Comments on: The Big East in the BCS Debate – Big East, or Big Least?

By: Sports Geek

Sports Geek — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:40 +0000

I agree that’s an argument that can get sticky and complicated. That’s why I didn’t emphasize that, and concentrated on researching the impact of the Big East on the BCS over its history. The point is that the Big East does not have a vast array of MORE quality wins than a conference LIKE the Mountain West. Big wins aren’t exclusive to big conferences.

By: Bryan Bejar

Bryan Bejar — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:00:00 +0000

If your going to make leaps like Utah’s win over Oregon State, who beat USC. Think about USF’s win over Auburn at Auburn, who beat Florida that year. Florida was the defending national champion. No easy win

By: Loyal Homer

Loyal Homer — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:20:58 +0000

I agree with Sports Geek. I miss the Jan 1 traditional bowl games that have been moved. The NCAA wants it where there arent many games on at the same time and not much overlap but that takes away from the bowl watching experience for me personally.

By: Sports Geek

Sports Geek — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:24:42 +0000

Mike, I know a lot of folks share your opinion on that. I actually love bowl games. What I miss is the January 1 tradition. There are now only five or six games on New Year’s Day, and the BCS has dragged their games out for another week. I think we lost a little part of Americana when that happened.

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:18:34 +0000

There are way too many bowl games in college football!