The Best World Series Champ of the Decade Debate – Breaking the Curse, Red Sox Overcame To Be the Best

November 9, 2009

Read the arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan about which teams they believe were the best World Series Champs of this decade.



It all ended on October 27, 2004. The best World Series Champion of the past decade – and one of the best in the history of baseball – completed the final out in an unprecedented season. To the chagrin of new TSD contributor and fan persona Babe Ruthless, the 2004 Boston Red Sox are the best World Series Champion of this decade.

The Red Sox finished the 2004 season two games shy of 100 wins, and three shy of the division crown, taken again by perpetual stumbling block, the New York Yankees. After sweeping the Los Angeles Angles in the American League Division Series the Red Sox faced its old foe and curse-perpetuator from the Bronx. We all know the story now, down 0-3 in the series and 4-3 in the bottom of the ninth of the first game in the series where the Saawwwwxx faced elimination, spark plug Dave Roberts pinch runs for Kevin Millar. Millar drew a rare walk from Mariano Rivera, and then Roberts stole second and scored the game tying run in the bottom of the ninth on a Bill Mueller RBI base hit. The rest is an improbable history making event where the Red Sox were the first team in history to overcome a three games to zero hole to win an American League Championship Series, before sweeping through the World Series. This Red Sox team accomplished what few thought was possible in the modern era of sports, winning a series after putting itself in a three game hole. But the amazing feats from this Red Sox team did not stop with a surprising comeback.

Another reason the Red Sox are the greatest World Series championship team of this decade is because each player on the roster exceeded their previously established talent limitations. For example, opening day second baseman Mark Bellhorn set career highs in batting average (.264) and RBI (82). Catcher Jason Varitek hit a career best .296 and even grabbed 10 stolen bases. The usual suspects in the middle of the order, Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz – put up their usual excellent stats. The difference makers for this team were the several players on the Red Sox roster that played above what their career stats indicate as possible. You know the scenario in your favorite team’s context. “I know player X, player Y, and player Z are going to be great this season. But if player A, player B, and player C give us ANYTHING it will be gravy.” The 2004 Red Sox were a team dominated by gravy.

Players that are able to go beyond their limitations are a requisite for any championship team. What makes the Red Sox better than the usual championship team is that they broke a 100 year “curse.” Therefore the players that exceeded their capabilities exceeded them by such a significant amount that the team was able to accomplish something no other team in the history of baseball was ever able to do.

During TSD’s last production meeting Bleacher Fan specifically asked that I not make any mention of the bloody sock. However, it is impossible to research and write anything about the 2004 Red Sox and avoid the bloody sock. Pitcher Curt Schilling pitched hurt during the ALCS and the World Series, and he pitched extremely well. We all know the story. In retrospect the bloody sock is important not because of Schilling’s individual performance but because historic teams – transcendent teams that defeat not only a formidable opponent but vanquish a curse – must have a symbol that embodies the experience and the journey. For the Red Sox the bloody sock was so much more meaningful than a red stain on a baseball sock. The sock symbolized hard work, dismissing frustration, above and beyond effort, and a general disregard for adversity – all characteristics of the team’s personality.

No team built momentum like the 2004 Red Sox, either. After the surprising comeback against the Yankees in the ALCS, the Red Sox were an unstoppable locomotive, sweeping the National League champion St. Louis Cardinals. The team redefined momentum with its beating down of the Cardinals – the team that won more games during the regular season than any other team in baseball in 2004, including the Yankees – 11-9, 6-2, 4-1, and 3-0.

Many great teams exist in baseball’s history. Only ONE broke a curse in a spectacular, unprecedented, and an unavoidably entertaining way.

What ultimately makes the 2004 Red Sox great is not solely what the team was able to accomplish in between the chalk lines. The team had more than just baseball skills. It had history, character, and an unstoppable spirit rivaled by no other team.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Best World Series Champ of the Decade Debate – The 2001 Diamondbacks Were the Perfect Storm!

November 9, 2009

Read the arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer about which was the best team of the last decade to win a World Series.



Pitching wins championships. Following that logic, it stands to reason that the World Series championship team with the best pitching would make for the best World Series championship team. Of the past decade, no team to win a World Series had better pitching than the 2001 Arizona Diamondbacks.

As proof of that statement I offer two names – Randy Johnson and Curt Schilling. These two pitchers – who were two of the most dominant on the mound over the past 20 years – joined forces during the 2000 season and became the most devastating 1-2 punch I have ever seen in a pitching rotation. During the 2001 regular season, Schilling and Johnson combined for a record of 43-12, with Johnson winning 21 games and Schilling winning 22.

Once the duo entered the postseason they continued their almost unbeatable performance. Throughout the postseason these two mound monsters pitched a record of 9-1. Not bad when you consider the fact that 11 wins is all that it takes to win the entire postseason!

Schilling and Johnson, who were both named to the National League All-Star roster, presented a tandem that simply could not be touched. During the 2001 postseason they pitched a total of 89.2 innings, giving up only 13 runs. They threw a combined 103 strikeouts (45 of which came in the World Series alone), and gave up only 14 walks. They dominated from their first pitch to their last.

While having Johnson and Schilling is enough to make any team a contender for the World Series, pitching is only half of the game. A championship team still needs to produce runs on offense, and the Diamondbacks had one of Major League Baseball’s biggest hitters of the year in outfielder Luis Gonzalez and his 57 home runs and 142 RBI. Those totals, along with 36 doubles and an overall batting average of .325, earned Gonzalez the only Silver Slugger award of his career that season, in addition to being named an All-Star along with teammates Schilling and Johnson. With Gonzalez, fellow outfielder Reggie Sanders contributed another 33 homers and 90 RBI.

Two other notable names on the Diamondbacks roster were former Chicago Cubs All-Star and Gold Glove first baseman Mark Grace and infielder Craig Counsell, who won the 2001 NLCS MVP award for his performance against the Atlanta Braves.

The 2001 Arizona Diamondbacks were the product of a perfect storm. Thanks to the combination of the league’s two best pitchers, a career season from one of its sluggers, and the leadership and consistency of several key veteran players, the Diamondbacks went on to win its first World Series in franchise history and become the best World Series Championship team of the decade!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best World Series Champ of the Decade Debate – The Surprising 2003 Marlins Reign Supreme

November 9, 2009

Read the arguments by Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan about which teams they believe were the best World Series champions of this decade.



Since the final World Series of this decade was just completed, The Sports Debates must debate which specific World Series winning team was the best of the decade. (The 2006 St. Louis Cardinals do not belong in the discussion. That team was eliminated from consideration quite early in our conversation.) Almost everyone, at least almost everyone outside of New York, was thrilled to see the Boston Red Sox win in 2004. In 2001, the Arizona Diamondbacks defeated the heavily favored New York Yankees in the post 9/11 World Series. To me, that remains the best World Series I have ever personally watched, with the exception of the 1991 World Series (minus the outcome, of course). But as far as team of the decade, I really feel the 2003 Florida Marlins got hot at the right time and ended up being the best World Series championship team of this decade.

The Florida Marlins have been either hit or miss since its inception in 1993. The team won the World Series in 1997, too, but this 2003 team just had something about it. Not many experts expected much out of it. Sure the team won 91 games in the regular season (a full ten games behind division winner, Atlanta). The 91-win season occurred after starting the season 19-29 and changing managers (Jeff Torborg was replaced by Jack McKeon). And the team was not really expected to do much in the playoffs. But, they defeated San Francisco in the first round, a series that concluded with Ivan Rodriguez holding on to the ball at home plate after being run over by J.T. Snow.

Many people, fair or not, think of Steve Bartman when they think of the 2003 NLCS. But the Marlins deserve some serious credit for overcoming a 3-1 deficit in the series. The Marlins won Game six and seven against the Cubs in Chicago when the Cubbies featured young guns Mark Prior and Kerry Wood on the bump.

After the NLCS came the supposed mismatch against the heavily favored New York Yankees. The Marlins payroll was $54 million, compared to the $164 million payroll of the Yankees. However, behind dominant starting pitching, Florida won its second World Series in six seasons, winning four games to two. Josh Beckett pitched the clincher, going the distance on three days rest in one of the most clutch starting pitching performances in postseason history.

The postseason was the coming out party for then-20 year old Miguel Cabrera. Cabrera was called up midseason but he really caught the attention of the baseball world during the postseason. The highlights include hitting three home runs in the NLCS and hitting a home run off of Roger Clemens in the World Series (in what was supposed to be Clemens’ last season… hahahaha!).

What carried the Marlins was the young pitching trio of Beckett, Brad Penny, and rookie sensation Dontrelle Willis. Those three showed no fear in being thrust unexpectedly into the postseason spotlight.

The 2003 Marlins were a true underdog pretty much the entire season. The team overcame that stigma to win a title. For that, the 2003 Florida Marlins deserve to be called the team of the decade!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.