The NFL Most Deceiving Record Debate – Fear Not, They Are STILL the Bengals

September 30, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument and Loyal Homer’s arguments about the which team in the NFL has the most deceiving record.



It was not that long ago that many people (myself included) were discussing the fact that Marvin Lewis, head coach for the Cincinnati Bengals, was in danger of losing his job. What a difference three weekends can make!

After losing to the Denver Broncos on a last-second play during the season opener, Lewis and the Bengals responded by defeating the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers. As a result, the Bengals sit at 2-1 and are only one game behind the AFC North leading the Baltimore Ravens. It is safe to assume that fans in the Queen’s City are very excited about football again, and Lewis can sleep comfortably at night knowing that the temperature on his seat has been turned down (for the time being).

Leave it to Bleacher Fan to rain on the parade! Call it pessimism, cynicism, or any other kind of “ism” you can think of – I am not buying the hype.

It is fun to jump on a bandwagon, especially when those riding look like they are having fun! ESPN.com is on board, as they list the Bengals as the 11th best team in the NFL, moving them all the way up from 24th since their last power rankings. In similar fashion, CBSSports.com lists the Bengals as the 12th best team, and Sports Illustrated ranks them 13th.

As I was breaking down the Bengals’ performance over the first three weeks of the season I found the hype is the only thing the Bengals have going for them right now (well, that AND being fortunate enough to play in the SOUTHERN half of Ohio, not the NORTHERN half).

Week One – Cincinnati LOSES to the Denver Broncos by a score of 12-7

The only relevance from this game came in the final 11 seconds, when wide receiver Brandon Stokley caught a deflected ball to give the Broncos the win. It is true that the Bengals were leading in this game, and if not for that miraculous final play by Denver, it would be the Bengals – not the Broncos – sitting at 3-0 right now.

The fact remains, however, that the Bengals LOST this game. It does not matter how unlucky the team was, and it does not matter how competitive the team made the game. The Bengals allowed the Broncos the opportunity to win, and the Broncos capitalized. As for the caliber of Denver team that beat the Bengals three weeks ago, Cincinnati is still boasted as Denver’s most impressive win.

The Bengals LOST to the Denver Broncos.

Week Two – Cincinnati takes a page out of Denver’s book

The only difference between this game and the Denver game is that Green Bay was charged with a false-start penalty in the closing seconds. If not for that penalty, Green Bay was potentially on their way to attempt a game-tying touchdown that would have forced overtime. Instead, the Bengals were the beneficiaries of a lucky break, and BARELY won the game by a score of 31-24.

Week Three – Cincinnati BARELY beats a group of people dressed in Pittsburgh Steelers Uniforms

Pittsburgh deserves more blame for this game than the Bengals deserve credit.

The Steelers came into week one of their season buying a little TOO much into their own hype. They committed costly errors, and played a little too reckless and cocky. As a result, they NEARLY lost a game it SHOULD have had well in hand against the Tennessee Titans, and safety Troy Polamalu was injured in the process.

The Steelers have been paying for that overconfidence ever since. They lost to the Chicago Bears the following weekend, and allowed the Bengals to score a game-winning touchdown in the final seconds of the game (sound like a pattern yet?) during the week three matchup.

I have news for Bengals fans… if Troy Polamalu was on the field, this game would not have been close! The mistake that football fans and analysts everywhere are making is that they are reacting as if the Bengals defeated the 2008 Pittsburgh Steelers, not the 2009 version that is playing without one of their star players.

Stars have not performed, offensively

In three games this season, quarterback Carson Palmer has only thrown for 615 yards, and has thrown four touchdowns to four interceptions. His passer rating is a bleak 76.2!

Wide receiver Chad Ochocinco is tied for 30th in the NFL with only 14 receptions on the year, and has only caught one touchdown pass.

Running back Cedric Benson ranks at 21st in the NFL in yards per carry, averaging only 4.4 yards each time he touches the ball. He has rushed for 293 yards on the season, but 141 of those yards came in a single game against the Packers, who are among the bottom-ten in the NFL in rushing defense.

The current formula does not equal long-term success

The Bengals have failed to convince me that they are a legitimate contender in the NFL. They have yet to establish a comfortable lead of any kind in a game, and their offensive playmakers have underperformed thus far in the season.

Although the Bengals will most likely defeat the Cleveland Browns this weekend – moving to 3-1 on the season – the Bengals have an upcoming schedule that includes two games against the Baltimore Ravens, another matchup against the Steelers (who should have Polamalu back), the New York Jets, and the Minnesota Vikings. Luck has gotten the Bengals this far, but they are going to need a lot more than luck to survive the 2009 season. I just do not see it!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The NFL Most Deceiving Record Debate – Andy Reid Uses Misdirection, Fools Fans, League

September 30, 2009

Read Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan’s arguments about which team they believe has the most deceiving record in the NFL.



The headline fits. Andy Reid is putting together one heckuva a coaching job so far in the 2009 season. He signed quarterback he did not need in Michael Vick, he unexpectedly lost a quarterback he DID need with Donavan McNabb’s injury, and he is getting much more of a quarterback he was not sure he even wanted in Kevin Kolb.

After a 1-3 preseason (like THAT matters), the Philadelphia Eagles have looked quite solid with a 2-1 record as the team enters its bye week. The Eagles are currently second in the NFC East behind the New York Giants. The team has overcome the potential distraction of Michael Vick’s presence as McNabb seems to remain the team’s leader despite his injury.

Everything seems to point to a great season for the Eagles, right? Wrong. The Philadelphia Eagles have the league’s most deceiving win-loss record.

After the team returns from the bye week it will host the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, a team that is thanking its lucky stars the Cleveland Browns are so bad. Then the Eagles hit the road to face the 1-2 Oakland Raiders and the 1-2 Washington Redskins – you know, the team that just lost to the DETROIT LIONS. It is hard to imagine an easier schedule in the entire league. It is very possible that the team ends up 5-1 after the first two months of the season are in the books.

But, that is when the wheels will fall off the Eagles’ first class train ride to Miami for Super Bowl XLIV.

When the calendar turns to November, the season becomes more difficult and the team’s true nature will be revealed. The Eagles play five games in November, starting by hosting the New York Giants and Dallas Cowboys before hitting the road to face the San Diego Chargers and the Chicago Bears. The final game of the month is at home against the struggling Redskins. November may change the Eagles 5-1 fortunes as they play much tougher defenses and offenses that will test the team’s limits.

The season does not get any easier in December, either. The Eagles play the Atlanta Falcons in Atlanta – think they will boo Michael Vick? – then the Giants in New York before hosting a resurgent San Francisco 49ers and the league’s best defense to date, the Denver Broncos. Then they play at Dallas to end the season.

A strong start is vital if the team believes it has any chance to make the playoffs. The Eagles must bank early victories against subpar teams to ready itself when the schedule becomes more difficult when the weather turns colder.

The Eagles also struggle with injuries year in, year out. Running back Brian Westbrook has never avoided injured reserve for an entire season. McNabb has been injured more often in recent years, too. The Eagles have already lost four players for the entire season are playing with a depleted linebacking corps and secondary.

The Eagles also play in a very difficult division where the Cowboys and Giants are two of the elite teams in the entire league. The Wild Card spots are more uncertain than ever before, too, considering the emergence of the NFC North as a decent division and the strength of the Falcons and New Orleans Saints in the NFC South. For the Eagles to have a shot at returning to playoff glory, early wins must be combined with the capacity to survive the season physically and emotionally.

With a depleted, injury-riddled team and an increasingly difficult schedule on the horizon, the Philadelphia Eagles have the most deceiving record in the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The NFL Most Deceiving Record Debate – Undefeated but Still Aways To Go

September 30, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that Philadelphia’s record is the most deceiving, while Bleacher Fan argues that the record of the Bengals is the most deceiving.



The NFL is arguably my favorite sports league, as my passion for it has taken off in the past eight years especially due to fantasy football. I watch and read about the NFL as much as I possibly can. There are some teams that appear to be for real (New Orleans and Baltimore come to mind quickly) and there are some teams that appear headed for long, miserable seasons (Cleveland and St. Louis qualify for that category). But today, The Sports Debates is looking at which NFL team has the most deceiving record. After taking a quick look up and down the standings, I have determined that the 3-0 record of the Denver Broncos is the most deceiving.

The Broncos entered the season with a firestorm of controversy. First, new head coach Josh McDaniels and quarterback Jay Cutler failed to get on the same page and Cutler was traded to Chicago. Then, there was all of the off the field controversy with wide receiver Brandon Marshall. When the season finally began the Broncos were trailing late in the first game… VERY LATE… when the other Brandon, Mr. Stokely, grabbed a tipped pass and raced 87 yards for a touchdown in the waning seconds to defeat the shocked Cincinnati Bengals.

The Broncos then followed that miracle with a 27-6 victory over the high-powered Cleveland Browns (9.7 points per game through three games… only the St. Louis Rams at eight points per game are worse)! To follow that up, the team had a tough road game in Oakland Raiders (12 points per game). The Browns, Rams, and Raiders appear among the league’s worst teams. But do not get too comfy out there, Denver fans! The next five games are against Dallas, New England, at San Diego, at Baltimore, and against Pittsburgh.

I am not trying to hate on the Broncos. They have a decent team. I am not sure Kyle Orton is the answer at quarterback. Sports Geek would probably agree with me on that (editor’s note: Sports Geek DOES agree. Enthusiastically). But the Broncos do have two solid running backs in Correll Buckhalter and Knowshown Moreno, a rookie out of Georgia. And Denver still has Marshall at wide receiver, which is a good thing (when he is a law abiding citizen).

Does anyone see Denver winning the AFC West? I do not. I believe the Chargers are the class of the AFC West and could very well be 4-4 after the next five games. However, for the time being, the Broncos should enjoy being one of the seven teams in the NFL with a 3-0 record even though no one seems to believe they are one of the seven best teams. Enjoy it while you can, Denver, because rough times are ahead!<br

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Value of Hazing Debate – Totally Unnecessary

September 30, 2009

Read the debate intro, Sports Geek’s argument that hazing is unnecessary, and Bleacher Fan’s argument that hazing has real value.



I will recap the arguments made by both interested parties before rendering my decision first. Then, as always, we encourage feedback. So, feel free to leave us a comment or two at the bottom of the page.

Bleacher Fan’s argument stated that hazing promotes teamwork and unity. The argument provided a poignant personal example from Bleacher Fan’s younger years about activities at the local fire department, successfully illustrated the fact that certain bonding exercises build up the concept of teamwork. Bleacher Fan’s main point was to illustrate that no one person is more important than a team, and that “hazing” helps instill that attitude.

Sports Geek, on the other hand, outlines three points in trying to prove that hazing is bad for team sports. The Geek stated that hazing is a waste of time, that it is bad for team chemistry, and quite simply, that hazing is stupid (Oh my, he said the “S word”)! Also linked in the argument is an article that lists 40 sports hazing incidents that have had a negative impact. If you did not click on the link in the argument, here it is again. It is amazing – and maybe even a little disturbing – to read that a majority of these situations took place in high school.

After reviewing the arguments from both sides, I have decided to award the victory to Sports Geek!

While I appreciate the experience Bleacher Fan had while hand washing fire trucks and ambulances, I am not really sure it fits in this particular case. We are discussing “team sports.” While working at a fire department is most definitely a team assignment (God bless all the men and women who work at a fire department… I hope you all realize the sacrifices and the dangers they experience), it is not a sport. Bleacher Fan tried to correlate that experience to something happening in sports (even linking Michael Crabtree, who would probably not be a fan of The Sports Debates at this point). But, the main “thesis” of the argument is built around the fire department. In this particular situation, it does not fit.

Sports Geek, however, won me over with his link about the times hazing was taken too far. Some of these incidents are just totally unnecessary and, quite frankly, uncalled for. Sports Geek also pointed out that hazing, if done inappropriately, can lead to legal problems for all involved parties.

Agree? Disagree? What constitutes hazing?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Value of Hazing Debate – Nobody Wins When Hazing Happens In Sports

September 29, 2009

Read the debate intro and Bleacher Fan’s argument that hazing is acceptable in sports.



See how long you can hold your breath. Now see if you can bend a spoon with your mind. Now haze someone. What do all of these activities have in common? They are all pointless with zero redeeming value.

Hazing is bad for sports for three primary reasons.

Reason #1: Waste of Time

Playing sports, at either the collegiate level or the professional level, requires an enormous amount of time. Using football as an example, there is practice time, stretching time, film room time, rep time, conditioning time, weight lifting time, playbook study time… plus all the stuff people normally do like sleep and eat. If a player is a good player, then they have media time, autograph signing time, so on and so forth. With all of those elements necessary to the life of an athlete, why would an athlete build extra time into their schedule for a pointless waste of time like hazing a teammate? The time it takes to plan a hazing incident, perpetrate it and deal with the aftermath is all time better spent preparing for a game. Plus, it can get a player into unnecessary, easily avoidable legal trouble.

Reason #2: Bad for Team Chemistry

Not everyone in every locker room wants to haze a person. As in any social situation, there are players who will side with the ones who are hazing a player, and players who will defend the player who is being hazed. It is human nature to take sides. As those sides become more prominent they become more divisive and drive a wedge between a team. You know what a team is? It is a group of people working toward a COMMON goal. Any behavior that distracts from the common goal should be immediately eliminated from the team dynamic. And, it should not be up to the coaches to eliminate a negative activity. If everyone on the team truly is working toward the same common goal, then none of them would be willing to engage in activity may harm the team dynamic.

Reason #3: Hazing is Stupid

Hazing is stupid. It is designed, supposedly, as a way to welcome new players into a team. In reality it is the old, established guard of the team making newcomers feel unwelcome. How is that in any way a characteristic of a winning team?

Reason #4: Rite of Passage

Either a player contributes to a winning team or they do not. There is no middle ground. It is not more complicated than that. Therefore, labeling hazing as a rite of passage for a new player on a team is ludicrous. A rite of passage should always be focused on the task at hand. The first hit in the NFL is a rite of passage – something everyone must encounter as they grow. Hazing is not something everyone must encounter.

There is a substantial difference between a hazing incident and a prank (a prank defined as many of the examples Loyal Homer provided in the intro). Frankly, Coye Francies of the Cleveland Browns overreacted. That sounded like a harmless prank. More often than not in sports, hazing turns violent and can scar emotionally.

Here is a list of more than 40 sports hazing incidents that have a negative outcome. Each was avoidable. None took place on a championship team. If the goal is winning championships, it appears that hazing must be eliminated.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Value of Hazing Debate – Thank You Sir, May I Have Another?

September 29, 2009

Read the debate intro and Sports Geek’s argument that the practice of rookie hazing does not hold any value.



The term ‘hazing’ today carries a very negative connotation. When people hear the word ‘hazing’ most immediately envision the cruel (and often illegal) TORTURE of some poor college student who is simply seeking acceptance into a fraternal society.

Hazing to that extent is bad, and should be condoned by no one!

There are times and places, though, where hazing (in moderation) can be perfectly acceptable and can actually ADD value to an organization. Most often, that value comes in the form of increased camaraderie and team unity.

I will say again that duct-taping a rookie to the goalposts and leaving them there overnight is not what I am referring to.

The REAL intention behind the practice of hazing is to instill within a newcomer the idea that no single person individually is more important than the team collectively. There are certain organizations and groups (such as professional sports teams) where teamwork and unity are VITAL to the success of the team.

The best way for me to describe the value of hazing is to share a personal (and positive) experience of my own.

While still a student in high school, I had the privilege and opportunity to work within the local Fire Department within my city. Nowhere is teamwork and unity more important than among that very brave and honorable group of men and women.

Within the particular station-house that I was working (‘Station No. 4’), the team adopted a unique method of hazing that I found to be very positive, productive, and successful. That was the requirement that rookies (usually they come in groups) personally hand-wash all of the station vehicles, such as the ambulance and fire engine.

First, it should be noted that hand-washing the vehicles is a task performed regularly by the department. The vehicles must be properly maintained, and since they will not fit through a normal carwash, it must be done by hand. Also, it is not the rookies’ responsibility to perform this task EVERY time it is needed until the next batch of rookies is welcomed. Instead, this is a one-time experience that is used to teach an important message to rookies on their first day in-house. Then the responsibility is once again shared by everyone.

It is a form of hazing that helps drive home the point that no individual is above the others. There are menial tasks that must be done, and you might as well get used to having to do things you do not like from time-to-time. The next time you do this “we will be working right beside you, helping you along the way.”

In addition to that message, it is also a very educational form of hazing. It helps the rookie learn firsthand the equipment they will be working with (by teaching them how to properly disassemble and reassemble any mechanisms that must be removed in order to be used/maintained), and it also helps instill a sense of greater pride for the organization. The number on the station house (and its vehicles) is the symbol that you, as a Fire Safety Officer, represent. When a ‘Station No. 4’ rig drives by, you should be PROUD that you are a part of that group, and you should strive to be a represent that group in a positive manner.

Even though I was in high school at the time, I was not exempt from this rule, and so I (along with one other rookie) spent a day doing “the housework.” To this day (nearly 15 years later), I still proudly boast any time I see ‘Station No. 4’ that it was behind THOSE doors that I worked with some of the finest men and women in our city! That pride started on day one, when I was taught to appreciate the value of being a part of that team.

While professional sports are considerably less serious a profession that Fire Safety work, the necessity of teamwork is no less vital to the success of that organization. It is very important for a player within a football team to understand right away that they are not individually more important than the team collectively.

Michael Crabtree could use that lesson right about now, huh?

The level of ego in professional sports is completely ridiculous. There are athletes who believe they are above everyone else (including the law, sometimes), and who operate with such an overblown sense of self-worth and entitlement that they believe they alone are worthy of walking this earth, and the rest of us should feel grateful to even have the opportunity to breathe the same air that they do.

Professional sports could use MORE hazing like that of the Fire Department, not less. It provides an opportunity for positive reinforcement, education, and develops a sense of team unity and pride. It sends a clear message that no one is more important than the team.

Check your ego at the door, because we are all in this together and no one can succeed individually until we all learn to succeed as a team!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Value of Hazing Debate – Does Hazing Belong in Team Sports?

September 29, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument that hazing does not add value to team sports and Bleacher Fan’s argument that it does add value to team sports.



There are three things that are guaranteed in life: death, taxes, and the hazing of rookies/freshmen. At my high school in Georgia it was fairly common for freshmen to get hazed by seniors. The main course of action was for a senior to give a wedgie to a freshman. It was just considered standard procedure. This Loyal Homer considers himself lucky. I was fortunate enough to have a good friend who was 300 pounds and a starting offensive lineman for my high school’s football team. He actually went to the University of Georgia on a football scholarship. He was also my next door neighbor, and believe me, I stayed pretty close to him for most of my freshman year. I was a 14-year-old, four-eyed freshman who was not interested in getting a wedgie! He definitely looked after me! Thanks Randall!

If you were in a fraternity in college, or if you are familiar with how the “system” works, then you know all about the hazing that new pledges have to go through to gain membership into that particular fraternity.

Hazing also goes on in sports. It has been going on for years and often provides funny situations. Maybe the rookies have to take the luggage of the veterans to the airplane at the airport. Maybe they have to make a quick run to Kentucky Fried Chicken to get buckets of fried chicken for the offensive lineman. Maybe they have to pick up the tab at dinner.

The reason we have chosen to debate the value of hazing is because of a recent incident involving Cleveland Browns rookie Coye Francies. Upset at being the victim of a prank, Francies stormed into the locker room after practice, bringing with him a full Gatorade bucket of ice, and began slinging ice at various players in the locker room. Francies then began to swing his arms towards safety Abram Elam before being separated by teammates. Francies was escorted out of the room as cooler heads prevailed. The Browns are trying to downplay the incident and head coach Eric Mangini has said that the incident was just a rookie overreacting and the players essentially said the same thing.

That situation leads to today’s debate question.

Is hazing necessary in today’s sports world? Does it provide value to team sports?

Bleacher Fan will argue that hazing provides benefits to a team and Sports Geek will argue that hazing really does not provide value to team sports.

The floor is yours. And, while you are at it, the judge wants a snack. How about stopping by Dairy Queen and buying me a large Oreo blizzard?

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Fumbling the BCS Debate – Mike Gundy, Cowboys Give T. Boone Pickens Buyer’s Remorse

September 28, 2009

Read Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer’s argument about who they believe fumbled their chance at potential BCS glory already this season.



In 2007 T. Boone Pickens, the 80-year-old oil turned new energy tycoon got out his huge checkbook. As one of the more famous graduates from Oklahoma State University, when he gets his checkbook out, folks notice. Folks take FURTHER notice when that check turns out to be for $165M… and is classified as a “gift.” Generous.

That donation, combined with the existing trust and a boatload of wise investments, left the school with a high class problem: How do we invest $343M? Needless to say, as happy as tennis coach James Wadley was to hear about the gift, the football program was the squeaky wheel deserving of a whole boatload of grease. And they got it in the sum of $120M to be turned into new offices, new locker rooms, new training facilities, and additional seating in an enclosed portion of the team’s stadium. The team was also built a multi-purpose indoor team training facility… in addition to the three other practice fields built for the program. Surely it is an impressive sight for any recruit to behold. In 2007, though the program finished just 7-6, it was going places.

When the calendar turned to 2008 expectations were ramped up. Their conference was never better. Though Oklahoma State lost three conference games, they lost to first ranked Texas, second ranked Texas Tech, and third ranked Oklahoma. Though the bowl loss to Oregon was suspect, the team was still riding a high in the offseason.

Expectations continued to build for the upcoming 2009 season. An opening weekend game against tough non-conference rival and top ten BCS favorite Georgia was just what the doctor ordered for a team poised to make an early national championship run. The Cowboys would play their highly ranked chief rivals for Big XII and BCS glory. The team had a soft mid-year non-conference schedule that would function for stat-padding their Heisman contenders while serving as walk-throughs for the freshman to gain experience. All the team had to do was “take care of what they could control” – which is much easier when backed by a $120M endowment!

Oh, and the program had some highly touted Heisman Trophy contenders. In 2008, quarterback and team leader Zac Robinson tossed over 3,000 yards and 25 touchdowns against just ten interceptions. Running back star Kendall Hunter notched 1,555 yards and an excellent 16 touchdowns while averaging six and a half yards per carry. Wide receiver Dez Bryant grabbed 87 passes for 1,480 yards and a whopping 19 touchdowns. All three were in Heisman conversations when the year started. The team, and its stars, were poised for greatness in 2009.

Instead they blew it, more than any other team in college football. Oklahoma State had the funding. Oklahoma State had the perfect schedule tailor-made for a title run. Oklahoma State had the leadership and star power to make a run at the sport’s most important trophy – a championship.

Now, once the media darlings and sleeper BCS picks for the Big XII South, conference, and even BCS title, the Cowboys are again relegated to also-ran status after a week two loss to an unranked Houston team. Programs that are ready to make the leap into the elite category simply do not make these mistakes. They take no opponents off. They refuse to allow 45 points to an unranked team. The lofty top five ranking and national scrutiny were apparently too much for the Cowboys to handle… even if $120M is not.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Fumbling the BCS Debate – Sometimes, Your “Best” Just Isn’t Good Enough

September 28, 2009

Read Sports Geek’s argument and Loyal Homer’s arguments about the which NCAA football team has lost their chance to play in a BCS game this season.



Four weeks ago, The Sports Debates had an argument about which team ranked outside of the top ten at that time had the best shot of breaking up the traditional BCS party. The team I felt at the time had that best opportunity was the California Golden Bears.

Within my argument, I spelled out my reasons for why the Bears were a dangerous team, and why I considered them a threat to the USC Trojans within the Pac-10. Those reasons included a relatively weak schedule, and the very dangerous running back, Jahvid Best.

I also discussed exactly what Cal would need to accomplish in order to see that BCS dream come to fruition. Two of those accomplishments were to first defeat Oregon, and then to defeat Southern Cal. I argued at the time that if California could defeat Oregon (whom I expected to struggle early in the season under their new head coach Chip Kelly), it could position itself for a Pac-10 showdown at home against a very young and vulnerable USC team.

Leading up to last weekend’s matchup, everything went as planned for Cal. As predicted, the Ducks did struggle early, falling out of the top 25 after a week-one loss on the road at Boise State (star running back LeGarrette Blount was also lost for the season in the process). California, on the other hand, started off the season by winning in VERY impressive fashion, outscoring their first three opponents (Maryland, Eastern Washington, and Minnesota) by a combined score of 146-41. As a result, California had climbed ahead of USC in the rankings, moving all the way up to the sixth position.

Then came the showdown with Oregon, which is when the good times ended for the Bears.

Last weekend, the Oregon Ducks EMBARRASSED the sixth ranked California Golden Bears, defeating their PAC-10 cohorts 42-3. During the game, THEN-Heisman hopeful Jahvid Best (he should NOT be hopeful anymore) managed to rush for just 55 yards on 16 attempts as the Duck defense completely shut down an explosive California offense (the Bears only managed to gain 207 total yards of offense in the game). On the other side of the ball, California’s defense did not fare any better as they gave up 22 second-quarter points, putting the game out of reach before halftime.

Had the Bears been able to pull off the win, they would have entered PAC-10 play with a victory, would have climbed into the top-five in rankings (thanks to a loss by GREATLY overrated Ole Miss), and would have been poised to host a USC team that had proven their vulnerability by losing to Washington two weeks earlier (good call, Sports Geek). Instead, the loss puts California at 0-1 in the Pac-10 BEHIND Oregon, with a matchup against USC looming on the horizon. As a side note, the 42-3 score marks the worst loss in history for California when they entered the game ranked in the top ten (thanks to ESPN.com for THAT obscure stat of the day!)

Unlike USC, a team that has already defeated a BCS-caliber opponent in Ohio State and could potentially get an at-large BCS invitation, California needed to win the PAC-10 if they wanted to reach the BCS. That meant beating Oregon AND USC. They were unable to beat Oregon, and their BCS hopes are now gone! In order to win the PAC-10 now, they have to win out the rest of their season (including a victory over USC), AND they need Oregon to lose to USC and ONE MORE PAC-10 opponent (not to mention the fact that they also need all of the OTHER PAC-10 teams to lose at least one game). I just do not see it happening.

California was the top-ranked PAC-10 team, and had every opportunity to play in the BCS in January. After a blowout loss to an unranked in-conference opponent, they can kiss the BCS goodbye!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


The Fumbling the BCS Debate – BYU Blows Golden Opportunity

September 28, 2009

Read Bleacher Fan and Sport Geek’s argument for which team they believe fumbled their chance at a BCS berth.



We are four weeks into the college football season. Some teams that started at the top are still there (see Florida and Texas). Some teams began at the top but have fallen back a bit with early losses (see Ohio State, Oklahoma, and Southern Cal). Other teams are making a surprising run (see Houston and TCU). While it is still relatively early in the season, some teams have absolutely blown their chance to play in a BCS game. But, no team choked as much as the BYU Cougars.

The Cougars came into the season ranked in the top 25 in both the Associated Press poll (20th)and the coaches poll (24th). They started the season off with a game in Arlington, Texas against the Oklahoma Sooners. It was a game not many expected the Cougars to win. But, behind a strong game from quarterback Max Hall (328 passing yards), the Cougars upset the landscape of the BCS early on with a shocking 14-13 victory.

Cougar Nation was making noise and college football fans were taking note. Hall was sneaking up on some Heisman contender lists, too. Talk had began about what would happen if BYU finished with an undefeated season. Surely they could get past an average FSU team that was making the trip out west, right?

WRONG!!!

Not only did they lose but they got embarrassed in their home stadium! 54-28!!!!!! The Cougars were put to sleep, and so were their BCS chances! For a conference that is screaming for BCS attention, it was a devastating loss, not only for the Cougars but for the entire Mountain West Conference. We have debated on this website whether or not the MWC deserves an automatic BCS bid. What leg does the MWC have to stand on now that it has been proven that BYU cannot even play a competitive game on its home field with a an average team from the ACC?

BYU had visions of making a run toward glory. Now those visions have faded away and slipped into darkness. That is not to say that BYU cannot have a fine season. They can. And they still have a couple of conference showcase games on their schedule. A homecoming game against TCU (I thought scheduling a cupcake for homecoming was the norm) and the regular season finale against Utah appear to be the only potential roadblocks in the final eight games of the season. There would be nothing wrong with an 11-1 regular season.

But when 12-0 was within reach, it could be viewed as a disappointment, especially after riding the wave of beating Oklahoma. Unfortunately, the wave turned out to be a dud as it washed ashore and the Cougars were nowhere to be found. Instead of playing in a BCS bowl game, the Cougars, barring a wild ending to the season, will likely be playing in a lower-tier bowl game, regardless of what they accomplish the rest of the season.

You dropped the ball BYU! You dropped the ball when Loyal Homer was rooting for you! You blew it! It was a fumble in a big game, and no, the ground did not cause this fumble! Deal with it!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.