The 2010 Most Interesting NBA Playoff Series Debate… Hawks Need To Take the Next Step

April 16, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

The longest postseason in sports – the NBA playoffs – begin Saturday afternoon. Today, we’re giving a little preview by talking about the matchups we’d like to see. Sports Geek is desperately wanting to see the Cavs and Celtics battle, mainly because he wants to see the hate each team has for each other come to the surface. Bleacher Fan wants to see Lebron and Kobe do battle, and I think that’s the matchup that would draw the biggest ratings. That doesn’t leave me with a lot to choose from, so being a Loyal Homer, I’m going to choose a series that most of you probably wouldn’t care to see. I want to see the Hawks rise to the occasion and take on the Cavs. Bear with me now.

The NBA playoffs is easily the postseason out of the big three (MLB, NBA, and NFL) that I am least passionate about. It’s too long and drawn out and loses my interest, especially in the early rounds. Plus, my home-standing Hawks have been terrible for much of my lifetime. But the last couple of years I have followed it more intensely and have every intention of doing so this year. That’s because the Hawks have been in there. I’ve always followed them, so don’t call me a bandwagon, fan but the interest has definitely picked up of late. Two years ago they took the defending champion Boston Celtics to seven games in the first round. Last year, the Hawks were swept in the second round by the Cavs. This year, what’s going to happen? It remains to be seen. During the regular season they won 53 games and are the third seed in the Eastern Conference. I get the sense, however, that no one takes them seriously… nor should they. What have they accomplished on the national stage? Not a thing. During the regular season they were 2-6 against the Cavs and Magic, with one of those wins being a meaningless game on Wednesday against Cleveland. What will the Hawks have to do to get some national love? Beat the Cavs.

The Cavs enter the playoffs with the bulls-eye on their chest. They are the team everyone expects to make it to the Finals, and they are the team everyone wants to see play. Heck, all three of us are writing about them today for different reasons. Anything less than a Finals appearance would be a disappointment, and quite frankly, a choke. They will have to be prepared to take the best shot from everyone and that’s exactly what they’d get from a team like Atlanta. As I stated, the Cavs went 3-1 against the Hawks. But the three Cavs wins were closely contested. They were just able to close the deal in the fourth quarter in those three wins, which, as we all know, separates the “haves” from the “have nots.”

I’m not convinced the Hawks have the confidence to beat a team like Cleveland in the postseason. But that’s exactly what they are going to have to do to take it to the next level. Atlanta is known for its night life, and that’s why visiting players like to go there. What it’s not known for is its passionate fan base. I went to a game a couple of years ago and let me tell you, I’ve heard more noise at a cemetery. But a victory over the Cavs could light a fire in the city of Atlanta and give the Cavs yet another rival.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The LeBron James Patriotic Obligation Debate… A King Must Represent His Country

April 16, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Nothing brings out the fire of Americans like a debate involving patriotism, huh?

LeBron James definitely turned some heads recently when he stated that he may skip out on the FIBA World Championship Tournament. The fact that Jerry Colangelo called him out on it erased any chance this had of slipping through the cracks. Colangelo backed down (somewhat), but it is an interesting enough situation to catch the attention of The Sports Debates.

Does LeBron James have a patriotic duty to participate in the World Championship Tournament?

Bleacher Fan believes that LeBron has the freedom to choose not to play, which is correct. It is also correct that LeBron has done his fair share of work to prove his loyalty to our fine country. He, along with being the face of the NBA, has been the face of Team U.S.A. for the past six years whenever the Stars and Stripes have participated in a tournament.

Babe Ruthless, in the role of U.S.A. cheerleader, breaks out the pom poms. He argues that the FIBA World Championship Tournament, like Ron Burgundy, is kind of a big deal. It’s the same way Joe Biden feels about health care reform. The Babe is obviously disgusted that King James wants to follow in the footsteps of The Worm and The Diesel and pursue a movie career, instead of suiting up for the Red, White, and Blue.

It is often said that the World Championship Tournament is held in the same high regard as the Summer Olympics. I would not go that far. Before all of this came up, I had absolutely no clue where the tournament was going to be played this summer. Either way, LeBron has made it clear he has a REALLY (times five) busy Summer. We all know his contract situation and how hectic that could turn out to be. And by all means, he certainly has the FREEDOM of choice to do whatever he deems appropriate with his spare time.

But the question centered on whether or not he has a duty to play, and he most certainly does. Therefore, I award the victory to Babe Ruthless.

I would not go as far as to say his reputation would take a big hit if he skipped out for a non-injury related issue. But people like Babe Ruthless will not forget. Another point that needs to be made is the fact that Team U.S.A. has worked extremely hard to put our country back on top in international basketball team competitions. The 1992 Dream Team was one of the most dominant forces in sports history in its pursuit of the gold medal. The 1996 team won also. But since then, the aura surrounding American basketball had slipped. Europeans and other nationalities began to infiltrate the NBA, and it became increasingly clear that basketball had become more of a worldwide sport. This was evident by an embarrassingly lackluster effort in the 2004 Summer Olympics, when Team USA brought home the bronze.

Things got so dire that Mike Krzyzewski was brought in to right the ship. Much more emphasis was put on tournament competition to get U.S.A. back to the top. The additional attention and effort showed in 2008, as the Americans cruised to the gold medal. Bleacher Fan pointed out that there are many other stars that could carry the torch for the U.S.A. That’s certainly true. But, what if the unexpected happens and the U.S.A. loses in the world championship tournament this summer if LeBron doesn’t play? Is it LeBron’s fault? No, of course not. But much of the blame would be put on him. People will say, “Well if LeBron would have played…”

No one is DEMANDING LeBron James play. This isn’t a dictatorship, thank goodness. But it is a duty that he needs to fully understand. You don’t have to vote in this county, but it is your duty as a citizen to do so.

I will use Babe’s quote, which has been said many times over. “With great power comes great responsibility.” LeBron James is the face of American basketball. He has the power. And with that power, it’s his responsibility to help keep U.S.A. basketball on top.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The LeBron James Patriotic Obligation Debate

April 15, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Beginning on August 28 and lasting until September 12, the2010 FIBA World Championship will take place in Turkey. This is a round-robin basketball tournament in which countries from all over the world participate. Twenty-four teams are currently set to participate, and the U.S.A. is obviously on the list of teams.

The domination of Team U.S.A. in the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing was something that team executive director, Jerry Colangelo, and head coach Mike Krzyzewski strived for with great pride after years of mediocre performances in international competition. They sold the team on the amount of commitment it would take to develop team camaraderie. It was basically a three-summer commitment from that team. It was successful. And, it is something that is evidently going to happen again as the 2012 Summer Olympics in London draw closer. The World Championships this summer is the first step in working toward the ultimate goal of winning the gold in 2012.

In preparation for 2012, Colangelo is expecting full participation from the top Team U.S.A. players this summer. He recently said, “There are no free passes to London. There are no special rules for anyone. If someone decides to pass without a legit issue, they do it with the understanding of the risk.” I am not sure Colangelo anticipated the firestorm it would cause as the game’s marquee player, Lebron James, immediately took umbrage at the comment.

You may have heard, but King James has a huge payday forthcoming this offseason. He is going to be making a decision that will define the rest of his career and ultimately shape his legacy. Whether he resigns with Cleveland, or signs with another team, it is bound to be a busy summer for Lebron. That, and the fact that he is currently set to begin shooting a movie titled Fantasy Basketball Camp, leave little time for James to participate in the World Championships.

Colangelo has since backed off his original comments somewhat, but the controversy had already started. The seed is already planted into the minds of the writers at The Sports Debates. This is a worthwhile debate, even though the question is quite simple.

Does Lebron James have a patriotic duty to participate in the World Championships?

Bleacher Fan will argue that James does not have any obligation whatsoever to participate, while Babe Ruthless will channel his patriotic feelings and argue that he does have a duty to play for his country.

The stage is set, and the winner brings home The Sports Debates’ version of the gold medal!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The LeBron James Patriotic Obligation Debate… Say It Ain’t So, LeBron

April 15, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

LeBron James may choose not to represent America by playing for Team U.S.A. during FIBA World Championship tournament this summer in Turkey. Say it ain’t so LeBron, say it ain’t so.

Although I have never been the biggest basketball fan in the world, I have pretty much always been a LeBron James fan. Since he burst onto the scene in the NBA during the 2003-2004 season, his dynamic play captivated the attention of millions and made him a national icon. He is athletic, entertaining, and dominant – all qualities that endear him to the public, as well as Babe Ruthless. But my support for King James may come to a screeching halt depending on the choice LeBron makes this summer between the love of money or country.

For those unfamiliar with the FIBA World Championships, it – like Ron Burgundy – is kind of a big deal. The U.S.A. Basketball website even states that, “The World Championship title is considered as prestigious as the Olympic title.” It could accurately be compared to the World Cup in soccer. Bailing on Team U.S.A. for reasons other than military service or death should be out of the question. But LeBron has alluded to bowing out for the ultra-convincing reason of, “I got a really, really, really, really, really busy summer.”

Well since he used five really’s, I understand. Had he used four then I would question it.

So what’s going to keep the Cavaliers’ star so busy that he cannot take two weeks to represent the country that gave him the opportunities to be successful in the first place?

If he is worried about getting an injury that would lower his value in free agency, he needs to think again. If Albert Pujols or Peyton Manning had injuries during the offseason before their free agency, does anyone in their right mind think they would still not receive top dollar? Certainly not. Elite players are often worth their salary in terms of the draw they bring at the gate and on TV, let alone their contributions on their respective playing fields. LeBron James would be no different. Hypothetically, in a worse case scenario, he blows out a muscle playing for Team U.S.A. I firmly believe he would still demand top dollar on the free agent market simply because he’s LeBron James – one of the most marketable players in sports right now.

It is rumored that part of the reason LeBron could choose to skip the tournament is because of a movie deal. Are you freaking kidding me!? Pardon my shock and utter lack of enthusiasm for the project, but I thought it was clear by now that basketball players and movies go together like peanut butter and turds. Maybe he can follow in the footsteps of Dennis Rodman and make a great action movie like Double Team. With a powerhouse teaming of Jean Claude Van Damme and Dennis Rodman, what could go wrong? The film poster could have read, “One is not from this country and the other is not from this planet.” Or if LeBron is finds he is really good at acting – as most professional athletes with just a high school education are – he might be lucky enough to mimic the acting career of Shaquille O’Neal. I do not know how anyone could forget Shaq’s epic portrayal of a genie granting children wishes in Kazaam. The tagline for this little cinematic wonder was, “He’s a rappin’ genie with an attitude… and he’s ready for slam-dunk fun!” I hope for the film goers’ sake there are some good previews.

It is also believed that James wants to take time to choose where he will be playing next season. With free agency quickly approaching, LeBron must decide whether to stay in Cleveland or departure for a bigger market – perhaps the Big Apple where his beloved New York Yankees play. While I respect him for wanting to make a decision about his future after the season rather than creating a huge distraction, I do not believe that it would actually prohibit James from playing in the World Championships. Whatever his choice, I feel certain he would have enough time to make it. The last time I checked you can still make decisions just as well in Turkey as you can in Cleveland.

The most frustrating aspect to the whole situation is that it is clear LeBron likes representing America, he just seems to have his priorities out of whack right now. LeBron has played for Team U.S.A. during the 2004 and 2008 Summer Olympics, and played in the last FIBA World Championship in 2006. But it appears his self-interests are getting in the way of his duty to his country.

His decision to miss the 2010 World Championships also comes with future repercussions. U.S.A. Basketball Chairman Jerry Colangelo has stated that missing the World Championships without an acceptable excuse would prohibit a player from playing for the U.S.A. during 2012s Summer Olympic Games in London. I would hate for a poor decision to tarnish the legacy LeBron is building for himself, not just as an NBA legend, but an ambassador of basketball to the world.

I know that LeBron never took an oath to represent America against threats both foreign and domestic, but some American athletes have. A special few athletes like Pat Tillman have given their last full measure of devotion to the protection of this country. No one is asking LeBron James to raid caves in Afghanistan looking for Al Qadea, they are just asking him to do what he does best for the benefit of his country. It is well said that with great power (in LeBron’s case, talent) comes great responsibility. James is arguably the best player in America right now, and he should be representing this country to the rest of the world. Maybe my admiration of LeBron has caused my expectations to be too high, but I do not think so.

LeBron James has a duty to serve his country. Money, movies, or personal decisions should not hinder him from doing what so many others would gladly choose to do if they had the God-given talents that James has. It seems to me that basketball is running short of reputable heroes… the type of players that kids can look up to. LeBron has the opportunity to be that type of hero. I sincerely hope that he strongly reconsiders his current stance on playing, or he will surely loose patriotic fans.

My personal advice to LeBron is to rent the movie Miracle, actually listen to the national anthem they sing before each ballgame, and take a trip out to see the Statue of Liberty the next time he’s in New York. After having a heart to heart with Lady Liberty, I think he will make the right decision. U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Resigning Ilgauskus Debate Verdict

March 24, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

This debate was especially difficult to judge for yours truly because, as frequent TSD readers know, I am a firm believer that life isn’t fair, and neither are sports. Yet for this debate I was assigned as an arbiter of fairness.

After reading both arguments, my gut reaction was to declare Bleacher Fan the winner. Looking at the situation legally, it appears as though Zydrunas Ilgauskas was acquired following all the right procedures. It appears that Cleveland’s legal advisors made sure the Cavaliers dotted all their “i”s and crossed all their “t”s. All empirical evidence indicates that the Cavs were well within their rights to reacquire Ilgauskas.

Then I re-examined the introduction to this debate and discovered that the premise of today’s debate was not whether the Cavaliers acted legally to reacquire Ilgauskas, but whether or not the action was fair.

Then I considered the point that Loyal Homer kept hammering home – that the trade made an already great team even better for virtually no compensation. He is correct. What did the Cavaliers really give up to get Antawn Jamison and Sebastian Telfair? Basically one first round pick. This is even less valuable than it appears since NBA draft picks are basically nominal after the lottery. When you look at the situation through this prism Loyal Homer is correct – Cleveland got something for virtually nothing. I can see how that would not sit well with his sense of fairness.

Both Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan make convincing arguments. Loyal Homer points out that the series of events that transpired seem to more than stack the deck in the favor of the Cleveland Cavaliers. He also makes a strong case that there is enough evidence for a reasonable person to suspect some covert and suspicious activity. Bleacher Fan did exactly as I predicted in the introduction and provided a thorough examination of every step of the deals which brought Big Z to Washington, and then back to Cleveland. He pointed out how the Cavaliers complied with NBA regulations every step of the way.

Ultimately the debate was decided by the answer to one central question – was Ilgauskas’ acquisition unfair. In a word – no. As Bleacher Fan pointed, out every team had an opportunity to sign Big Z and only the Cavaliers were able to. That is not an unfair advantage. Even if Ilgauskas’ acquisition even gave the Cavaliers that great an advantage, wouldn’t it stand to reason that another team would attempt to sign him so that Cleveland did not end up with him? Both the Yankees and Red Sox are notorious for this tactic. But Ilgauskas did not garner enough competitive suitors besides Cleveland, therefore no team stepped up with an offer compelling enough to block the move and force Z to reconsider his options. This is in no way an unfair advantage. That’s why this debate victory is awarded to Bleacher Fan.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Resigning Ilgauskus Debate

March 23, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

Last summer the Cleveland Cavaliers traded for Shaquille O’Neal. Many in the sports world, including myself, began to ponder the ramifications for an already very good Cleveland team. Could this be the elusive piece of the puzzle that finally puts a ring on King James finger? That’s left to be seen. But while O’Neal’s arrival meant an upgrade for the Cavaliers, it also meant a demotion for former starting center Zydrunas Ilgauskas. Big Z could see the writing on the wall. He told the New York Daily News that the move “means I’ll probably be coming off the bench.” His words proved to be prophetic, but they do not take away from the overall improvement that the Cavaliers made. Having two seven foot centers the caliber of O’Neal and Ilgauskas makes the Cavs more dangerous. Certainly there must have been some speculation about trading away Ilgauskas, but few could have predicted the trade shenanigans that occurred around the trade deadline.

Zydrunas Ilgauskas was traded to the Washington Wizards as part of a multi-player, three team deal on February 17th. About a month later Ilgauskas is headed back to Cleveland, where he signed a one year contract today. Confused? I don’t blame you, but maybe I can help.

The Wizards decision to acquire Ilgauskas was motivated largely by finances. The struggling team is undergoing an overhaul to restructure the talent and salaries within the organization. Washington was able to deal Antawn Jamison’s hefty price tag to the Cleveland in exchange for Ilgauskas’s smaller and soon to be expiring contract. The Wizards were then able to free up even more money by buying out Ilgauskas’ contract early, making him an unrestricted free agent. Shaq then suffered an injury that could put him out till the end of the regular season… and you can guess which team quickly became the number one suitor for the big man. Or I can just tell you – the Cleveland Cavaliers. Sure Ilgauskas had to clear waivers first, but that was easy. Then he simply waited until the league told him he was allowed to resign with the Cavs. But, the crazy coincidence and timing of this trade and release and resigning have some questioning the validity of a trade that allows a player to rejoin the team that traded them 30 days later.

Which brings us to today’s debate. The Sports Debates will explore the question: Is it fair that an NBA team can trade a player, then end up with the same player 30 days later?

Bleacher Fan will argue that the Cavaliers’ actions were both fair, ethical, and did nothing to that hurts the NBA as a whole. He is sure to provide a thorough explanation of the rules regarding player acquisition and how the Cavs did nothing to tamper with those rules.

Loyal Homer will argue that this trade was both unfair and not in the best interest of the league. He will question the credibility of a system that allows a player to be traded and return in less than a month. Loyal Homer is going to have to make a stronger argument than a simple violation of the “spirit of the law” defense if he wants to win this debate. He must address how trades like this are bad for basketball and cannot continue.

Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer are worthy opponents who know each other well. While they may respect each other, they are going to have to dish out some brutal honesty, because you don’t win the respect of Babe Ruthless until you get vicious. Gentlemen, we’re all sitting courtside. Now it’s time to impress.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Resigning Ilgauskus Debate… It’s Just Not Fair

March 23, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

There are some things in life that are not fair. Like, for example, the jerk seemingly getting the girl while the nice guy watches from afar. Perhaps you were passed over for a promotion at the office even though you have more than paid your dues.

Sports are not fair either. Maybe your team gets hosed on some calls that cost them the game. Maybe your star quarterback gets hurt in the first quarter of the national championship (see Colt McCoy). Maybe Jeffrey Maier or Steve Bartman shows up at the game. Yes I know, go ahead and say it before someone else does. LIFE IS NOT FAIR. Well, guess what? Neither is the situation involving Zydrunas Ilgauskus, as highlighted by Babe Ruthless in the intro to this debate. I told Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek this about a month ago when we all saw Big Z was likely going to resign with Cleveland after being bought out by Washington (much to their laughter). But it just really chaps my behind that this whole situation was allowed to happen in the first place.

You can throw all the parameters into the situation out the window. I don’t care that Washington bought him out. I don’t care that Ilgauskus lost money in the deal. I don’t care that Cleveland gave up a 2010 first round pick, which figures to be a LATE first round pick anyway. If I am a fan of an Eastern Conference team (which I am) that will be trying to bring down the Cavs in the postseason, I am livid – which I am. Make no bones about it, the Cleveland Cavaliers essentially got Antawn Jamison for NOTHING. The best team in the East has gotten better with addition BY addition (as opposed to addition by subtraction). Big Z certainly is not the player he used to be, but he is a warm, BIG body. His presence could be key to the team’s success in the playoffs, especially if the Cavs face the Orlando Magic. If nothing else, Ilgauskus would have his six fouls to offer. Those would come in handy since, as we all know, Dwight Howard is less than stellar at the charity stripe (he stands at 60 percent through Monday’s action).

The Cavs, and I am not really blaming them because they are well within the rules to do so, are not the first team to do this. Back in 2005, the Celtics traded Gary Payton to the Atlanta Hawks, only to waive him so he could eventually resign with Boston. On a less grand scale, the Magic traded Adonal Foyle last year, only to resign him after the Grizzlies waived him. I know that publicly, no underhanded deals are made as far as making arrangements to resign before the completion of the original deal, but one sure has to wonder. Even coaches like Phil Jackson and Doc Rivers have publicly stated that something is wrong with how the system is currently set up.

Teams are going to continue to take advantage of the loophole in the system as long as it is there. It is up to the NBA to eliminate it, and good luck in getting the union to help seal that loophole. The loophole makes it possible for the best teams to get better without having to give anything up. In the interest of the fairness in the league, this loophole must close.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NBA Trading Deadline Debate – Phoenix Wins By Standing Pat

February 22, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.



The NBA trading deadline has come and gone. Several teams made moves, with some making moves to improve the team and make a run at this season’s championship. Others, meanwhile, made moves to essentially throw in the towel for the season and begin the rebuilding process. Some of those teams made moves to clear cap space for the free agent bonanza. Perhaps you have heard a thing or two about it. Possible free agents you have heard include LeBron James, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh. But the team that made the biggest move at the trading deadline was, in fact, a team that did nothing. And that is a good thing. That team is the Phoenix Suns.

For weeks, we heard about all the places that Amare’e Stoudemire could be traded. Would it be the Miami Heat, where he would team up with Wade to power an underperforming team? Would it be with the Cleveland Cavaliers, where he could be on the same team as King James? Would it be Dallas? Every day we heard or read different rumors. I often wondered why the Suns would be so eager to part with a talent like Stoudemire, who is quite the force on the court when healthy.

Obviously, there is some risk involved. Amare’e (he is one of those players you can refer to on a first name basis) could choose to opt out of his contract after the season and decline the $17.7M option. Perhaps he wants to throw his hat in the ring this offseason. If that is the case, then maybe Phoenix regrets not making a move. Amare’e has stated that he is leaning toward NOT opting out of his contract. That would be welcome news for Suns fans, and welcome news for Suns general manager Steve Kerr, who would take some serious heat if the opposite happened.

As for this season, I think it is an excellent move for the Suns to stand pat. It is not like the Suns are competing with the Nets for the number one pick in next year’s draft. They are right in the thick of things in the Western Conference with a record of 34-23 through Sunday. That currently puts them sixth in the conference, but just three and a half games back of Denver for second place. Are you really helping your team by trading away a guy who is averaging 21 points and nearly nine rebounds a game? He is still young at only 27-years-old (he is younger than all four TSD writers) and, when healthy, he is absolutely a nightmare for defenses to deal with on the court.

Suns fans have to be pleased that Kerr did not pull the trigger on any of the trades that were thrown his way over the past few weeks. He decided to roll the dice a little and see how the situation plays out with Amare’e. I think it is a gamble that will pay for the Suns in the short run, obviously, but also in the long run.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Coach Kicking Out Fans Debate – How Much Authority Does a Coach Really Have?

December 24, 2009

Read the arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.



The four of us here at The Sports Debates consider ourselves to be four very passionate sports fans. We have lively discussions with each other as well as with our friends and family. We scream and yell at the TV when our favorite teams are playing… and when our most hated teams are playing (Editor’s note: This example is mostly Bleacher Fan. Loyal Homer just destroys whatever technology is handy). When we are at games, we cheer loudly for our teams when they are doing well… and usually berate the referee or official when our team is not doing so well!

Have you ever been to a game on any level where a fan heckled a coach, player, or referee to no end? If you are like me, you often yell at the official that the buffet will still be open after the game so he can go ahead and call the fouls that are necessary! Maybe you have seen a fan go too far and perhaps you have seen that fan escorted out by security for whatever reason. Maybe other fans asked for him to be thrown out. Or, better yet, maybe the coach had the fan thrown out. That leads us to today’s debate.

Recently, North Carolina head basketball coach Roy Williams, who is generally a likable and calm guy, asked security personnel to remove a heckling fan after the fan “somewhat” heckled one of the Tar Heel players during a free throw attempt. Check out the video here. This situation, by most accounts, appeared to be overblown and Williams himself even said he regrets the incident took place.

Today we are debating the following: Should a coach have the right to kick a fan out of a game?

Thankfully, we have the experts at The Sports Debates to argue this passionate topic. Babe Ruthless, in a debate that very much fits his persona, will argue that coaches SHOULD have the authority to kick a fan out. Bleacher Fan, in a debate that also fits his persona quite well, will argue that coaches most definitely SHOULD NOT have the authority to remove a fan from a game.

We invite your feedback on this one. Have you perhaps seen a fan given the heave ho from a game? Did he or she deserve it? Perhaps it was you that got thrown out of the game? Please tell us! We want to hear from you!

As far as this debate goes, the loser will be thrown out and will not be allowed to eat Christmas dinner, which means more food for the rest of us!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NBA’s Two Step Traveling Rule Debate – Does it Really Matter?

November 11, 2009

Read the arguments by Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.



Before I begin, let me first welcome our newest colleague and fan persona, Babe Ruthless, to the Sports Debates – a welcome addition to our team. Today will actually be the first article from Babe, so I am looking forward to reading the argument. I also have a feeling that our two personas will have some intense battles over the coming months because they are quite opposite of each other. It should be pretty entertaining!!!

Did you know the NBA had a rule called “traveling?” If you are a fan of the Chicago Bulls of the 1990s or a current fan of the Los Angeles Lakers or the Cleveland Cavaliers, then no, you might not be! But, yes, there is a rule against traveling in the NBA! (Obviously, I am being sarcastic!)

And this season, the wording on “traveling” has been changed. The section of the NBA rulebook dealing with traveling used to allow players to “use a two-count rhythm in coming to a stop.” It has been reworded this season to say players “may take two steps in coming to a stop, passing or shooting the ball.” The NBA has repeatedly stated that the actual rule has not changed. That is another debate in itself.

The NBA season is just two weeks old so it is a little early to tell if this “rewording” of the rule will have a major affect of the game. The Sports Debates is taking it a little further. We are debating: Is the “new” traveling rule good for the NBA?

Bleacher Fan will argue that the new rule adds very little to the game and that it is not good for the league. Meanwhile, Babe Ruthless, will, in a debut article on The Sports Debates, argue that the new two-step rule is good for the league.

I am very curious to hear both sides of this debate. And, I am even more curious to hear what the fans have to say on this topic. Please comment and give us some feedback. I guarantee that at least one of us will respond to your comments! We always do.

The basketball court is yours, and Babe… it is sink or swim time!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.