The 2010 Sport You’re Most Thankful For Debate… Thanks for America’s Pasttime

November 24, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.

Walt Whitman once said, “I see great things in baseball. It’s our game – the American game. It will take our people out-of-doors, fill them with oxygen, give them a larger physical stoicism. Tend to relieve us from being a nervous, dyspeptic set. Repair these losses, and be a blessing to us.”

His deep reflections on this simple sport are as accurate as they are well articulated. Baseball is a thing of beauty. America is truly blessed to have such a sublime sport for its national pastime.

As millions of families gather together today and give thanks for the many blessings in their life, one blessing I will remember is baseball. Even though the New York Yankees did not win the World Series, and the 2010 season saw the loss of one of the most iconic figures in all of sports history – “The Boss” George Steinbrenner – this season proved, as always, to be a thing of beauty. It reminded me why, as a grown man, I love a child’s game so very much.

Perfect In Its Imperfections

The 2010 season was the first to see two perfect games in the same season, those of Dallas Braden and Roy Halladay. Shockingly, it came remarkably close to seeing three.

Aramando Galarraga of the Detroit Tigers pitched flawlessly through 26 batters. He had a perfect game going through 8 2/3 innings. All indicators pointed toward perfection, and he was just mere pitches away from joining the most elite company in baseball history by pulling off the rarest feat in the Bigs. Fate had different plans for Galarraga. On the last out of the game he was inarguably robbed of immortality by umpire Jim Joyce.

This was a travesty that could have been worse. Arguably the worst blown call in baseball cost Galarraga his shot at immortality. This could have invalidated the sport. This could have driven fans away in droves. Instead, fans were treated to a bittersweet ending, an ending which highlighted the human aspect of the sport, but more importantly ended with a story of forgiveness and redemption.

Jim Joyce, the 22 year veteran and consummate professional, did the unthinkable. He did what no one dreamed an official or anyone connected with professional sports would ever do. He admitted he was wrong.

With a tearful confession and a heartfelt apology, Jim Joyce set things right. He avoided a potential disaster for MLB and instead restored faith in the game for many. For stories like these, I give thanks.

A True Team Celebration

I was similarly blown away by the thoughtfulness of the Texas Rangers clubhouse in celebrating their post-season advancements. When the Texas Rangers clinched the America League West crown they celebrated in typical fashion with a champagne free-for-all in the clubhouse. This was an unforgettable night and deserved an equally unforgettable party, but one man was unable to partake in the festivities.

Rangers sluggers Josh Hamilton, who struggled mightily to overcome his history of substance abuse problems, chose to be elsewhere. While he was no doubt as excited as his teammates, his self-imposed lifestyle restrictions left him out of the party. But when the Rangers advanced, the players didn’t make that mistake again.

Instead the Rangers showered each others with ginger ale, a touching consideration for their valued teammate. This type of camaraderie is not often displayed in professional sports, but special moments like this renew ones passion for baseball and for that I give thanks.

Miracles and Heroes Abide

Without a doubt, the thing about MLB I am most thankful for is the fact that heroes and miracles still survive. Baseball has had some serious PR issues over the past three decades. From the strike to The Steroids Era, there were plenty of reasons to look down on baseball. But there are still players and stories that keep the legacy of the past alive.

Perhaps nothing is more touching to me than the story of players who hit homeruns on command for a sick child. This seems to be a folk tale from a bygone era, but amazingly it is not. As recent as the 2009 season Brett Gardner defied the odds and did exactly this. Making it all the more improbable is the fact that Gardner did it with an inside the park homerun.

A special young girl in need of a heart transplant asked Gardner that to hit a homerun for her. She even told him that she had been praying he could do it. He wasn’t supposed to be able to do it. He wasn’t a bruising slugger, and he wasn’t even in the lineup that night. But due to an ejection of the left fielder and a miraculous hit Gardner was able to live a story that even Disney could not have even imagined.

It’s so very refreshing to hear good news about a sport and see there is something worth being fanatical about.

So, amidst all the turkey and even the football, I stop to give thanks for baseball, and the great American legacy it continues to build.

Former San Francisco Giants third baseman, Al Gallagher once said, “There are three things in my life which I really love: God, my family, and baseball.” I am inclined to agree.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest Officiating Screw Up Debate… The Play That Won The White Sox The World Series

June 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

 

As a child, the song “Take Me Out To the Ballgame” lied to me. It taught me that, “…it’s one, two, three strikes you’re out at the old ball game”, but sometimes that is not the case.

In the case of a dropped third strike, the batter can run to first base and must be thrown or tagged out. Normally this is no big deal, as even speedsters are usually retired with ease on this routine play. But during the 2005 American League Championship Series (ALCS) this play was anything but ordinary.

Going into the bottom of the ninth inning during Game Two of the series, the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim were all knotted up with the Whites Sox at 1-1. The Angels were hoping to pull ahead in extra innings and take a 2-0 lead in the ALCS back West to Anaheim, where they figured to make short work of finishing off the upstart Sox and heading to the World Series. Ozzie Guillen’s wily White Sox ballclub had other plans.

Reliever Kelvim Escobar had successfully retired the first two batters and was looking to send the game into extra innings when the Chicago White Sox batter A.J. Pierzynski stepped into the box.

Pierzynski worked the at-bat to a full count, and on the payoff pitch he swung and missed. Normally this would signify the end of the inning and mean free baseball for the fans (because after all, you pay for nine innings, and anything else is a sweet bonus), but that is not how things transpired. The Angels’ catcher, Josh Paul, gloved the ball just before it hit the dirt, tossed the ball out toward the mound, and headed toward the dugout for what he thought would be the top of the tenth inning.

That’s when things got crazy. Pierzynski broke for first base, and with the Angels trotting toward the visitors’ dugout he made it easily.

Pierzynski, a catcher, knew that on a dropped third strike he would have to be thrown or tagged out, so he tested it. Lo and behold he got the call. Home plate umpire Don Eddings had clearly closed his fist signifying strike three, and with no cry of “No Catch!” allowed Pierzynski to take the base virtually without a play.

Throughout a lengthy huddle between Eddings and his fellow umpires, interrupted by a protest from opposing manager and former catcher, Mike Scioscia, Pierzynski remained on first. When all the talk was finished, the call stood.

Replays clearly showed that, although the tip of Paul’s glove dipped into the dirt, he caught the ball cleanly. The call was blown and the Angels were about to pay for it in a big way.

The Sox brought in a pinch-runner, Pablo Ozuna, who immediately stole second base uncontested. Then the South-Siders’ third baseman, Joe Crede drove in Ozuna to win the game.

The chain of events starting with the controversial Pierzynski at-bat led to a run of dominance that did not end until the White Sox won the World Series, as the previous night’s loss to the Angels ended up being the last Chicago loss of the postseason. This one blown call completely changed the game, and the momentum shift potentially changed the outcome of the series. Pierzynski defended his actions and Eddings stood by his call, but regardless, the damage was done.

Don’t get me wrong, I fully support Pierzynski’s try anything, win at all costs hustle, but the officiating crew could have and should have gotten this one right. Although they did not have the aid of replay, they didn’t need it. Eddings made the call and rung Pierzynski up. There was no call or signal to the Angels that the ball might still have been live, and the whole team was headed off the field.

It seems like the ump got caught sleeping on a player who was attempting to become an opportunist.

This should not have happened. There have been countless cries for the expansion of replay since the whole Galarraga drama unraveled recently, but that game did not have championship consequences that this one did. If Bud Selig were ever going to expand the use of replay, then would have been the perfect time, after a blown call that actually mattered.

This costly and controversial call was performed on one of baseball’s biggest stages, and might very well have altered the course of the postseason.

Somehow the lyric “For its one, two, three strikes and sometimes you may be awarded first base” does not exactly have the same ring to it, but that is how things went down on the night of the biggest blown call of all time.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Monday Morning Referee Debate – The Milk Spilled… You DON’T Need a Press Conference to Confirm It!

October 13, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the NCAA should publicly acknowledge when a referee makes a bad call during a game.



It is time for another dose of some good ‘ol fashioned, folksy wisdom from Bleacher Fan.

Today, we will be considering a lesson which is drawn from Saint Francis of Assisi – Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.”

A much more folksy way to interpret this is with the adage – There is no use crying over spilled milk!

Those phrases exist to highlight the fact that nothing positive is gained by dwelling on events that cannot be changed. Once the milk has been spilled, for example, crying will not help to put the milk back in the glass, nor will it help clean up the mess. Instead, what you SHOULD do is take measures to either correct the situation, or to try and prevent it from occurring in the future.

With regard to officiating in college sports (or any sport in general), the reality is that referees are going to make bad calls occasionally. Sometimes it will work out in favor of your team, and other times it goes against your team. In the case of the incident during the Georgia/LSU game that was highlighted by Loyal Homer during the introduction to this debate, it seems to be very clear that wide receiver A.J. Green should not have been penalized for excessive celebration. Nobody is disputing that fact.

What I am disputing, however, is the fact that Rogers Redding, the SEC’s coordinator of officials, felt the need to publicly acknowledge and admit to the blown call. The only thing accomplished by Redding was to bring additional controversy to the game, bring increased scrutiny onto the SEC official who made the bad call, and get a lot of people upset for no reason. They cannot overturn the call, and it is not going to change the outcome of the game, so what is the point?!

As I said before, bad calls happen often in sports. Some are more prominent than others, and some may have a more direct impact on the outcome of the game, but it is foolish to assume that bad calls are unavoidable. What USUALLY happens with blown calls (even those that seem egregious) is that fans on the “losing” side will gripe and complain, then will move on (which is what they will STILL have to do in this situation, because the outcome of the game will NOT be changed). Instead of allowing that process to take place, Redding fueled the fire of those complaining with a statement that justified their concerns. While his intention may have been to appease the upset Bulldog fans, what he ACTUALLY did was further undermine the authority of the officiating crew.

In the interest of following that very important message of focusing only on things that CAN be changed, the NCAA should promote PRO-activity, rather than RE-action. Since they will not correct the situation by changing the outcome of the game, the NCAA’s only PROACTIVE option is to take measures that will help prevent these controversies from happening in the future. In doing so, the NCAA could actually promote a positive resolution to a negative situation.

Life as an official is not easy. I once served as an umpire for a charity softball game, and was assaulted by a barrage of criticism as if I had blown a call at the plate in the seventh game of the World Series. And, this was a CHARITY event! I can only imagine the pressure and scrutiny that a referee in a high-profile college football game endures.

The problem in sports today is that technology creates the opportunity to employ hindsight in scrutiny of every aspect of the game. Officials used to be perceived as infallible, and their interpretation of the facts became law. Now that we have the technology (and literally thousands of machines) dedicated to capturing every event of every game, the officiating becomes subject to increased pressure. What the NCAA SHOULD strive to do, in light of that enhanced technology, is focus solely on answering the following question – Should the officials continue to be perceived as infallible?

If the determination is made that the officials can be fallible, then the NCAA must expand Instant Replay usage to support the acknowledgement that the officials will sometimes make a mistake. In doing so, the organization would put measures in place to help further analyze situations, and rectify any bad calls that are made. If, however, the NCAA deems that the referees are infallible (which was once the assumption), then the NCAA, its conferences, programs, AND fans will have to accept that mistakes will be made, and are a natural part of the game. What they CANNOT do is continue to support a self-destructive process of allowing mistakes to take place without ANY means to correct it DURING the game… then publicly criticize the mistake AFTER the fact under the guise of a “heartfelt” mea culpa.

By taking on the practice of post-game admissions of guilt, the NCAA is essentially talking out of both sides of their mouth. On one hand, it establishes a policy that grants absolute authority to make a call that is CLEARLY subjective on the shoulders of one person. On the other hand, it then publicly criticizes a person’s subjective interpretation without giving them ANY support to actually make an educated decision in “the heat of the moment.”

It is time to start looking forward… not behind!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.