of every NFL team. For example, remember all of the hubbub about concussions in the NFL, and how some serious changes were on the way to being made to make the game safer, and force players to sit out extra time to avoid long-term damage? Yea, that noble imperative lasted a week, and now it’s “toughness as usual” in the NFL. No league demonstrates – or values – its tough brand more than the NFL (paying attention, NHL???).

One more example of PR prowess… there is a terrible fight going on between the owners and the players association right now… even to the point that there is legitimate talk of a work stoppage before the 2011 season. But, how much of that story do we find in the mainstream media? A couple of random mentions, at best. The one story I found to support my argument is dated in March.

The NFL had the best 2009 of any league because it has the ability to dominate any sports news cycle any time it wants. From future hall of famers making playing or not playing choices to Tom Brady’s return after a devastating injury to the Saints fast start to the season, to the Colts near perfection, etc., “The League” dominates the news. The NFL is a television ratings draw, an ad space seller for sports websites, and the recipient of more ink in newspapers and online than any other league – no matter what time of year. The NFL has the uncanny knack of making relative non-stories into major stories. For example, it seems only in the NFL are teams achieving (see the Indianapolis Colts, Minnesota Vikings, and New Orleans Saints) as much of a story as teams not achieving (see the Pittsburgh Steelers, the New York Giants, and Carolina Panthers). Heck, Monday Night Football analyst Jon Gruden was RUMORED to return to coaching and it was a major story that helped him capture a long-term deal with ESPN. Being in an NFL story is neither bad news nor good news – but it is always news.

Whether evaluating business, brand, public relations, or fan enthusiasm, no league demonstrates more of each than the NFL, making it the best league of 2009.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Most Surprising NFL Division Debate – Who Expected The NFC South To Go South?

December 23, 2009

Read the arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.



With two weeks left to go in the NFL’s regular season, there is still quite a bit to be determined. Three division races are still up for grabs and three of the four wild card spots have yet to be claimed. Today, The Sports Debates is exploring which division is the most surprising. Taking a quick look at the divisions, there is one division that really surprises me, and it is not one of those good surprises. Good surprises will happen to all of us hopefully two days from now. This is a bad surprise… the disappointing play in the NFC South.

First, the one bright spot in the NFC South is the New Orleans Saints. I thought they would make a run at a playoff spot, and I am a big fan of Drew Brees. But never ever did I expect the Saints to be 13-1 at this point in the season. That is certainly a good thing.

Now, on we go to the bad!

The Atlanta Falcons were a sexy preseason pick to make a run in the playoffs, and possibly even win the Super Bowl. Folks, that just is not happening as the Falcons were already eliminated from playoff consideration before this past Sunday. Running back Michael Turner got off to a mediocre start (ask Sports Geek about that) and that led to more pressure on Matt Ryan, who struggled at times. Then, once Turner and Ryan went down with injuries, the Falcons were doomed. That is because the undermanned Falcons defense has been downright horrible at times. I have been a vocal critic of defensive coordinator Brian VanGorder, but in reality, he has very little to work with on defense. I mean, look at this defensive depth chart. Yikes!!!

The Carolina Panthers, last year’s division winner, has been a favorite target of The Sports Debates. First, Sports Geek stuck a fork in the team back in early October. Then, we actually did an entire debate on the future of John Fox. The bottom line is that at 6-8, the Panthers have been a complete disappointment. In actuality, the writing was written on the wall in INK when the Panthers front office had a complete brain fart and decided to give Jake Delhomme a contract extension (which takes the cake of the year’s worst contract in ANY sport… by far!). Not sure what they were smoking then, but I hope they have stopped by now. That constitutes a violation of the NFL’s drug policy! Whether or not this season costs John Fox his job remains to be seen, but either way, it has been a disappointing season.

I think we all saw the Tampa Bay Bucs taking a dive but yikes! This bad? How in the world did they beat Green Bay earlier in the season? I know the Bucs play in the NFL , and, theoretically, every team has a chance to win every week. As Dennis Green would say, “That’s why we took the [expletive deleted] field.” But come on! A record of 2-12? Fairly or unfairly, head coach Raheem Morris is already under fire partly due to the fact that he has essentially fired both his offensive coordinator and his defensive coordinator this season. Wait a minute! He fired his offensive coordinator ten days before the season. Why didn’t we see the signs then? And, are there signs of improvement? Not really!

It is the time of year to celebrate good surprises. But I am lamenting a bad surprise. The NFC South went south this year!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Two-Back System Debate – One is the Loneliest Number

December 10, 2009

Read the debate intro and the argument from Bleacher Fan about whether or not a two back system in the right approach for a successful NFL offense.



Looking around the NFL nowadays it becomes increasingly clear that the every-down type running back is nearing extinction. Teams are getting a plethora of players involved in the rushing attack. From short yardage specialist to third down pace-changers, more and more running backs are getting touches. But one approach to the rushing game is starting to garner support and has certainly piqued my interest – the two-back system.

Why not double your pleasure and double your fun with two full-time starting running backs? Now before your start to confuse my proposal with the enigma that is the running back by committee approach, let me clarify what I mean by the two-back system. The two-back system employs two primary running backs interchangeably. Coaches switch between the two backs in order to keep them fresh or alternate them on different drives. Running back by committee systems typically involve complex role assignments (e.g. the starter, the goal line back, the third down pace-changer, the fourth quarter clock grinder, etc.) that are meticulously assigned considering everything from defensive matchups to playing surface to statistical history. This is all too complex. The two-back system reduces this excessive entanglement with arbitrary stats and employs more of an old fashion gut feeling approach to calling the running game.

In 2008 the Carolina Panthers were a perfect example of a successful two-back system. Two running backs, DeAngello Williams and Jonathan Stewart, attempted 457 rushes for 2,351 yards and 28 touchdowns. While the dynamic duo did not split the load evenly (Williams had 273 attempts, 1,515 yards and 18 rushing scores while Stewart had 184 attempts, 836 yards and 10 rushing scores), they certainly were successful as a powerful tandem of starter quality running backs. The Panthers ended the season third in the NFL in rushing yards and first in rushing touchdowns, besting the next closest team by six scores. Even with the Panthers’ poor record in 2009 (5-7), the Panthers’ “double trouble” are primed to finish near the top of both categories again. It is clear that the two-back system is working in Carolina.

The New York Giants also experienced huge success last season leaning on the two-back system. The Giants led the NFL in rushing yards with 2,518. Brandon Jacobs and Derrick Ward accounted for the vast majority of this yardage while splitting the total number of carries somewhat evenly across the season. Brandon Jacobs had 1,089 yards on 219 attempts and 15 rushing touchdowns and Derrick Ward was not far behind with 1,025 yards on 182 carries and two rushing touchdowns. While Ward’s touchdowns are not comparable with Jacobs, the two backs were easily the envy of the league with dueling 1,000 yard seasons. This season the Giants rushing attack has taken a step back. Currently, the G Men are ranked tenth in rushing yardage entering week 14. This can be explained, in part, by the pounding Jacobs took last season. But I cannot help but wonder if the departure of Jacobs’ rushing brother-from-another-mother, Derrick Ward, is to blame. Ahmad Bradshaw (122 attempts for 596 yards and four rushing touchdowns) has not proven himself as an equivalent, starting caliber back that Derrick Ward was last season. In my opinion the Giants stuck with the two-back system, but the problem is the not the system but this season’s choice of backs.

The system is proving itself a winner. Teams like the Panthers, the Giants, and even this year’s Arizona Cardinals team, are really onto something. It is simple and effective and is quickly becoming a must for success in the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NFL Fumbling the Playoffs Debate – The Pitiful Meow of the 2009 Carolina Panthers

October 5, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s arguments for which NFL teams they believe have already squandered a chance at postseason glory, just four weeks into the 2009 regular season.



In order for a team to fumble its chances for the postseason – especially this early in the 2009 season – it must have started the season with some shot to actually make the playoffs. In others words, the Cleveland Browns do not really qualify for participation in this debate (lucky for them). This debate is about teams that actually had a shot and have already squandered their chance at the postseason.

Since the lousy usual suspects will not be included, there are just a handful of teams that should have played good football and earned a spot in the playoffs this season. For me, no team has already blown its opportunity at postseason glory quite as spectacularly as the Carolina Panthers.

How appropriate that the Carolina Panthers spent week four of the NFL season at home on a bye week. You know, “bye” as in good “bye” to the team’s postseason chances this season, despite the fact that the calendar still reads early October.

The Panthers are showing all of the signs of a team destined to miss the NFL playoffs after a preseason of hype and high expectations. Exhibit A – the win-loss record. The Panthers completed their preseason slate with a record of 0-4. Fans speculated the team was struggling in the preseason because of the quality teams the Panthers faced, losing at the New York Giants, at Miami, then at home against Baltimore and defending Super Bowl champions Pittsburgh. Tough losses, but it was preseason and not the end of the world.

The thing about losing all of the preseason games is that it creates a culture of losing throughout a team. The Panthers saw that losing culture in full force in week one as the team hosted Philadelphia, and were destroyed 38-10. The Panthers followed up that surprising loss with a trip to Atlanta to face a Falcons team with many weapons. The Panthers lost that game, too, and then traveled to Dallas and lost on Monday night, scoring a mere seven points.

While the offense has struggled, the normally excellent defense that is the hallmark of Panther teams has struggled as well. For some perspective on the poor play of the defense, consider that the Panthers have given up more points than EVERY team in the NFC, except the St. Louis Rams.

That Panthers have only outpaced the offensive prowess of two other teams in the NFL – the Cleveland Browns and the St. Louis Rams. Not the company a team wants to keep in the stat column this season.

So, the offense is bad and the defense is bad. All of the badness will make it difficult to come back and compete in a division that is tough. The Panthers have already lost to one division opponent – the Atlanta Falcons – and will have a challenge to beat them when the two teams play again. The New Orleans Saints lead the division and promise to continue giving Carolina’s defense fits. The Panthers even trail the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in tiebreakers, placing the presumed impressive Panthers squarely in the basement of the NFC South.

The team is also suffering from the slow decline of established veteran leadership and infighting – and the two issues are related. Quarterback Jake Delhomme has slowly changed into a leader with diminishing skills. In the opening game of the season the quarterback threw a whopping four interceptions before getting the hook from the head coach. He has now thrown seven interceptions in three games. His teammates are apparently frustrated. Star wide receiver Steve Smith, showing an uncanny ability for how to use the media, called in to a local sports talk show in Charlotte to announce that he “never liked” Delhomme as a quarterback. When the quarterback and star receiver are not getting along… well, that is not exactly a foundation for a winning team.

On top of all of these obvious issues, the team is now losing faith in its head coach, John Fox. If the coach’s seat was warming up on September 13 – before the season actually started – then it must be on fire now.

The simple fact is that all signs point to a continued collapse from the Panthers. The team does not appear to have the guts and leadership to pull itself up by the bootstraps and compete in the division and fight for a spot in the playoffs. After all of the preseason and training camp belief that the Carolina Panthers were a team destined for an appearance in the postseason, they are now the team most notorious for blowing their shot early in the season.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Overcoming Team Obstacles Debate – Which is Better, Incompetent or Incapacitated?

September 24, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument and Loyal Homer’s argument about which is more difficult for a team to overcome, the loss of a star player to injury, or the slow demise of the team’s leader.

In week one of the 2008 NFL season, the New England Patriots suffered a major setback. Quarterback Tom Brady was injured and lost for the entire year. As a result, the Patriots were forced to call upon their untested backup, Matt Cassel, to carry the team through the entire schedule. Although the Cassel-led Patriots managed to win 11 games last year, they still fell short of a playoff appearance. Coming off of an undefeated 2007 regular season that ended with a very dramatic loss in the Super Bowl to the New York Giants, 2008 was supposed to be a year of redemption for New England. Instead, the loss of their star quarterback to injury became the Patriots’ defining event, and the team never fully recovered.

Fast-forward to the opening weekend of the 2009 season, where the Carolina Panthers had to address quarterback issues of a different kind. Their offensive leader, veteran quarterback Jake Delhomme, managed to escape the game without suffering physical injury. In hindsight, however, suffering an injury may have been the more merciful option for exit from the game. Delhomme, who ended his 2008 season in the NFC playoffs by throwing FIVE interceptions in their loss to the Arizona Cardinals, had hoped to start the 2009 season off on a much more positive note. Unfortunately for Delhomme, the opposing defense of the Philadelphia Eagles had other plans, as Delhomme threw for another FOUR interceptions before finally being benched.

Although Delhomme responded with a marginally improved performance during week two (308 passing yards, one touchdown and one interception in their loss to the Atlanta Falcons), questions abound regarding the long-term viability of Delhomme and his future as the quarterback for the Panthers’ team.

The situations for the 2008 Patriots and the 2009 Panthers were very different. On one hand, a team lost their star player to a season-ending injury, and was then forced to look to a very inexperienced backup player to fill that star’s shoes. On the other, a team must choose between an experienced veteran who may or may not be able to successfully compete in the NFL any more, or an inexperienced backup whose performance may not be much better than that of the veteran.

Both are bad situations to be in, but which is worse?

Is it easier for a team to overcome the setback of losing a superstar player to a season-ending injury early in the year, or to overcome the setback of having to rely on a veteran leader who is no longer able to perform at the same successful level that they used to?

Loyal Homer will argue that it is easier to overcome the slow demise of a veteran leader. While that leader’s play might be spotty and inconsistent, there are also still going to be glimpses of the player that ‘was’. Occasional moments of success from a tested veteran are still better than relying upon an untested backup to assume 100% of the responsibility on the field.

Sports Geek will argue that a season-ending injury to a star player is easier to overcome. The definitive knowledge that a star player is going to be unavailable, and the subsequent acceptance that others on the team will have to step up their performance, is better than the uncertainty and unreliability that comes from a veteran leader who may be on their way out of the game altogether.

Enlighten me!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Most Devastating NFL Injury Debate – The Steelers Cannot Afford to lose Ben Roethlisberger

August 24, 2009

Read Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer’s argument for who they believe is potentially the most devastating injury an NFL team can suffer.



Many NFL teams have important players. However, only a few teams in the NFL would be devastated if they lost their most important player. The writers at The Sports Debates believe there are three teams – and three players – who, more than any other team, would be significantly less effective if the player went down to injury. Bleacher Fan will argue the player a team that least afford to lose is safety Ed Reed (Baltimore Ravens) while Loyal Homer will argue the player is quarterback Peyton Manning (Indianapolis Colts).

If there was ever an NFL quarterback who knew how to win without winning pretty, it is Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Big Ben debuted in the NFL in 2004, and won two offensive rookie of the year awards. Since then the awards have dried up, sans the one selection to the Pro Bowl in 2007. He just is not a big time stat producer like some of his fellow quarterbacks in the NFL – Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. Instead, Big Ben is a winner. Now entering his sixth season of professional football, Roethlisberger has two Super Bowl rings. Roethlisberger is the league’s most important player.

Ben Roethlisberger has some skills at quarterback, for sure. But, what he has that most lack is guts and instinct. He has a knack for staying in the pocket and taking the big hits to deliver a pass. He will also stick his neck out in order to gain an extra yard or two on a play (or stop a car). He has an uncanny ability to use his feet to create extra time in the pocket while his receivers get open.

Then there is the ability to lead, measured in the NFL by wins and losses. Roethlisberger has an outstanding all-time regular season record as a starter of 51-20. Against the elite teams in the NFL (we’ll define them as follows: Baltimore Ravens, Carolina Panthers, Chicago Bears, Dallas Cowboys, Indianapolis Colts, New England Patriots, New York Giants, Philadelphia Eagles, San Diego Chargers) he has a respectable regular season record of 15-9. Against his division, the AFC North, he has an all-time record of a whopping 22-4. The supposed biggest rivalry on the Steelers yearly calendar, the Cleveland Browns, have never defeated the Steelers in a game Roethlisberger has played in. He has been so dominant in the battle of the steel cities that the Browns are not even considered a rival anymore (at least they are not considered a rival to the Steelers).

Since Roethlisberger entered the league in 2004 the Steelers compiled a record of 56-24. That means that when Roethlisberger starts at quarterback the Steelers have a winning percentage of 72 percent. Basically, they win three of every four games they play when Big Ben starts under center. Without him the Steelers winning percentage is 56 percent. It is the same defense, the same receivers, the same offensive line, the same running backs – but about a quarter fewer wins. Those stats say something about Roethlisberger’s value.

I cannot make a good argument for Roethlisberger being the most important player to a team in the NFL without talking about his playoff performance. He is lifetime 8-2 in the playoffs – having defeated both NFC teams he has ever faced in the playoffs. He has led three playoff comebacks for victories as well.

We must also talk clutch. Of the 59 career win Roethlisberger has piled up as a starter in the NFL, he has led his team from behind in 19 of them. Eight of those wins happened when he led a scoring drive that ended with less than 43 seconds on the clock (that does not include his two overtime wins). That includes the 2008 Super Bowl when he led a scoring drive that notched the go ahead touchdown against the Arizona Cardinals with just 35 ticks left on the clock.

Roethlisberger wins in the regular season, he wins in the playoffs, and he wins by leading when it matters most, as the seconds tick down. In those clutch, last second drives of the game here are the statistics that Roethlisberger has compiled: completes 74 percent of his passes for 737 yards and six touchdowns. That completion percentage is something to behold.

More, when injury speculation surrounds Roethlisberger, everyone takes it very seriously. The mere specter of an injury to the Steelers’ leader causes a frenzy amongst the Super Bowl media and changes preparation for the opponent. In other words, a single injury rumor about Big Ben impacts how a team prepares for the Steelers.

Roethlisberger’s ability to physically do things in the pocket (and out of the pocket), plus trust his unmatched instincts, separates him from the other quarterbacks in the league. He does not have the Brady’s style or Manning’s extreme smarts. He has his guts, his intuition – and his Super Bowl rings. The Pittsburgh Steelers would not be as dominant year in year out without Roethlisberger. If the Steelers lose him, they lose their identity – and their place in the standings.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.