The NBA Free Agent Double Standard Debate… We Are All Witnesses… to a Crime

July 8, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

Thank goodness it all ends today!

My office sits right in the heart of Cavalier Country (or perhaps LeBron Land is the more appropriate term), right next door to Quicken Loans Arena on East 9th Street in Downtown Cleveland. Outside of my office window sits one of the hundreds of banners hung all over town to tell LeBron James how much the city of Cleveland loves him. Outside and below my office window for weeks stood groups of people who were literally REQUIRED by their employer to stand, waving similar banners, blowing air horns, and inciting traffic to honk back at them.

Why? As Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports writes, “So that these hard-working people can “beg a diva who doesn’t care about them to accept a $100 million contract.”

Sounds ridiculous, right?! Well, it is.

LeBron James has made a joke of himself (a WEALTHY joke, perhaps, but a joke nonetheless), and a joke of the good people of Cleveland. Whatever his decision, his actions leading up to tonight’s pathetic excuse for a serious announcement will have forever altered the relationship he has with the city he once claimed as his home.

If he leaves, he will join the ranks of Art Modell as one of the most vile, despicable people to have ever associated their name with Cleveland sports. If he stays, the pain and anguish that he put the city through will nevertheless hang like a shadow over the collective hearts of Cavs fans everywhere.

They will forgive him, but they will never forget.

And although this abhorrent display of pompous selfdom has reached a fever pitch since Free Agent season began on July 1, it is actually the culmination of a process that began several years ago.

Do not fool yourself into thinking that this circus developed organically, either. The NBA, and the greater sporting world at large, has actually been little more than pawns in a game that LeBron James and his cohorts around the league began playing more than two years ago. They have manipulated the league and its fans like puppets in a show, all designed to build up towards the climax that will be “The Decision.”

For the past two years LeBron has strutted all over the NBA like a tease on prom night, feigning interest in anyone who would bat an eye in his direction just long enough to get them worked up to a near frenzied state – only to a cold shoulder just at the point where it would make them crazier, rather than turn them off.

He has been very blatant in his intentions, and spoken openly about how excited he was to play the field when the 2010 period of free agency opened. He made it known that he would openly solicit all suitors, getting team officials and fans alike salivating at the possibility of having “The King” grace their own court.

For two years LeBron has dangled his free agency like a carrot on a stick, all for one reason – to inflate his already overinflated value. Unfortunately for everyone who is NOT LeBron James, his strategy worked.

So what did Dwayne Wade, Amar’e Stoudemire, Chris Bosh, and Joe Johnson do? Like a shark smelling blood in the water, they joined in on the fun.

And of course the scavenging media quickly followed. Every tweet from one player to another, every piece of clothing that one of the players wore, and every game played in the city of a prospective future employer became a headline story. And when James, Wade, and Bosh allegedly met for a “summit” (the fact that it was even dubbed a summit is ridiculous) to seriously discuss all options and strategize what would be the best thing for each of them to do, the process which started out as little more than a self-marketing campaign took the plunge into full-fledged collusion!

If this three-ringed extravaganza had been put on by team officials trying actively to recruit LeBron and company, they would have immediately been punished. The NBA prohibits collusion among team officials because they don’t want teams to have the ability of manipulating league conditions to manufacture an unfair advantage over the players or fans.

That rule does not apply to players, though, and so LeBron and his buddies were permitted to run unchecked, and the result was the manipulation of EVERYONE, all for their own selfish gain. It was a vicious cycle that continued to feed itself, ultimately snowballing into one of the most absurd and ridiculous sports spectacles ever.

A pack of free agents, led by LeBron James, was able to completely monopolize the free agency process.

What would have surely been an intense period of contract negotiation instead transformed into a sports version of “The Bachelor.” with the free agents each holding open court to see which teams would jump highest and bend farthest to give all they had.

Teams cut their own throats for two full seasons, all on the promise that they would be “allowed” to talk to James, Wade, and the other free agents. Fans across the country had to endure frustration, grief, and anguish, all on the hope that it would be worth it after July 2010.

The problem is that only one team can sign LeBron James and/or Dwayne Wade, so what about those other teams? The New Jersey Nets and New York Knicks, for example, had dumped every possible contract they could to make as much cap room available as possible. If they should fail to land any of the marquis free agents (Amar’e Stoudemire will be playing in the Big Apple, but by himself that is small consolation) the teams will both be hamstrung for the NEXT three to five years, after having willingly committed suicide over past seasons.

The Cleveland Cavaliers are another organization completely crippled by this power heist the players have committed. LeBron James had worked the system so much in his favor that the Cavaliers literally NEED him to sign with them. They had invested so much time and money into supporting him that if he leaves, the team will be crippled. They will have no means to begin the rebuilding process, and would simply be cast aside like a used up husk, all because LeBron James no longer found value in their organization.

What will happen to the Cavs?

When the curtain falls on this Shakespearean tragedy, many teams will be left in utter ruin, all so that four or five free agents could get maximum contract offers (AND maximum exposure). They have hijacked the entire NBA, and forever altered the course of professional basketball.

If the NBA wishes to regain ANY control over the situation to prevent this from ever happening again, the league needs to impose the same restrictions on free agents as it does on team executives. The “business” of basketball should play out in a business-like fashion, with the same rules applying to both sides of the bargaining table. Without that EQUAL responsibility, you end up with what we are “Witnessing” today, which is a one-sided free-for-all, where the whims and egos of a few can assume far too much control over the many.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NBA Free Agent Double Standard Debate… NBA v. the First Amendment

July 8, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan.

Last time I checked the First Amendment still provided for freedom of speech in America. That is unless commissioner Stalin – excuse me, I meant commissioner Stern – has his way.

The NBA currently maintains the mother of all double standards in the way it restricts comments players and executives make about signing new players. While players can suggest, infer, and generally run their mouths off about whatever they want, coaches and front office staff are prohibited from comments that speculate about the future intentions of players, in order to prevent tampering.

For starters, tampering is really the wrong word to describe the rule anyways. As Ross Lipschultz of bleacherreport.com points out, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term tampering actually means: “To try to deal, or enter into clandestine dealings with, (a person)… often with the connotation of meddling or interfering improperly with a person.” Public statements of interest in a player are anything BUT clandestine or secretive. And as far as meddling and interfering go, when was the last time a star actually signed with a team simply because a coach or player suggested it in an interview?

My competition for this debate, Bleacher Fan, agrees that this double standard has got to go, but he is misguided in his belief of how the NBA should go about eliminating its currently hypocritical policy. He thinks that instead of doing away with the ineffective rule altogether it should be universally applied to all NBA entities (i.e. players, coaches, general managers, owners, etc.), which makes him “wronger than a fanny-pack on a fat man!”

Just for kicks, let’s say that Bleacher Fan is right (which he isn’t), and commissioner Stern decides to apply this rule to EVERYONE in basketball. To what extent can the NBA actually enforce such a gag order? Obviously public statements regarding free agents and the like would be out, but where would they draw line be drawn?

NBA officials cannot actually think they can effectively monitor ever player’s statement both public and private. In today’s technological society, that means scrutinizing Tweets, Facebook posts, Web site updates, and more – not to mention any leaked emails or text messages. I cannot even imagine the unnecessary bureaucracy that a universal application of this flawed rule would create. The league would surely be so busy investigating allegations that one of two things is bound to occur. One, the NBA would neglect more important issues in order to examine “tampering charges.” Or two, the commish would stop enforcing the rule because he was preoccupied with more pressing issues. Either way the rule would not be effective.

One question that remains to be answered in all this is, “What is even gained by the gag order?” Seriously, what does the NBA think they are accomplishing by prohibiting talk about signing players? Players, coaches, and executives singing the praise of free agents on other teams is not really detrimental to the sport. If anything it’s a little bit of friendly cross promotion that furthers the sport, a refreshing change of pace in professional sports.

If commissioner Stern wants to limit trash talk against other organizations, that is one thing. But as it stands now, coaches cannot even acknowledge that they would like to have a great player on their team. A perfect example of this is Stephen Colbert’s interview with New York Knicks head coach Mike D’Antoni. During the interview, Colbert attempts to elicit some sort of affirmation of interest in recruiting possibly the most coveted free agent of all time, LeBron James. D’Antoni has to bite his tongue and decline comment even in this satirical interview, lest he be fined by the NBA. This is just ridiculous.

Honestly, the whole reason this rule has come to the forefront of national attention as of late is the dramatic twists and turns of the LeBron James sweepstakes. Does anyone seriously think that King James is swayed by the sound bites or quotes given by coaches or general managers? I think not. I seriously doubt that, even if the rule didn’t exist, he would say at tonight’s highly anticipated press conference, “I was going to listen to my heart, my family about where I should play; but I saw on the news that the Mike D’Antoni said I should play for the Knicks, so I figured he was right.”

Anyway you look at it the rule does more damage than good, and that’s reason enough to do away with it. I say, “Let them all talk.” People have gone absolutely nuts over the whole LeBron-apalooza scenario. It has dominated the headlines during a time of year when baseball usually reigns supreme. I caution to make that point because I know that today’s judge is as sick of the situation as anyone. But I think the point is valid because it serves as evidence that all the speculation of late has boosted the NBA’s profile. Sure there will be losers and disenfranchised fans that emerge from the LeBron sweepstakes, but it no doubt has attracted people to follow the sport that usually do not, myself included.

In the end, if a coach wants to put it out there that he wants to recruit a certain player, then more power to him. After all, it’s his credibility that is on the line, not commissioner Stern’s. Look at MLB and the NFL for examples. Vocal owners like George Steinbrenner and Jerry Jones have always been vocal about letting the whole world know who they want to bring into their championship fold. Sometimes they get the guys, and sometimes they don’t. I don’t consider this tampering as much as active recruiting.

If a team starts offering money before free agency, then there is a problem. But that is not what we are debating here today. We are arguing about simple freedom of speech, the right to say what direction a team is moving in, and what players they are seeking. The alternative is creating more bureaucracy in the NBA and in turn more headlines of players, coaches, and executives violating a useless policy. Let the people speak. A little controversy can go a long way towards promoting a league.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best NFL RB of All Time Debate… No One is Sweeter Than Sweetness

July 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

Before “Peyton” was a recognizable first name in the NFL, “Payton” was the most recognizable last name.

Many great running backs graced the formation space behind the quarterback throughout the long history of the NFL. No running back was greater than Payton at making toughness routine, displaying versatility, and exuding a quiet tenacity that few players in the history of the game possessed.

Walter Payton was only five feet ten inches tall. By today’s standard running back, that means he should be around 230 pounds so he is stocky and compact enough to bruise opposing defenses. But, Payton’s playing weight hovered around 200. And, despite his smallish stature, he never ran out of bounds to avoid hits. He routinely took on defenders of all sizes because of an abject refusal to give up and run out of bounds. If any extra yard was there for the taking, Payton was going to take it (more on that in a moment). His running style was so physical that he predicted he would only last five seasons in the NFL. Walter Payton has fight down to his bones. Here is a favorite quote:

“If I’m going to get hit,” Payton said, “why let the guy who’s going to hit me get the easiest and best shot? I explode into the guy who’s trying to tackle me.

Besides tough, Payton was also versatile in a rare way. He was a great runner, of course, but he was also an outstanding pass catcher. My colleagues are championing two other great, but less versatile players. Jim Brown had just under 15,000 yards from scrimmage for his career. Emmitt Smith did have a few extra yards from scrimmage than Payton – 21,579 to 21,264. Of course, Smith had two extra years on Payton, too.

Sure, Walter Payton ran for 16,726 yards, but he also had 4,538 receiving yards. Plenty of solid receivers retire without that many receiving yards. Another strange but difficult to ignore stat – he also threw for eight touchdowns in his career. He was versatile enough to help out with trick plays – and properly execute them. His 125 career touchdowns are extremely impressive.

Part of the reason Walter Payton had so many yards from scrimmage is that he always relentlessly fought for every single inch he could find on the field. One of my favorite, and most enduring Walter Payton memories, comes from watching him as a kid growing up just outside of Chicago. After he was tackled on every single play he would stick the ball out over his head, trying to stretch the mark of the ball and improve his team’s position. His teammates took note, and loved him for that. His coaches took note and called him a leader. I took note, too, and adopted that philosophy in my own career. If better is possible – if another inch is there for the taking – go after it.

Walter Payton led the NFL just once in his career in rushing yards in a single season. He finished the 1977 season with 1,852 yards rushing, 2,121 total yards from scrimmage, and 16 touchdowns. Oh, and the season was still just 14 games long. I think he earned the MVP he was awarded that season.

Let this be a lesson, kids. Walter Payton ran for just 679 yards as a rookie for the Chicago Bears, despite being drafted fourth overall. Yet, he was roundly praised and his spot with fans and the front office could not have been more secure. Why? He paid attention to – and sweetly executed – the details of the game of football that are so vital. Folks, Walter Payton broke into the league not just because he was a great runner, or because he had the ability to catch out of the backfield, or because he was tough. He broke in – and stayed in – because he was a great blocker, from the first whistle of his rookie season onward.

All of these stats and characteristics add up to a simple truth. In an era of great running backs – players like Eric Dickerson and Tony Dorsett – Payton stood out the most and was largely exulted as the best running back to ever play the game. Walter Payton embodied the three characteristics necessary to put him over the top of any contemporary running back. But he is also better than the greats of other eras, cementing his status as the greatest of all time.

Smith ran for 15 seasons, Payton for just 13. To break Walter Payton’s records, Smith hung around well past his prime. That statement is not intended as a knock on Smith – who is ONE of the better running backs in the history of the game, no question – but are his accomplishments as impressive as Payton’s? No, because it matters how they are accomplished. It matters that Payton missed one game in his entire career, and went out on top, despite his physical style. Smith extended his career by running out of bounds rather than over an opposing player.

While Smith lacked Payton’s toughness, Jim Brown lacked his longevity. Walter Payton went out on top. Brown also went out on top as well – but his “top form” lasted just nine remarkable seasons to Payton’s impressive 13.

Walter Payton was also the master of irony. While his offensive prowess and unmatched toughness led the way for the dominant 1985 Chicago Bears throughout the entire regular season and playoffs, he was unable to score in the 42-10 blowout that was Super Bowl XX. It almost seems unfair that the greatest running back to ever live failed to score in his team’s most important game. Then again, that never bothered Walter Payton. The team won, and that was all he cared about – another attribute of greatness.

Being a great running back is more than just running the ball. Earning that title requires unmatched toughness, versatility, perseverance, and character that is worthy of admiration. Many players throughout NFL history have a mashup of several of those characteristics. Only one player had them all. Walter Payton, the greatest running back in the history of the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best NFL RB of All Time Debate… Brown is Cleveland’s Greatest of All Time

July 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

Don’t let the numbers fool you – former Cleveland Browns running back Jim Brown IS the greatest running back of all time.

When the NFL expanded its regular season from 12 to 14, and then from 14 to 16 games, it was inevitable that records which once stood would ultimately fall.

Through those changes to the game, running backs have had greater opportunities to amass higher career totals. So when Jim Brown’s career total of 12,312 rushing yards was surpassed by the likes of Emmitt Smith, Walter Payton, Barry Sanders, etc., it was not an indictment against Jim Brown’s legacy. Instead, it was a side-effect from the fact that today’s running backs simply have greater opportunity to gain yards. And just as Emmitt Smith currently sits atop the all-time list for yards and touchdowns today, if the NFL decides to expand its season to 18 games, his records won’t last long either.

There is one standard that has not changed, and it serves as a valid comparison for ALL running backs regardless of the number of games they played. It is by this measure alone that the greatest running back of all time can be determined, and it is the one measure in which Jim Brown remains unsurpassed.

Jim Brown is the only running back in NFL history to AVERAGE more than 100 rushing yards per game over the course of his ENTIRE CAREER.

Think about that for a moment. The standard by which a running back is deemed to have had a successful game is if they rush for more than 100 yards. That was the AVERAGE for Jim Brown. Walter Payton was good for only 88.0 yards per game, and Emmitt Smith averaged only 81.2. Jim Brown was good for an extra 20 yards every single day he played the game.

Jim Brown also never MISSED a game during his nine professional years. Despite all of the physical punishment, and all the strain he underwent, he was the definition of reliability. If there was a game to be played, Jim Brown was good for at least 100 yards.

The Jim Brown Standard

Jim Brown still serves as the standard for all other running backs. Now a full 45 years removed from his last professional football game he is still the barometer for greatness.

It is important to put Brown’s numbers into perspective. He only played football for nine seasons. Having also played during seasons that were considerably shorter than those which are played out today, Brown only played 118 games in his career.

Still, in that condensed timeframe, he was able to rush for more yards than Hall of Famers like O.J. Simpson (who played in 135 total games) and Marcus Allen (145 games). He is also one of only eight players in NFL history to score more than 100 times from the ground, and he is the ONLY one of those other LEGENDS to have never played more than 14 games during a single season.

And although he never had a 2,000 yard season to his credit, that is once again due only to the shortened seasons. During the 1963 season, Brown gained 1,863 yards on the ground for a superhuman 133 yards-per-game average (which stands today as the second best single season average of all time).

At that rate, Brown would have been on pace for to rush for 2,129 yards during a 16-game season. In case you are wondering, the greatest single season rushing total on record is held by Eric Dickerson, who gained 2,105 yards on the ground over 16 games during the 1984 season (that’s 24 yards less than what Brown was on target to achieve). For an apples to apples comparison look at Dickerson’s 14 game total from his “record setting” season and compare that to Brown’s 14 game total from 1963. After an EQUAL amount of games played, Dickerson amassed only 1,792 yards on the ground, which is 71 yards fewer than Brown’s total.

The Most Dangerous Man on the Field

During his criminally short nine-season career (thanks to the worst person in all of sports – Art Modell), Brown led the league in rushing for eight of those seasons. He was a nine-time Pro Bowler (every season he played), an eight-time All Pro, and a three-time MVP.

Not even the great Walter Payton or Emmitt Smith can make those claims.

What made Jim Brown so dominant as a running back was the fact that each opposing defense simply had no way to stop him. He was agile enough to run around you, fast enough to out run you, and big enough to run you over.

For every method of stopping Jim Brown, he had two ways to get past you.

It is ultimately in this manner that Jim Brown established himself as the greatest of all time – on the field.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best NFL RB of All Time Debate… Emmitt Runs Away As Greatest Ever

July 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.

I was always a fan of Barry Sanders growing up. His electrifying, razzle-dazzle, elusive runs made watching Detroit Lions football bearable on Thanksgiving Day. Unfortunately, he retired at the relatively young age of 31, and thus he doesn’t belong in this discussion.

Emmitt Smith does belong, however. He belongs at the top of the list of the greatest running backs in the history of the NFL.

Obviously, if you grew up in the 1990s you are all too familiar with Smith, The Triplets (Smith, Michael Irvin, and Troy Aikiman), and America’s Team. Three Super Bowl titles and a very visible owner heavily influenced the hype machine. Emmitt Smith was right there in the middle of all the hype.

Smith, who many people forget went to college at the University of Florida, has more rushing yards than anyone in history by a significant margin with a total of 18,355, which is nearly 2,000 more than Walter Payton’s total. He also totaled 175 touchdowns. I think where Smith’s greatness defines him more than the other two running backs in today’s debate (Jim Brown and Walter Payton) is the fact that he achieved incredible success in the postseason. Some of his other teammates – namely Irvin – were flashier, but Smith was Mr. Consistent and was perhaps the key in winning those three Super Bowls. He totaled 19 touchdowns and accumulated 1,586 rushing yards over his postseason career.

I have vivid memories of Sanders growing up, and while some like to compare Sanders and Smith, there really is no comparison for the same reasons there is no comparison to Brown and Payton. Brown, who Bleacher Fan argues for today, was known to just run over you and was very hard to tackle. Payton, nicknamed “Sweetness” and being advocated by Sports Geek, was known for the stiff arm and the “stutter step.” I wish I had gotten to watch both of them play during their Hall of Fame careers.

But Smith was none of that. He didn’t have the “on the field” flash that the others did. I recall watching Cowboys games growing up and while Irvin was getting his flashy receptions and running his trap while doing it, Smith was quietly accumulating yards. He took advantage of a very strong and BIG offensive line, running behind guys like Pro Bowlers Nate Newton and Larry Allen, a very good fullback in Daryl Johnston, and an outstanding blocking tight end in Jay Novacek. He wasn’t the fastest guy on the team by any stretch, and he certainly wasn’t the biggest. That’s what makes him so great. He was durable. He was a grinder.

It’s true that he played longer than Payton and Brown, but so what? That’s another part of his greatness. Playing 15 years as a running back in the NFL is quite an accomplishment in itself. But the truth lies in the numbers. And Emmitt Smith is riding those numbers all the way to the top.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Stephen Strasburg All Star Debate Verdict

July 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

There are essentially two ways a baseball player can be named to an All-Star roster.

The first is by way of fan vote. This is my personal favorite as a method for selection because it recognizes the unique problem inherent in identifying the “best” performers. There are no specific criteria for determining an All-Star. The criteria could be a great hitting, a great fielding, or a great personality. Each reason is just as viable as the others. So, in a way befitting the great nation of America, the voice of the public is called upon to decide. If the fans want to see you play, you get to play – no strings attached.

The second method for being named to an All-Star team is by way of player or manager selection. In order to earn this type of honor a player must not only prove to the fans, but to peers and coaches, that they are the most deserving player for the recognition.

These are the hurdles that any professional baseball player in MLB must overcome to be named an All-Star, and Stephen Strasburg is no exception.

Babe Ruthless makes a very strong argument for Strasburg’s candidacy. If the attention that has surrounded Strasburg since his fashionably late debut in the majors serves as any indication, he almost certainly would have received enough fan votes to have been named to the NL All-Star squad if he were on the ballot.

Along with that exceedingly high level of fan support, he goes on to discuss that “talent is talent.” And, with a 2.45 ERA and 54 Ks in only six appearances, it is quite obvious that talent is one category in which Strasburg is not lacking.

Unfortunately for Strasburg, he was not active in the majors long enough to appear on the ballot for fan selection. Whether he WOULD have gotten enough votes if he had been eligible since day one is irrelevant. He DIDN’T get them – end of argument.

If the Washington Nationals felt as though Strasburg was not yet ready to start for the team at the beginning of the MLB season, why should he be eligible to receive fan votes for the All-Star game?

And so with one door closed, Strasburg’s only viable option for All-Star selection is by way of garnering enough support from his peers and the coaches around the league.

Loyal Homer addresses this point specifically by quoting Phillies’ manager Charlie Manuel, who ultimately holds the responsibility for filling this year’s NL All-Star roster. When asked about whether or not he would consider Strasburg for the All-Star team, Manuel responded that Strasburg would need to “earn his way.”

Manuel is not implying that rookies are undeserving of All-Star selection. Instead, he is simply highlighting the fact that Strasburg has not played enough to warrant serious consideration.

For an average starting pitcher, six appearances amount to only 20 percent of the total they will make over the season. That is not nearly enough time to provide any real indication as to whether or not Strasburg is the real deal over the course of an entire season.

Baseball, more than any other sport, is a game of numbers. That is why the fan voting process begins so early, and plays out for such a long period of time. Some players may start out hot in the first six games of the season, but fade over the grueling stretch of the summer months. Likewise, it is possible for a player to start slow, but them come on strong as the season progresses.

Also, it should be noted that Strasburg’s first six appearances were not all boast-worthy.

Although he does claim a 2.45 ERA and 54 Ks, Loyal Homer points out that he has not won a game in three weeks (during which time he made four of his six total starts), and has only a 2-2 record to show for his hard work.

When you compare that pallid mark with those of other NL pitchers who also fell short in fan votes, such as Jaime Garcia and Mike Pelfrey, a 2-2 record simply cannot justify admission onto an All-Star roster.

It was that point that ultimately carried the day for Loyal Homer.

Stephen Strasburg is one of the brightest stars in baseball. He is loaded with potential, and the early indications are that he will live up all of the expectations set before him. The All-Star game is not about showcasing potential, though. It is about showcasing the best talent that IS in the game of baseball, not the best talent that COULD BE.

I have very little doubt that Stephen Strasburg will go on to a very successful career as a major league pitcher. He should earn for himself many opportunities to represent his respective league many times over as one of the best pitchers in the baseball.

The 2010 season is just not going to be one of those years.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Stephen Strasburg All-Star Debate

July 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Despite the latest rumors, Stephen Strasburg CANNOT walk on water.

But, just about all of the other stuff that has been written about him since his entrance into the Major Leagues is absolutely true.

This season has been one giant coming-out party for the Washington Nationals frosh pitcher, and he appears at this point to be worth every single penny of the record-setting contract he signed last season.

He was virtually unhittable in his appearances in the minor leagues before FINALLY being called up early in June to step make his professional debut. And if not for a complete absence of run support, he could very well be sitting undefeated today (but alas, that’s the price you have to pay for being on one of the worst teams in baseball).

His supporters, such as Babe Ruthless, feel that his performance warrants All-Star recognition. But others, like Loyal Homer, feel that he is not yet worthy of such high praise (at least, not this year).

Which leads us to today’s debate topic: Should Stephen Strasburg be an All-Star?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Stephen Strasburg All-Star Debate… All In Due Time

July 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

I watch the MLB All-Star game every year, but I freely admit that this year’s game seemingly has a lot of buzz… and I agree that is due in large part to today’s debate topic. Stephen Strasburg has started his career with an endless supply of hype and he’s made the Washington Nationals fairly relevant for the first time since the move to our nation’s capitol. I don’t think anyone doubts that he is an absolute stud. As a Braves fan I dread having to face him potentially six times a season. Add him to dominant NL East starters like Roy Halladay and Josh Johnson and it’s going to be a nightmare for opposing NL East hitters. But Strasburg has no business playing in the 2010 midsummer classic.

Strasburg, as great as he has looked at times, has still only pitched six times in the majors. That’s not enough to warrant one of the spots on the National League roster. If you look at the back of his baseball card, you will see that he is 2-2 with a 2.45 ERA. Projected out to a full season of starts, that ends up stretching out to a record of 12-12. It’s doubtful anyone thinks he would end up with that type of record, but that’s just what the numbers say.

It’s been said that he’s been dominant. If that’s the case, then how come he hasn’t won since June 13th? That was four starts ago. If he had more than two wins, he might have a stronger case. But he’s lost his last two decisions and he’s coming off a game where he only lasted five innings. That same Nationals team that has been ridiculed by many, including myself, scored three runs in the bottom of the ninth off K-Rod to prevent him from suffering a third consecutive defeat this past Saturday. Simply put, he hasn’t been “dominating.” Ubaldo Jiminez was dominating earlier in the season. Cliff Lee has dominated for the past month. Strasburg hasn’t been dominating for an extended period of time… yet.

There are other players deserving of a spot on the NL roster who didn’t make the team. San Diego pitcher Mat Latos is quietly having a fine season, going 9-4 with a 2.62 ERA for the division leading Padres, who, despite having the best pitching staff in baseball, have no pitchers on the roster right now. St Louis rookie Jaime Garcia, who I think has been overshadowed by fellow rookie Strasburg, is 8-4 with an ERA of 2.10. If Strasburg had posted those numbers people would be screaming for him to start the All-Star game. My bias hates to write this, but Mike Pelfrey has numbers worthy of being an All-Star. Before last night’s rough outing against Cincinnati Pelfrey was 10-2 with a 2.93 ERA. He’s one of the four double digit winners in the National League, and he isn’t on the team. All three of these guys have better “on the field” credentials than Stephen Strasburg, who currently is tied for 94th in the league in wins. That’s the bottom line.

Charlie Manuel, who ultimately had the final say on choosing the final rotation spots, said it best. He said, “I say let him pitch and let him get his feet on the ground in the major leagues and kind of let him earn his way.” The key word in that quote is EARN. Manuel went on to say that there are other guys who have started 18 to 20 games who warranted spots. That’s exactly my point.

I’m excited about the future of Stephen Strasburg. He’s going to be fun to watch, especially the first time he mows through Babe Ruthless’ favorite New York Yankees. He’s going to have plenty of other chances to pitch in the All-Star game. But for this year’s game, he’s best suited watching it on TV with the rest of America.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Stephen Strasburg All-Star Debate… A Star As Bright As Any

July 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from and Loyal Homer.

Even before the recent announcement of the MLB All-Star game rosters there has been a whirlwind of controversy surrounding the potential inclusion of rookie pitching sensation Stephen Strasburg on the NL roster. Having only made six major league starts – with a record of two wins and two losses, but a remarkable stat line of 2.45 ERA, 54 Ks, and 1.06 WHIP – many current and former players have weighed in on the issue about how deserving of an All-Star Strasburg is. Critics claim he hasn’t earned it and it would be an insult to those who pitched well all season long and were snubbed from the team. I am not so convinced.

Talent is talent. Whether it is displayed across six starts or 16, ability makes itself known. Strasburg has quickly become one of the most popular players in the country and his star burns brighter with each start.

He has become an invaluable asset to the Washington Nationals as well as MLB. He has skyrocketed to stardom not just as a pitching marvel, but as a popularity maven as well. Strasburg has driven up TV ratings and ticket sales for Nationals games both home and away. His merchandise is in high demand everywhere he goes, so much so that teams like the Cleveland Indians are cashing in, having taken to setting up stands devoted solely to selling Strasburg merchandise. A popularity like that is good for baseball and should not be ignored.

Strasburg is good for baseball, and therefore should be showcased during the All-Star game. Were it the decision of those representing and marketing MLB (i.e. Bud Selig) it would be foolish to pass on such a popular and up-and-coming talent as Strasburg.

Strasburg has developed quite a bit of name recognition for himself since being drafted with the number one overall pick of the Washington Nationals in 2009. I can honestly say I am more familiar with him than I was with other dominant National League pitchers like Ubaldo Jimenez who is buried in the anonymity of the Rockies roster.

During the B.S. (Before Strasburg) Era, the Washington Nationals were not even a blip on the proverbial radar f, but now I follow them with a unique fanaticism. He has honestly made a believer of me. I actually pay attention to the Nationals box score and make appointments with the television to watch him anytime I can. Admittedly I am doing some fantasy scouting, and counting down the days until he hits free agency (so he can be lured to the pinstripes and bright lights of the Big Apple, but that is another story entirely). He has provided a huge boost in popularity to the Nationals and baseball itself, and as such merits inclusion on the All-Star roster for the good of the game itself.

Obviously he is not going to receive a special invitation to the All-Star game because he is important and marketable. Fortunately he warrants inclusion on the roster because of what he can actually contribute to the team.

Strasburg should make the All-Star team because he gives the NL a legitimate shot at winning. Think about it. There is not one batter on the AL All-Star team, starter or reserve, that has ever seen Strasburg’s electric stuff. Talk about a secret weapon. American League batters would be stepping into the box with zero previous at-bats against him and only minimal scouting reports to assist them. Add to that the fact that he will only be called on to pitch to one or two innings of batters… and we are talking about a deck stacked in favor of Charlie Manuel’s team.

Make no bones about it, the All-Star game has consequences. Like it or not, the winning league secures home field advantage for the World Series. Every player and manager has to realize the importance of this consequence and capitalize on the strengths at a team’s disposal. Strasburg’s usefulness as an overpowering pitcher that the American League has virtually no prior read on is an advantage too powerful to ignore.

Few if any critics of Strasburg’s participation in the All-Star game challenge his talent, but rather how much he deserves to play in the event. The idea that he has not “paid his dues” by playing in the entire 2010 season is irrelevant. The belief that Strasburg’s inclusion due to his overwhelming talent and popularity is somehow inappropriate because it insults players who didn’t make the cut is flawed at best. If that were the most important factor, then why would fans get to vote at all?

The fans vote for who they want to see play, not who has earned the unwavering support of their peers. Plenty of players get questionably selected to the All-Star team. For example, Derek Jeter is having a down season but easily won the starting shortstop gig for the AL team with the second largest number of votes. Is he having a great season? No. Is he having the best season of any shortstop in the AL? Maybe not. But does that make him undeserving of the honor? Absolutely not. This highlights how “being deserving” – however that phrase is defined – is not essential criterion for participation in the event. Jeter made the team because the fans want to see him play, and I firmly believe that if he were available for voting Strasburg would easily emerge with a ticket to Anaheim.

Strasburg belongs in the All-Star game. He belongs there for baseball’s sake. He belongs there for the competitiveness of the National League team. And he belongs there because the fans obviously want to see him play. Any argument to the contrary is obviously motivated by team loyalties or jealousy.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The MLB 2010 Best First Half Player Debate… Mauer’s All-Star Burns Brightest

July 5, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

Major League Baseball’s 81st All-Star game is nearly upon us. Can you believe it? I know, it seems like just yesterday that it was only the 56th. While the majority of the sports media concentrates very hard on dissecting the snubs from the All-Star rosters, The Sports Debates is doing something a bit different – and we hope, a bit interesting. Rather than churn out three more columns on guys that should have made the team but didn’t, we’re identifying the absolute best player from all of the All-Stars.

While I would have loved to take Joey Votto in this argument, he did not even make the team (yet). That snub, combined with zero pitchers from the MLB best San Diego Padres staff, was almost enough to derail today’s topic. Fortunately, our commitment to being different stayed on track… just like nothing can derail Minnesota Twins catcher Joe Mauer from getting his due as the best of the best for the 2010 mid-summer classic.

Some of you may recall the article I penned a few weeks ago arguing that if I were forced to start a MLB team from scratch I would start with Joe Mauer over Albert Pujols – and anyone else. I will not rehash that entire article here in this space. We all know at this point that Mauer is supremely talented on offense, defense, and as a strategic thinker behind the plate. We all further recognize that the demands of playing catcher in the major leagues is much more difficult compared to the other positions on the diamond… but so is the importance of the job and its influence on a team. Those realities alone cements Mauer as the best player at the toughest position in the game, and therefore the all-star among All-Stars.

But, there are some additional feats from Mauer already in 2010 that reinforce the notion that his star shines the brightest.

In what is traditionally a glorified popularity contest, Mauer still attracted the most votes from the millions of voters that decide the All-Star starting line ups. In fact, Mauer’s 5,372,606 votes was the third highest vote total of all time. Amazingly, Mauer’s homegrown Minnesota charm has reached well beyond the confines of the land of a thousand lakes. Traditional baseball fans find a player like Mauer very appealing and easy to root for because he always performs to expectations, and he “plays the game the right way.” In other words, he would not do what Hanley Ramirez did yesterday and watch his dribbler hit in front of the plate without moving. Mauer would hustle out of the box, and right into the hearts of baseball fans across the country.

It is true that Joe Mauer is not putting up the type of stats that earned him an AL MVP last season. But, that would be extremely difficult to do, as he hit .365 with 28 home runs and 94 RBI. What makes Mauer special is that, at baseball’s toughest position, he remains extremely good, and very consistent. He leads the AL with 24 doubles in 2010, he is still batting over .300, and he’ll finish with great stats all around as the leader for one of the top teams in baseball. True to Mauer’s persona, he does nothing terribly flashy. He just does his job extremely well. Here is a cool, but rather unsexy but telling Mauer stat – 16 percent of the guys on base when Mauer is at the plate score. Mauer is consistently reliable, whether he is at the plate or behind it.

Another fun and telling stat about Mauer’s first half performance this season – his pitching staff has a combined ERA of 3.91 under his guidance. Perhaps it is altogether too idealistic of me, but I would like to think that fans all over the country grasp the depth and breadth of Mauer’s talent, and are not distracted by the superficial home run and RBI stats. Those stats are, of course, important. But a game is won and lost often in the details that Mauer handles with such aplomb.

Mauer admits that he has played the majority of this season a bit banged up. He missed a week in May with a bruised heel that has painfully nagged him throughout the season. Yet he is still putting up solid numbers, and still playing the game the same way… never failing to handle the details.

Now, some may argue that Mauer is not the best of the best. Certainly Mauer does not measure up statistically with players like Pujols. But, between the level of responsibility he has on the field – and in the clubhouse – he performs like few others throughout the history of the game – and definitely out-performed anyone through the first half of this season.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.