The Miami Heat Playing As A Team Debate Verdict

January 28, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

I really, really hate that I have to judge a debate like this. Call me a basketball purist, but one of the things I really enjoy about basketball is the fluid motion of five guys running an offense, communicating on defense, etc. It can be such a graceful sport to watch for that reason. You may read that and say that I’m immediately biased in favor of deciding that the Miami Heat MUST play a team game in order to be successful in the post-season. That is incorrect.

While I regret that much of the NBA has moved beyond the fluid team game that I believe basketball should be, that regret has no bearing on my understanding of what it takes to be successful in the NBA. Kobe Bryant’s Lakers have won the last two NBA championships. If that is not somewhat of a ringing endorsement of selfish play, I don’t know what is. On the other hand, the Boston Celtics have been very successful and they have a very team-oriented style. Bu, I went into this debate with an open mind. Let’s go to the arguments and see who emerges victorious.

Truth be told, I thought Babe Ruthless summed up his argument in the title of his post: “There’s No “I” in Team, But There is in Win.” Babe Ruthless is always big on individual achievement, and great players taking a team to victory… and this argument is no different. If this debate had popped up a month into the NBA season, Babe Ruthless would have no shot at winning, seeing as the Heat were a royal mess at that point in time. However, since King James’ cathartic Cleveland experience where the Heat demolished the Cavs, the Heat have been on a roll, and now Babe Ruthless’ argument holds a lot of weight.

Loyal Homer really gave no statistics to back up his argument, but his reference to the post-season struck a chord with me. He talked about how the rigors of a seven-game playoff series can expose holes in your team, leading the reader to infer that individual talent may be able to win for one night, but that it takes cohesive team play over a seven-game series to bring home the crown. At this point, I still hadn’t made up my mind who won the debate.

However, the more I thought about it, my inference from Loyal Homer’s post won him the debate. I thought back on my formative years as a Chicago Bulls fan, watching Michael Jordan (and eventually Scottie Pippen), two of the greatest NBA players of all time, bang their heads against the postseason glass ceiling a few times before breaking through. What did the trick for the Bulls? Jordan realized, as Kobe has now, that you need help to win a championship. Sometimes you need Steve Kerr to take the last shot because the better basketball move is to use your supreme talents as a decoy. It is not disrespect if you touch the ball less than your teammates, and only get the ball in crunch time now and then. Individual talent can be dominant in the regular season (see last season’s Cleveland Cavaliers), but it takes a cohesive team to win the trophy. Will Miami be that team? Dwyane Wade doesn’t think they need to be, but Loyal Homer and I disagree.

As a token of congratulations to Loyal Homer, I award him a pair of D-Wade’s sweet new goggles. Please understand that I am in no way making fun of Wade’s migraine issues. Migraines are brutal and frustrating to deal with, but I genuinely miss the era of guys running around with wild-looking goggles. Medical reason or no, I think D-Wade can bring them back – right after he sends his first pair to Loyal Homer.

Babe Ruthless will argue the Heat don’t need to play a team game to win, while Loyal Homer will argue the Heat need to play a team game to win consistently. Why don’t you take your talents to these articles, and the poll, and decide this question?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Miami Heat Playing As A Team Debate

January 27, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Babe Ruthless.

When LeBron James took his talents to South Beach last NBA off-season, the question in the minds of a lot of basketball fans was, “How will three guys make a team?”

This question will be even more hotly debated after the latest comments by Dwayne Wade. Wade publically stated that, perhaps, the Miami Heat don’t need to play together to win games. Has the individual game finally reached the upper echelon of the NBA itself, ruining the team game forever?

Undoubtedly, these comments will receive prime airplay on the various ESPN commentariat shows, with much weeping and gnashing of teeth. That weeping and gnashing of teeth will fall into two categories. But, who is right? Is the team game of the NBA is ruined, or the team game is essential and the Heatles are about to learn that lesson the hard way? Our job here at The Sports Debates is to tell you which side is right.

Babe Ruthless will argue the Heat don’t need to play a team game to win, while Loyal Homer will argue the Heat need to play a team game to win consistently. Why don’t you take your talents to these articles, and the poll, and decide this question?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Miami Heat Playing As A Team Debate… There’s No “I” in Team, But There is in Win

January 27, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Newsflash, America – the Miami Heat are not comprised of team players!

Did that shocking news revelation really just blow your mind… because it shouldn’t have. We all knew LeBron James and Dwyane Wade were never going to end the season first and second in the league in assists, but apparently there is a bit of an uproar that the Heat should be more “team-y.”

Criticism of Miami’s recent four game losing streak prompted Dwyane Wade to make comments defending his team’s unique strategy of letting star players loose to do their thing. Wade elaborates that the Heat are, “not [one of] these kinds of teams that need to play together.” And he is absolutely right! The Heat were designed to be a team of hired guns who keep the ball in the talented hands of their playmakers, then sit back and watch as LeBron, Wade, and Bosh do the rest. Why are people surprised when Wade makes a comment like this stating the obvious?

Playing to their Strengths

The Miami Heat currently sit atop the Southeast Division of the Eastern Conference of the NBA with a 31-13 record for a reason – they win games. The Heat have a core of explosive playmakers on offense that, when hot, are virtually unbeatable. Putting the ball in the hands of James, Wade, and Bosh has propelled them to success thus far throughout the season, so why abandon that game plan at the first sign of struggles? Letting James and Wade play their preferred type of game is simply playing to their strengths.

Asking the Heat to change their game to be more team oriented is like asking the Yankees to abandon an affinity for the longball in favor of National League style small ball. Obviously the team aspect of small ball works for some clubs, but the Yankees simply aren’t built with that type of game in mind. Ignoring this fact in favor of a more team friendly approach would be placing an arbitrary handicap on the Yankees. Just as no one would expect Albert Pujols or Alex Rodriguez to quit swinging for the fences at the first sign of a minor slump, no one should expect LeBron and Dwyane Wade to move the ball around at the first sign of struggle.

Rewarding Experience

Although it doesn’t sit well with those big on “team play,” letting LeBron and D-Wade hog the ball is a viable and effective offensive strategy. It was this same individual focused rewards strategy that turned around the Heat’s season after struggling out of the gate. Coach Erik Spolestra decided that when his players made big stops on defense they would have liberal doses of freedom on offense. This motivation technique, although controversial, yielded results. It helped the Heat to set franchise records as they won eight straight by double digit margins. This in turn helped them pull ahead of the Magic and take the top spot in the division.

Critics of this rewards system will point to the fact that the Heat still trail teams like Boston, and claim that it is a flawed strategy. It should be considered that the Heat have been playing in the only Eastern Conference division with two other teams with records above .500 (Atlanta 29-16 and Orlando 29-16) and are still winning. Similarly, they have a far superior road record (15-8) than other division leaders like Boston (12-7) and Chicago (10-10). The system works, despite all the naysayers who second guessed the players’ ability to coexist. The Heat’s 96-82 victory over the Charlotte Bobcats saw both James and Wade put up 30 plus point games, proving not only that they can coexist but dominate as well.

Harping on the fact that basketball is a team sport is, in this case, arbitrary rhetoric. True there are five men on the court wearing the same jersey, but each shot is taken by an individual. In Miami those individuals seem to be at their best while playing their own game. Dumping that strategy now would be foolish.

It’s a long season, and the Heat are a new team still working out the kinks. We have yet to see how the players will function in the post-season, but if its anything like the regular season has been thus far, the league should be prepared to handle an explosive offense with a unique style that is hard to handle.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Miami Heat Playing As A Team Debate… No I in Team

January 27, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

The topic of today’s debate the part of sports that I really don’t believe in. Unless I am playing golf, tennis, or any other individual sport, I don’t believe in individuality in athletics. I never have. I had that instilled in me by my little league coaches when I was a scrawny little dork playing in sweltering South Georgia heat. In baseball, you hit the ball to right side of the infield to advance the runner over. In basketball, you pass the ball to your teammate if you feel he has a better shot. You rely on those teammates to achieve the ultimate goal, which is to win the game.

Evidently, Dwayne Wade doesn’t prescribe to my school of thought. He said, “We’re not the Boston Celtics. We’re not these kinds of teams that need to play together. We have guys that have the individual talent, and sometimes the individual talent, one-on-one ability is going to take over. Boston has more of guys that have great individual talent, but they feed off each other.” Guess the Celtics do it the wrong way, huh D-Wade? That’s why, entering action on Tuesday night, they had a 2.5 game lead on the Heat for the best record in the Eastern Conference.

The popular theory is that the NBA is a superstar driven league where individualism is magnified and necessary. How often does the end of a game come down to a one-on-one “iso” play, after all? But it’s been evident in recent years that even the great ones need not only good teammates, but need to learn how to play together as a team. Kobe Bryant, when commenting recently about Carmelo Anthony’s current plight with the Denver Nuggets, essentially implied he had the misfortune of playing with the likes of Smush Parker. He knows the importance of teammates, despite his reputation of being a selfish player, and that’s why he has five rings.

I give all this background data knowing full well it has nothing to do with the 2010-2011 Miami Heat. This Heat team features three players who at one time or another have been the focal point of their team during their careers, and now they are going through a process of give and take. All three of their respective scoring numbers are down slightly, but they knew that would happen. After all, LeBron did say they realized their days of winning MVP titles were probably over.

In a seven game series everything is magnified. The half-court offense becomes more a part of the game, and even superstars need teammates in those situations. There are no games against the Cavaliers where anyone can loaf. Everyone must bring it every night. The Heat really need to learn how to play together, and Wade needs to take this seriously if he has visions of earning a second championship.

Do you remember at the beginning of the season when the Heat were struggling, and much of the blame that wasn’t being put on Eric Spoelstra was put on the fact that the big trio didn’t play much during the pre-season? They hadn’t had time to develop much chemistry. We’ve had the team chemistry debate on this website, and while Sports Geek didn’t feel it was that important in the verdict, I certainly felt, and still feel, team chemistry plays a big part in a team’s overall success.

The bottom line is the “one-on-one” mentality that Wade speaks of is not the type of mindset to have in the playoffs. Perhaps we’ll see the “team” talent in Boston against the “individual” talent in Miami in the post-season, and see whose talent prevails. I think Mr. Wade will realize that he needs the help of the role players on the TEAM to help bring a title to South Beach.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best One-Loss Season Debate Verdict

January 26, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Babe Ruthless.

It is not very often that you can compare and contrast the radically different sports of horse racing and football, but that is exactly the context of this debate.

Both the 2007 New England Patriots and the horse Zenyatta flirted with immortality before it was cruelly ripped away from them at the zero hour. For the Patriots, they stood on the cusp of becoming the only team in NFL history to cap off a perfect 16-game season with a Super Bowl victory, while Zenyatta entered her final race with the hopes of being the only horse to retire at a perfect 20-0.

Both performed spectacularly. While they may have fallen short of becoming legends, their respective destinations should not overshadow their brilliant journeys.

If we hopped into the way-back machine, and were to assess the 2007 Patriots BEFORE the Super Bowl matchup against the Giants, then compare that to the career of Zenyatta BEFORE the 2010 Breeder’s Cup Classic, whose performance would history deem as being greater?

On history’s behalf, allow me to answer – Zenyatta.

What ultimately won the day for Zenyatta (and vicariously for Optimist Prime) is the fact that Zenyatta’s career was legendary BEFORE her final race. The fact that she lost to Blame at the 2010 Breeder’s Cup Classic is an unfortunate close to her legacy, but she had already established herself among the greatest horses ever to run – win OR lose.

Over her career, as Optimist Prime points out, Zenyatta significantly changed the sport of Horse Racing. In a sport where notoriety traditionally comes from success at the fabled Triple Crown races, Zenyatta blazed a new path to horse racing superstardom.

Thanks to Zenyatta, no longer is a Kentucky Derby victory a pre-requisite for horse racing greatness.

Think about the greatest horses in racing history – Secretariat, War Admiral, Affirmed, and more. Each was made great by their performance in the Triple Crown. Likewise, consider the horses of modern racing who have reached superstar status – Barbaro, Big Brown, Smarty Jones, and more. Just as with the former group, it is their respective Triple Crown performance that give them notoriety.

Zenyatta was different.

Instead of hoping to catch superstardom at the spectacle of the Kentucky Derby, she was the first horse to win two separate races at the Breeder’s Cup, was the first Mare to ever win the Classic, and no other horse has more consecutive Grade/Group One victories than Zenyatta. She became a celebrity by virtue of her outstanding CAREER, rather than her performance in three individual races.

Not since Man o’ War had a horse so captured the public’s eye without racing in the Triple Crown, and that is only because Man o’ War’s time came BEFORE the Triple Crown.

It is true that the New England Patriots also set many records. As Babe Ruthless mentions, they remain the only team ever to complete an undefeated 16-game regular season. But the NFL is always evolving. As it evolves, the statistical accomplishments of previous eras lose relevance. For the very same reasons that Babe Ruthless mitigates the 1972 Dolphins’ perfect season (because it came over a 14, rather than 16, game season), folks will one day mitigate the records of the New England Patriots as we now move closer to an 18-game season.

What does not lose relevance, though, is the fact that there has already been a perfect champion in the NFL. No matter how great the statistical achievements of the 2007 Patriots (as pointed out by Babe Ruthless), they were attempting to REPEAT history, not make it. Yes, it is true that the 1972 Dolphins played two less games, but they were nonetheless perfect champions.

Unlike the 2007 Patriots, Zenyatta was a pioneer.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best One-Loss Season Debate

January 24, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Babe Ruthless.

In most years – and in most sports – the notion of perfection is lost long before the possibility is truly believed.

Each sport has its own idea of what constitutes perfection. But, no matter the sport, competitors who flirt with perfection draw a lot of attention. As they near that perfect effort, the pressure mounts. By the time the moment arrives – whether it is the tenth frame, the ninth inning, or the final game of the season – the world is watching.

In that moment when perfection is realized, history is instantly made. But how do you measure a failure to make history, especially when it comes in the final seconds of the quest?

Which brings us to our question for the day.

Whose one-loss effort was better, race horse Zenyatta, or the 2007 New England Patriots?

The 2007 New England Patriots tore through the regular season and stood one game away from becoming only the second team in NFL history to complete a perfect season before losing to the New York Giants in the Super Bowl.

In 2010, race horse Zenyatta entered the Breeder’s Cup Classic with an unblemished 19-0 record. The Breeder’s Cup was to be Zenyatta’s final race, and a victory in that race meant that the horse would retire at a perfect 20-0. But in the stretch, it was the horse Blame that claimed the Cup.

History will define both legacies by the number in their respective “L” columns, but we are going to look past those unfortunate numbers for today and focus on which “W” column is greater.

Babe Ruthless feels that the New England Patriots quest for immortality was the better of the two, while Optimist Prime thinks Zenyatta takes the crown (even if only by a nose).

You see… losers can still be winners!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best One-Loss Season Debate… Zenyatta, By A Nose For Once

January 24, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Let me start by extending my gratitude and stating how much I appreciate the esteemed editorial board of this fine website for accepting a debate involving the sport of kings. Now that one of the contributors to this website lives in Kentucky, I figure that one horse racing debate a year is not too much to ask. After all, we gave the rest of the country bourbon – don’t we deserve at least one debate? (Editor’s Note: Bourbon is delicious. No debate there.)

Now that we’ve established the credentials of this debate, let’s get to the meat of it. Zenyatta finished her racing career with a 19-1 record. Her lost loss came in the 2010 Breeders’ Cup Classic, the richest North American horse race. She lost by a nose to a horse called Blame. Blame called Churchill Downs home, and defeated Zenyatta by a nose there.

The Patriots, as we all know, lost to the New York Giants in a stunning upset in the 2008 Super Bowl (representing the 2007 season). The question we’re debating here is “which season was better?”

I’m not sure that anyone can deny that the 2007 Patriots were a steamroller of a football team. They dominated teams in a manner not seen since the 1985 Chicago Bears, and most of the sporting world expected a similar rollover in the Super Bowl. However, the Giants, clearly sick and tired of hearing that they were a speed bump on the way to history for the Pats, dominated the game on the defensive line and emerged victorious. Was the Pats’ season impressive? Absolutely. Was it better than Zenyatta’s one-loss record? No.

Zenyatta rose to fame as an unbeaten female race horse. While she rivaled the great unbeaten female race horses such as Personal Ensign and, arguably, Ruffian, she did not strike the national consciousness until she beat the best male race horses in the world in the 2009 Breeders’ Cup Classic, in a thrilling victory. Her win was all over ESPN, and she became a rare thing in the horse racing world – a veritable superstar outside of the confines of the well-known Triple Crown races. The next year, 2010, became all about Zenyatta cementing her place in the pantheon of horse racing greatness. She raced through 2010 unbeaten until she lost to Blame by a nose (on his home track) in the 2010 Breeders’ Cup Classic.

The question before us, though, is which season is better, more historic? The answer is clearly Zenyatta’s one-loss season.

Realistically, most of us look back on the 2007 Patriots and see a great football team, but not a football team that fundamentally altered the fanbase of a sport. On the other hand, Zenyatta fundamentally altered the future fanbase of an entire sport. Between her segments on 60 Minutes and her featured position on ESPN during the Breeders’s Cup week, she garnered sports press that equine athletes before her had not. If you question that, recognize the following statistic – the ratings for Zenyatta’s 2010 Breeders’ Cup Classic were 180 percent higher than the previous year. The race pulled a 3.1 rating, which rivals many NASCAR telecasts. While many consider horse racing a niche sport, the fact that one horse could increase the ratings of a big race into NASCAR territory is hard to believe. Furthermore, watch the Youtube videos of the 2010 Classic. She made an emotional connection with many fans that I guarantee you the 2007 Patriots did not.

The fact of the matter is, both Zenyatta and the 2007 Patriots were phenomenal examples of excellence in their respective fields. However, when you question which one was better and more historic, the answer is simple. Zenyatta may have fundamentally altered the viewership and fanbase of an entire sport. The 2007 Patriots lost their fair-weather fans somewhere between the bean dip and the salsa.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best One-Loss Season Debate… Patriots Near Perfection Still Major

January 24, 2011

Read the opposing argument from Optimist Prime.

“Who the heck is Zenyatta!?” Those are the exact words I shared with my cohorts at The Sports Debates when I was chosen for this debate. Honestly, I’m still pondering that question today. After a few minutes of research on the old interwebs I learned that Zenyatta is a race horse – a really, really good race horse – but, a race horse. I mean, what is a horse anyways besides a larger, dumber hoofed dog? But I digress. This new knowledge of what Zenyatta – which for the record sounds like some sort of Buddhist meditating female Yeti – actually is prompted me to try to address another, perhaps more important question, who HONESTLY cares!?

Sure, someone out there has to care about horse racing, or else it would have gone the way of the XFL. But if it did, would normal Americans miss it? Aside from gamblers, weird horse people, and rich ladies who like to wear big hats, who would truly miss horse racing’s existence? I believe the answer to that question to be a resounding “NO ONE.”

That is why I feel that today’s debate, which asks me to compare the near perfect season of the 2007 New England Patriots to that of the racing record of a relatively obscure horse, is a slam dunk in my favor.

The 2007 Patriots displayed a level so rare that it has only been bested once before in the history of the NFL. The 1972 Miami Dolphins are the only team to have gone undefeated throughout the entire regular season and playoffs. It should be noted, however, that the Dolphins did it with a regular season that consisted of only 14 games. The ‘07 Patriots went 16-0 in the regular season, and there is no guarantee that the ‘72 Miami team would have claimed perfection if they had to win two more games in the regular season.

New England eventually fell short of perfection in a nail biting 17-14 loss to the New York Giants in Super Bowl XLII, but they accomplished much along the way. Randy Moss made history that season, setting the single-season touchdown reception record with an amazing 23 touchdown catches. That was history in and of itself, considering that mark bested a record held by Jerry Rice since 1987. That record held for two decades for a reason – it was hard to accomplish. But nothing was too hard for perhaps the most dynamic passing duo in NFL history. That same season Tom Brady truly became “Touchdown Tom” when he broke another improbable plateau by setting the single-season passing touchdown record with 50. As an admitted Peyton Manning fanatic I thought Manning’s 49 touchdown season in 2004 would stand forever, but Brady one-upped him as he has often done in the two’s storied rivalry. The Patriots finished first in eight offensive categories and were among the best defensive teams in the league as well.

With that much scoring the team had a potent offense, but it was so powerful that no team stood a chance during the regular season. The Patriots were decimating teams by 46 and 45 point margins. The Pats 16-0 regular season record included hard fought wins over very tough teams, including the Eagles (31-28), Ravens (27-24), and the always dangerous Colts (24-20). The 1972 Dolphins certainly had to beat some serious competitors, but they never had to beat a motivated Peyton Manning (who was at the time the single season touchdown record holder). That really says a lot about the difficulty behind the Patriots’ 18-1 record, the likes of which horse racing simply cannot compete.

Even with the Super Bowl loss the Patriots are still in the conversation of the greatest team in football history. Although they didn’t go 19-0, they still outshine the 1972 Dolphins in the score differential against opponents. The 2007 Patriots outscored their opponents by a total of 315 points. That’s 101 points better than the ‘72 Dolphins, a team that outscored opponents by 214 points. As further proof of their achievement, the Patriots led the NFL in myriad statistical categories that serve as proof of a legacy of accomplishment.

Is that horse Zanadoo… or Zimbabwe or… whatever its name is… in the conversation of the greatest racing horse of all time? Maybe. But will its legacy hold up over time and compare with that of the 2007 Patriots? Highly doubtful. Americans love football, and the 2007 Patriots are among the greatest to ever play the game regardless of their record, that makes them the winner of this debate.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Which Lockout Hurts More Debate Verdict

January 20, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Bleacher Fan.

Bleacher Fan stated it best with the opening statement of his argument. He indicated that 2011 has the potential to be a LOUSY year for sports. Can you really imagine a Fall and Winter without the NBA and NFL? I’d rather have an American Idol with Simon Cowell (wait, that’s happened!) It’s possible, folks. We could be miserable this Fall and forced to watch brand new episodes of Jersey Shore with our significant others and have to hear the word “Snookie” over and over. We might not recover!

But for this debate, I asked my colleagues to debate which league – the NBA or the NFL – would have a harder time coming back from a lockout.

First, let’s take a look at Bleacher Fan’s argument. He writes that the NBA would have a harder time to recover. As I stated in my intro, it’s been a pretty special year for the NBA, minus all the Carmelo Anthony trade speculation. Ratings are up. Interest is up (thanks, Lebron). Attendance is up. But Bleacher Fan took an interesting angle. Instead of focusing on the negatives on the NBA, he chose to focus on the strength of the NFL. Obviously, the numbers back up the fact that the stronger league is the NFL. It took years of momentum to establish that fact, too.

Meanwhile, Optimist Prime believes in the theory of “the bigger they are, the harder they fall.” I felt like this was a unique and distinctive way to approach his side. There’s no sense of tackling the T-Rex that is the NFL when it comes to popularity. However, using an analogy that I had not thought of put everything in a different light. CART and NASCAR used to run neck in neck in the auto racing world in terms of recognition many years ago. The billion-dollar industry that NASCAR has become was no such thing. There was no SPEED channel. NASCAR went one way. CART went the other way, like Optimist Prime wrote. Remember the strike of 1994 in Major League Baseball? I know people that still hold a grudge towards baseball because, “That strike was nothing but greedy players wanting more money.”

Yet I’m not convinced though that the NBA can recover more quickly than the NFL. Nothing Optimist Prime wrote convinced me to dispute anything Bleacher Fan wrote, so I am siding with Bleacher Fan.

In my opinion, the NBA has been trying for years to recover from the retirement of Michael Jordan. A Shaquille O’Neal-Kobe Bryant three-peat tried to bring those casual fans back to the game, but even that leveled off. Maybe this is the year interest picks back up to those levels. Meanwhile, the NFL’s interest keeps growing to the point that we could break even more records this Sunday (we seemingly say this every playoff weekend now). The NFL has built itself such a cushion that no matter how far it does fall, I think it can recover.

If Lois Lane falls off a 100 foot building, and Superman catches her before she hits the ground, then she can recover. Sure, she’ll be a little panicked, but at least she’ll live to write about the story in the Daily Planet. That’s the same situation here. If there is a lockout, some fans will be bitter. But if the NFLPA and the owners reach an agreement before too much damage is done (and surely they will), then the damage can be repaired, and the fans will slowly come back. It’s football! What else are we going to do in the Fall?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Which Lockout Hurts More Debate

January 19, 2011

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Bleacher Fan.

As we enter the end of yet another NFL season we begin to soak in the possibility that, unfortunately, a lockout may be forthcoming.

That day is quickly forthcoming in March. If you’ve watched any sports recently you know this, but more importantly, if you’ve read our debates you know this because we’ve been frowning upon the possibility of it for months. The players and the owners are squabbling over various issues including the owners wanting an eighteen game schedule and a rookie pay scale, which we touched on in a debate earlier this week. This would be disappointing on many levels, especially with the NFL playoffs again drawing record ratings, and is poised to do so again this weekend with two highly anticipated matchups.

Somewhat quietly on the horizon is the possibility of an NBA lockout. The current agreement expires at the end of the regular season, and I don’t know if it could happen at a worse time. The league has worked so hard to overcome the Michael Jordan shadow. Sfter some 12 years I think the league has finally made some progress. Interest and awareness in the league is up and ratings are up double digits from a year ago. Obviously, the guys in Miami have a big part in that, but it never hurts to have a good team in big markets like Los Angeles, Boston, and even a resurgent Knicks team in New York City. Not to mention buzz worthy up and coming players like Blake Griffin and Derrick Rose have captivated fans across the nations. The NBA has buzz, people! But a looming lockout seriously threatens that.

Herein lies today’s debate. With both leagues currently enjoying lots of notoriety, which one would have a more difficult recovery?

Look at it from all angles, arguers. Optimist Prime will argue that the NFL would struggle more while Bleacher Fan will argue that the NBA would have a more difficult recovery.

Let’s hope neither sport gets put into that position… but for the sake of this debate, you’re locked out!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.