The 2010 Summer’s Best Event Debate… Two Perfect Summer Days

May 10, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

Summer has always held a special place in the hearts and minds of Americans. When we were children it offered a retreat from teachers, homework, and the annoyance of school. In our adulthood it provides a similar escape from the stress and rigors of dealing with work, bills, and, in general, adult responsibilities. The magical moments made possible by more daylight and warmer temperatures may not be measureable, but they are very real. For a sports fanatic like me, summer comes to a fevered pitch for two days in July with the pinnacle of all Summer sporting events.

With the patriotism of the Fourth of July still fresh on our minds, Americans turn to their national pastime to be treated to one of the most grandiose displays in all of sports. Two days of clutch hits, eye-popping Web Gems, and jaw dropping long ball blasts that reward the baseball faithful, and convert the nonbelievers. It is two days of, unequivocally, the most anticipated and greatest sporting event of the summer. The two days are the MLB All-Star Game and Home Run Derby.

The marquee event itself, the MLB All-Star Game, is truly fantasy baseball in the real world. Fans get to see what an N.L. infield of Albert Pujols, Chase Utley, David Wright, and Hanley Ramirez is capable of, or the A.L. lineup containing the potent fire power of Ichiro Suzuki, Derek Jeter, Manny Ramirez, and Alex Rodriguez. But, the All-Star Game is not just a glorified batting practice. Elite level pitching gets its chance to shine as well. Fans are treated to watching many of their favorites and frontrunners for the Cy Young Award engage in matchups against the best hitters in the game. In the same respect, All-Star rosters contain mind-blowing bullpens that include shutdown closers like Joakim Soria, Jonathan Papelbon, and Mariano Rivera in the AL. and Jonathan Broxton, Francisco Rodriguez, and Trevor Hoffman in the N.L. The All-Star Game is a virtual cavalcade of the best players in baseball. The greatest pitchers and batters converge on that one night creating lasting memories of one unforgettable experience.

Like baseball itself, the All-Star Game has a rich history. The game isn’t just about what might happen, but what already happened. The Great Bambino hit the first home run in All-Star Game history during the 1933 game. Just 16 years later, number 42 continued to break barriers as he and three other African American players integrated the All-Star roster. Some 50 years after the tradition of the All-Star Game began there had never been a grand slam, but the California Angel’s Fred Lynn hit the game’s first. And he did it in Comiskey Park, the same place the game began, and where Babe went yard half a Century before. Even in the modern millennia the game reaches new heights. In 2007 Ichiro hit the first inside the park homerun in the game’s impressive history. As records get broken and history gets written, fans are treated to one of the greatest displays in all of sports. The All-Star game is simply a can’t-miss event.

As exciting as the All-Star Game is, it is preceded by an event of equal magnitude – The Home Run Derby. The Derby is pure excitement. What do people like about baseball more than a home run? Absolutely nothing! The home run is the most exciting aspect of baseball, and the derby puts it on center stage. The shock and awe display of batting firepower leaves fans breath-taken. Players don’t just hit homers at the derby; they perform superhuman feats, smashing balls into the Summer night. In 2002 “Slammin” Sammy Sosa mashed the longest dinger in the history of the Home Run Derby, sending the ball on a 524 foot one way trip. In 2005 Bobby Abreu surprised the fans at Comerica Park in Detroit by shattering records hitting a massive total of 41 homeruns into the Detroit night. It turns players and casual fans alike into children again. Little boys that marvel at the greatest hitters in the game doing what they do best. Grown ball players ask each other to pose for pictures and sign autographs. They even overlook team and divisional rivalries to represent baseball and their league. It is one great night for baseball, and one great night to be a fan.

The best part of the All-Star Game and Home Run Derby are the unexpected storylines. In 2008 the All-Star Game and Derby returned to New York for Yankee Stadium’s swan song. Everyone expected Yankee Stadium itself to steal the show as the Yankees spared no expense to give Baseball’s Cathedral the type of send off the hallowed grounds deserved. But another story dwarfed any story the baseball world was pushing. Josh Hamilton did something special during the 2008 Home Run Derby.

Rangers outfielder Josh Hamilton, who was once banned from baseball and struggled through multiple stints in rehab, seemed to be living his dream, and America was there to witness every emotional minute of it. On that one night in Yankee Stadium Hamilton let the world see how far he had come. Hamilton’s fight against substance abuse nearly cost him his baseball career, and more importantly, his life. But the world saw him overcome his personal demons one swing at a time. With his old (and I mean old) BP pitcher Claybon Council throwing to him, Hamilton established himself as one of the premier sluggers in the game. He hit an astonishing 28 homers… in one round. Hamilton’s historic shots surpassed the previous benchmark of 24 established by Bobby Abreu in 2005. Hamilton also hit the third longest home run in derby history, a 518 foot blast. The big story of the night was not the incredible number of home runs Hamilton hit, but the unforgettable tale of redemption that it represented.

Completely spent from the first two rounds, and his 71-year-old pitcher Council still somehow hanging on, Hamilton finished in second place overall, but walked away as the peoples champ and clear winner on the night.

Each year’s All-Star Game and Home Run Derby bring the opportunity for stories like these to be written. This year, when the greatest players in baseball converge on Anaheim California, another unscripted, miraculous story will develop. You don’t want to miss it.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Summer’s Best Event Debate… Prime Time at Pebble Beach

May 10, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

I was all set to build this argument around the return of the U.S. Open to Pebble Beach, California, which is where the 2000 U.S. Open was held and certain person dominated at that tournament. Any guesses who won in 2000? Tiger Woods won by a record 15 strokes, as he was the only golfer under par that year. However, it remains to be seen if Woods will be able to tee it up at all at this year’s U.S. Open. He had to withdraw from The Players Championship on the seventh hole due to an apparent neck injury. With the U.S. Open beginning June 17, it is uncertain as to what Woods’ playing status is. Either way, the show must go on, and the event still promises to be quite a show.

Depending on what happens in the next month, it could be an opportunity for Phil Mickelson to overtake Woods for the number one ranking in golf. If Mickelson had won at Sawgrass this past weekend he would have. As of today, Mickelson sits a little over a point behind Woods in the world ranking system. I could spend all day explaining the Official World Golf Ranking points system to you, and I still wouldn’t cover it all. Just know that this is the closest it has been in quite some time.

It’ll also be a chance for Mickelson to win his second consecutive major. If he wins, that would keep open the possibility of a “Mickel-slam.” That would happen if Phil the Thrill went on to win the Open Championship and the PGA Championship later in the year, giving him all four majors in one calendar year.

The great thing about golf is that good stories always develop as the tournament develops. Despite what the national media would have you believe, the golfing world doesn’t always rotate around Woods and, to a lesser extent, Mickelson. As the PGA Tour slogan goes, “These guys are good.” And yes, they are! Many of you may not have watched The Players Championship this past weekend due to the usual big names not being up there, but it was very entertaining. The three guys vying for the title, Tim Clark, Robert Allenby, and Lee Westwood, had either never won on the PGA Tour or not won at all.

What’s really going to make this year’s U.S. Open exciting is the fact that weekend action will be played in prime time on the East Coast. This was tried two years ago when the championship was played at Torrey Pines . That was the year Woods held off Rocco Mediate in a Monday playoff. That also was the third-highest rated U.S. Open ever. NBC holds the broadcast rights and must be hoping to cash in once again.

I’m definitely looking forward to this year’s U.S. Open. It’s going to be played at one of the world’s most majestic golf courses. Whether or not Woods will participate will be a popular topic over the next month. But even if he doesn’t, it still promises to still be as exciting as ever.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NFL Draft QB Success Debate… No Expectation Means No Disappointment

May 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

Sam Bradford was selected by the St. Louis Rams as the top player in the NFL Draft this year. The Rams, coming off of a 1-15 season where they only defeated the equally hapless Detroit Lions, are looking to Bradford to help resurrect a team that won the Super Bowl just ten years ago.

The Carolina Panthers feature one of the most dominant running tandems in the NFL, and back that up with one of the top receivers in the game. The problem is that their quarterback situation last season left much to be desired. To solve all of the Panthers’ woes, Jimmy Clausen has been called upon as the missing puzzle piece to put the Panthers back in the Super Bowl.

No pressure!

Meanwhile, Colt McCoy has quietly rolled into the Cleveland Browns organization, a situation where he can only succeed.

Why will Colt McCoy be the most successful quarterback coming out of the 2010 draft? Because expectations are exceedingly low for the young gunslinger out of Texas, but his potential is exceedingly high.

Low Expectations

Colt McCoy will not be starting for the Cleveland Browns.

Colt McCoy will not be COMPETING for a starting job with the Cleveland Browns.

The Browns organization, which is hoping to build off of a very strong close to the 2009 season, has cast their 2010 lot on the shoulders of Jake Delhomme. That means that all McCoy has to do is learn.

It is entirely possible that McCoy could ultimately work his way into a competition for the starting job. But even if he doesn’t, the Browns spent a pittance (a late third-round pick) for him, when there was some pre-draft speculation that McCoy could be worth a second-round (or even late first-round) selection.

And even if McCoy winds up working his way into a competition for the starting role, that prospect is likely years down the road. For now, the Browns are openly in rebuilding mode as they continue to lay the foundations for what they hope will be a return to the postseason for a once-great franchise.

High Potential

Fact, Colt McCoy has won more games as a college quarterback than any other player in the HISTORY of college football.

In four years as a Texas Longhorn, Colt McCoy has thrown for over 13,000 yards and boasts a CAREER completion percentage of 70.33 percent. His touchdown count (112) nearly TRIPLES his interception total (45), and his passes have netted his team an AVERAGE of more than eight yards per catch!

Entering into his senior year, he was 3-0 in bowl games, including a BCS victory over Ohio State in January of 2009. Had it not been for an early-game injury during the 2010 BCS National Championship Game, he may have even been a national champion.

For his professional development, he is now paired with an organization being led by the same Mike Holmgren who can take credit for developing Hall of Fame quarterbacks such as Joe Montana (while quarterback coach and offensive coordinator for the 49ers), Steve Young (both in San Francisco and in college as quarterback coach for Brigham Young), and (eventual HOF’er) Brett Favre.

To put it simply, the winningest quarterback in NCAA history, who is a high producer on the field with outstanding accuracy, is now playing for a man who has helped build championship programs in both college and the NFL, and has developed MULTIPLE Hall of Fame caliber quarterbacks. I don’t know about you, but that sounds like a formula for success to me!

And to all of the detractors out there who feel that Colt McCoy’s height of 6 feet 1 inch may prove an obstacle, that didn’t seem to stand in the way of Holmgren turning the aforementioned Montana and Young (both of whom are only 6 feet 2 inches) into Super Bowl champions.

This is a win-win situation for the Cleveland Browns and Colt McCoy. By comparison to the other quarterbacks drafted this year (and the burdensome expectations being piled on their very green shoulders), the investment made by the Browns is one of extremely low risk with a high possible return.

Ironically, by virtue of low expectations, it is safe to expect great things from Colt McCoy in the NFL!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NFL Draft QB Success Debate… Can I Put Clausen In The Hall of Fame Yet?

May 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

The 2010 NFL Draft class was heralded as one of the most talented at the quarterback position in years. Franchise QBs were there for the taking and while the order they were picked may not have followed the expected path, they have all found new homes. Who will be the next Peyton Manning, and who will be the next Ryan Leaf? Only time will tell, but that won’t stop the writers here at TSD from making our best prognostications. So with no further ado, allow me introduce you to my pick for the Pro Football Hall of Fame class of 2032 – Jimmy Clausen.

Ok, so maybe it’s a little early to start work on his plaque. But I do think Clausen is an incredibly talented athlete and he will be the most successful quarterback of the 2010 NFL Draft Class by far.

Jimmy Clausen has the tools and swagger to be a winner. Some people think he is cocky. I agree, but I like it. Anyone who heard the pre-draft read on Clausen is aware that he played in a pro-style offense. That puts him ahead of the learning curve and improves his odds of breaking camp with the starting job. Clausen knows he was the best player in the draft and he aims to prove that. To be a winner in the NFL you have to have self-confidence, and Clausen oozes it. Why should he be humble about his ability and promise?

He was a great college QB and his physical skills figure to make him successful in the NFL. Clausen is smart. He proved that at Notre Dame, where he made heads up plays even with the pressure of the media and huge expectations settled firmly on his shoulder pads. He may not have a cannon arm for an arm, but his above average accuracy will be more than enough to get the job done in an NFL. In recent years several teams have found success with passing games that focus on shorter high percentage passes. Short screen passes to Steve Smith – which the Panthers refer to as Smoke Routes –open things up for the big strike later. Expect John Fox to capitalize on this early and often. The post-Delhomme era Panthers need a gunslinger like Clausen to get the job done, and I think the pairing will be mutually beneficial.

Although it may not have felt like it on draft day, Jimmy Clausen probably could not have landed in a better situation than he did with the Carolina Panthers. He joins a team that is loaded with rookie and veteran talent and is coached by a cunning head coach that will give Clausen a chance to shine right away. Those are fantastic conditions for a young quarterback to grow and flourish in.

Carolina will be the perfect place for Clausen’s seeds of success to germinate. The Panthers will help him to mature and hone his skills by allowing him to play alongside the perfect blend of veteran talent and rookie exuberance. The knowledgeable voices of Steve Smith, Muhsin Muhammad, and John Kasay (I’m just kidding about that last one. Kickers have virtually nothing to offer but an occasional three points.) will help Clausen develop the timing and leadership that comes from experience and is so crucial to success in the NFL. And younger players like Jon Beason and Jonathan Stewart can help him learn the ropes of the pros and surround him with the youthful energy and edge he will need to become a winner.

John Fox’s offense will help take Jimmy Clausen straight to the top of the league. Coming to Carolina, Clausen will be equipped with a Pro Bowl playmaker in Steve Smith, a sure handed route runner in Muhammad, and talent rookies in Brandon LaFell, Armanti Edwards, and David Gettis. Similarly the “Double Trouble” tandem of Jonathan Stewart and DeAngello Williams will alleviate much of the burden Clausen might have had to carry had he landed with a team that had less of a running game. But, most importantly, John Fox will give Clausen a chance to start soon. If he proves out of camp he is the right guy for the job, which he will, Clausen could be making his case for Hall of Fame candidacy beginning in 2010. Unlike other coaches that allow talented players to waste away on the bench, in the name of learning to play the game, Fox will give Clausen a legitimate shot to take the job from incumbent starter Matt Moore, and that may make a world of difference for Clausen and the Panthers.

There are many signs pointing to Clausen’s huge potential, but to me the difference maker between him and all the other QBs in the draft is he has the most to prove. Clausen was rumored at one point to be in contention to be drafted number one overall. Instead he free falls to the second round. Not only did that make people question his ability, but it also impacted his livelihood. Instead of being compensated like a top ten pick, Clausen looks forward to being compensated like a second rounder. Sure the money is nothing to scoff at, but that fact alone will be motivation for a kid who knows his worth like Clausen does. The fact that Tim Tebow, despite all the questions and criticism, gets taken well before him will be motivation to the young gunslinger on every down of every game.

He knows he has to work that much harder to prove he is the best quarterback in the draft. He knows he has to change people’s minds. He knows he must be the best, and I firmly believe he is capable.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NFL Draft QB Success Debate… Number One Pick For A Reason

May 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

It’s going to be interesting to see how history looks back on the quarterback class of the 2010 NFL Draft. Obviously, the big four (Sam Bradford, Colt McCoy, Jimmy Clausen, and Tim Tebow) will be heavily scrutinized. Amazingly, despite being temporarily slotted in as a third string quarterback, Tebow posted the hottest selling jersey in the NFL in April. But he isn’t going to be the best quarterback of this class. None of the writers at The Sports Debates beileve that. When all is said and done, Sam Bradford will be the best quarterback of the class of 2010.

With all the fuss about how far Clausen dropped and how Tebow was picked a little early, people tend to forget about Bradford. At least that is the impression I have. And that would be a huge mistake.

Like Tebow, Bradford was a winner in college. Not to the extent that Tebow was, as Bradford’s Sooners never got over that hump. But, in two full seasons as a starter (2007 and 2008), Bradford was 23-5. Obviously, we know he won the Heisman Trophy in 2008 with gaudy passing numbers. And he was surrounded by talent on his Sooner teams.

It’s going to be interesting to see his transition from a spread offense to a pro-style offense. He appears to be a smart guy, though, and early indications are that he isn’t afraid to take control of the huddle. At Rams rookie minicamp last week Bradford took charge of the offense with relative ease, and that is something coach Steve Spagnuolo was looking for rather intently.

Despite his injury-plagued 2009 campaign in Norman, I’m still convinced this guy has the strongest arm. At this pro day back in March, he showed off his accuracy, completing an amazing 62 of 63 passes, which had all the pro scouts in attendance drooling. That type of accuracy is what separates him from the rest, and it’s what got him to the position of being the number one pick. Many have compared Bradford to legendary Cowboy quarterback Troy Aikman. They both actually have Oklahoma roots. That isn’t bad company, is it Sam?

There is one thing that Bradford can claim without much question, and that is the fact that he plays on the worst team. Bleacher Fan may disagree, but the Rams are much worse than the Browns, and obviously are worse than the Panthers and Broncos. The Rams are terrible. Awful. An embarrassment of Detroit Lions proportions. Last season’s number one pick, Matthew Stafford, had to deal with the same situation when he was drafted by the Lions. It’s going to be tough on Bradford, just as it was on Stafford. But at least he had Calvin Johnson to throw to. Bradford doesn’t even have that. However, expect Bradford to eventually move the Rams on up. He may experience growing pains early on, but when we look back on this class in 20 years, we’ll all agree that Sam Bradford was the best of the bunch.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Hate in the NBA Debate… Fueling the Fire

May 7, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

I would love to wax poetic on the virtues of non-violence. There truly is far too much aggression, anger, and hatred in this world, and the Earth would be a MUCH better place if everyone got along.

It is extremely ironic, then, that an event which is centered on competition, and celebrates winners over losers, can actually unify in the act of dividing. Don’t believe me? Then I would strongly recommend you tune into the events that will take place beginning in June in South Africa.

The World Cup is a perfect example of how people with the utmost hatred and disgust for each other can still come together and celebrate even the smallest commonalities between them – a game of soccer. Likewise, the Olympics present another rare opportunity for people to come together in a competition of NATIONAL pride that will not wind up with excessive blood spilling or death.

Sport, at its very core, is peaceful.

That does not mean, however, that sport is (or should be) entirely without aggression and even MILD violence. Many of the best rivalries in sports today have evolved from deeper lying disputes that have absolutely nothing to do with sports in general.

The Origin of a Great Rivalry

The greatest rivalry in American sports – The Ohio State vs Michigan football game – actually stems from a land dispute in 1835 called the Toledo War. That’s right, every year when the Buckeyes take the field against the Wolverines, it is quite literally a battle fought as an extension of a nearly 200 year old WAR. And although the reasons for that war have been lost over the centuries, the mutual dislike between Ohioans and Michiganders has continued to fester. Folks in Ohio HATE folks in Michigan, and vice versa.

Consequently, when Ohio State supporters watch their Scarlet and Gray clad warriors set foot on the gridiron, they do so with the utmost dislike for the Maize and Blue soldiers of Michigan and their flag-waving counterparts in the stands (with that hate being reciprocated by the Michigan faithful). Consequently, they EXPECT their on-field representatives to share in that hatred, as well as the hope for the athletic destruction of the vile opposition.

The Curse of Free Agency

In recent years, however, that sense of passionate rivalry has been lost in the NBA (and professional sports in general). While fans of the game still feel deep-rooted love for their teams (and vicarious hatred for all others), a disconnect has developed between the fans and the athletes who represent them.

Free agency has KILLED rivalry.

Fans today feel no relationship at all with the players who don their beloved uniforms because they know that the players have no real attachment to the city in which they represent. A kinship that once existed between players and fans has been lost, because we as fans know that the player filling the uniform is fleeting. By this time next week, my beloved power forward may very well be plotting where he will be playing next season, perhaps for the team that I despise.

Likewise, players have become so ingrained in a culture of contract performance that they no longer care which colors they are wearing as long as they are being made rich in the process. Taking that a step further, athletes have become business-savvy enough to recognize that too much animosity towards a certain market may actually HURT their chances at making a bigger paycheck in the future. Rather than alienate fans of a prospective future fan base (burning bridges BEFORE crossing them), they have completely disconnected from the fans.

Hometown Heroes

Athletes like LeBron James and Derrick Rose are so exciting in the NBA because they’re hometown heroes. Not only are they some of the game’s brightest stars, but they are authentic representatives of the teams and cities they represent (at least for now). LeBron James, for example, isn’t just a kid who was DRAFTED by Cleveland Cavaliers, he IS Cleveland. He becomes a focal point of support and love that fans can rally around, and equally becomes a focal point of animosity and hatred for those who resent what he represents.

Speaking on behalf of all the Cleveland fans out there (of which I PROUDLY claim membership), we NEED LeBron to act and feel as we do. It is as simple as that. (Why do you think we took such offense when he showed up to an Indians playoff game in a Yankees hat?)

We as a city and as a people have been abused, belittled, and berated by the rest of the sports world for long enough. From insulting nicknames (“The Mistake by the Lake”) and berating implications (“You don’t live in Cleveland!”), to heartbreak and failure on the field, the city of Cleveland has long suffered.

Finally, though, we have a player who truly UNDERSTANDS. He grew up with us, lived in our struggling economic environment, shops in our stores, and can truly REPRESENT us. There is a bond between LeBron and the fans of the Cavs that MOST in sports will never understand. I’ve played basketball on the same St. Vincent St. Mary’s court as LeBron. I’ve sat in the same stands as LeBron while enjoying a University of Akron basketball game. Having attended a rival high school of LeBron’s, the best man in my brother’s wedding has a poster of himself getting dunked on by LeBron.

He is not just a hired gun who was called upon to bring a little justice to our neck of the woods, he is the local boy making a stand. He is one of us.

So when he steps onto the court, I don’t WANT to see him shaking hands and playing nice with Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce. I don’t want to see him hugging and laughing it up with Rajon Rondo. I want him to lead the rest of the Cavs in an all-out rampage to dismantle and EMBARRASS the Boston Celtics, whose players and fans have NO IDEA about what it is like to lose the way that we have in Cleveland (an 85 year championship drought in baseball means absolutely NOTHING when your basketball team has won 16 NBA Championships in the meantime).

When the Cavs lost to the Magic last year, I didn’t want to see LeBron shaking hands. Instead, his act of storming off of the court was the perfect representation of how we ALL felt in Cleveland.

We don’t WANT LeBron to hate the Celtics as much as we do. We NEED him to. Since I won’t have the opportunity to get in Garnett’s face and tell him what I REALLY think about him, I have to trust that my faithful and duly appointed representative, Mr. LeBron James, will satisfactorily handle that responsibility in my stead.

Loyal Homer is absolutely correct that we don’t need anymore gun-toting, riot-inducing incidents in sports. However, Babe Ruthless is also correct in asserting that the NBA cannot afford to shed all of its edginess without risking the overall appeal of the product to the fans. This is not a friendly game of Chutes and Ladders we are talking about, here. Instead, this is a physical test of superiority. It is a battle that takes place on hardwood flooring, where our best physical specimens will matchup against your best physical specimens, and only one side will walk away victorious in the end.

If the NBA tries to hide, diminish, or eliminate physical and aggressive rivalries, they will ultimately lose appeal. Babe Ruthless is awarded the victory for this debate by recognizing the importance of these intense rivalries to the most important people in sports – THE FANS!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Hate in the NBA Debate

May 6, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

The second round of the NBA playoffs is featuring two matchups which, over recent seasons, have developed into heated and physical rivalries. In the Western Conference it is the San Antonio Spurs versus the Phoenix Suns, and in the East the Boston Celtics versus the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Animosity is shared in both cases, and the games regularly regress into hard fouls, cheap shots, and often blood.

But is this a good thing for the NBA?

Both LeBron James and Doc Rivers have recently commented publicly that they enjoy the heated nature of bitter rivalries. James even references to the 1980s and 1990s when the play between teams like the Celtics and Lakers, or the Pistons and Lakers, was often fierce and physical. According to James and Rivers these very nasty rivalries help drive competition among the teams, and make for a better overall.

The NBA, however, has taken great strides to polish its image in recent years. Heavy emphasis on rivalries for their brutality and (dare I say) violence seems to contradict the image that NBA commissioner David Stern has fought hard to promote.

Is it a good thing for the NBA’s image to have the potential of violence returned to the court with old-fashioned, hate-filled rivalries?

In breaking this question down, Babe Ruthless will argue his belief that these rivalries are good for the NBA, while Loyal Homer will contradict with his own argument that this is not a good thing for the image of the league.

What’s it gonna be? Hugs or haymakers?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Hate in the NBA Debate… Throw Them Bows

May 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.

In the style of Justin Timberlake, I’m bringing hatred back.

Where did it go, you ask? I don’t know. But it seems to have been missing in the NBA for a while. The hostile rivalries of the 1980s and 1990s are long gone, and in its place exists a kinder, gentler NBA. Excuse me if I’m not quaking with excitement at the prospect of a neutered NBA. Instead of intense competitions that bring out the best in players, now NBA fans are treated to NBA Lite (“now with fewer calories and less excitement than ever”). As the rivalries died out so did the exhilaration that comes with them. But a glimmer of hope has emerged as of late. A little ruthless aggression has breathed new life into the game, and basketball will be all the better for it.

As Bleacher Fan points out in the introduction to this debate, NBA commissioner David Stern has taken great strides to clean up the tarnished image of the NBA. While I agree that the NBA was in need of commissioner Stern’s image makeover, amidst player-fan riots and players dressing with the flamboyance of Flava Flav, the NBA cannot afford to purge all the edginess from the sport unless he wants to turn the game into a fast paced version of Bocce ball. I maintain that a healthy dose of hostility is exactly what the sport needs to spice up storylines. Plus, commissioner Stern should be happy that NBA headlines are about actual games instead of about where LeBron James will play next season. (Again, for the record I do not think it will be in Cleveland, in spite of this MUST SEE promotional video.)

Bringing a little hate back to basketball is great because it makes the league entertaining again on and off the court. For the casual NBA fan, like myself, it seems that the NBA playoffs last forever, and include practically every team in the league. Don’t get me wrong, they can still be exciting. But just not while teams like the Milwaukee Bucks, Oklahoma City Thunder, Utah Jazz are still in the playoff hunt. The only reason I even knew that the Bucks were in the playoffs was because of the video of Bucks’ mascot’s insane dunk. I actually had to double check to make sure the Thunder was a real team, and, for the record, I am still not convinced (seriously when did that happen?). My attention remains ungrabbed until the NBA Finals, but the heat in the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers matchup has actually made me pay attention. Similarly, things are starting to get interesting between another renewed rivalry between the Spurs and Suns. If this can pique the interest of a non-diehard fan, then it certainly cannot be bad for the sport.

Really and truly it should not even be about what David Stern wants as much as what the people want. I know today’s debate judge, Bleacher Fan, to be a man of the people. Because of that I want to enlist the support of the guys in the cheap seats in my argument. While not a very scientific approach (I apologize to my high school and college statistics teachers), I base this part of my argument off of comments I read left by fans on Web sites discussing the revived rivalries. Because in the end who is better than the fans to determine what they want to see in their sport? For every detractor that wanted to downplay the hate in the game there seemed to be three more that like the excitement and spontaneity that it brought to the game.

To me it just makes sense. Would fans be more entertained by a more reserved game that resembles a tea party, or an all out war on the boards that resembles the Acclaim classic Arch Rivals? I think that is a pretty easy choice.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Hate in the NBA Debate… Stop the Violence!

May 6, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.

As soon as you get finished reading this fine argument, call up your friends, who may be casual sports fans, and ask them if they have been following the NBA playoffs closely. As you are taking out your trash when you get home after work, you may notice Joe the Plumber mowing the grass next door. Go over and ask him if he’s been watching the NBA playoffs. I can say with some certainty that you are going to not get an affirmative response. If you’re reading this debate, you probably are watching the NBA playoffs. All of the writers here at TSD are certainly following along. Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek are losing sleep over the status of Lebron’s elbow. But certainly not everyone feels that way. An answer I often get when asking someone if they are watching the NBA playoffs is, “Man, those guys aren’t nothing but a bunch of thugs. Josh Smith, Ron Artest, Kevin Garnett, all of them.” Or, “Man, it’s nothing but street ball. It’s not like it used to be.”

Fair or not, the NBA’s overall image took a serious hit on November 19, 2004. That was the night of altercation between the Pistons and the Pacers in which, among others, the infamous Ron Artest entered the crowd during a brawl. Many people became disenchanted with professional basketball that night because of the violence that took place. How could anyone want the threat of violence to even enter the picture during a basketball game?

It has been well-documented that Lebron and Doc Rivers enjoy bitter rivalries, and they miss the “glory days” of the battles in the 1980s that featured the Celtics, the Lakers, and the Bad Boys of Detroit. But those battles took place over 20 years ago. It’s a different league now. It’s a different society now. Heated situations in the NBA are more likely to get out of hand. Unfortunately, I believe that’s the overall reputation among common folks regarding the NBA.

What happens if Anderson Varejao and Kevin Garnett start pushing and shoving in game three in Boston this weekend? Pushing and shoving is going to take place, and who knows where that could lead, as both of those players are known for getting under the skin of the opponent. Before you know it, a fight could break out, players could get thrown out of the game and suspended, and the brawl would overshadow the game itself.

Some may say, “Well that’ll bring publicity to the sport.” There’s no doubt, it would definitely do that. But it would be the wrong kind of publicity and attention. David Stern and other NBA officials have worked to clean the game up, by setting up automatic suspensions for anything from throwing an elbow to not abiding by the cleaned up dress code (which I was highly critical of at the time, but I think was a wonderful idea in the long run).

No one is ever going to mistake the NBA for the PGA Tour. Basketball isn’t a gentleman’s game by any stretch. But it’s not a good thing for the NBA when the threat of a violent incident looms over a series. It’s bad for the overall image of the league, and while it could provide some short term buzz, it would provide long term damage.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Most Hated MLB Team Debate… Beantown Wannabes

May 5, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.

If this debate was ten years ago, my answer to the question of who the most hated team in baseball was would definitively have been the New York Yankees.

The Bronx Bombers of the last 20 years have represented everything about baseball that I despise. Rather than go about winning championships through development of talent, hard work, and long-term strategy, the Yankees would allow other franchises to do all the dirty work. Then, right when all of that hard work by “lesser” franchises was about to pay off because one of their athletes had established himself as a true superstar, the Yankees would swoop in, price almost every other team in the league out of the market for that player (including the very team that had invested so much into his development), and simply acquire an already cultivated superstar.

Admittedly, part of my resentment stems from the fact that the strategy works. From 1996 until 2000 the Yankees pulled off an impressive FOUR World Series championships. George Steinbrenner had monopolized the game of baseball, and it took all of the fun out of the game for fans anywhere else in the country.

Leading the charge for the anti-Yankees bandwagon was the Boston Red Sox, their bitter rivals, whom many had perceived as the yin to the Yankees’ yang. While the Yankees had gone on to purchase one World Series after another, the Red Sox were in the throes of an 80+ year World Series Championship drought. For all of the reasons that the Yankees were despised, the Red Sox loved.

Compounding the pro-Red Sox support was the fact that they, just like every other team in the Majors, fell prey to the big-budget mentality of George Steinbrenner and had to sit back while once revered players from Fenway celebrated World Series championships in pinstripes. Even Red Sox stalwarts like Wade Boggs and Roger Clemens ultimately wound up defecting to the Dark Side, WILLINGLY signing contracts in New York later in their careers, and were perceived by many as having sold their soul for a World Series ring.

Then the Red Sox changed. Like so many of the players that Red Sox fans (and those who vicariously supported Boston through a shared hatred of the Yankees) cursed for having sold out just for the prospect of a World Series championship, the Red Sox themselves hypocritically became sellouts. Under the philosophy of “In order to BEAT the Yankees, we must BECOME the Yankees,” guys like Theo Epstein and Mike Port began to seek out and steal the high-priced talent in the league for themselves, taking players away from other teams… even that team in New York.

Since 2000 the Red Sox have bought talent like David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez, Kevin Millar, and Curt Schilling. They have overpaid in bidding wars for guys like Eric Gagne, and have dropped $50M just to reserve the rights to TALK to Daisuke Matsuzaka. Basically, they had become the very thing that they once hated.

In fairness, this new strategy has worked for them, which makes their treachery that much worse! Like the Yankees of the late 1990s, the Red Sox have since won multiple World Series championships, and are now perennial postseason contenders in the AL East (although this year has been anything but a success for Boston thus far). However, that success came at the price of their principles. For the very reason that they once berated the Yankees, they now are guilty of committing the same infractions.

Once perceived as bitter rivals, the New York Yankees almost became role models to the Red Sox, as they graduated Valedictorians from the “George Steinbrenner School of Winning in Baseball.”

The Boston Red Sox are the most despised team in baseball today because they not only bought (rather than earned) their way into the forefront of MLB competition, but more importantly, they did so in hypocritical contrast to all that they once stood against.

At least the Yankees come by it honestly.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.