The Most Anticipated Olympic Event Debate – Somber Mood Surrounds Tense Luge Competition

February 15, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.



What a tragic way to begin the 2010 Winter Olympics. Georgian luge athlete Nodar Kumaritashvili lost control of his sled after hitting a pipe in a training run, was thrown from it, and then later died in a Whistler hospital from injuries sustained from the crash.

Certainly this is a strange prism through which to see something that should be fun, like an “anticipated event.” But, the sliding track in Whistler has been under suspicion for months, and not solely because of the rumored dangers of the track. Officials also restricted access to the track, making it difficult for lugers to get experience on the track – unless a luger happened to belong to the Canadian team.

The track is designed for lugers to reach speeds upward of 90 miles per hour on runs down the hill. The sharp blades of the luge, and its reactive steering, make movements at high speeds dangerous for even the most seasoned and well-rehearsed athletes. Throw inexperience and limited track time in the mix, and track officials have been downright negligent in how they have managed the training leading up to the event.

Interviews with athletes and team managers after the effects of the accident were publicized revealed anger and frustration about Kumaritashvili’s death specifically because of the correlation between his youthful inexperience (only 21-years of age) and the limited track time. The younger the luger, the less experience they have. The less experience a luger has, the greater the need for track time. Like every other luger, Kumaritashvili was granted only limited access to the track, perpetuating inexperience and leading some to speculate the outcome of the training run on a rainy February 12th could have been different.

That, and the track was downright dangerous… needing construction work the night before the event was scheduled to begin.

Kumaritashvili’s accident came on the heels of another 12 training accidents in the week leading up to the event. Many Olympians are saying the right things in support of the IOC and other governing bodies responsible for athlete safety. However, some apprehension now surrounds the locker rooms of the athletes as they prepare to take on one of the most challenging tracks in the sport’s history.

While inexperience may have played a role in Kumaritashvili’s accident, Armin Zoeggeler, a two-time champion in luge, also had an accident on the track earlier in the day. He walked away, but the lesson was evident – even the best, most experience athletes struggled with Whistler’s challenging course.

Without sounding macabre, the entire world was genuinely sitting in anticipation about the luge events – and will be anticipating other sliding events – at this Olympics because of the additional amount of danger. Say what you want about the human condition, more intrigue surrounds the pending sliding events than it would normally at the Olympics because of the additional level of danger. The folks that watch stock car racing for accidents tuned in for the luge, and will watch other sliding events. While I am not that type of viewer, the pending investigation must be followed through on all the way, and the outcome of the investigation is important to the future of sports safety and governance.

The tragic story of Nodar Kumaritashvili is not yet finished. A sure-to-be-launched full-scale investigation into how the track was both managed and constructed will create furor around other sliding events at this year’s Olympic games. Viewers will tune in to follow this story as it unravels. Despite the sad circumstances surrounding the luge at the twenty-first Olympic games, the luge was the first of a string of sliding events that will be the most highly anticipated spectacle of the Olympics.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Most Anticipated Olympic Event Debate – I Have a Need for Speed

February 15, 2010

Read the arguments by Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.



As I have told my colleagues over and over, I am not a huge follower of the Olympics (Editor’s note: Uh…… WHY????????????). I realize that millions watched the opening ceremonies Friday night. I, however, was not one of them, as I was enjoying my first ever snowball fight with friends (hey, I live in the South… cut me some slack!). But I realize that the nation is captivated with the Olympics so I am doing my best to enjoy them this year. I will agree there are some good storylines, and two of those are highlighted by Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan. I am coming to you as the ultimate casual Olympic fan, so I am looking forward to some of the speed skating events.

Now, when I think “skating” in the Olympics, I think back to my younger years and watching the Nancy Kerrigan-Tonya Harding saga unfold before our very eyes. But, that is figure skating. Speed skating is actually the fastest, human powered, non-mechanical aided sport in the world.

At their peak time, skaters can reach speeds of more than 60 kilometers per hour. Folks, that is fast. It usually takes place on a 400 meter oval ice rink. Athletes usually compete in pairs and they race around the rink in counter-clockwise fashion as they change lanes once per lap to equalize the distance covered.

As I write this, an incident has popped up between the Chinese and the South Koreans that could add drama to an upcoming speed skating event. China and South Korea have developed quite a rivalry over the years. Apparently, a member of the Chinese delegation was taping the South Koreans during a practice session. South Korea coach Choi-Guang Bok did not like this, and doing his best Bobby Knight impersonation, hurled water bottles toward the onlooker. It is perfectly legal to record practice, and it remains to seen if this incident gets into the head of the South Koreans.

Another cool thing about speed skating is that it goes on throughout the Olympics. You have different types of speed skating on various surfaces. There are events going on this afternoon all the way up to the 27th, when the men’s and women’s team pursuit finals take place.

Again, I do not pretend to be a huge follower of the Olympics. But I enjoy seeing competition involving speed. I have a need for speed sometimes. And watching speed skating will give me a chance to watch the best skaters in the world race for the gold medal!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best NBA All-star Game Contest Debate – Shoot Stars Truly Celebrates Basketball

February 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.




One of the great things about the NBA all-star weekend – and one of the primary factors that separates the NBA’s mid-season celebration from all of the others – is that it truly combines entertainment and it translates well to television. From H-O-R-S-E to the skills competition to the game itself, each event at the all-star game each season shows off the best young, bright talent in the league and celebrates everything that makes the NBA great. It mixes celebrity and superb basketball. It is fun, but not without competitiveness and drama.

With all of the compelling entertainment surrounding the NBA all-star weekend this season, the one competition that stands above the rest in my opinion is the Shooting Stars.

For readers unfamiliar with the Shooting Stars competition, it is simple. Each “team” is comprised of three players – a retired yet well-known NBA player, a current NBA star, and a current WNBA player. There are five spots on the floor where one shot has to be made from each spot. The final shot that has to be made is from half-court. The team to make the shots in the least amount of time wins. Obviously the half-court shot is the most challenging… yet this contest never fails to surprise as to which player will make the last second half-court shot. Sometimes the WNBA player swishes it, other times the current NBA player makes it (though this seems like the least frequent outcome). My personal favorite is when players like former Detroit Pistons great Bill Laimbeer and former Chicago Bull and all-time top 50 NBA player Scottie Pippen drain the toughest shot.

The 2010 version of the game promises to be very entertaining. The four teams represented are:

  • Team Dallas: Dirk Nowitzki, WNBA player Becky Harmon, and former Houston Rockets guard and current TNT Analyst Kenny Smith.
  • Team Atlanta: Joe Johnson, WNBA player Angel McCoughtry, and former Atlanta Hawk Steve Smith.
  • Team Los Angeles: Pau Gasol, WNBA player Marie Ferdinand-Harris, and former L.A. Clipper Brent Barry.
  • Team Sacramento: Tyreke Evans, WNBA player Nicole Powell, and former Sacramento Kings forward Chris Webber.

Represented is a great group of players with a range of skills. No, it’s not LeBron and Kobe, but – as good as those guys are – they are not suited for Shooting Stars because of the way the game is celebrated by this competition.

Here is what it does so much better than any other competition during the weekend, game included: It celebrates the entire league and the game of basketball… past, present, and future.

Shooting Stars embodies everything that was, is, and will be great about professional basketball. It showcases current stars, introduces new players and styles of basketball to diehard fans with the presence of WNBA players, and reminds us of the players from our youth that made us all fall in love with the game in the first place.

The NBA does not focus on this event as it should. It is teachable entertainment, and any NBA fan should embrace this great event.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Best NBA All-star Game Contest Debate – Celebrating Basketball’s Future

February 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.



The NBA does something special that no other league does. Their all-star game, like all professional leagues’ all-star games, is intended to celebrate ALL of the present “greats” of the game. What the NBA does differently, though, is celebrate ALL of their greats – past, present, and future.

The NBA past is honored in the league’s Shooting Stars event. Each team in the event includes one of the NBA’s “legends” who play in an exhibition match along with a current NBA star and a star from the WNBA.

As entertaining as that may be, though, the REAL excitement comes from the Rookie Challenge – a celebration of the NBA’s future.

While the Shooting Stars event is an entertaining exhibition, the Rookie Challenge is an opportunity for the brightest potential in the NBA to prove something to the rest of the world, that they deserve to play one day with the “big boys.” During the Rookie Challenge, one team of NBA Rookies (freshmen) take on a team of NBA second-year stars (sophomores) in a game with much more than just entertainment on the line.

To begin with, the game presents an opportunity for members of different NBA “classes” to earn some bragging rights. Take the NBA class of 2004 as an example. This class, which includes LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony, Dwayne Wade, and Chris Bosh, is regarded as one of the greatest classes of the modern era. Yet this group of future legends could not manage to stop a team which included guys like Marko Jaric, Ronald Murray, Nene, and Mike Dunleavy. Understandably, this was an exhibition game, but don’t you think the sophomore class of 2004 takes a little pride in knowing they put a 142-118 BEAT DOWN on a group of people who were already being lauded as the NBA’s next great generation?

In addition to the bragging rights, these “kids” have a special opportunity to be a part of the same stage as the current superstars of the game. No other league does that! Once again, this is an example of the NBA establishing (and honoring) its legacy by honoring past greats, present greats, and the FUTURE greats of the league, which is exactly what many of those participants will go on to become. In fact, since the NBA began hosting the Rookie Challenge in 1994, 62 different participants have gone on to play in at least one all-star game later in their careers, while countless others have found equal success in European leagues.

Last, the Rookie Challenge provides fans with a second all-star game at no extra charge (except for the fans in attendance). While the athletes invited to play in the Rookie Challenge may not be NBA all-stars, most of them have just come off of NCAA careers where they WERE perceived as all-stars. As such, we get treated to a college basketball all-star game of sorts.

Just imagine if the NFL put on an exhibition like this during the Pro Bowl weekend. This year you could have had a rookie team with Mark Sanchez, Knowshon Moreno, Percy Harvin, and Jeremy Maclin facing off against a sophomore team that would likely include Joe Flacco, Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, and DeSean Jackson. It might even be more exciting than the REAL Pro Bowl!

The NBA is proud to honor its legacy like no other league in professional sports. I can think of no better way to celebrate the NBA (and the sport of basketball) than by giving fans a taste of what the future may hold!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Best NBA All-star Game Contest Debate – The Slam Dunk Still Dunks the Rest of the Weekend

February 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.



I have always liked NBA all-star weekend. I enjoy most all of the events. This year, the actual game, which appears to be headed towards a battle of attrition with each passing day, falls on Valentine’s Day. Too bad so many of you guys will be stuck taking your valentine to the movies to see Dear John or Valentine’s Day! But, as you know, there are other televised events going out through the all-star weekend. And, despite all the turnover throughout the years (with stars choosing to bypass the event for various reasons) I still believe the slam dunk contest is the best event of the entire weekend.

Take a stroll with me down memory lane if you will. Go back to the mid to late 1980s. Superstars Michael Jordan and Dominque Wilkins battled it out in competitions that my friends and I talk about to this day. I have an old VHS cassette showcasing the 1988 Slam Dunk contest in Chicago, when Jordan defeated Wilkins in an epic battle in which, I might add, I still think Jordan received some home cooking scoring from the judges. Nevertheless, that year is perhaps the signature contest for this event.

Over the years the contest has become a chance for young players to make a name for themselves. Isaiah Rider, Harold Miner, Dee Brown, and Josh Smith are names that come to mind immediately without even looking it up. Even last year’s winner, Nate Robinson, won it in 2006 as a rookie, and up until his recent playing time dispute with the Knicks, that has been how most casual fans know about him. That and the fact that he is just a tad taller than former champion Spud Webb.

This year’s contest features Robinson (who may actually pull out with an injured groin), Shannon Brown, Gerald Wallace, and the winner of a Friday dunk-off between DeMar Derozan (who?) and Eric Gordon. I know what you are saying, because I am thinking the same thing. These are not big names. And you are right. NBA Commissioner David Stern and I would love nothing more to see a certain number 23 in the event. Shaquille O’Neal tried to talk up a possible contest between LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, and Vince Carter. Wouldn’t that have been a real treat to see?

But, despite the lack of big names in the event, it is still the best event of the weekend. Like the Home Run Derby for baseball, the Slam Dunk Contest is that event where the all-stars have their kids sitting on the court with them while they record the event with their video camera. It still has the buzz that I am not sure the other events have. Let’s hope it delivers once again!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Fans Voting For the All-Star Starters Debate – Fans Must Get Out Of Their Own Way

February 12, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.



Imagine a day at work. Your boss walks up to your desk and hands you a big project. He or she impresses on you tremendous responsibility of the project, and the opportunity is immense for you from a career standpoint. But, as the deadline approaches, you realize you have squandered that opportunity. You got most of the project right, but made one obvious, glaring error. What should your boss do? If your answer is, “Give me the next big project, too” you probably voted for Allen Iverson to be an NBA all-star in 2010.
.

As in other sports leagues, NBA Fans are entrusted with a tremendous responsibility. They must vote for the starting all-star rosters. This is an important responsibility for a couple of key reasons.

Unlike most of the other league’s all-star games, the NBA can actually play a real game. A real, entertaining game. Sure, the play will not be as physical, the game will feature more acrobatics than chippy plays… but the fans deserve to be treated to an excellent game featuring the best players. The potential that is the NBA all-star game can only be unlocked when the league’s best players are out on the floor. The current model of all-star selection does not deliver the best possible product, therefore the debate verdict is awarded to Babe Ruthless.

While the all-star game is important to fans, it is also important to players. Making the all-star game is a bargaining chip, a piece of leverage a player gets over a team when negotiating a contract. All-stars command a certain market rate, while non-all-star caliber players get the leftovers. Fans cannot be allowed to directly vote bargaining chips to players who do not deserve them. That type of power in the hands of the fans is bad for the entire process because fans then have more than just the ability to vote for their favorite players… they impact the financials of a game in a way they are grossly under qualified to.

Fans deserve better than themselves as voters. Allen Iverson’s inclusion in this game (before he pulled out for “personal matters”) means his career achievements will be viewed improperly. What is one of the primary criteria fans use to evaluate the success of a player at career’s end? All-star game selections. An undeserving player like Iverson – or as Babe Ruthless pointed out, Tracy McGrady’s near inclusion in the game – changes history’s perspective on a player and makes them appear more qualified for post-career accolades than they really are.

The Babe introduced Chauncey Billups’ idea for including fans in the voting process… allowing fans to vote for the reserves. But even that seemingly safe approach devalues the game itself because if Iverson is a bench player for the East, and a GOOD player occupies that same spot on the West’s bench, the West has a depth advantage. It is a competitive game. The sides should be equal.

Despite Bleacher Fan’s creative and delicious argument features one of my favorite analogies to date here on The Sports Debates, but the argument inherently demands that every fan’s opinion is valid when it comes to evaluating professional basketball talent. Babe Ruthless’ argument recognizes that some fans are better informed voters than others. With something as important as the all-star selection, dumb fans have too much power to skew results. Favorite players are not always the best players… unlike the ice cream flavor market. Since it is hard to allow only smart fans to vote, no fans voting is more fair for the quality of the game and for history’s perspective on a career.

I disagree with Bleacher Fan’s assessment (and commenter OG’s assessment) that the NBA serves only to entertain fans. For league executives and players fan entertainment is a byproduct of them doing their jobs well. The NBA exists to make money, for players, coaches, and regions. It is a business enterprise, fan supported.

The best point Babe Ruthless made, and what ultimately tipped the verdict, is the regional favoritism fans trend toward, and how it does not favor small market teams… no matter how good and deserving of all-star selection their players are (uh… did Babe take a page out of Loyal Homer’s book????). Babe makes a great point that the league must take actions to protect the integrity of the game from selfish, regional fan interests that devalue the very product they claim to serve.

If the all-star moniker did not carry so much weight and importance, Bleacher Fan’s argument would resonate more. For the game to entertain the fans in the way that Bleacher Fan rightly demands, the hardwood cannot feature a collection of favorites – it must be the greatest players in the league at a given time. Fans, by definition, are unable to consistently deliver that.

Bleacher Fan is correct that the NBA should pursue other means of getting fans involved in the sport. But selecting the all-star starting rosters is not it.

Babe Ruthless is correct, fans should not be selecting the starters for the all-star game, as they prove to make too many mistakes that devalue the game, inflate salaries, and warp history. Undeserving players like McGrady and Iverson should not even be on the ballot.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Fans Voting For the All-Star Starters Debate – How Involved Should Fans Be?

February 11, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.



Well, Allen Iverson is an all-star for the NBA. The star turned journeyman who is now with his second team this season and sporting much worse stats than his best seasons of years past. Back with Philadelphia this season Iverson is averaging under 15 points per game and shooting just over 40 percent. Not exactly amazing, all-star worthy numbers. Nevertheless, a seemingly undeserving Iverson was voted in as an all-star for the season by the fans. Therefore the question begs – should fans be allowed to vote for all-stars?

Here is how the all-star roster selections happen in the NBA. The fans choose the starters, other players and coaches choose the reserves. The rosters are solid for the most part, with Iverson as the one blemish. Now a player that dominates the ball will have something to prove in the all-star game. Not exactly the formula for compelling television.

In short, it is reasonable to confirm that the fans’ choice to vote Iverson into the all-star game is a bad one.

Sure, sometimes fans vote solely for their favorite players (just like plenty of media folks do, too). But, fans tend to also watch more games than “experts” do, since those experts are usually covering other games, playing in them, or coaching in them. Fans are sometimes able to take in more games, study more stats, and, thanks for other fan favorites like fantasy sports leagues, fans sometimes have a better sense of the league’s depth and the type of players that are incredibly valuable but float beneath the radar.

But, all fans are allowed to vote for the players, not just the smart, engaged, well-researched ones described above. And, in the defense of the media, they have often been covering the sport for years, seen thousands of players and careers start with promise and flame out. These reporters know good from bad, and perhaps deserve more respect from the public, and more involvement in choosing the league’s best players every season.

The question for The Sports Debates today – Should fans be allowed to vote for the players in the all-star game?

Bleacher Fan will argue that the fans do deserve the right to become further engaged with the game they love by voting for the all-stars while Babe Ruthless will argue they do not.

The way fans consume media and enjoy sports is changing. Should the NBA continue to allow fans a voice in its all-star starters despite flaws, or should the perception of the all-star vote and the meaning of a roster spot be preserved by the so-called expert voters?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Fans Voting For the All-Star Starters Debate – The NBA All-Star Shame: An American Travesty

February 11, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Bleacher Fan.



Americans like to vote. That is obvious. Look no further than American Idol to understand that. Last year this country cast nearly 100,000,000 votes for the American Idol season finale, which is shocking considering there were 125,225,901 votes (as reported by CNN) in 2008 during the American presidential election. But, Americans will vote for just about anything, given the opportunity. For example, South Carolina still allows the public to elect their state agriculture commissioner. Do you think that the average South Carolinian has a profound understanding of the agricultural needs of the Palmetto State? Probably not, but it provides one more office that Bubba gets to vote for, and that makes Bubba happy. So when the average American is offered the chance to vote for his favorite NBA player to be a starter in the all-star game, he is going to take it. Which is one step forward for democracy, and one giant leap backwards for the NBA.

Don’t get me wrong, democracy is great… just not for the NBA. Criticism of the NBA All-Star Game is abundant to say the very least, focused mainly on the selection process for the starters in the NBA All-Star Game. The starters are selected by the fans and well… this year a dud got through – Allen Iverson. AI was selected to this year’s all-star game in spite of his less than stellar numbers and the fact that he has played in just 19 games. Even more shocking than Iverson’s selection is the fact that a disgruntled and inactive Tracy McGrady very nearly made the team as well.

McGrady ranked high enough in the voting to have earned a spot as one of the two Western Conference guards selected for the all-star team. He was luckily surpassed by Steve Nash near the end of voting. McGrady’s election to the all-star team would have been a travesty. It would be similar to an NFL player in a contract holdout making the Pro Bowl. McGrady has played in just six games this season, after missing more than a month of the season to injury. He was all but released by the Rockets while they look to trade the disgruntled guard. His presence on the team would have completely sunk the credibility of the event, and his near selection exposes the fan’s election process as a flawed tool.

The selection of Allen Iverson, and the near selection of Tracy McGrady, even has other players publicly decrying the fan voting system. In reference to these two players connection to the all-star game, Denver Nuggets guard Chauncey Billups was quoted as saying, “”You end up having guys that are in that position that are taking away from some deserving guys.” Billups went on to suggest that players select the starters and the fans stay involved by selecting backups for the game.

Since today’s debate centers around the principles of democracy (and in honor of Iverson playing for the Philadelphia 76ers) I am going to solve this problem with a simple history lesson. NBA fans should not have the power to determine the starters in the all-star game for the same reasons the founding fathers created the Electoral College. First, minimize the influence of regional voting and second out of the fear of power in the hands of the uneducated masses.

The founding fathers feared that if the public was allowed to select the president directly they would simply vote in a regional candidate. In many cases that is exactly what happens when the public gets to vote players into the All-Star game. The masses often vote for a hometown hero (Loyal Homer) or a big market national icon (Babe Ruthless) rather than let statistical analysis and keen insight (Sports Geek) decide for them. Considering the fact that only five starters per conference are selected to represent the best in the entire NBA, it puts small market teams at a huge disadvantage. When the tug of regional loyalty and national exposure are so strong it is simply unfair to let the fans decide when so much is at stake.

As for the other great fear of our founding fathers, letting the masses wield such a great power, they believed that poor uneducated farmers would make self-serving selections that were not in the best interest of the country. Similarly NBA fans, while better educated than the average 18th century farmer, have demonstrated themselves incapable of selecting appropriate players. Actions need to be taken to protect NBA fans from themselves.

While I do not suggest the foundation of an NBA electoral college, I do encourage the stirrings of revolution. The NBA players, coaches, and fans in the know should demand that the NBA alter its all-star game selection process. After all, it’s the American thing to do.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Fans Voting For the All-Star Starters Debate – I Scream, You Scream, We ALL Scream for All Stars

February 11, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Babe Ruthless.



I am putting together an all-star list of my own. The list will feature the all-star ice cream flavors of 2010. There will be some obvious selections, such as Vanilla and Chocolate. After the “sure-things” are named, though, how do you go on to decide the rest of the list?

No matter which flavors make the list, people will challenge the validity of certain selections. I can hear it now

”What idiot thinks that Butter Pecan should be on the list?”

“Where is Mint Chocolate Chip? How did that NOT make the list?”

“If Chocolate, Vanilla, and Strawberry are already separately on the list, why is Neapolitan also up there?”

The list of questions and challenges to those selected would be as varied as the list of flavors itself. The reason for this is simple – it is a SUBJECTIVE list. My opinions on the ‘best’ ice cream flavors most likely differ greatly from yours. It is a matter of personal taste.

Even if the list were based on some objective ranking, such as the amount of scoops purchased last year for each flavor, you and I would still disagree at least partially on the end result. Likewise, even the decision to rank the flavors objectively, based on the number of scoops purchased, was still a subjective decision. Someone ultimately made the decision to use that as the method for ranking based on THEIR subjective opinion that it was the best method. They could have also used the amount of money spent on each flavor, the number of locations that carry that flavor, the list goes on and on.

In much the same manner, determining which players should constitute the NBA all-star rosters is entirely subjective. Someone must ultimately make the decision on which players deserve to be recognized as all-stars and why. It does not really matter what the criteria for that decision is, because there will always be people who disagree with it.

If the list were based solely on statistical performance, such as total points scored, there would still be grounds for disagreement. ”Player X may not have had as many total points as Player Y, but Player X gets a higher percentage of points for the minutes he plays.”

It is IMPOSSIBLE to create a list that EVERYONE would agree with. It just cannot happen. My opinions on those players who SHOULD be all-stars will be different from yours, and that is okay. The only thing that REALLY matters is that the criteria for ranking is consistent with everybody.

For the NBA, that method of consistent ranking is done through fan voting, which makes perfect sense to me. The NBA is a spectator sport, meaning that it serves as a production intended to entertain a crowd of spectators (fans). Without those fans, the NBA does not exist.

Although it may be an imperfect system (as I said, though, they are ALL imperfect), the NBA has made the decision to REWARD their collective fanbase for their ongoing support by giving them the opportunity to see their favorite players in one place. Those players will then participate in an exhibition game that is designed to – you guessed it – ENTERTAIN THE FANS!

Who cares if Allen Iverson got selected to the all-star team? I will tell you who cares – THE FANS! That is why he was chosen. Whether you or I believe he SHOULD have been selected is completely irrelevant. Clearly there were enough fans out there who DID believe he deserved it, and they get just as much of a say in the matter as I do. That is the beauty (and the risk) of a democratic system. Even if it is for only one day and in a game that does not count, the fans get the opportunity to let their voices be heard.

This is one of the few ways that professional sports organizations like the NBA can thank their fans in a real way, by giving them the ability to DIRECTLY influence the operation of the league. Why on earth would they want to stop that process?! The removal of fan voting from the NBA all-star process will only make things worse, not better. It may eliminate FAN subjectivity and bias from the process, but it will not eliminate subjectivity altogether. It WILL, however, upset the fans to know that their opinion is no longer solicited or valued by the NBA.

Of course, if the NBA does decide to one day eliminate fan voting, they could at least make up for it by instead giving their fans some of that delicious ice cream at every game!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NFL Hall of Fame Class of 2010 Debate – The Jerry Rice Factor

February 10, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Babe Ruthless and Loyal Homer.



There was no surprise that Jerry Rice was going to be voted into the Hall of Fame, in his first year of eligibility. There is a surprise, though, in that no other receiver even get a second glance, despite several very worthy candidates.

There were several players among the list of the final 15 candidates whose careers were built around absolutely dominating performances as receivers in the league. In addition to Rice there was Tim Brown of the Oakland Raiders, Cris Carter of the Minnesota Vikings, and Shannon Sharpe of the Denver Broncos and Baltimore Ravens. Yet, none of those players even made it out of the preliminary rounds of selection, despite very impressive credentials.

Shannon Sharpe

During his 14-year career, Sharpe completely redefined the tight end position. Sharpe was the most dangerous, explosive tight end to play the game since Ozzie Newsome. In fact, Sharpe surpassed Newsome in every single noteworthy statistic over the length of his should-be hall of fame career. In terms of statistics, Sharpe was the first tight end in NFL history to amass more than 10,000 receiving yards. Read the article from Babe Ruthless for further proof of Sharpe’s greatness.

Tim Brown

Tim Brown has more career receiving yards than HOFers like James Lofton, Steve Largent, and Art Monk. He ranks FOURTH on the NFL’s all-time list of receiving yards and also ranks FOURTH on the all-time receptions list. He ranks SIXTH on the all-time receiving touchdowns list.

Brown, who is already a College Football Hall of Fame inductee, was named to nine different Pro Bowls during his 16-year career. He is the only NFL receiver to catch at least 75 passes in ten consecutive seasons, and is the oldest player in NFL history to return a punt for a touchdown.

Cris Carter

Like Tim Brown, Cris Carter was one of the most prolific wide receivers during his career. His performance places him EIGHTH all-time on the NFL’s career receiving yards list, FOURTH all-time for receiving touchdowns, EIGHTH all-time in combined rushing/receiving touchdowns, and THIRD all-time in total receptions.

The Jerry Rice Factor

Each HOF nominee was to be considered on their own merits. Factors such as statistical success and big-game performances are measured. Sharpe, Brown, and Carter are each among the greatest players ever to suit up at their positions, they share 25 combined Pro Bowl selections, and were each named to the NFL’s all-decade team of the 1990s.

So what kept them out of the Hall of Fame? The answer is Jerry Rice.

This was the first year that Jerry Rice was eligible for induction. It does not matter how great Sharpe, Brown, and Carter were in comparison to the rest of NFL history because they were nothing when matched up against Rice. Fair or unfair, these players just do not compare to the greatest wide receiver (and perhaps the greatest player) who ever stepped onto the gridiron. Realistically, that is a standard that no one can match (except maybe Terrell Owens – IF he had a good quarterback, that is).

It is a shame that the voters were unable to separate the careers of Rice and his peers (and that is what Sharpe, Brown, and Carter were – peers). The Hall of Fame is where competition ends. It is no longer about determining who the best is, because they were all the best. The Hall of Fame is a fraternity of the best players to play the game, and yet three of the greatest ever were excluded.

I can only hope the voters get it right next year.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.