The Time To Panic Debate… The Vikings Ship Is Still Sinking

October 17, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

I was looking forward to today’s debate all weekend long. Both teams are two high profile teams, and since both the Dallas Cowboys and Minnesota Vikings were matched up in a late afternoon national broadcast yesterday, I knew I’d get a chance to sit down in my recliner and soak it all in. Being the lazy man that I tend to be on Fall weekends, that’s exactly what I did. Thanks to a couple of Tony Romo interceptions and a handful of Cowboy penalties, the Vikings were able to escape with a much needed victory. That victory left the Vikings at a much more manageable 2-3 and within striking distance of the vulnerable Bears in the NFC North. But, a victory does not mean all is well in the Twin Cities.

First, let’s look at yesterday’s game. By no means did the Vikings dominate the game. Hardly. A quick look at the box score shows quite the opposite. The Vikings had 188 total yards, which included a measly 118 passing yards from Brett Favre. The Cowboys, in contrast, had 314 total yards, and seemed to be able to move the ball a lot easier than the Vikings. If it wasn’t for Percy Harvin’s 95 yard kickoff return to open the second half the outcome of the game could have been flipped as the three other scoring drives by the Vikings totaled an embarrassing 75 yards! Ouch! Obvious questions remain.

New acquisition Randy Moss was supposed to jump start the Viking offense, but that really hasn’t happened yet. He hasn’t been a distraction yet, either. In fact, both Favre and head coach Brad Childress credit Moss for firing the team up at the half. But Moss really hasn’t been the spark to the offense on the field. In two games he has nine catches for 136 yards. Expectations are admittedly high for Moss, but I don’t think nine catches over two games meets those expectations.

Then there’s our newest text message fanatic, Mr. Favre. For those of us who have watched the NFL for the past eighteen years we have gotten used to #4 riding in his white stallion and saving the day for his team. He’s not that guy anymore. And to be perfectly fair, we shouldn’t expect him to be. What he accomplished last season at age 40 was amazing. What he is doing this season at 41 is realistic. Last season we often heard, “How did he make that throw?” This season we are hearing, “Brett would like to have that one back.” I heard that more than once from commentator Troy Aikman. That’s not to say that Favre doesn’t still have it in him. He can still play. He’s just not an All-Pro quarterback anymore. Not to mention the fact that he has been battling elbow tendinitis and also has ongoing off-the-field distractions.

The Vikings, however, are built to win in 2010. They traded for Moss to win in 2010. They talked Favre out of retirement… AGAIN… to win in 2010. And if you look behind Favre on the quarterback depth chart, quarterbacks number two and three bring out the names Tavaris Jackson and Joe Webb (who?). At least Dallas has Jon Kitna! Can the Vikings win this season with those guys if Favre goes down with injury (entirely possible)? Are those guys capable of leading the team in the future? Hahahahahaha!!!

Both the Cowboys and Vikings have uphill battles to make the playoffs in 2010. With both being 2009 division champions, they have extremely difficult schedules the rest of the way. But the Vikings have age going against them. They HAVE to win now and that’s why there is more panic in the Twin Cities.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate… Freaking Out Doc

October 14, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.

This is my first Friday Game of the Week debate in quite some time. Generally speaking, the game of the week is a football game, and if that fits your fancy feel free to give the articles by Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek a look. But Saturday night’s game one of the National League Championship Series was too good to pass up!

Obviously, these two teams have outstanding pitching staffs. And they have certainly turned it up a notch – actually two notches – in the post-season to this point. In the first round sweep of the Reds the Phillies totally dominated a good hitting Cincinnati team allowing just three earned runs in 27 innings pitched. That’s a 1.00 ERA. That’s impressive stuff.

As for the Giants, it took them four games to get by a banged up Braves team, but their pitching staff was just as dominant with a 1.66 ERA over the four games.

Now we have quite a treat in store for us Saturday night at Citizens Bank Ballpark. Roy Halladay versus Tim Lincecum. The Doc versus The Freak. Short hair versus long hair. The button down shirt against the Zac Brown toboggan (Tim’s version). These two guys have had the most dominant performances of the post-season so far (with apologies to Cliff Lee), and they’ll be going head to head tomorrow night. It’s hard to believe it’ll be each pitcher’s second career post-season start each.

If you like pitching, you’re probably going to enjoy this series. If you like pitching, you’re definitely going to enjoy this game. The Giants did not get to the playoffs on the strength of their offense. They were ninth in the National League in runs scored, and in the NLDS they hit a paltry .212. Strangely, you would think the Phillies would be an offensive powerhouse with that lineup and playing in a telephone booth, but they too have struggled at times on offense. The Phillies actually only hit .212 on offense during the NLDS. It appears the pitching will limit the hitting in this matchup as well.

Halladay is of course coming off his no hitter against the Reds. But some have argued that Lincecum’s 14 strikeout performance against the Braves was more dominant, which I totally don’t buy. There’s no doubt Lincecum has turned his season around though, thanks in small part to a small alteration in his in-between starts routine, and he’s been back to his dominant self. As a guy who grew up a Braves fan, I love dominant pitching. This is different, though. Greg Maddux and Tom Glavine dominated by mixing changing speeds and hitting their spots (John Smoltz was a power pitcher). Both of these guys are power pitchers and are fully capable of powerfully dominating a game.

It’s going to be a fun series to watch. Most experts have the Phillies controlling the series, but if Lincecum and his boys can steal one tomorrow night by knocking off Doc Halladay, then it could be a totally different series.
My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate… Bucks, Badgers In High Stakes Big Ten Matchup

October 14, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

Over the past four years, the SEC has been the premier college football conference. It has claimed the last four national championships, and there has been an SEC program at the top of the rational rankings every week since December 7th, 2008. But with Alabama’s loss to South Carolina last weekend all that came to an end, and now it is the Big Ten’s Ohio State Buckeyes that sit atop college football’s mountain.

Behind junior quarterback and Heisman hopeful Terrelle Pryor the Buckeyes have rolled to a 6-0 record, including an impressive win over the Miami Hurricanes. The team now sits in the driver’s seat for the race to the national championship game.

But how long will the run at the top last?

Even the BCS, which provides the only ranking that REALLY matters, is projected to have Boise State, not Ohio State, as the number one team after the first standings are announced. Meanwhile, Ohio State, who is ranked number one in all of the major polls, could actually find itself as low as fifth in the BCS standings.

But a win on the road at Camp Randall Stadium over the eighteenth ranked Wisconsin Badgers could be all it takes for Ohio State to jump into the BCS lead.

As for the Badgers, who have not beaten Ohio State since 2004, a victory over the top-ranked Buckeyes would catapult them back up the rankings and into the BCS conversation, a welcome outcome after the fell at the hands of undefeated Michigan State two weeks ago. And, Home-Sweet-Home is right where the Badgers want to be for this matchup, as the team boasts one of the nation’s best home records since the last victory over Ohio State (40-4).

So, what will be the key matchup this weekend?

Wisconsin’s running backs, John Clay and James White, are leading a rushing offense that averages more than 240 yards per game (the eleventh best in the nation), while Ohio State’s rushing defense has only allowed 78 yards per game (the fourth best in the nation).

If the Badgers hope to pull off the upset Clay and White will have to find a way past Cameron Heyward and the rest of Ohio State’s defensive front.

It will be a classic Big Ten matchup between two of the conference’s powerhouse programs, with the winner staking a claim as a frontrunner team for a conference on the cusp of supplanting the SEC as the premier collection of football universities.

It is the game of the year for the best conference in the country.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best Game of THIS Weekend Debate… Winning Is a Choice One Team Must Make

October 14, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

It’s now or never.

In fact, it may very well be never or never for the Dallas Cowboys and the Minnesota Vikings. Both teams sit at 1-3 and both teams have more questions than answers. Both teams were expected to be the elite teams of the NFC and contenders for an appearance in the Super Bowl. Oh, and both teams are desperate.

Both teams have (had?) major expectations and have crumpled beneath them, but for starkly different reasons.

The Vikings lost the receiving corps to injury – despite the team’s latest desperate measures to secure the services of Randy “Every Down” Moss. Now Brett Favre’s elbow hurts, which sounds a lot like a built in excuse for failure. The once vaunted run defense with the Williams’ brothers in the middle is now a middle of the pack group that allows over 100 yards per game on the ground routinely. The team is full of weak spots and led by a desperate coach.

Speaking of teams with weak spots and desperate coaches, the Dallas Cowboys are also playing in this game. Jerry Jones has recently stated that he is not going to fire Wade Phillips until the end of the season, which is something I think few folks actually believe. Here is another situation where the receivers are decimated by injury, running backs are underperforming, and the defense is only two positions better than the Vikings – giving up 102.3 yards per game.

The football basics that make up the best teams are the very traits that appear to have vacated both teams. This game, however, is the perfect opportunity for one of the two teams to reclaim the ground they’ve lost to this point in the season. Neither team is playing to the level most fans and pundits expected, but neither team is dead in the water, yet.

The choice – and yes, it is a CHOICE for these two teams and their collective players – is between 2-3 and a faint glimmer of hope, and 1-4 and certain death this season. It’s a choice because playing well starts in the film room on Monday, it continues in the walk throughs mid-week, it governs thoughts and extra study on travel day, and that choice is made when lacing up cleats pre-game. The team with the most players to make winning choices wins the game and life in the season. The stakes don’t get much higher for an earlier season game, even if it does reek of desperation.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Publicly Grading Officials Debate VERDICT

October 14, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

Today’s debate is not about whether leagues should grade officials, but whether those grades should be public knowledge.

This is an extremely important issue in sports because there is a great deal at stake. On the one hand, if publically grading officials encourages them to perform better then it would improve the overall quality of the sports we love so much, but if it does not have this effect than it could serve to seriously undercut the authority of officials.

Bleacher Fan based his argument off of the need for increased accountability through transparency in the way leagues evaluate officials. He believes that officials are afforded the ability to hide behind a wall of anonymity when it comes to corrective efforts meant to redress poor officiating. He finds this to be hypocritical considering the high profile nature of every other aspect of sports. He pointed out that the actions taken against players, coaches, and team management for poor performance is usually very public, yet the league’s efforts to correct problematic officiating remain highly secretive.

This point was definitely not lost on me. Sports fans are very aware of league actions taken against players and owners alike, but officials remain a different story. We all know about the not-so-private war between NBA commissioner David Stern and Dallas Maverick owner Mark Cuban. We all know about the leagues dealings with player with problematic players, such as Ben Roethlisberger and Michael Vick. But no one seems to know which officials, if any, are getting their butts handed to them behind closed doors. Bleacher Fan believes that this cloak in dagger approach cannot lead to anything good.

Bleacher Fan acknowledges the human aspect of the sports. He admits that no one is perfect, but that because we know that no one is perfect leagues should be more open about telling the public what officials grades are and what the leagues are doing to improve the lowest achievers.

Loyal Homer, however, states those grades should remain a secret. He challenges the logic behind releasing private evaluations to a public that is already highly critical of the job officials are doing in the first place. As Loyal Homer explains in his argument, public evaluations would only serve to further undermine the authority of officials.

He made a strong point for his argument when he aptly pointed out that evaluations are not intended for the purpose of establishing worst-to-first ranking of officials, but rather to specify the areas where each official needs to demonstrate professional growth. The goal behind assessing the job officials are doing is to encourage improvement, not to invalidate their authority, which very well could be the result of releasing performance evaluations. Loyal Homer stood firm in his belief that the mere fact that performance evaluations and the incorporation of assistive technologies (i.e. replay) exists to help officials is enough to ensure their validity and reliability as an arbitrator of the rules.

Loyal Homer’s argument raises concerns over the potential dangers of labeling officials due to their performance review grade. If publicized, referee and umpire ratings would be akin to restaurants sanitation grades. Can you imagine the grumbling and second guessing that would surround the calls of an umpire with a “C” rating (the equivalent of a sketchy IHOP)? Regardless of the accuracy, there would be those who would second-guess them solely on the basis of their performance grade. Similarly, in the mind of the public it would not matter whether the official met the minimum competencies established by the league because any official with a less than perfect score would be perceived to be doing a bad job.

Ultimately it was this comparison that made my decision. In the real world, not all workers deserve perfect performance reviews. If they did there would be a lot more Fortune 500 companies out there. The truth is that there are excellent, above average, average, below average, and poor employees in virtually every industry, including professional sports. Some officials are better than others, but publically acknowledging that fact and then highlighting the underachievers would only serve to create a distracting spectacle. Publically grading officials would do nothing to help them improve. Do you really think Jim Joyce would have tried harder to call Armando Galaragga’s near perfect game if he knew his evaluation would be in the media at the end of the year? I honestly think when an official screws up, the media usually covers it sufficiently. Ultimately it is because there is nothing gained but controversy and the undermining of authority by publically grading officials that I award this victory to Loyal Homer. Bleacher Fan can throw the red flag all he wants to, this is one call that is final.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Publicly Grading Officials Debate

October 13, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

Officiating blunders have been everywhere recently, some small and others spectacular in their enormity. Jim Joyce’s botched call, which cost Armando Galarraga his bid at perfection, thrust the issue into the national spotlight, but the problem is not limited to baseball. There have been blown calls in football and basketball, in both the college and the pros.

Now poor officiating has many fans demanding everything from an expanded use of replay to public disclosure of officials’ performance reviews. Which brings us to today’s debate—Should the grades that officials receive during the season be publically announced?

Clearly something must be done, but would publicizing officials’ performance review encourage more accountability or cause more problems than it is worth? Would referees and umpires step up their game knowing they have nowhere to hide, or would it create more controversy when an official receives less than a stellar score. Certainly there would be even more second guessing of close calls if the officials rating was subpar, so what is worse? A perceived lack of accountability or the mess public scoring could make.

Loyal Homer believes the latter, suggesting that simply grading the officials in the first place should be enough. Loyal Homer will argue that, as long as the guys with the whistles are held accountable for their mistakes at the end of the season, that is all that matters. But he also worries that drawing too much attention to referees makes a spectacle of officials and could subject them unnecessarily to the court of public opinion.

Bleacher Fan, on the other hand, feels that officials should be accountable for their actions via public assessment of their performance. He will argue that incompetent referees and umps should not be able to hide behind a wall of anonymity. Bleacher Fan believes that if transparency can provide accountability, then the end justifies the means, especially if the end result is a better officiated sport.

This debate removes the athletes from the spotlight and refreshingly puts the officials on the hot seat. Gentlemen, put forth your best arguments because there will be no instant replay or review by the booth here. Good luck. 
My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Publicly Grading Officials Debate… Anonymity is the Way to Go

October 13, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.

We’ve all been at sporting events or watched games on television where we thought our team was deprived of a chance to win the game, thanks to an incorrect call by the official or referee. In my mind, I have a who’s-who list of officials that have shortchanged the teams I root for. And we have all seen how guys like Jim Joyce and Ed Hochuli can mess up calls in critical junctions of the game, becoming a main part of the story. It is unfortunate, but it is part of the game. Any official who has worked a game on any level has been subjected to the wrath of a fan at some point. And on the professional levels, the officials are subjected to yearly evaluations by the league’s competition committee or through some other evaluation process. These findings are kept in house, and I am sorry Bleacher Fan, but that is the way it needs to stay!

Occasionally, a news source will do an anonymous survey amongst players asking them to name the best and worst umpires or a list of worst calls in sports history. That is all well and good, but what good does it really do to PUBLICLY humiliate the officials? Some matters are better left behind closed doors and handled in private.

We all go through job evaluations in our respective lines of work. Would you want your boss to release your evaluation to the public? Obviously these evaluations are necessary, but they are there to show you what you as an employee need to improve on in your day-to-day duties. The same goes for officials. The evaluations are done to show their respective areas of improvement and to show them how they graded out throughout the season. The purpose is to show the officials where improvement needs to happen. By releasing these grades to us as fans, the respective leagues would essentially be publicly throwing its employees under the bus.

Thanks to the great invention of instant replay in some sports, many mistakes are fixable and disaster can be avoided. Other times, due to the lack of replay (yes I am referring to MLB), games are often swung in favor to the opposing team.

As fans we hate that. We remember the guy who missed the call. I still remember a horrific strike zone from a playoff game 13 years ago in the 1997 NLCS, but I don’t need to know his evaluation. His evaluation was and is fully set in my mind forever, and it is not a favorable one. No grading system released by Major League Baseball was going to change my mind. We see the calls with our own two eyes. We see the replays. We know if the umpire is good or bad!

It is often said that a good journalist never becomes the story, much as a good umpire never becomes the story. By making job evaluations and grades of officials available to the public, the officials become the story and it shouldn’t be that way. Should they be routinely evaluated? Of course! But these findings should be kept private. They should certainly be held accountable for how they are doing their jobs, but I see no great benefit in releasing this information to the public.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Publicly Grading Officials Debate… Open the Book of Secrets

October 13, 2010

Read the opposing argument from and Loyal Homer.

Athletic competition is passionately followed by millions of people.

The reason for this passionate following is that at its very basic level, athletic competition is a battle of skill between two of the top performers in a particular field. And when one person or team arises victorious out of the competition, that victory comes strictly on the merits of the athlete’s performance.

To help ensure the integrity of that athletic competition within each of those major sporting events, there is a governing process where officials work to ensure fair play among the competitors. These officials are supposed to serve as observers, ensuring that all conditions during the competition remain equal so that the person or team with better skill is the one that will ultimately win the day. These officials are NOT supposed to directly influence the outcome of the game.

But far too often we hear about situations where the officials are doing just that.

Here we sit in the middle of a postseason that should be celebrating some of the greatest postseason pitching in MLB history, and many headlines are still being dominated by officiating mistakes and inconsistencies.

Shifted strike zones, blown calls on stolen bases, and highlight-reel caliber catches that didn’t count have led directly to game-changing plays that may well have altered the course for the entire MLB postseason. But there IS something that can be done to help address the issue of poor or inconsistent officiating (and I am not referring to expanded instant replay, which actually would not have applied to correct many of the blown calls from the past few weeks).

At the end of each season, the officials in each of the major sports are graded in their performance, but no one ever sees these grades, nor do we ever know what is being done (if there even IS anything being done) to address those situations when an official fails to make the grade. So if you want to reduce the number of concerns related to poor officiating, I have an easy fix – Tell us what those grades are, and tell us what you are doing about them!

I am not suggesting a witch hunt, where the most grievous offenders are stalked by a mob of pitch-fork toting villagers seeking justice. But we as fans DO want to believe that the groups like the NFL and MLB are actively working to address the poor performance concerns of their officiating crews, in an effort to improve the quality of the game the NEXT time that official steps onto the field. But how can we have that assurance if we don’t even know what is being done?

Every other aspect of every major sporting event is transparent, so why not this?

Whenever a player performs poorly on the field, the corrective action taken by the organization to address that poor performance is public. The player may have his time cut, he could be benched, or even released altogether by the team.

Likewise, when a coach or general manager fails to build or maintain success on the field, the corrective action taken by the organization is public. We as fans can see that the poor performance is being addressed, and we then have a standard by which to measure how successful the steps taken by the organization were.

We may not always like the outcome, but at least we can be given the assurance that the poor performance is not being tolerated, because we become more informed and can see exactly what is being done by each sports organization.

Yet many of the actions taken to improve officiating in these major sports are still foolishly kept secret, which frustrates both the fans and the players who want to believe that officials are held to the same high standards of consistently solid performance that the athletes themselves are.

The system as it exists today lacks any appearance of accountability.

Officials can commit grievous errors one week, then show up in stripes at the next competition as though no issues ever arose. And the more that those officials continue to make mistakes, the more we as fans develop the notion that the poor officiating is actually being TOLERATED, rather than addressed and corrected, because there is no visible action being taken to resolve the issue.

But it doesn’t have to be that way. Simply by publishing the officials’ grades at the end of each sports season, organizations like the MLB and the NFL would succeed in letting the fans, players, and owners see not only those officials who failed to perform up to an acceptable standard, but it would also let those same people know what is being done to address those poor performance issues.

We can accept that people (yes, EVEN referees, umpires, etc.) will make mistakes. And as much as we may complain about how technology can reduce or eliminate the flaw of human error, we can nevertheless accept it as a very real part of the different games we all love. All we are asking for is that the leagues begin to demonstrate the accountability of their respective officials.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The MLB Playoffs Home Field Advantage Debate Verdict

October 11, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Optimist Prime.

This debate took some crazy twists and turns. I believed I had a good idea of the direction each argument would take, but both writers surprised me.

I was very interested to learn that a smart, professorial type chooses to spend his hard-earned intellect analyzing sports. Dr. Ray Stefani has compiled an impressive study, as Optimist Prime highlights in his article. The study completely breaks down the numerical value of home field in a formula, also providing insight into a fan’s impact on a given game – something we all know makes up a large part of what constitutes home field advantage. Needless to say, it is a good thing Bleacher Fan wasn’t writing in this debate, as I am sure he would have some choice words for Dr. Stefani’s analysis on the value of the fan.

It was interesting to note that home field advantage for Major League Baseball is a factor of only 7.5 percent – by far the lowest of the rated sports. Simply, home field – and by extension the crowd – just does not play a major factor in changing the outcome of a game. Statistically, this is impossible to refute and a blow to the value of the fan overall when it comes to post-season baseball.

But, statistics generally paint with a broad brush and try to define qualitative factors within a mathematical structure. In other words, stats can’t measure passion, and home crowds provide plenty of it. Just ask the Chicago Cubs. The famed “Bartman” incident happened at Wrigley Field, and I’m guessing few of the Cubs’ players at the time saw any advantage in that. But, the interference plays mentioned in Babe Ruthless’ article are not exclusive to the home field, which is really what is being evaluated within the framework of this debate.

For baseball, even the most passionate fans that are incredibly smart and always cheer at the proper moments of a baseball game will inevitably be unable to have any impact on the outcome of the game without violating protocol. Fans are a huge part of the home field advantage equation. But, Babe Ruthless was unable to convince me that fans’ impact is substantial enough, and that home field makes a big difference. Therefore, Optimist Prime wins the argument.

Now, that doesn’t mean Babe Ruthless’ argument isn’t outstanding. He makes one point in particular that nearly swayed me to his side, even in the face of overwhelming statistical evidence offered by Optimist Prime.

Babe is absolutely correct that home field players know every dirt and pebble on the infield and have a feel for exactly how much space separates the warning track from the wall. But in today’s modern era of baseball those nuances are not completely foreign to opposing teams. Within the same league teams get ample opportunity to play one another, so ignorance is no longer an excuse in this case. Interleague play further dilutes any advantage home teams have over the opposition.

Babe’s article is infused with too much conjecture and guess-work to sway me. Sure, a roaring crowd COULD impact the way a player plays, but not necessarily and not every time. Baseball is unique because the player – the batter in particular – has the power to control the crowd by stepping out the batter’s box.

The nuances Babe Ruthless draws attention to are not incorrect, but if they really DID make a significant impact on a home team’s prospects it would show up in the win-loss analysis the good doctor compiled. While it is true that fans can literally reach out and alter a game, they aren’t supposed to and it rarely happens.

I also do not believe that baseball managers would unilaterally declare a desire to play all games at home. I know of many Chicago Cubs managers who lament the unpredictable wind. I also suspect that Florida Marlins’ managers in the past were not wedded to the idea of playing every playoff game in front of a smattering of decidedly unenthusiastic fans (seriously, how do sports survive on South Beach??). Some managers also know that their team plays better with an edge a player can only develop when playing on the road, and will rent out a hotel in the team’s hometown in order to simulate the road experience and create the edginess needed to win the post-season.

I honestly wanted the home field and fan support in baseball to give the players and teams a great advantage. But, all of the factors that define home field – from fan presence to a player sleeping in his own bed the night before a game – do not appear to make any difference with baseball. The game is played the same way regardless of what field it is played on – from MLB parks to urban sandlots. In fact, baseball’s ubiquity is one of its endearing qualities. Anyone at any time is able to play baseball, and the game has been that way for almost 150 years. Maybe the fans and some home cooking don’t make a dramatic impact on the outcome of a game, but the fact that baseball has been played the same way since Abner Doubleday is pretty great. Baseball may not have home field advantage, but it does have history. And it always will.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The MLB Playoffs Home Field Advantage Debate

October 11, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Optimist Prime.

It’s natural as fans to believe that playing at home ALWAYS gives the home team a distinct advantage.

But absolutes in sports are dangerous.

For baseball teams in October the assumption is that home field matters. But the rhythm of fan cheering in baseball is entirely different than football. While hometown football fans scream when the opposing team is about to go into score – in an effort to boost the defense and make it difficult for the opposition to communicate – baseball fans don’t exactly scream in a distracting way to the opposing team.

After watching some high profile visiting team wins already in this baseball post-season, the question begs: Does home field advantage really matter in the MLB post-season?

Babe Ruthless will argue that home field does matter, but he won’t limit himself to his Yankee-colored glasses. Sure, the Yanks have a great home field environment, but the Yankees aren’t the only team in baseball. Optimist Prime will argue that baseball is the same game regardless of where it’s played, so home field does not matter.

Gentleman? Play ball.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.