The NFL Becoming a Players League Debate… For Love of the Blame

December 12, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

The NFL is being ruined right in front of our very eyes, and the players are to blame.

While I am normally the first one to suggest that a player or team with even a miniscule amount of leverage should exploit it to the fullest for their personal gain, even I can see that there is a limit. Clearly the NFL has reached its tipping point. Players have gone mad with power and the league presently teeters atop the precipice of a very steep and slippery slope. The empowerment of the modern era NFL player has come at a steep cost – the sanctity of contracts and the authority of the coaches – and sadly the game as a whole may soon suffer for it. For a very long time.

This, however, is not a new story, and the current state of affairs in the NFL did not just happen overnight. The writing has been on the wall for a very long time. Think back to the 2004 draft when Eli Manning was able to force his way to the New York Giants, rather than stay with the team which drafted him out right – the San Diego Chargers. Since then players have been able to threaten, pout, and generally blackmail their way on to the teams of their choosing with virtually no recourse.

The league could have – and more importantly, should have – stopped moves like this as they occurred. Instead, the league stood idly by while their authority was diminished in front of a league of hundreds of players just beginning to realize the leverage and power the NFL was allowing them to control. Now it is common to see players like Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall publically clashing with their coach and team management in hopes of agitating their way to a new team. Many times the players are successful, and sometimes they are not – like Albert Haynesworth this off-season (Editor’s Note: And, regular season too?). But, the point remains that players are very much aware of their newfound leverage in controlling the future.

The drama that unfolded between the Redskins and super star defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth highlights the fact that the NFL is a player dominated league. Even though Haynesworth failed to force the Redskins to trade him or to rearrange their defensive scheme to suit him, he has clearly held the front office hostage throughout the season. His recent suspension demonstrates that the ‘Skins never gained control of the situation, and this “punishment” certainly does not serve as a deterrent to Haynesworth, who didn’t want to play for Washington this season anyways. It is no deterrent for any other player wanting to diva their way into a more preferable scenario.

This behavior is not limited to individuals, either. Through the sandbagging actions of NFL teams it can be ascertained that there is a much bigger problem on the horizon. Over the course of the 2010 season, both the Cowboys and Vikings seem to have made their lack of support for their head coach known through underachieving play. While it can’t be proven that players were throwing games, it seems fairly evident that they weren’t trying their all, and a large reason for this seems to be their lack of confidence in their head coach. Whatever the reason, both teams’ head coaches were fired and it certainly looks like the players masterminded the situations. This past off-season the players won’t just be screwing over one team with their actions, but rather the whole league when they force a work stoppage in 2011.

Like it or not, it has become a matter of fact that NFL players call all of the shots these days. There is a certain sad irony about a league which prides itself on parity would have such a disproportionate balance of power between players and the rest of the league.

Players are starting to wield some very real power in the league. They are forcing trades, demanding their own playing schemes, and even getting any employee who stands in their way fired. Perhaps the NFL should be renamed the NFPL – the National Football Players League.

While it’s not a very appealing name, and I seriously doubt that it will catch on anytime soon, it would be a far more fitting name because it would recognize those with all the real power and authority in the league – the players!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NFL Becoming a Players League Debate… Maintaining a Delicate Balance

December 12, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless

I have not been impressed with the actions of many players around the NFL recently.

For example, the Dallas Cowboys and Minnesota Vikings quit on their coaches, Wade Phillips and Brad Childress. They weren’t happy with the way things were going early in the season, and so these so-called professionals allowed locker room politics to affect their play on the field. As a fan, I am furious that these professional athletes were allowed to get away with anything less than their very best.

Once their respective coaches were fired, though, they magically became successful teams on the field again. Hardly a coincidence.

There were several marquis holdouts this year. Darrelle Revis, Vincent Jackson, and Logan Mankins are but a few names you will find on the list of those players who sat out some portion of the season.

In Denver, Brandon Marshall and Jay Cutler both managed to orchestrate their own trades from the Broncos, and Brett Favre has danced around retirement for three years, now, stringing several different franchises along while he waffled in his decisions.

Yes, players have been commanding a lot of attention in the NFL. And with the new CBA upcoming, the NFLPA is actively working to secure new rights for the players of the league.

But to declare that the NFL is following the NBA in becoming a league controlled by the players is a gross overstatement.

Players will always test the boundaries of a league. I do not blame them at all. The system in the NFL is structured in such a way that the players in the NFL are allowed to hold out on their contracts and demand trades. I may not agree with the system, but I cannot blame the players for taking advantage of the system as it exists today.

There is a difference between players maximizing the system as it exists today, and players taking over control of the league.

Sure, Darrelle Revis was able to hold out in his contract, and ended up getting himself a better deal from the New York Jets. But for every Darrelle Revis, there is an Albert Haynesworth.

Haynesworth, owner of the most lucrative defensive contract in the history of the NFL, was just suspended for the remainder of the season for conduct detrimental to his team. What was that conduct, you ask? He did the exact same thing that Darrelle Revis did – he did not abide by the terms of his contract.

In a player’s league, Haynesworth’s actions would have been accommodated, his demands met, and his new coach silenced. He is (or was) one of the premier players in the league, is a major difference maker when he is on the field, and a franchise in a player’s league would never dream of upsetting an athlete of his caliber, especially after investing the amount of money that the Redskins did in acquiring him.

Or how about Vincent Jackson? After a Pro Bowl season a year ago, Jackson felt that he deserved a much more lucrative contract, but the San Diego Chargers disagreed. This situation became very nasty as the weeks passed by, and Jackson was very public in his criticism of the Chargers’ organization. Tensions grew to such a heated point that many assumed Jackson would never wear a Chargers uniform again.

Well, the Chargers called his bluff, and guess who suited up for San Diego against the Indianapolis Colts two weeks ago.

These are just the most recent examples where player egos and demands are being held in check. Unlike the NBA, where players like LeBron James have completely hijacked the league, the NFL has an established system which allows players room to negotiate, but still retains enough control to ensure that the players’ demands would never endanger the overall stability of the league.

It is the give and take of those player/owner negotiations which create a balanced system to the benefit of everyone involved.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The TCU to the Big East Debate Verdict

December 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

TCU is making the move to the Big East. And after having read the arguments by both Sports Geek and Loyal Homer, and I have come to the following conclusion – I LOVE the move (and am awarding the verdict to Loyal Homer).

Sure, there are plenty of reasons why they should not leave the Mountain West for the Big East:

  • This will create additional strain for the University’s smaller athletic programs
  • There is not a regional connection between TCU and the rest of the Big East programs
  • TCU is neither “big”, nor is it “east”

But none of those reasons can outweigh the very simple, extremely positive fact that TCU gets to take a HUGE step up in class.

Who cares that their new neighborhood might be further away? It is a MUCH nicer neighborhood.

Instead of being grouped with the likes of New Mexico, Colorado State, and Wyoming, TCU is now discussed in the same conversations as Notre Dame, West Virginia, Georgetown, and Pitt. Instead of hoping for an invitation to face Navy in the Poinsettia Bowl, the program can earn an invitation to face the SEC in the Compass Bowl, or the Big XII in the Pinstripe Bowl. Instead of hoping for a scrap FROM the BCS tables (which will only be granted if they perform PERFECTLY during the regular season), TCU is now AT the BCS table. Instead of hoping for an automatic bid to the basketball championships, the basketball program is a part of a conference that last season was awarded EIGHT at-large invitations.

Oh yeah, and a great deal more money is available with the move.

I sympathize with the TCU Women’s Rifle Team, Sports Geek, I really do. They will be required to travel all the way across the country on multiple occasions, now, just to shoot guns for their inter-conference matchups. But to turn down an opportunity that will literally generate millions in additional revenue for the school’s two largest athletic programs (which will also trickle down and positively impact EVERY athletic program at the school), and will likely grant the school exposure to a better class of recruits in every program, all because of ten girls in a Title IX program that likely generates NOTHING for the University, is absurd.

This is a case where the sacrifice of the individual is necessary for the benefit of the masses.

And as Loyal Homer points out, ESPN features many of the Big East’s matchups in football and basketball. Where can you watch the Mountain West? On Versus (if you are lucky).

TCU is beholden to nothing but itself. The athletic department has an obligation to pursue opportunities that are best for the University, and joining a well-respected athletic conference that is guaranteed a BCS invitation in football – and one that is regarded as the very best in basketball – is too good of an opportunity to pass up simply because it will require some extra travel time.

Enjoy competing with the big boys (and girls), Horned Frogs! This is the chance you have been hoping for!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The TCU To the Big East Debate

December 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

Just when we all thought the conference reshuffling was over in college football it is announced that TCU is joining the Big East.

Folks across the country have had the opportunity to register their reactions by now. Or, rather, the lack of reaction. It seems that this news was met with a large scale shrug of the shoulders. At The Sports Debates, we believe this issue is far more interesting than just a shrug of the shoulders. It is a supposed major football conference adding a team of some national importance.

Today’s debate question: Is TCU’s decision to join the Big East conference a good one?

Sports Geek will argue that the decision is not a good one while Loyal Homer will argue that it is.

It doesn’t get more cut and dry, writers. Let the debate begin!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The TCU To the Big East Debate… Desperate TCU Blew It

December 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Want to know a Sports Geek fun fact? Whenever I am in the mood to job hunt I always leave the comfy confines of my suburban home and head to Mongolia. Because, after all, that just makes sense, right?

Uh, no. But, that is what TCU has decided to do. The program has decided it is best to gain the recognition it seeks by turning its back on its region in search of a fat payday.

Seems like we’ve heard this story before in a Greek tragedy or two, haven’t we?

Before diving into the logistical and geographic challenges to TCU joining the Big East, consider the most important point that has gotten very little focus from the talking faces in other national sports media outlets. Ask yourselves – would it have made any difference this season if TCU were in a supposedly major, elite BCS conference? Do you really think that if TCU were in the Big East for the 2010 season that the team would have received stronger consideration for a national championship game bid and more overall respect from the computers and voters alike? No way.

Do not misinterpret. TCU is a really solid program that is up and coming. And I think we can all agree that some pretty strong financial incentives – whether those are disclosed in the press or not – were part of this deal. TCU of course stands to gain a lot of notoriety by now being classified in “the club” as a BCS team. But, even elite clubs have clicks, and the Big East does not sit at the cool kids table.

TCU has really made a foolish decision. There was a time when TCU cared a great deal about leading the Mountain West into the Promised Land. In fact, Utah began a bid three years ago to lead the MWC to legitimacy and fight for an automatic BCS bid. TCU is – rather, was – as much a part of that fight as any other program in the conference. Now, with just one more year of legitimate elite play from the conference as a whole – a conference that is losing Utah but gaining Boise State – TCU has turned its back for the logistical nightmare of the Big East.

By “logistical nightmare” I am, of course, referring to the idea that the TCU women’s rifle team now has to travel to Syracuse, New York to play a regular season conference match. That takes real money, real time from class (these are still amateur athletes, ya know… just ask the NCAA rules infraction committee), real resources, and real effort. Sure, the windfall of cash the BCS will infuse into the ranks of the many athletic programs at TCU is great, but the effort now required to compete will be no doubt exhausting. Texas is not anywhere close to New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, etc. It is clear the only commonality between TCU and its Eastern Time Zone conference comrades is a love and affection for money.

It really does not make any sense for TCU to choose the Big East, either, because it does not stand to gain much through the newfound exposure to Big East media markets. It is not as if TCU needs to leave the state for Texas, for example, to recruit elite football players for the program. Moreover, the hotbed of high school football talent does not reside in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, etc. Any college football fan worth his (or her) salt knows the elite players are found in Florida, Georgia, Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and California. Those are simply the facts.

In the end it does not matter if Sports Geek from The Sports Debates believes TCU sold its soul for money. All that really matters is that TCU made a move but did not guarantee itself anything. The program acted out of desperation, as if the only path to elite conference status was by nonsensically joining the Big East. The big thinkers at TCU got lazy, and now they are left to deal with an irrational Big East commitment that simply does not make sense to anyone but the few with thicker wallets.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The TCU To the Big East Debate… TCU to the Big East Is a Win-Win

December 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Sports Geek.

It’s been a mighty fine seven days for TCU, not only for its football program, but the university as a whole. Going to the Rose Bowl is something that those players on the football team will cherish forever. Most teams outside of the Big Ten and Pac-10 never even come close to taking a sniff of Pasadena on January 1. TCU isn’t supposed to have opportunities like this. Can all of you even tell me where TCU is located in Texas? However, with the recent announcement that TCU is joining the Big East in 2012, recognition and opportunity will surely improve.

Obviously, there is the guaranteed BCS bid for the Big East conference champion. That’s guaranteed big money for the school, even if they don’t win the conference. This season the Big East will receive $17M for having a participant in the Fiesta Bowl, and those funds will be split amongst its members. The Mountain West Conference doesn’t currently have that type of AUTOMATIC revenue coming in for making a BCS game.

Besides that, look at the other bowls that the Big East currently ties in to: the Champs Sports (Tampa), Meineke Car Care (Charlotte), and Pinstripe (New York City) are some of the highlights. These are nice places to spend the holidays, they each offer decent payouts, and opponents from other BCS conferences. Now, take a look at the guaranteed spots for the Mountain West. Las Vegas (Las Vegas Bowl) and San Diego (Poinsettia Bowl) are definitely nice destinations, but Shreveport? Albuquerque? Do these excite you? These are also not marquee bowls, but the bottom line is that there is more bowl revenue available for Big East members.

Being in the Big East definitely brings more exposure to TCU. Why wouldn’t it? The majority of the games are broadcast on one of the ESPN channels. This is huge because despite being in the fifth-largest market in the country (Dallas), I feel like TCU is often overlooked in its own state. I have cousins that live 60 miles from TCU’s campus, and they rarely talk about the Horned Frogs. They remain in the shadows of the likes of Texas and Texas A&M in the Lonestar State. By going to the Big East, the awareness of the school should improve.

People are focusing so much on football, and deservedly so since it brings home the bacon, but let’s explore the basketball angle. I couldn’t tell you much about TCU’s basketball program. But I can tell you that the entire Big East tournament is televised on ESPN and is played at Madison Square Garden in New York City. That’s exposure folks. It’s yet to be determined how the conference will be divided as far as basketball goes. However, it’s important t to note that last season the Big East earned $23.1M from the NCAA tournament, which was more than any other conference. The Mountain West, meanwhile, split a measly $4M. You do the math. Plus, having the likes of UConn, Georgetown, Syracuse, and other traditional Big East basketball powers make a trip to Fort Worth will only improve the TCU basketball program over time.

It’s a win-win situation. The Big East wins because whatever danger it had of losing an automatic bid with the BCS went out the window. But TCU is the real winner. No more Mountain West. No more stressing about going undefeated just to have a chance to go to a BCS game. Let’s face it… if Boise State hadn’t lost to Nevada, where would TCU be? If they had lost to Utah and finished 11-1, where would they be playing this holiday season? Definitely not a BCS game! However, if they go 11-1 in the Big East, they are almost assured of going to a BCS game and earning a lot of money.

So tell me Sports Geek… why is this a bad move for TCU?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Disappointing College Football Team Debate… Dawgs With No Bite

December 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Back in late September we had a debate surrounding the status of UGA head coach Mark Richt. Both Optimist Prime and Bleacher Fan presented compelling cases as to what the university should ultimately do with Richt. Thanks to our loyal readers, that was one of our most popular debates in our still short history. I was the judge of that particular debate and ultimately decided that Richt deserved to keep his job. New athletic director Greg McGarity agreed with me and has said that Richt will be back in 2011. However, despite the supposed vote of confidence, that does not hide the disturbing fact that 2010 has to be categorized as a huge disappointment.

Fair or not, and realistic or not, Georgia Bulldog fans don’t expect to be 6-6 at season’s end. They don’t expect to have to win the last game of the season just to become bowl eligible, jus to go to some lower-tier bowl game. They expect to play for SEC championships. They expect to play in bowl games on New Year’s Day. That didn’t happen this season… or last season, for that matter.

The season didn’t get off to a good start at all. Perhaps the Dawgs should have seen it as an omen when then-athletic director Damon Evans got arrested over for the summer for a DUI. Then player after player kept getting read their Miranda rights read to them. When all was said and done, eleven players were arrested throughout the course of the year. All-American candidate A.J. Green, arguably the best wide receiver in the country, was suspended the first four games of the season because someone apparently thought an Independence Bowl jersey was worth $1,000… and Green was stupid enough to take it since he needed some spring break shopping money.

The season was just set up to fail from the first snap… and it did.

Starting out a season 1-4 is inexcusable. Especially devastating was the fourth loss, which came at the hands of the Dan Hawkins’ led mighty Colorado Buffalos (side note… Mr. Hawkins is no longer the coach of the Buffs). At mid-season UGA managed to rebound to 4-4 and had a chance to climb back into contention in a down SEC East with a win over a weak Florida Gator team. But once again, the Dawgs couldn’t get over the hump against their neighbors to the South, losing in overtime. Losing to Auburn, in which many UGA fans still claim three weeks later was a game ridden with dirty plays by the Tigers and shouldn’t even count due to the Cam Newton scandal, was just icing on a cake that really didn’t taste all that good.

Next season is a big year for Richt, and he knows it. He made a small change in his coaching staff yesterday, naming a new strength and conditioning coach. I’m not sure the splash from this move is going to cool off his hot seat anymore. He does have Aaron Murray, who was outstanding as a redshirt freshman quarterback this season. He’s going to need more from Murray next season with Green likely headed to the next level.

A record of 6-6? That has to be disappointing at a school like UGA, doesn’t it? Or, maybe, as Bleacher Fan has hinted off the record, UGA just isn’t what it thinks it is. The fans may just be off-base. Maybe it truly is that “seven” who comes to the party thinking it’s a “ten.” Whatever the case may be, 2010 has to be considered hugely disappointing on all fronts in Athens.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Disappointing College Football Team Debate… West Coast Flop

December 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

With a less than stellar record, a controversial coach, and a history making scandal that overshadowed much of what was happening on the football field, there really isn’t a whole lot to like about the University of Southern California’s season.

Sure, the Trojans have some excuses… like they are rebuilding and they play in a very competitive conference. But the program has still found a way to underwhelm in spite of the lowered fan and media expectations and NCAA sanctions.

This season USC finished third in the Pac-10 with a 7-5 record. While that’s not exactly something to be completely embarrassed about, it should be noted that the team also posted a pedestrian 4-4 record in conference play. While losses to very good teams like Oregon and Stanford are understandable, the opposite can be said of losses to 5-6 teams like Washington and Oregon State. Now, those teams are not pushovers, but, quite simply, more is expected of USC.

Since the Lane Kiffin show rolled into town it seems USC is more flash that fight. Kiffin has come in amidst his usual whirlwind of unfounded high expectations and mediocre play. While it is not fair to judge a coach by his first season numbers, it seems that poor first season records are all Kiffin seems to record. He was 4-12 with the Raiders in 2007 and 7-6 in Tennessee in 2009. With so much movement it is tough to gage Kiffin’s long term potential, but the Trojan’s 2010 season is not exactly cause for great optimism.

Come to think of it, his hiring is a puzzle in and of itself. Kiffin is a lightning rod for controversy, and has been for quite some time. Bruce Pearl made that abundantly clear with his recent comments about missing the “[expletive deleted] [Kiffin],” and the distractions he made which got Pearl off the hook, when he made bad decisions of his own. Now, Kiffin brings those distractions to a new school and an even bigger media market.

It hasn’t taken him long to start making waves, either. By July he was stirring the pot by hiring away assistant coaches from other teams and kicking off touted prospects. It seems likely that a team amidst so much change would seek a sense of normalcy, and Kiffin does not exactly fit that bill. But then again the Trojans seem to do everything big.

Don’t believe me, just ask Reggie Bush who has created a scandal so unique in its enormity that it forever associates USC with the surrendering of the Heisman Trophy. Bush’s Heisman hijnks hijacked the headlines, surrounding USC in 2010 and for seasons to come. It is one thing for a team to have to answer for their own poor performance and misbehaviors, but it is another to have to answer for the actions of a player many years removed from a team. This season the Trojans’ players found out they must face a bowl ban and scholarship penalty for Bush’s poor decisions.

In all of NCAA football there really isn’t a more disappointing team than USC. All of these things – Bush’s Heisman fallout, Kiffin’s controversial coaching takeover, and a subpar season – combine to make 2010 a season to forget for the Trojans.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Pat Riley Taking the Heat Debate Verdict

December 2, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Optimist Prime and Loyal Homer.

Erik Spoelstra should not be fired. Let’s clear that up right away. Though that fact has nothing to do with Pat Riley taking over the Miami Heat, the problems the Miami Heat are facing are not specific to the influence of Erik Spoelstra.

The Miami Heat have real basketball problems. Don’t let the consecutive lopsided victories against the Detroit Pistons and the Cleveland Cavaliers fool you. The Heat are struggling. The team does not have a true floor general in the form of a point guard that is able to divide up the touches on the floor between the superstars LeBron James and Dwayne Wade. The team also lacks a real low post threat, with respect to the fan favorite and ever-popular Zydrunas Ilgauskas. These are real basketball problems that not even elite superstars can overcome.

None of those basketball problems are Erik Spoelstra’s fault. In fact, they are the fault of Pat Riley. The general manager of the team has done a fairly poor job of building a complete basketball team. Riley is great at attracting superstars, but the supporting players are not as important. More importantly, they are injured right now. The injuries to Udonis Haslem and Mike Miller have devastated the team from a role playing standpoint.

Again, this is not Erik Spoelstra’s fault. It is, however, is problem.

As Loyal Homer states in his argument, Erik Spoelstra deserves respect, and he deserves time to become a great coach. He is long time friends with Pat Riley and has earned his respect. And, as Loyal Homer points out in his argument, Pat Riley’s last foray into coaching was not the championship season. Rather, it was a season when he coached a team that won just 15 games. Yikes.

As Optimist Prime points out his argument, however, Pat Riley is too proud to watch his team go down in flames.

Both arguments are correct to a point. Pat Riley is proud, and Erik Spoelstra is thrust into difficult circumstances with insoluble basketball problems. But, one point won me over. Optimist Prime may be right about Riley’s pride, but Pat Riley is too proud to become head coach right now. He will face the exact same problems that Erik Spoelstra faces now. Basketball won’t change, and Riley knows that. If Riley takes over as head coach, the point guard and low post center position will not be magically improved on the team. Loyal Homer rightly points out that, “It’s not realistic to think Riley could come down out of coaching retirement on his little white stallion and wave the magic wand and all of a sudden make the troubles of the Heat go away.”

It doesn’t matter if Wade or LeBron have faith in Spoelstra one minute, and no faith the next. Pat Riley has been around basketball too long to a) not recognize the real reason a team is struggling and b) not care enough about his legacy to risk it being tainted by a return to coaching that is doomed to immediate failure, regardless of what superstars on thon the team.

Pat Riley is not the best coach for this team because he knows that he doesn’t have the best team. He jettisoned Stan Van Gundy several years ago because he knew the team had potential to win a championship. He doesn’t know that with this team, despite the hype. Reality is different, so the front office is quiet and Pat Riley is enjoying the view from his box, content to watch his young coach struggle until more good players can be placed around the superstar nucleus.

When Riley gets more role players and the overall team improves, the he will mount the white stallion and ride in to rescue the team. Those conditions have not yet been met, so Riley is content to hang Spoelstra out to dry.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.