The All Time Greatest Colts Quarterback Debate… Johnny U Reigns Supreme

August 10, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Bleacher Fan has asked the Babe and I to determine who the greatest Colts quarterback of all time is. I know the easy answer, especially for you young lads, is Peyton Manning. It’s quite obvious Babe Ruthless has a serious man crush on Manning (he’s approaching Tom Izzo-Sports Geek status with that relationship). Peyton has obviously racked himself up quite a career to this point and he’s still got a little bit left in the tank. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed watching him in college and the NFL. It’s hard to root against the guy. But, with no disrespect intended toward Manning, I’m think Johnny Unitas is the greatest Colts quarterback ever.

If you ask the fathers of any of our writers here at TSD they would probably go on and on about how great “Johnny U” was. I know I’ve heard my dad mention his name on several occasions when he discusses NFL lore. I bet your dads have mentioned him as well, and with good reason. Back then he was the star of the league, probably more so than Manning is today since Manning has to compete for attention with the likes of Tom Brady, Brett Favre, and the seemingly constant infatuation with the Dallas Cowboys.

Babe Ruthless likes to talk about the fact that Manning’s individual passing numbers are consistently better each year than those put up by Unitas. But while considering those numbers, it’s important to note that Unitas never had the opportunity to play in a regular season with 16 games. The NFL didn’t expand the season to 16 games until 1978. Actually, Unitas played only 12 games per season in his first few seasons. The schedule wasn’t extended to 14 games until 1960. Yet, Unitas began playing in 1956, where he had three of his six first team All-Pro selections in the 1950s. You do the math on that.

It’s often said that both Unitas and Manning have one Super Bowl at this point, and that’s certainly true. But, before the Super Bowl era began in 1966 Unitas won two NFL World Championships, in 1958 and 1959. He also was the winning quarterback in the “greatest game ever played,” and helped build the legacy of future Hall of Fame coach Don Shula. All of that has to count for something, right?

Old school Colts fans like to say that today’s quarterbacks get more protection from their offensive line and from the officials as well. I think we can all agree there is probably a great deal more emphasis put on protecting the quarterback in the modern era than it was back when Unitas was under center. But that didn’t stop Johnny U from throwing touchdown passes in 47 consecutive games, a record that still stands today. Meanwhile, Manning, still in the prime of his career, had three games last season where he didn’t throw a single touchdown pass.

The legacy of the stars of yesteryear seems to grow as time goes on, and as more and more stories are told by fathers to children and grandchildren. Perhaps in thirty years we’ll be telling stories about Manning to our children. But as it stands now, Johnny U remains the greatest quarterback in Colts history.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Scariest Three Words in Sports Debate… What if N.F.L. Stood for No Football League?

August 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Imagine you live in Phoenix. You just read a news release that a fan favorite from the Boston Red Sox was being traded to the Toronto Blue Jays. Are you concerned?

Or imagine that you live in Kansas City, and you just found out that the owner of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers has announced he is relocating the team to Los Angeles. Does that affect you at all?

The answer to those questions is No. While the people in Boston or Tampa Bay may perceive the above headlines as being bad or even scary news, folks everywhere else simply perceive them as news.

Now, imagine it’s a bright Sunday morning in September. You can be anywhere in this great nation of ours – Spokane, Oklahoma City, or Tallahassee. Maybe you are returning home from church. Maybe you are just waking up from a long night of partying. No matter what led you to this point in time, you only have one thing on your mind right now. You are looking forward to plopping down on the sofa, filling up a plate or bowl full of junk food, and turning on the TV to enjoy a relaxing afternoon, as NFL games should be getting set to kick off any minute.

But instead of being bombarded by the cackling madness of Howie, Terry, and the rest of the NFL pre-game show when you flip on Fox, you are greeted instead by a conversation between Hawkeye, Radar, Hot Lips, and Klinger in a military hospital tent from a M*A*S*H rerun.

“That’s okay,” you figure. “The NFC game must be blacked out locally, so I’ll just flip over to CBS and catch the AFC game of the week.” Once you flip to CBS you are met with Sam, Woody, Cliff, Norm, and the rest of the Cheers gang all sitting around the bar on another Boston afternoon circa 1987.

Where’s the football?!

And it is precisely at that point that you remember having heard the worst three words that could possibly uttered in sports, and your heart breaks all over again.

NFL. Player. Lockout.

Out of all the possible three-word combinations that could be used, from “You’ve been traded” to “Career ending injury,” only an NFL player lockout carries implications grand enough to affect the entire sports world in America.

For many years running, the NFL has been far and away the most popular sport in the United States. The thriving popularity and success of Fantasy Football serves as testament, as fantasy football alone has grown into a $1B industry. The simple fact is that people LOVE the NFL.

Ticket prices are rising, the economy is slumping, and attendance figures are still rising every season. The Dallas Cowboys just built a $1B stadium, where suite owners have to cough up as much as $90 just to by a pizza, and still people flock to the NFL.

The NFL has become the single most entertaining sport in America. It provides us with drama, excitement, with just a dash of danger for flavor. It evokes the most passion in us, and even though the season is played out over only 17 Sundays each year, it manages to consume nearly 12 months of conversation.

But with the impending expiration of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement, and the prospective lack of any hope for a new CBA on the immediate horizon, there is a painful, all-too-real possibility that we could not have an NFL season next year.

Just think about that for a moment.

Scary.

Last night, I (and millions of my football loving brethren) enjoyed watching the Cincinnati Bengals take on the Dallas Cowboys in the inaugural pre-season game for the 2010 season. I am also getting ready for not one, but TWO, fantasy football drafts. Imagine if that wasn’t going to happen.

I can take Brett Favre’s retirement, and I will be just fine if another Major League baseball slugger is found to have used Performance Enhancing Drugs.

PLEASE don’t take away my football!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Scariest Three Words in Sports Debate… The Doctor Is In

August 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

As a sports fan, I’ve come to recognize trends in athletics and what certain innuendos mean. There are three little words in sports lingo that just scare the jeepers out of me. I usually know it’s not a good thing when these three words are brought into any conversation, relayed on any news reports, or uttered from the mouths of coaches, managers and players. Those three words are Doctor James Andrews.”

Dr. Andrews is an orthopedic surgeon who practices in Birmingham, Alabama at the Andrews Sports Medicine & Orthropaedic Center (call and you might actually be able to schedule an appointment, as only about 25 percent of his surgeries are done on athletes.). He’s one of the most recognizable “name” doctors in the known world. But to many professional athletes, he’s their personal doctor. To fans of those athletes, he’s a scary name. Usually if someone is associated with Dr. James Andrews, something is wrong. That problematic something, whether it is knee, shoulder, or elbow, is going to get fixed. But if it is serious enough for Andrews to look at, then it is pretty serious.

If there’s someone else who has a bigger list of names associated with him, I want to see it. Can you imagine what the contact list on his cell phone looks like? He must have some kind of referral rate! Just take a look at all the names he has been associated with, either through surgery or consultation, over the years: Troy Aikman, Drew Brees, John Smoltz, Jack Nicklaus, Roger Clemens, Michael Jordan, and more recently, Brett Favre. These are all Hall of Fame caliber players, and there are countless others. Smoltz has repeatedly said on local Atlanta Braves telecasts that Andrews single-handedly saved his career and made his off the field life more enjoyable. Back in 2000 Smoltz was having serious elbow pains. Just four years removed from a Cy Young award, he thought his career may be over and he thought the things he took for granted, such as playing with his kids and swinging a golf club, would be severely limited. But in swooped Andrews to perform Tommy John surgery and two years later, Smoltz was an All-Star closer.

Andrews is in the news this week, and Minnesota Vikings fans are praying that he has some good news for a certain someone. Brett Favre had his ankle surgically repaired by Andrews back in May and is set to consult with him later this week about the ankle. If Favre gets good news and assurance from Andrews, then it’s a good bet that #4 will be suiting up for the Vikings again. Just when you thought that career was put to rest, huh? Admit it… you never thought Favre was going to retire anyway!

Just last week I was at Turner Field watching the Braves take on the Mets. During the game, Braves pitcher Kris Medlen began experiencing pain in his elbow and had to leave his start early. Before the broadcasters even said it, the good doctor’s name entered my mind and I immediately cringed, both as a fan and for the player. It’s amazing how one name can be associated with so many athletes and so many professional teams. Sure enough, an MRI showed Medlen had a partial tear in his UCL, which will likely eventually lead to Tommy John surgery. Any guesses who is going to perform that surgery? Kris, meet Dr. James Andrews.

“Dr. James Andrews” is definitely a scary phrase to hear, especially if it relates to a player for one of your teams. On one end, fans feel fairly confident that Andrews will fix whatever ails the athlete. But, if it’s serious enough for Andrews to look at and possibly fix, then chances are that athlete is going to miss a lot of time on the field. That’s what’s scary!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Scariest Three Words in Sports Debate… You’ve Been Traded

August 9, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

The three scariest words in sports are undoubtedly, “You’ve been traded.”


Yes, I realize that’s more like two words and a contraction, but you get my point. The simple utterance of this phrase has the ability to make or break an entire career. A trade can mean the difference between playing for the Los Angeles Lakers or the Utah Jazz, the New England Patriots or the Detroit Lions, the New York Yankees or the Kansas City Royals.

Every season in every professional sport trades are made, many of them advantageous to the players involved. But that is not always the case. Sometimes up and coming stars are relegated to obscurity. As a lifelong Yankees fan I have watched this happen to plenty of young guys in the farm system. Obviously not every prospect is going to make it, but an untimely trade to the wrong team can be disastrous. A player’s future can be derailed because a new team uses them ineffectively or at the wrong position. Or maybe the new team simply overworks a young star so much that their body breaks down.

Obviously trades can be beneficial. But, they also have the infamous ability to marginalize burgeoning stars and established veterans alike. Nomar Garciaparra is a case study. Nomar was Boston’s answer to Derek Jeter. He was a Red Sox Nation fan favorite if there ever was one. He was a rookie sensation that blossomed into one of the fiercest hitters in the league. He was respected and liked by his teammates. But his career took a dramatic turn for the worse because of a trade.

Once the face of the Boston Red Sox, Nomar’s entire legacy was undermined by a 2004 trade to the Chicago Cubs. He was dealt at the trade deadline in one of the most pivotal seasons in Red Sox history, the year the ended the 86 year drought and finally won another World Series. It was a campaign for the Red Sox that meant so much more to Boston than just winning the most coveted prize in baseball, it was a rebirth. The team finally won, but more importantly, they vanquished the New York Yankees to get there. It must have been an indescribable feeling for the Red Sox, one Nomar Garciaparra would never fully know.

Nomar continued to play, but both his skills and his star power seemed to diminish rapidly. His power numbers fell first, followed by his batting average, health, and, ultimately, playing time. He ended his career less auspiciously than it began, playing in a limited role for the Oakland Athletics. Nomar went from one of the most recognizable faces in baseball to Mr. Mia Ham. His fall from greatness was swift and painful to watch, and it was triggered by a trade.

No one is safe, no matter how iconic they appear to be or how much the media likes them. Donovan McNabb is proof. While he had a wild ride and somewhat of a love-hate relationship with Philadelphia since he was greeted to boos in the 1999 draft, he also went on to take the Eagles to new heights. With McNabb under center Philly made eight playoff appearances – including four consecutive NFC East championships from 2001-2004, five NFC Championship appearances, and a Super Bowl appearance. You would think those kinds of results would keep him safe from criticism and second guessing, but alas, no. McNabb’s fate was a trade within the division to a much less appealing Washington Redskins team.

Although McNabb figures to use this slight as motivation to succeed, he faces immense obstacles. Thus far he has remained optimistic even comparing his relocation at age 33 to John Elway in Denver, when Elway received a new head coach – and a big change – at age 34. But, as ESPN.com writer Matt Mosley points out, “Elway had Terrell Davis at running back and a stable offensive line,” something McNabb doesn’t bring with him to Washington. In fact, he doesn’t even have the young receiving corps of DeSean Jackson, Jeremy Maclin, and Jason Avant that he had back in the City of Brotherly Love, meaning this trade could be the abrupt punctuation on an otherwise impressive career.

Modern sports superstars wield considerably more power in controlling a career than those of the past. Since the advent of free agency, these privileged pros have literally gotten to choose the team of their liking on a semi-regular basis. Contemporary stars may even have an entourage of agents and publicists that work to secure even more career control. These players have their own dedicated staff working around the clock trying to place their client in the most lucrative situation possible–with full no trade clause and 4th year option, of course. But even when athletes land in scenarios they deem unfavorable they can still use a variety of tactics, including everything from holdouts to a highly publicized war of words, and try to get what they want. Unfortunately for players, however, this is not the reality for all professional athletes. Some still live and die by trades.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Greatest Defensive Back of All Time Debate… In Rod We Trust

August 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

Rod Woodson is an absolute beast. He is undeniably one of the greatest ball hawks in NFL history and the undisputed master of the pick-six. His game-changing ability is unmatched not just by any other defensive back, but by any other defensive player in NFL history, securing his legacy as the greatest DB of all time.

Although Rod Woodson had been wreaking havoc on NFL offenses for years, I first took notice of him toward the end of his career, during his days as an Oakland Raider. And no, I did not notice this stellar defensive star for the reasons one might think – Because of his outstanding 2002 season, or for leading the Raiders defense in Super Bowl XXXVII. I became a fan of Rod Woodson because he was killing my Madden gaming.

Every time I threw a pass it seemed to be picked off by Rod Woodson. Every time I rolled out with my quarterback he was sacked by Rod Woodson. I always knew Woodson was a good defensive back, but the skill of his video game counterpart made me do a little research, and learned that as good as the virtual Woodson was, the real deal was even better. I soon discovered that the former college standout from Purdue was one of the best defensive players of all time. I learned that the former Steeler, 49er, and Baltimore Raven was a terrific all around ball player. He could return kicks and make tackles, but most importantly, he could catch interceptions.

Roderick Kevin Woodson was an above average ball player to begin with—generating more than his fair share of tackles, fumbles, and sacks—but where he really shone was in his ability to generate turnovers, specifically interceptions, as he currently sits third on the all time interception list with71.

Pick after pick, Woodson proved himself to be lethal to the opposing offenses’ game plan, and he was even deadlier after making an interception.

Throughout his career, Woodson racked up 1,483 interception return yards. That is not just impressive, it is the NFL record. That means that throughout his career he ran the length of nearly 15 football fields after making a pick. While a great wide receiver might be lucky enough to accumulate that much yardage after the catch, you have to remember that none of these passes were ever intended for #26.

But most impressive of all is the number of interceptions that Rod Woodson returned for touchdowns in his career. With a grand total of 12 picks returned for scores, Rod Woodson sits atop the stats sheets with yet another NFL record. While not necessarily recorded, who knows how many more scores were the direct result of a possession that began with a turnover created by Woodson. Defenders aren’t supposed to score that many touchdowns, but apparently no one ever told that to Rod Woodson. The term game-changer gets thrown around a lot in football, but what else can you call a player like Woodson? On any down he could not only force a change of possession, but could put points on the board in the process.

Woodson’s impressive pedigree ultimately earned him a spot in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Despite an incredible career highlighted by numerous individual accolades and records, Woodson remained exceptionally humble in his induction speech (it was both articulate and engaging – well worth the watch). He attributed his success to teamwork and the Lord. He could have bragged or been cocky because he certainly had the resume to back it up, but time and time again he credited others with his development and success.

Rod Woodson was a hero on the field and off. He was a one of a kind defender who had an uncanny nose for the ball. His records may not stand forever, but they are impressive nonetheless, and at least for now remain as one of the lasting legacy of the greatest DB in NFL history. 

My ZimbioBlog DirectorySport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favoritesDigg!
Bookmark and Share


The Greatest Defensive Back of All Time Debate… The Assassin

August 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Defensive Backs have one job in the game of football – stop the pass.

Some backs play a finesse game. They read the opposing offense and try to put themselves in exactly the right place to make a play on the ball. Guys like Rod Woodson and Deion Sanders were masters at that game. It didn’t seem to matter where they were at on the field when the quarterback released the ball, they always managed to have a shot at the ball by the time it got near the receiver.

The problem with that style of play, though, was that it often requires a gamble. Guys who make a play for the ball run the risk of misreading the pass, which opens them up to give up very big plays. And when you are in the secondary, you can’t afford to give up big plays.

But there was another way to stop the pass that made for far greater success – intimidation. There is no stat line for intimidation, but it is nevertheless an invaluable weapon on defense.

That is exactly the game that Jack Tatum played, and nobody played it better.

Jack Tatum was without a doubt the single most intimidating man ever to play as a defensive back in the NFL. Quarterbacks and wide receivers had to always mark Tatum’s position on the field. Not because they were worried about his breaking up the pass, but instead because they were worried about his breaking up the wide receiver (literally).

While DB’s like Rod Woodson and Deion Sanders relied on gambles to try and make a play for the ball, Tatum relied on fear. Receivers facing Woodson or Sanders had to make sure to protect their routes and protect the ball. Receivers facing Tatum had to protect themselves. Tatum’s FOOTSTEPS could do more to disrupt a pass than Woodson or Sanders’ hands, and there is nothing more awe-inspiring than a defender whose footsteps alone are enough to instill enough fear as to cause a professional to fail!

Tatum may not have had the individual statistics to compete on the all-time rankings with some others to have played the game, but he was far more valuable to those organizations on each and every play of the game.

Tatum played football only one way, at full speed. His mission was to hit his target as hard as possible, every single play of the game. Receivers always knew when they were coming across the field and Tatum was waiting for them on the other side.

What made Tatum so successful in the secondary was his combination of speed and size. He was originally recruited as a running back for the Buckeyes, and did not make the transition to defense until midway through his freshman season. That was when his true value was realized.

Over the course of his Hall of Fame career in Columbus, Tatum earned First Team All-Big Ten honors for his play every year he started, and he was a two-time All American. In 1970, he was also named the Defensive Player of the Year, and was even a Heisman Trophy Finalist.

After Tatum made the transition into the NFL, he continued to build his reputation as a punishing tackler who could disrupt any play from anywhere on the field. It was that reputation which ultimately earned him the title of “The Assassin”.

He continued to dominate in the defensive backfield over an outstanding career of 10 seasons, which included three Pro-Bowl selections, two All Pro selections, and the Defensive Back of the Year award in 1973.

Tatum put 100% of himself into every single play. His aggressive style earned him recognition as one of the NFL’s “10 Most Feared Tacklers in NFL History”. And for all of the aggression and power that Tatum demonstrated on the field, it is vitally important to note that he was not a dirty player. Even his infamous hit on New England Patriots’ wide receiver Darryl Stingley, which tragically left Stingley paralyzed and became the dubious defining point in both of their professional careers, was a perfectly legal hit within the rules of the game during the 1970’s.

Although his career does not boast the same statistical dominance that some others have seen, Tatum was still the greatest defensive back of all time.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Greatest Defensive Back of All Time Debate… Prime Time Shut Them Down Like No Other

August 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

As far as I am concerned, this argument starts and ends with one name.

In my mind, this man invented the phrase “shut down corner” long before the likes of Champ Bailey and Darrelle Revis came into the NFL. Some may say this guy had as much hype as any athlete to ever play defense in the NFL, which very well could be true and would be tough to argue against in a debate. But behind that hype was a fine cornerback. He was the best.

Who am I talking about? None other than Deion “Prime Time” Sanders!

I never have been the biggest fan of “Neon Deion”, despite his southern roots. He grew up in South Florida and eventually played collegiate ball at Florida State. After an impressive career as a Seminole (both in football and baseball), Sanders was drafted by the Atlanta Falcons.

Much of the highlights he established as a Falcon were centered on flashy punt returns (and let’s be real, much of Deion’s reputation was and still is built on flash) but the guy was truly a shutdown corner.

He was not a good tackler. If the quarterback was to throw a quick toss to the receiver and Sanders had to tackle him, chances were the receiver could rack up some Yards-After-Catch! But with the game on the line and the opposing team needing to drive down the field, Sanders was the guy I wanted defending the number one receiver. That receiver would not beat Deion.

After leaving the Falcons, he went to San Francisco, where he won a Super Bowl with the 49ers. But one year in the Bay Area was enough and he made his way to Dallas, which is really where he gained the most notoriety. (Jerry Jones and Deion Sanders working together had to be quite a scary thought, though. Who would ever get to say anything else when those two were in the room, huh?)

Intercepting 53 passes over a career is impressive. Averaging over 25 yards per interception return is remarkable. Scoring nine times after those interceptions is extraordinary. Achieving all of those numbers while rarely having the ball thrown his direction is what makes Sanders’ accomplishments amazing.

Before Revis was making news for his contract holdout, he was known primarily as THE shutdown corner in the NFL. He was the guy that opposing offensive coordinators would game-plan around. Keep in mind Revis has essentially been the guy for a year or two. Sanders was THAT guy for a decade, as evident by his eight Pro Bowl appearances, and six-time first team All-Pro selections.

What is also impressive to me is that from 1991-1999, he was either first or second team All-Pro with the exception of one year (1995), and that was the year he was coming back from arthroscopic surgery.

No matter what you thought about Sanders and his extremely outgoing personality, you have got to admit that he certainly backed it up while out on the gridiron enough to prove that he was the best to ever play cornerback in the NFL.

My ZimbioBlog DirectorySport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favoritesDigg!
Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Over Signing Recruits Debate Verdict

August 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

I generally do not regard myself as a bleeding heart, and I am a firm supporter of the philosophy that the buyer should beware. Any time a person enters into a contract, they need to absolutely understand the terms which they are agreeing to.

With regard to high school recruits needing to understand that their letter of intent does not “guarantee” a scholarship for them, Babe Ruthless is absolutely correct. The rules around recruiting for college football do not preclude the Universities from accepting every letter of intent they receive. Likewise, signing a letter of intent does not carry with it the right or guarantee of a scholarship.

They are called “letters of intent” for that very reason – an athlete is expressing their intention of playing for the University. Once that letter is signed by the player, and accepted by the University, a partnership is formed, and both parties have a shared obligation to support the overall goal of making the program success.

Just because a contract is legally defensible, though, that does not mean that it is without flaws. This debate was not around the legality of the over-signing practice employed by many major college football programs, but instead was about whether or not it is a practice that unfairly exploits loopholes to a very one-sided advantage.

As far as the programs are concerned, I have no issue at all with the institution doing everything in its power to protect itself. As Babe Ruthless also mentions, some students will be deemed as academically ineligible, others may get injured, and more still may fail to meet the high demands necessary to support a successful program. If a program does not have the ability to protect themselves from those very real dangers, then they are being asked to absorb a great deal of risk.

College football is big business, and it would be extremely irresponsible on the part of the organization if they did not take every possible precaution to protect their best interests.

What I do have an issue with, however, is the imbalance of the system.

Universities are essentially allowed to “hedge their bets” by inviting more students than there are scholarships available. That way, after the fallout of academic ineligibility, poor performance, and injury has mostly been realized, the program can still move forward with a strong and healthy foundation.

But what about those recruits who are cast aside?

While the programs are allowed to put back-up plans in place to protect themselves from hardship, the recruits are not given that same freedom. They cannot issue back-up letters of intent to other programs, JUST IN CASE things don’t work out for them at their first choice. It is that imbalance which Loyal Homer brings up that ultimately earned the verdict for today’s debate.

As illustrated by Loyal Homer’s example of Elliot Porter, the “gray-shirted” recruit from LSU, when those recruits are denied a scholarship they have nowhere else to go. For athletes like Porter, even if they are granted a release from their initial institution (something that is not guaranteed), they must still hope to catch on at another program which happens to still have a roster spot (and hopefully a scholarship) available. Unfortunately, by the time the release and appeal process plays out, the pickings are very slim.

The likely result is that the recruit will be unable to find and sign onto a program where they have any hope of playing football in the foreseeable future.

And so it is ultimately the recruits who suffer with this process. They are asked to stake a full commitment to one single institution. And once that commitment is given, the institution essentially owns the rights to that recruit’s future, who consequently has no means to protect their own best interests. All the while, the institution is freely permitted to play the “what-if” game, and can implement any number of backups or fail-safes to protect their own needs.

Something is inherently wrong.

I am not advocating the idea that college football programs should be stripped of their right to protect their own interests. In fact, I am actually advocating the very opposite – That these programs SHOULD be allowed to take the measures necessary in protection of their own best interests. But the system as it exists today must be changed.

Any partnership in which one side is permitted to operate without obligation while the other is strictly beholden to a commitment is unfair and exploitive.

If the Universities wish to continue the practice of offering more invitations than they have scholarships available, then the NCAA MUST allow for the program’s recruits to have a similar process of protection and self-preservation. Only then will the process be balanced.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Over Signing Recruits Debate

August 5, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Overbooking is a common practice in the airline industry.

Rather than risk losing money by flying with empty seats on it airlines will intentionally sell more tickets than they have seats available. Overbooking flights allows airlines to maximize profits by ensuring full flights as often as possible.

Because this practice by the airline industries almost never negatively impacts the consumer, people generally accept it without issue. But should that same practice be tolerable in the world of college football?

Major universities around the country intentionally over-commit available scholarships to new recruits. Then, over a series of grueling workouts intended to reduce roster size, excess players are “trimmed” until the headcount matches the available scholarship limit.

As far as Babe Ruthless is concerned this practice is vital and completely appropriate in order to support the development of a successful college football program. Loyal Homer, however, feels that this process unfairly manipulates and exploits the system.

And so the question for today’s debate: Is this practice of over-committing scholarships a fair way to build a college dynasty, or does it unfairly take advantage of the system (and high school recruits)?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Over Signing Recruits Debate… Do Homework Before Signing

August 5, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

Whatever happened to due diligence? In today’s immediate gratification culture, cautious and responsible decision making seems like a thing of the past. Everywhere you look there are examples of people running headlong into risky situations. From credit card debt to the mortgage crisis and everything in between, it appears that people are no longer reading the fine print. It’s a dangerous game because when reality sets in it’s easy to be way over your head. There is no one else to blame but yourself.

That’s why I have no sympathy for college athletes who claim to be “victimized” by athletic programs that over recruit and over sign. Athletes know the risks involved with signing to play a sport in college. Or at least they should.

Let’s go back to that “due diligence” phrase I used earlier. For anyone not completely familiar with the expression, let me break it down for you. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines the term as follows:

  1. “The care that a reasonable person exercises under the circumstances to avoid harm to other persons or their property”
  2. ”Research and analysis of a company or organization done in preparation for a business transaction”

Both definitions aptly describe the caution a student and their family should exercise when signing to play a collegiate sport. Especially when scholarship money is at stake.

Considering the amount of information about this controversial practice available on the Internet – there are even entire websites devoted to the subject (see oversigning.com) – that it stands to reason a college bound athlete would have means and the ability to research the situation they are getting into. If not, should they really be attending college in the first place?

The Blame Game

Athletes get cut all the time. The situation is unfortunate but inevitable. Whether an untimely injury or poor performance necessitates the cut, the simple fact is an athlete’s grasp on a roster spot is more tenuous than they would probably like to think. The problem is it just doesn’t sit well with the public when a player, one perceived to be a hardworking kid, loses his spot on a team and the scholarship that made college possible in the first place along with it. The public needs someone to blame for the “injustice.” But who?

Contrary to popular belief, coaches are not to blame. What is their great crime? Being proactive and planning for the future?

Coaches know that not every player they scout will turn out to be the player they hoped to get. Similarly, they would be fools to assume that no one on their team is going to get hurt. If schools don’t over recruit they unnecessarily put the program at risk.

Like it or not, college football is a business. The boss – in this case the coach – has to do what’s best for his business. Bosses make tough decisions about who to promote and who to fire all the time. It certainly isn’t easy, but it is a necessary evil. It’s an “evil” the boss does for the good of the company. Coaches are no different. They have to cut players that can’t stay healthy or don’t produce for the good of the team. Imagine the dysfunction that would ensue if an employer refused to fire underachieving workers or chronically absent employees. A football team is no different.

For all you bleeding hearts out there saying, “But Babe Ruthless, these are children. You can’t do that to them.” I say, “The kids have to grow up sometime.”

The real world is ruthless and brutal. The sooner that is learned the better. Colleges would not be doing anyone a favor by teaching athletes that there are no consequences for poor performance, or even just a bad break. Bear in mind that college football players are supposed to be student athletes, with the emphasis on the word “student.” Unlike professional athletes, they aren’t securing guaranteed money. If a student on a music scholarship could no longer perform at an acceptable level, or even at all, would anyone expect a school to continue to provide them with free tuition? Obviously not.

Regarding over recruiting, coaches are just trying to build the best program possible. To stay with the music analogy, it would be like an orchestra conductor bringing in a group of 30 musicians to compete for 20 spots. The director is simply trying to assemble the best ensemble possible. Will there be some hurt feelings? Maybe, but that is bound to happen anytime there is competition. Coaches know from experience that some guys won’t qualify academically, others won’t live up to their scouting reports, and some simply won’t pan out. So the coach is merely doing his due diligence, by protecting the team’s assets, when he accepts more letters of intent than scholarships. Sure recruiters may promise the world. But like anything else, unless a recruiting target has the promises in writing they really don’t have anything at all. There is a reason teachers and guidance counselors tell students not to put all their eggs in the athlete basket. Any number of reasons can knock an athlete off the fast track to a professional career, and college is no different.

No Foul, No Harm

Critics of over recruiting and over signing will be quick to point out the worst offenders as the norm rather than the exception, but this is an unfair generalization. While conferences like the SEC and teams like Alabama have a track record of overindulging when it comes to signing new players, they always end up complying with the NCAA’s cap of 85 scholarship players. There maybe some kids with bruised egos and broken dreams, but they will live. You can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. No one ever said playing sports is easy. While it may not sit well with everyone’s sense of fairness, if teams are acting within the rules, and there are no rules violations, cries of “foul play” ring hollow.

Surprisingly, the SEC is responding to criticism by imposing its own set of restrictions on over signing policies. The conference set a limit of 28 players per signing class in May of 2009. That’s three more signees than the NCAA limit of 25 players per class, establishing somewhat of a compromise. It will curb the major abuses of the past, when schools such as Ole Miss signed as many as 37 players in one year. This sort of self governance should be reassuring to those who fear the practice. It limits abuses of power while providing schools with the flexibility they need.

Programs are going to do what is in their best interests, and nothing is going to change that. Players have a duty to be well informed about the competitive scenarios they enter into when signing to play with a particular school. It is ultimately the individual’s responsibility to read contracts and understand all the fine print. The excuse of being “just a kid” only lasts for so long.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.