<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ESPN Dedicated Local Coverage Debate – Is ESPN Local Coverage Good For Sports, Fans?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesportsdebates.com/2009/07/29/the-espn-dedicated-local-coverage-debate-%e2%80%93-is-espn-local-coverage-good-for-sports-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesportsdebates.com/2009/07/29/the-espn-dedicated-local-coverage-debate-%e2%80%93-is-espn-local-coverage-good-for-sports-fans/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Sports Debates For The Sophisticated Fan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports Geek</title>
		<link>http://thesportsdebates.com/2009/07/29/the-espn-dedicated-local-coverage-debate-%e2%80%93-is-espn-local-coverage-good-for-sports-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sports Geek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsdebates.com/?p=1357#comment-810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are each national news outlets, I think it&#039;s hard to brand them as &quot;state run media&quot; -- which is something completely different.

What they have in common is a great deal of &quot;mind-share&quot; (Read: eyeballs) paying attention to them, and people trusting them to filter their news. Discussion on how they use their filter and what their filter means for news is an entirely different debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are each national news outlets, I think it&#8217;s hard to brand them as &#8220;state run media&#8221; &#8212; which is something completely different.</p>
<p>What they have in common is a great deal of &#8220;mind-share&#8221; (Read: eyeballs) paying attention to them, and people trusting them to filter their news. Discussion on how they use their filter and what their filter means for news is an entirely different debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbygee</title>
		<link>http://thesportsdebates.com/2009/07/29/the-espn-dedicated-local-coverage-debate-%e2%80%93-is-espn-local-coverage-good-for-sports-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobbygee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesportsdebates.com/?p=1357#comment-809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ESPN is a joke.. You mention CNN and ESPN in the same breath. CNN is a bigger joke. They all are state run media. Give me a break.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESPN is a joke.. You mention CNN and ESPN in the same breath. CNN is a bigger joke. They all are state run media. Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

