The 2010 Best Sweet 16 Story Debate… Big Games from Big Red

March 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer/Bet Loser and Sports Geek.

My first thought for this debate was to argue The Ohio State Buckeyes, who won a very impressive game against Georgia Tech yesterday afternoon. However, Loyal Homer was practically BEGGING me to let him argue on behalf of his new favorite team, so I acquiesced. (Editor’s Note: Loyal Homer lost a bet to Bleacher Fan and had to write about the Buckeyes. Check it out! He makes a good case.)

I have also already discussed the talent and potential of the Xavier Musketeers who rolled into the Sweet Sixteen over the Pitt Panthers yesterday, making them another of the many hapless Big East teams to crumble under the pressures of this March Madness tournament.

But Xavier and Ohio State make up only two of the teams still remaining in contention for the 2010 NCAA Basketball national championship, and neither have been a part of the REAL story of this March Madness. The REAL story has been the increased (but not surprising) success of longshot underdogs and mid-majors against some of the so-called best teams in the country.

Davids like Northern Iowa, Old Dominion, Ohio, Murray State, and St. Mary’s have already slain Goliaths from the power conferences like Georgetown, Villanova, Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, and even the overall top-seeded Kansas Jayhawks. Because of these mighty minis, no office pool bracket survived the first weekend of competition unscathed.

No team, however, has captured the spirit of “The Little Engine That Could” more than the Cornell Big Red. Defying odds, stereotypes, and history, the Big Red have rolled into the Sweet Sixteen as the highest seed still standing. I learned a long time ago, though, that you should never judge a book by its cover. Especially not one that has earned the seal of approval from sage minds of staff from the likes of Harvard, Yale, and Princeton – those folks tend to know what they are talking about!

Teetering on the thin line between “mid” and “low” major, the Big Red received virtually no respect entering the tournament. As a member of the Ivy League, a conference known more for its prowess in the classroom than on the hardwood, Cornell cruised through their regular season to a 27-4 record en route to their conference championship. For all their effort, they were slotted in as a 12-seed in the 2010 tournament and were slated to face Temple (ranked 12th in the nation) during their first-round matchup.

The fact that Cornell was the nation’s best team from beyond the three-point arc got them a little recognition, and they quickly became a “sexy” upset pick against the A-10 champs. Still, most considered the group of “nerdy” Ivy-Leaguers a longshot to upset their much more battle-tested opponents.

At the end of the game, those who did believe Cornell had all the makings of a real tournament contender were repaid with a win, making them look like geniuses worthy of admission into Cornell’s own ivy-walled institution.

But the ride wasn’t over yet. Cornell could enjoy the reward for their stunning first-round victory only briefly, because a REAL test was looming on the horizon. Cornell would next face their first “power conference” foe, the fourth-seeded Wisconsin Badgers out of the Big Ten.

Wisconsin had already beaten several top-ten teams this season (Duke, Ohio State, Purdue, and Michigan State). By comparison Cornell should have been nothing more than a blip on the Badgers’ power conference radar. It seems once again that Cornell had other thoughts in their oversized minds.

When the hour was up and all the pencils were down, it was Cornell who took their more esteemed opposition to task, schooling them in every facet of the game. Wisconsin was out-shot, out-rebounded, and most importantly out-scored by Cornell, allowing more points in this game than they had all season.

The Big Red provided Wisconsin with a Master’s-level education in butt-whoopery (that is an official, Ivy League accredited term), soundly defeating them by a score of 87-69.

Cornell’s tournament play thus far has been nothing short of remarkable. Both their program and the conference that they represent have long suffered when in competition with other Division I programs. As a school, 2010 marks Cornell’s third consecutive appearance in the NCAA Tournament. It is only the fifth overall tournament appearance in the entire history of the school, with two other one-and-done appearances in 1954 and 1988. As far as the conference is concerned, the last time an Ivy League school won even a single tournament game was in 1998 when Princeton defeated UNLV.

Now Cornell is the first Ivy League member since 1979 to survive the first weekend of the NCAA Basketball Tournament. Whether they win or lose against the top-seeded Kentucky Wildcats on Thursday night during their Sweet Sixteen matchup, the Big Red have already proven to be biggest winners in a tournament loaded with mid-major magic!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Best Sweet 16 Story Debate… Crow Tastes Nutty

March 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

First off, let me get this out of the way. Congratulations to Ohio State, who clearly was the better and more deserving team against Georgia Tech yesterday!

Gahhhh, it pains me to say that! You see, on Saturday, Bleacher Fan issued a little wager to me regarding the matchup between his Buckeyes and my Yellow Jackets. If Georgia Tech won, he would discuss Georgia Tech in his debate today and I would discuss St. Marys, Cornell, or whomever I wished. If the Buckeyes won, I would discuss the greatness that is Ohio State. Well you see how it turned out!

The truth is I had Ohio State winning in my bracket, but I thought it was a good chance to stick it to Bleacher Fan’s pro-Big Ten attitude. And for the second time in just over two months, I underestimated the strength of a Big Ten team against a Georgia Tech team, and in two different sports, too!

Flash back to December 5, 2009. Ohio State guard Evan Turner, alone on a breakaway, falls to the floor after an attempted dunk in a non-conference game against Eastern Michigan. All of Buckeye Nation panicked. Bleacher Fan spoke with obvious concern about the young man’s well being in our editorial meeting. There was a brief period of time where no one knew how long Turner would be out (it was initially supposed to be eight weeks after breaking two vertebra in his back), but he amazingly would only miss six games. Fast forward over three months later to yesterday. Turner, the Big Ten Player of the Year, and a national Player of the Year candidate, came up just an assist and a rebound short of a triple-double in a 75-66 victory over Georgia Tech, giving the Yellow Jackets a chance to get their cell phones back quicker than they had hoped.

At the beginning of the season I am not sure many folks outside of Columbus would have believed that the Buckeyes would have a decent shot at the national championship. They were ranked in the preseason polls, but were lost in the shuffle behind 2009 runner up Michigan State, as well as Purdue, and Michigan. But the Buckeyes have been on a roll due in large part to Turner, having won fifteen out of their last sixteen games.

Now, with the almost annual choke by Kansas, the Midwest region sets up nicely for Ohio State, with the Ohio State-Tennessee winner taking on the winner of Northern Iowa and Michigan State. It’s pretty clear that Ohio State has to be the favorite coming out of the region at this point, especially with the Spartans point guard, Kalin Lucas, likely lost for the season.

On the surface it may not appear that Ohio State’s presence in the Sweet Sixteen would be a great story. And yes, there are definitely some Cinderella stories in this year’s tournament. But the fact that Evan Turner has, ironically, put the team on his back and on the path to the Final Four is truly an amazing story for the Buckeyes and Even Turner.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Best Sweet 16 Story Debate…Can’t Diss Northern Iowa

March 22, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

I think it is clear that the surprising Panthers from Northern Iowa are the best story of this year’s Sweet Sixteen. Knocking off tournament number one seed Kansas is an amazing and unlikely feat for a small(ish) university in northern Iowa. The university, with one hard fought win, has now been catapulted into pop culture and the collective memory of basketball fans around the country. I know I turned to my three year old son, who was sitting in the lazy boy with me watching the end of the game, and said, “I think this game will be talked about for a long time… and you can tell people you watched it.” Northern Iowa, with one victory, is now a culture phenomenon. The evidence is contained everywhere, including all over social media, and I will present a few reasons why this win is the best story of the Sweet Sixteen.

One of the great things about Twitter is that is provides a good indication of the most topical, most popular elements of society within a small snapshot of time. The more surprising or momentous the occasion – see Apple’s announcement of the iPad, for example – the more popular the topic is to tweet about. As many of you likely know, the more a specific topic is tweeted about, the more popular it is. The more popular topics become trending topics on Twitter. Two hours after the University of Northern Iowa’s basketball team beat Kansas 60 percent of the trending topics were about the Panthers’ 69-67 win over the Jayhawks. It is easy to see why.

Reason #1: Trending Topics Don’t Lie

  • “#AliFarokhmanesh”: The official trending topic and hash tag for the gutsiest performer… UNI’s own “Mr. Big Shot.”
  • “#Kansas-Northern Iowa”: While one series of tweets was devoted to the player that hit the big shot, plenty of folks realized how great this game was overall.
  • ”Northern Iowa Panthers”: Back in my days as a beat writer for a newspaper I spoke to a head basketball coach who used to have an affiliation with the College of Charleston. He told me that when his school beat number one ranked North Carolina in 1998 that the school saw a significant spike in student applications in the week after the victory. This trending topic is likely leading to the same groundswell of attention for Northern Iowa… a school that had to pull out all of the stops to save its baseball team recently due to budget cuts.
  • ”Iowa beats Kansas”: There’s no doubt that the Iowa Hawkeyes are pleased to get credit for sloppy tweets. It’s a little something I like to call “The Northern Iowa Effect.” Hmm.
  • ”Missouri Valley Conference”: This trending topic is probably the most attention the conference has received since that Larry Bird fella played at Indiana State.

Reason #2: Kansas Hype

The higher the perch, the harder the fall. The great thing about this game, and the UNI story, is that it never seemed REALLY possible, even while it was happening. Everyone knows how good Kansas is. They were the number one team in the country for a long time this season. They were the tournament’s number one seed. They were a lock for most championship games in most brackets (at least the folks I know). The deserved hype Kansas received all season, and in the build up to the tournament, makes this victory for the Panthers that much more impressive.

Reason #3: Northern Iowa’s Actually Pretty Good

Most of the media, and fans, will be buzzing about guard Ali Farokhmanesh’s gutsy three point jumper with 30 seconds on the shot clock while trying to preserve a lead. Well, gutsy is one word for describing that shot. Having watched UNI a few times this season, though, it is easy to see that Farokhmanesh has never met a three point shot he didn’t like. The thing is… he makes a lot of them.

However, a possibly large group of UNI fans, and fans of the underdog, were screaming “DON’T SHOOT IT” at their television when Farokhmanesh launched that shot. Those cries were followed shortly by “GREAT SHOT!!”

Great basketball stories need big shots, and Farokhmanesh delivered. But the interesting fact in the UNI story is that the entire team is actually pretty good. The team has balance, size, hustle, and loads of fundamentals. They are the ideal Cinderella story. They have no business staying on the court with some of the most athletic and talented college basketball teams in the country. But, because they hustle after loose balls, box out under the boards, set strong picks, and play great defense, they believe they can beat any team in the country. And they’re right.

Some of the other players include Adam Koch (pronounced “Cook”). He is a senior forward and has a younger brother on the team. But he also has a very complete game. In the Kansas game he grabbed a big time rebound and put it back in the final minute… an essential sequence that gave Farokhmanesh’s shot meaning. Plus, the Panthers have a player named “O’Rear” that looks like Starburns from the NBC comedy Community. How awesome is that?

Other Sweet Sixteen stories are okay. Cornell is good. Sure, St. Mary’s is a nice Sweet Sixteen story. But they also had any easy draw. As it turns out the A-10 was not that spectacular after all (I am carving up a hefty slice of humble pie on that one), so the victory over Richmond is not that impressive. Villanova also was a shell of its former self… and a prominent member of the most overrated conference in college basketball this season, the Big East.

The other best story, according to Loyal Homer, is Ohio State’s victory over Georgia Tech… but he’s writing that only because he lost a bet to Bleacher Fan.

The Northern Iowa Panthers are the best story because they simultaneously overcame the most and still have the most to gain. I will spare you all the glass slipper puns. Northern Iowa is not just a run of the mill Cinderella story. They are a legitimately good basketball team that just gained a WHOLE lot of confidence. What out, Michigan State.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Hardest NCAAB Region Debate… A Midwest Nightmare

March 19, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.

What did I tell you?! The March Madness tournament this year will be a) one of the most competitive we have ever seen, and b) LOADED with upset potential.

Day One did not disappoint! Congratulations to Old Dominion, Murray State, Ohio, Washington, and St. Mary’s for pulling off very exciting (and very entertaining) upsets yesterday, and for screwing up a lot of brackets around the country!

Speaking of screw-ups, the Big East had a TERRIBLE showing yesterday. In four games during the first day of competition, the Big East was LUCKY to finish at 1-3, with Notre Dame, Marquette, and Georgetown on the losing end of MAJOR upsets while Villanova was fortunate to escape with their tournament lives in order to avoid a sweep!

Now that the alleged depth of the Big East has once again been exposed for what it really is – overblown hype from having too many teams in the conference – we can move forward and take a look at which region is shaping up to be the toughest of the tournament.

Even with the early departure of the Georgetown Hoyas at the hands of a “lowly” mid-major MAC team (in case you haven’t learned yet, I am a supporter of the mid-major programs), the toughest region of the tournament is the Midwest.

To start with, the Midwest Region features the Kansas Jayhawks, who entered the tournament as the top team in the country. That fact alone means that 15 out of the 16 teams in that region would have go through the best team in the country just make it out of the region and into the Final Four!

Beyond the strength of the top seed in this region the Midwest is stocked with some of the strongest teams in the tournament.

Sitting opposite Kansas in the bracket is the Ohio State Buckeyes, who are led by the favorite for the NCAA Player of the Year award, Evan Turner. The Buckeyes, fresh off of claiming the Big Ten championship, were among the teams being tossed around as possible one seeds for the tournament, and have been playing some of the best basketball in the country over the last two months of the season.

Traveling further down the region, the road doesn’t get any easier. Sitting in the fourth position in the region is the second place team out of the ACC – Maryland. In a year where the overall performance of the ACC has been down, Maryland has been one of the two teams within that conference that still played exceptionally well this season, even defeating Duke earlier this month.

After Maryland comes fifth-seeded Michigan State. Although the Spartans struggled against many of the highly ranked teams they faced throughout the 2010 season, they are led by arguably the greatest tournament coach of the last decade in Tom Izzo (Editor’s note: Stay tuned next week for that debate). Under Izzo’s leadership the Spartans are now entering their THIRTEENTH consecutive NCAA appearance. During that run of thirteen straight NCAA Tournament berths, Izzo has reached the Sweet Sixteen EIGHT different times, has been to the Elite Eight SIX times, has FIVE different Final Four appearances, and has been to the championship game twice (WINNING the title in 2000)! If anyone knows how to “dance” it is Izzo.

If that is not tough enough, consider that some of the double-digit seeds in this region are capable of some very impressive feats! Entering the region as the ten seed, Georgia Tech showed during the ACC Tournament that they are capable of playing with and beating many of the top teams in the nation (including a victory over the aforementioned Maryland Terrapins). Then at 14 sits the Ohio Bobcats who already have proven they will run with anybody after they SMOKED Georgetown on Thursday by a score of 97-83.

We learned yesterday that there is no such thing as a free ride in the NCAA Tournament for 2010, and in no region is that more evident than in the Midwest. From top to bottom, the strongest caliber of teams at each level are represented in this corner of the bracket, and the team that ultimately does emerge victorious from this gauntlet will have tested and proven their mettle against the very best that March Madness has to offer!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Hardest NCAAB Region Debate… Eastbound and Up

March 19, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.

During our weekly editorial meeting here at TSD World Headquarters I was desperately hoping that, after claiming the East region in the debate topic discussion via text message during the selection show, I would not be forced to alter my fundamental argument about the strength of the East region very much. But Marquette’s early ouster does kill some of the buzz on the East region. Fortunately there is still plenty of quality teams and players buried in the East region – the single region that promises to be the most entertaining and competitive in the entire NCAA Tournament.

The primary reason why I believe the East is the toughest region in the tournament this year is because of the high concentration of great teams. One seed Kentucky and two seed West Virginia are both major conference tournament champions and excellent teams. That is the strongest 1-2 seed combination in the tournament. And both teams have to deal with talent and depth on their sides of the region, too.

Kentucky has to go through a spirited Wake Forester team, though I don’t believe that will be too challenging. They also have to deal with either Cornell or perhaps Wisconsin. Cornell is very athletic and disciple while Wisconsin is very tough and defends extremely well. Either team present an incredibly difficult challenge to Kentucky.

On West Virginia’s side they have to contend, likely, with a full court pressing Clemson Tigers team that will tire them out quickly, especially after having played as many games this season as being a conference tournament champion demands. If they squeeze by Clemson thy have to take on, most likely, a tough as nails New Mexico team OR the wide open offense of Washington, a team that surprised a talented Marquette team already.

Of course, if West Virginia and Kentucky both survive the second round, the possibility of a matchup in the regional final is a certainty – and a treat for fans.

As I briefly alluded to above, the motley grouping of teams with disparate playing styles also makes the matchups in the East region compelling. First, Clemson’s presence really inserts a strange approach into the mix. As a press-first team that relies HEAVILY on transition offense to score, Clemson will dictate the pace and style of the game and force other teams to beat them. Washington is almost on the complete opposite end of the spectrum with an up tempo, relentless offensive attack. Cornell and Wisconsin play a strong and disciplined half-court game on both ends of the floor. Kentucky and West Virginia can play inside out as well as any teams in the country. The matchups in this region, more than any other region, promise to be interesting and close straight down the line. After the first round, the chances of a blow are very slim.

The East is a bit unique, too, because the three weakest teams in the region – Texas, Wake Forest, and Missouri – will be weeded out very quickly. Wake already beat a Texas team in a downward spiral, and none of those teams will see the third round of play.

There are also quite a few teams in the East with feet perfect for glass slippers. From Clemson to New Mexico to Cornell and Wisconsin, each of these teams could easily pull a couple of upsets or get hot and ruin everyone’s bracket. While the South has its fair share of lovable underdogs, the matchups in the East region give these underdogs a legitimate shot.

The last, and perhaps most interesting reason the East region is best is that the region offers the best team at most of the seeds. For example, New Mexico is the strongest three seed given Georgetown’s early exit, Baylor’s scare, and Pitt’s inconsistency. Clemson is strongest at seven considering Richmond already lost, Oklahoma State played poorly down the stretch, and the Tigers are even stronger than BYU, who was taken to overtime by a weak Florida team. I have already documented West Virginia’s position as more of a fifth one seed than a great two seed. Cornell has asserted its strength as a 12, too.

Kansas is supposed to have the easiest region as the tournament’s top seed (despite Bleacher Fan’s protestations), and the South has the unanimously decided weakest one seed in Duke. The West, frankly, does not even enter in to the conversation. Without a doubt, the East presents the toughest region, and whichever team emerges will be battle tested and ready for Final Four glory.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 Hardest NCAAB Region Debate… The South Rises

March 19, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

Hours of non-productivity will take place again today at the office as day two of March Madness began at noon. How does your bracket look? Mine would look great if it wasn’t for Georgetown laying a big egg! Rough day for the Big East, huh? Today, as we complete the first round, we are going to take a look at the regions and decide which is going to be the most difficult to win. I am going to branch out a bit and say the South region will be the toughest to win.

Yesterday, there were four games from this region, and three of them were hotly contested down the stretch. The unpredictability of the entire region is what makes it so fascinating, and so difficult to win. Several teams in this end of the bracket have had “moments” throughout the season at one point or another.

Villanova, who escaped yesterday with an overtime win over a feisty Robert Morris team, has had his ups and downs lately. But don’t forget they were a Final Four team last season. They also were ranked as high as number two in the polls in early February. Purdue is obviously a different team with the loss of forward Robbie Hummel. And I am aware that they are coming off an absolute thumping to the Minnesota Golden Gophers in the Big Ten tournament. But they are still 27-5, and they did not get there exclusively on the back of Hummel.

Watch out for Louisville. The Cardinals spent much of the season on the proverbial bubble, but they played well down the stretch to find a way into the Big Dance. Their two high profile wins came against Syracuse, and one of those victories was when the Big Orange was number one in the country.

Duke is number one in this bracket and fresh off a march through the ACC in Greensboro last week. Winning the ACC, even in a down year, is nothing to frown at by any stretch. But, Duke really did not play all that well. They struggled in wins against Virginia and Miami. And they had to hold on to beat Georgia Tech in the championship game. Love them or hate them, they are still Duke, and they are always a threat at this time of year.

The sexy sleeper pick in this side of the bracket is Siena. The Saints come in with a record at 27-6, and four of those losses (Georgia Tech, Butler, Northern Iowa, and Temple) are to tournament teams. It is important to remember that Siena is tournament tested of late, as they have knocked off Vanderbilt and Ohio State in the first round the past couple of years. Might they be game for another upset?

The unpredictability of the South region is what makes it the toughest to win. Duke is a solid number one seed, but how many of you actually have them in the Final Four? I sure don’t. Enjoy the madness!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NCAAB Tournament Sleeper Debate… The A-Teams are Out in Force

March 18, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

I know the point of this debate is to pick THE sleeper team to watch out for in the NCAA tournament this season. I get that. But, I think narrowing the conversation down to just one team is really too simple. With that thought in mind, it is easy to understand why I believe each tournament team from the A-10 qualifies as a sleeper because the entire conference was underrated from the entire 2010 college basketball season.

Most conferences – other than the so-called “major” conferences – can boast multiple qualifying teams in the NCAA Tournament. The A-10 is, supposedly, a “mid-major” conference. I can’t help but wonder at what point the mid gets dropped a conference designation. It certainly no longer applies for the A-10 conference. They earned three bids into the tournament with all three teams earning a seventh seed, or higher. Conference tournament champion Temple – a team that completed the rare regular season and conference tournament sweep – earned a five seed in the toughest region in the tournament (more on that in tomorrow’s debate). Sixth seeded Xavier (a team Bleacher Fan decided to place a singular focus on) is a team in a less intense region that may have a deep run. Last, Richmond – a conference tournament finalist – grabbed the seventh seed in the South region. These are all solid teams that deserved the seeds they received.

I will provide little detail on Xavier as Bleacher Fan more than has that covered. Plus, if I take credit for his article and my article, chances are I’ll win the vote. That, folks, in TSD strategery.

Instead, it makes more sense to focus on the conference champion Temple Owls and conference runner up Richmond Spiders.

Temple is an easy case to make. First, they lost just five games all season. More importantly, they are not terrible losses. One loss was to a ranked Georgetown team last November… a game they lost by just one point. They beat Siena by four, beat should-be tournament team Virginia Tech by 11, and upset Villanova by 10. Plus, the A-10 presented some challenging in-conference games too, as the conference had five teams win 21 or more games in the regular season. Not bad. More, Temple has incredible offensive balance with only one player averaging over 14 points in Ryan Brooks. In short, Temple is really good and a lot of folks are discounting that (if you picked Cornell, get ready for an L).

Richmond is very dangerous, too. Their first round game against St. Mary’s isn’t a lock, but Richmond should win it. Part of the reason Richmond is so solid is because, like Temple, they played extremely well in the regular season. In fact, though they lost to Temple in the conference championship game, they also beat Temple during the season. Richmond played two ranked teams all season and won both games. First they beat Florida, then Temple, then Xavier in the conference semifinals. They also beat Old Dominion and Missouri, two other tournament teams. Richmond also boasts balanced scoring, though guard Kevin Anderson is the clear team leader on offense averaging nearly 18 points per game.

It is time to think about the A-10 conference is a majorly talented conference. When you filled out your bracket, if you did not place a strong emphasis on advancing A-10 teams, your bracket will probably be a mess by this time on Saturday. Between Temple, Richmond, and Xavier, the A-10 earned three quality bids to the NCAA Tournament. And I have no doubt they will make the most of them.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NCAAB Tournament Sleeper Debate… X Marks the Spot

March 18, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.

The Selection Committee, a group of people tasked annually with one of the most difficult jobs in all of sports, do not get nearly the credit they deserve! They tirelessly work for many hours during the closing days of championship week in order to put together a bracket that everyone (including all of us at TSD) will complain about BEFORE the tournament. However, without fail, the tournament annually plays out as one of the most exciting and entertaining sporting events of the entire year.

Still, no recognition is given to those whipping boys who made it all possible, and this year has been no exception.

I am turning over a new leaf! Rather than get sucked into the pre-tournament negativity that always comes from analysis of a bracket that has not yet played out, I am going to look for the positive potential that lies in a tournament which we all know will nevertheless unfold in dramatic and entertaining fashion.

What I love most about the tournament this year is that there are no sure-things. The better teams have been lumped together in the same regions, meaning that nobody is getting a free ride to the Final Four. While Kansas and Kentucky may have finished the season as the top two teams, they are by no means perfect in their execution. Therefore they do not deserve a free-ride into the Final Four just because they finished the regular season as the best teams in the nation. If they want to be considered national campions they are going to have to earn it!

On the flip side, when you look at those so-called “easier” regions of the West and South, the collective talent level of those 32 teams once again presents a greater opportunity for more competitive matchups. Sure, Duke has a weaker region to compete in, but Duke is also the weakest of the top seeds and are more likely to struggle in their games.

The 2010 bracket is set up to play out as one of the most competitive that we have ever seen. It is LOADED with potential for dangerous mid-level teams to make a “sleeper” run deep into the tournament because the parity across the regions is remarkable this year.

One team that could surprise many with a deep run is the Xavier Musketeers.

To begin with the entire Atlantic-10 Conference has been underrated and underappreciated this season (as Sports Geek will cover in his article). The conference turned in six different 20-game winners in 2010, including the AP’s #12 Temple Owls and #25 Xavier. The A-10 has arguably been the best mid-major conference of the 2010 season, and has turned out some of the most battle-tested mid-major programs for this tournament.

When you look at the West Regional – where Xavier is seeded sixth – they stand as potential beneficiaries from being in one of those “weaker” brackets where the level of competition may not be as stiff. That is not to take anything away from teams within the region, like Syracuse or Kansas State who are worthy top seeds. But Xavier would not be facing those teams (potentially) until much later in the tournament.

Their first matchup pits them against a Minnesota team that would (and should) not even be in the tournament had it not been for a fortunate draw in the Big Ten tournament last week. Minnesota’s performance in 2010 can be defined as “streaky” at best. They finished in the middle of the pack of a very top-heavy Big Ten and turned in some pretty disappointing performances against lesser-caliber teams like Northwestern, Michigan, and Indiana… not to mention a very underwhelming showing in the Big Ten championship game against Ohio State.

Assuming that Xavier does get past Minnesota (which based on the seedings they SHOULD be able to do), they will likely face three-seeded Pitt in their second-round matchup.

Pitt will present a challenge, but they are certainly beatable (and a stretch, in my opinion, for a three-seed). The Panthers have some quality wins under their belt (including wins against West Virginia and at Syracuse), but they have also laid some eggs this season. They lack a truly dominant scorer on the court, are a painfully slow-paced team at times (a problem they had to deal with last season as well), and they do not shoot well from beyond the three-point arc.

With the right matchups, and by maintaining a fast tempo throughout the game, a Xavier victory is entirely possible even against a Pitt team from the vaunted Big East conference.

Finally, do not be fooled by the fact that Xavier is led by first-time head coach Chris Mack. Although this is Mack’s first year at the helm, he is no stranger to post-season play. As an assistant with Xavier leading up to the 2010 season, Mack has helped to lead this team to five consecutive tournament appearances, including two Sweet-Sixteen appearances and one Elite Eight appearance. He knows his players very well and he has been integral in helping achieve tournament success for several years.

Mack’s Musketeers are an underrated threat, facing overrated opposition in a mid-major laden region. That sounds like a formula for sleeper success to me!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The 2010 NCAAB Tournament Sleeper Debate… Watch Out For the Ramblin Wreck!

March 18, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek.

As you filled out your bracket this week many of you possibly followed the standard and picked the favorites in most of the games. I have a couple of underdogs making a nice little run in my bracket. Then, we have teams that maybe come from power conferences, but are seeded a little lower and off the radar a bit. That is what we are discussing today here at The Sports Debates. Who is a possible sleeper in the Big Dance? There are several contenders and Bleacher Fan and Sports Geek address a few of them. I am going to go with the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets.

Before making a deep run in the ACC Tournament… before eventually falling to Duke… the Yellow Jackets were squarely on the bubble. It was a season that had been maddening to Yellow Jacket fans, with some calling for the head of coach Paul Hewitt. Hewitt expressed frustration with the local press, and Athletic Director Dan Radakovich failed to give Hewitt a vote of confidence before the ACC Tournament. But, after possibly being helping by Hewitt’s idea of taking away the players’ cell phones while in Greensboro last week (and planning to do so again in Milwaukee this weekend), the Jackets knocked off North Carolina, Maryland, and N.C. State before finally losing a close one to Duke in the conference tournament finals. Now, they go into Friday’s first round game against Oklahoma State riding that wave of momentum. The team is now definitely a threat to make some noise.

If you have watched the Jackets at all this season you know the strength of their team is down low with future lottery picks Gani Lawal and Derrick Favors. Favors, who is a likely candidate to be yet another one and done player for Georgia Tech, is coming off a strong ACC Tournament where he scored 22 points in the championship against the Blue Devils. He and Lawal, who is averaging slightly over 13 points per game, figure to give the Cowboys fits down low.

The key to beating OSU, and to making a deep run in the tournament, lies with point guard Iman Shumpert. He averaged ten points per game during an inconsistent regular season. Hewitt recently said, “If Iman is on his game, we’re really, really good.” Hewitt is exactly right. Unfortunately, Iman has not always been really, really good, as evidenced by his 111-87 assist to turnover ratio. He is also going to have his hands full guarding Big XII Player of the Year James Anderson.

Beat the Cowboys and Georgia Tech earned a likely matchup with Ohio State. I am not as big on Ohio State as my counterparts are, so I think it is quite possible that the Yellow Jackets could knock off the Buckeyes. If that happens, the rest of the Midwest region better take note!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NIT Winner or NCAA Tournament Loser Debate… Winning a Losing Game is Still Losing

March 18, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Bleacher Fan.

The NCAA Tournament begins today. On behalf of The Sports Debates, I truly hope you enjoy an event that is madness, and I also hope you manage to find time to do a little work (but not too much) over the next two days. In the meantime, we had an interesting debate yesterday surrounding the NCAA Tournament and the NIT, which actually started Tuesday night, in you missed it. Is it better to have a quick exit in the Big Dance or an extended run in the NIT? Obviously, it’s better for the program overall to make the NCAA Tournament. That falls under the “duh” category. But then wins and losses come into play.

Bleacher Fan gave us a flashback to April of last year when he compared the situations of Wake Forest and Utah to Penn State. The Demon Deacons and the Utes were sitting at the house being couch potatoes with the rest of America while the Nittany Lions were playing for an NIT championship at Madison Square Garden. An analogy was then made to lottery tickets, something that was near and dear to my heart upon the grand event of my 18th birthday.

Babe Ruthless comes right out and calls the NIT the loser’s bracket. Sure, there are some talented teams in the NIT but the majority of the teams with the “fortune” of playing in the NIT aren’t very good. The NIT is second rate and, according to Babe Ruthless, it’s like receiving a “glorified participation trophy.” In a twist, Babe used my introduction to prove his point that teams like Baylor and Notre Dame parlayed strong NIT runs into NCAA tournament berths the following season. The goal was not to get back to the NIT. It was to take it a step further. Basically, Babe feels strongly that it is essentially better to be a loser in a winner’s bracket than a winner in a loser’s bracket.

I, the judge, am awarding this victory to Babe Ruthless. Having been fans of teams that have made it to both the NCAA tournament and the NIT (a.k.a. “Not In Tournament”), I understand the joy of being invited to the dance and the agony of having the bubble popped. I also understand that there is something to be said for making a strong run in the NIT. It gives the seniors more games to play and gives the fans more chances to watch their team in action.

Let me ask you this: Before Bleacher Fan mentioned that Penn State won the NIT last year, did you actually know that? I couldn’t recall it. Yet, I can recall that in last season’s NCAA tournament Cleveland State knocked off Wake Forest. I can also tell you, and I am sure Sports Geek can as well, that tenth seeded Michigan knocked off seventh seeded Clemson in the first round (Editor’s note: Sports Geek does recall that.). While I am sure the loss left a bitter taste in the mouths of all Clemson players, I feel that once they looked back on it they had a better feeling on how their season went… better than they would have if they had made a deep run in the NIT.

I am not convinced a deep run by Virginia Tech or Mississippi State in the NIT this season would erase the disappointment of not being selected for the NCAA, even if they knew going in they would lose in the first round. Congrats to Babe Ruthless!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.