The Morals in Sports Debate… Do the ‘RIGHT’ Thing and Enforce Morals

April 23, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Does it seem that every time you turn on the TV these days, there is some type of moral issue going on in the world of sports? It sure does to us at TSD, which is one of the main reasons why we decided to have this debate. The debate centered on whether or not leagues should have a stricter moral conduct policy, if they even have one to begin with.

Bleacher Fan’s argument, aptly titled ‘Men Behaving Badly‘, focused on the wide variety of immorally wrong episodes that have taken place in recent memory. The three main points highlighted in the argument revolve around the fact that a) sports is a business, b) the athletes have a social responsibility to be role models, and c) that there is a matter of protection, and yes, you can interpret that last phrase however you so desire.

Babe Ruthless, on the other hand, admittedly had a tough argument to make. Nevertheless, some good points were raised and credit is owed to the Babe for that. While hardly anyone condones the scandalous activities done by today’s athletes, it is definitely important to note that these guys are human. As Babe pointed out, we must understand that while we may not have done some of the same things as today’s athletes, we have all done something we would not want the public to know about. And no, I’m not talking about the time when Sports Geek cheated off someone’s paper in his third grade spelling class.

Ultimately, this debate is quite simple – It is a matter of right versus wrong. As Bleacher Fan indicated, these players represent the team they play for. Tiger Woods is not an employee of the PGA Tour, but he is a representative of it. He is known as a golfer by the majority of us first and foremost, not as a spokesman for Nike (for example). It is the player’s responsibility to behave in a respectful manner because that image essentially is tied to the image of the respective league.

Obviously, athletes are entitled to live their lives as they see fit, but they must deal with the consequences, whatever they may be. The rest of us would have to deal with those same consequences if our actions were considered “immoral”. If you or I had been involved in the same type of situation that Ben Roethlisberger found himself in, how would our bosses look at it? Ask yourself that question and it will lead you to my verdict.

Every sports league needs to have some type of code of conduct to let their “employees” know that these types of shenanigans will not be tolerated.

Bleacher Fan is awarded the victory.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Morals in Sports Debate

April 22, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Morality is not just an issue in marriages and in real life. It has also become an issue in sports, and unfortunately it has been at the forefront of late.

Unless you’ve been under a rock the past six weeks you know the trouble that Ben Roethlisberger has had recently, so I won’t waste any of your time recounting that story. Though no charges were filed against him for his alleged shenanigans in Milledgeville, Georgia, the damage had been done to his already shaky image. It was not proven that Big Ben did anything wrong, but the NFL and Roger Goodell decided that he violated the NFL’s personal conduct policy, and as of yesterday was suspended for six games.

This, however, is not a debate on whether or not Roethlisberger deserved to be suspended.

This is instead a debate on morality and whether leagues should have some type of moral code in their respective by-laws, whatever that may be. Just look back at the past few years and you will see all types of behavior that is damaging to both the image of both the player and that particular league.

Like Roethlisberger’s highly publicized situation, we also know all about the incidents involving Tiger Woods and his mistresses. After a staged reading of a statement, two arranged interviews, and a press conference at Augusta, Tiger was back on the course to the delight of many and the agitation of many others. Unlike Big Ben’s situation, though, no type of punishment or public reprimand was handed down by the PGA Tour.

Or flash back to the summer of 2003 (has it really been seven years since this happened?). Kobe Bryant was arrested for sexual assault and though the charges were later dropped the damage had been done, both to his marriage (which was eventually repaired) and to his image (which arguably has been repaired also). But again, he received no type of suspension or public reprimand from the league office.

All of that leads to the focus of today’s debate, which is centered on moral conduct policies in sports. Some leagues, like the NFL, may already have personal conduct policies, but it is questionable how much they are enforced. The question for today’s debate is – Should leagues take a stronger stance on moral issues by defining and enforcing a moral conduct policy?

Babe Ruthless will argue that players are grown men and that they can behave however they want as long as it is not proven that any laws have been broken. Bleacher Fan will argue that the players have a responsibility to behave, and that the league should enforce some type of moral conduct policy for its players

Your behavior in this debate will be monitored and I hold the right to enforce The Sports Debates’ moral conduct policy!

My ZimbioBlog DirectorySport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favoritesDigg!
Bookmark and Share


The Morals in Sports Debate… Men Behaving Badly

April 22, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Here we sit, on the heels of yet another star athlete scandal.

Between Dog fighting, sex parties on boats, domestic violence, rape charges, drugs, drinking and driving, infidelity, and fighting in bars (just to name a few), I find myself thoroughly repulsed by the misdeeds of the athletic elite within our society today. And if the disturbing frequency with which new reports and allegations are released serves as any indication of what is really going on in the private lives of these people, then I am both saddened and alarmed.

Far too often, athletes have made poor decisions (that usually victimize another human being) and it is time that somebody took a SERIOUS stance against this deplorable behavior. A strong, clear, and consistent message must be communicated.

The Business of Sports

The “business” of professional sports is one of image. In a world where visibility and exposure is king, millions of dollars can hang in the balance. If an athlete wants to make millions on the field, they must portray success. If they want to make even more money in endorsements, they must appeal to the public. Simply put – Image is EVERYTHING!

Every business in America, including professional sports organizations, strives to portray an image of being a positive “corporate citizen.” There are plenty of “good guys” in sports today, like Phil Mickelson, who spend much of their time and money in philanthropic endeavors. Those deeds are publicized because they look good for everyone involved – The charity benefits from exposure, the athlete benefits from positive press, and the league benefits through the support of these good deeds.

While those organizations prosper from the radiating glow of being associated with an act of good PR at the hands of one of their representatives, they must avoid the radiating stench of bad press. The last thing that any organization wants to do is to condone or ignore inappropriate and illegal behavior.

The need for POSITIVE corporate citizenship is magnified in the world of sports, though, because of the added social responsibility that athletes have as role models to the public.

Social Responsibility

I don’t care that Charles Barkley uttered his famous line – “I am not a role model.” It is not up to him to decide. The very real fact in today’s society is that athletes ARE viewed as role models, whether they SHOULD be or not. Thanks to marketing campaigns from corporations such as Nike, Gatorade, and Gillette, society is led to believe that they can (and should) aspire to live the same lives as athletes.

And who can blame the youth of America for falling prey to this marketing strategy? After all, what part of life as a superstar athlete does NOT appeal to you? You can date super models, make millions of dollars, be adored by tens of thousands, and possibly be immortalized as a legend, all for playing a game that many would pay to play.

Clearly, people in America (and around the world) aspire to be like these athletes. Most athletes fell in love with a sport because they themselves idolized an athlete during their younger days. Whether it was watching Magic on the court, Montana on the field, or Nicklaus on the links, every single one of them had the same thought… “Someday, I’m gonna be like HIM!”

Fans idolize athletes – it is as simple as that.

A Matter of Protection

Unfortunately, many athletes today do not possess qualities that would make them WORTHY of being a Role Model. As pointed out by ESPN.com writer Tim Keown, there are just some people (like Roethlisberger) who don’t deserve life on the pedestal. Because we don’t have the luxury of picking and choosing the Role Models of society, though, there must be some other way to help protect us all from social rejects who have no regard for anyone other than themselves.

Society must be protected from idiots with too much money and ego, but too little common sense. The leagues must be protected from being associated with these dregs of society, and must take measures to protect their investment into the development of these athletes. And realistically, these players must be protected from themselves, before they do serious and irreparable harm to themselves and others.

This is where a strictly defined and enforced Moral Conduct Policy comes into play.

Keep in mind that I am not proposing that we strip athletes of their freedoms as if they were already criminals. I understand that they are grown adults who deserve the right to act freely. However, because much of their own livelihoods (and the success of the greater organizations that they represent) is based solely upon image, the various sports organizations should take the steps necessary to formally identify those actions that are viewed as being detrimental, and should impose severe penalties in discouragement of those actions.

For example:

Good – Going out to a bar with a couple friends for a celebration

Bad – Going out to a bar with a loaded gun in your pocket while sexually forcing yourself on an unwilling person

This SHOULD be common sense, but that is clearly missing in some people. Because many of these athletes have PROVEN incapability for governing their own behavior, someone must govern it for them. There is far too much at stake today, both from a social and a financial standpoint, for this type of self-destructive behavior to be permitted unchecked. By defining specific actions as appropriate or inappropriate, the officials within each league can establish a platform by which they can correct this disturbing trend.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Morals in Sports Debate… Sympathy For The Infamous

April 22, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

 

Ben Roethlisberger has opened Pandora’s Box and he doesn’t even know it. No, I am not referring to the NFL quarterback attending the grand opening of a seedy strip club in a drunken blackout state. I am referring to the fact that Roethlisberger’s conduct has sparked a huge controversy that is larger than one might imagine. The allegations against Big Ben are so deplorable that he is being discussed in the same category as Pacman Jones and Michael Vick. In fact, the public backlash against the Steelers’ QB has actually drawn some of the attention off of Tiger Woods, which is saying a lot here lately. The controversy over Roethlisberger’s behavior has prompted many to question whether sports leagues should attempt to crackdown on player misconduct in their personal lives by enforcing moral regulations. This may come as a shock to those who know me, as I am generally seen as a person of high moral character, but I actually do not support this stance that leagues should be involved in regulating the morality of players’ off-field behaviors.

I want to make it clear that in no way do I support the infamous actions of players like Ben Roethlisberger, Tiger Woods, or Pacman Jones. I find the behavior that these stars are accused of reprehensible and hugely irresponsible. I do, however, think that they have a right to a personal life. I take issue with the notion that somehow fans, sports media, and league officials are in a position to pass judgment on stars for actions in their personal lives. Whatever happened to the philosophy of “judge not, lest ye be judged yourselves.” Some of you may be saying “Listen Babe Ruthless, I never did any of the stuff those guys did,” and perhaps you are right. But I am willing to bet there is some mistake in your personal life, large or small, that you would not want plastered on the cover of the tabloids, discussed over the airwaves, and streaming across the bottom line of ESPN. The only reason the public is aware or even cares about these players’ behavior is because they are famous. If Tiger Woods wasn’t Tiger Woods the golfer, but Eldrick Woods the certified public accountant, would you really care that he cheated on his wife? I am guessing not, and I do not think there are many people out there that would feel comfortable with the level of exposure that professional athletes’ personal lives endure.

Similarly, I doubt many people would want their compensation tied to their personal conduct like professional athletes. When professional athletes do something stupid in their private lives they may be fined, suspended, and/or lose sponsors, but when the average person makes a bad personal decision the consequences do not necessarily carry a financial impact. That is a double standard, my friends, and while I do not support their immoral behavior, I think athletes get the short end of the stick on this one. When the average person cheats on their wife the consequences may include losing one’s house, half their possessions, alimony, or child support, but they usually do not get suspended from work or lose their job because of it. Tiger Woods’ extramarital affairs caused him to lose millions in endorsement deals because of his highly publicized personal indiscretions. Athletes’ lives are scrutinized enough without their every action having to pass before a moral police that wields power over their playing time and wallets.

Athletes have every right to be act like jerks. It is practically constitutional. Citizens are entitled to lives free of excessive government entanglement, and their rights are enumerated in the Constitution. Freedoms are granted to the good and bad, the moral and immoral just the same. So long as an athlete’s behavior is neither illegal nor in violation of a league rule, then they should be free to engage in that action regardless of whether it is popular or “moral”. Attempting to micromanage someone’s legal personal behavior is not reasonable for a sports league to attempt, and it is certainly not in keeping with the principles of our democratic government. If we allow the NFL, NBA, and MLB to decide what’s right and wrong, moral or immoral, where does it end? Will they one day get to fine players for not showing hustle? Will they be empowered to dock players for not displaying enough heart? That is a slippery slope that I do not want to see sports go down.

In the end, if off-field conduct is not illegal or directly impacting a player’s on-field performance then it should not be regulated. One day people like Big Ben, and everyone for that matter, will have to answer to The Man Upstairs, and I don’t mean Roger Goodell. Until that time, let’s leave the judgment to the Big Guy because He is qualified and we are not. 

 

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.