The Biggest 2010 NFL Offseason Debate – Bear Down, Lovie

February 8, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Bleacher Fan.



It all started in the first half of the first game of the 2009 season. Chicago Bears middle linebacker Brian Urlacher – the cornerstone of the Bears’ defense and hopes for the season – left the game against the Green Bay Packers with a wrist injury. It seemed impossible that on a fairly innocuous play early in the season a player of such importance to a team can be lost for an entire season, but that is exactly what happened. Next, each element of the team began to crumble without the foundation on which it was built able to take the field. In essence, the 2010 offseason began for the Chicago Bears on a still warm Fall Sunday night in September.

And, that early offseason got off to a rocky start since head coach Lovie Smith did not appear able to right the ship after losing Urlacher so early. Without Urlacher’s fast and versatile game, and the coach/defensive coordinator’s inability to gather the defense and mount a consistent effort, the Bears season derailed beyond recovery. The negative perception that formed about Smith – which was augmented thanks to general manager Jerry Angelo’s vocal lack of confidence in the coach when Smith was stripped of defensive coordinator duties – resulted in difficulties when trying to fill out the coaching staff after the predictable firings at season’s end. After offensive coordinator Ron Turner was fired as soon as humanly possible after the final game of the season, the search began for a replacement. Because Smith is viewed by the majority of the league as a lame duck coach, few coaches are willing to step out on a limb and risk a career move that could leave them jobless again after another poor campaign in the 2010 season.

Faced with a crucial offseason where the Bears must turn their fortunes around or search for a new head coach, Smith turned to friend Mike Martz to run the Chicago offense. Martz is a controversial character in his own right, and considered a failure at his most recent employer, the Detroit Lions. Nevertheless, Smith is willing to tie his future to Martz, and the pressure on Martz is to successfully install his offense during the upcoming offense and get the personnel he needs in Chicago to make his offense successful. In one offseason. Or else.

The personnel issues are particularly challenging for Martz and Chicago. Virtually the only solid aspect of the team’s offense in 2009 was the consistent performance of tight end Greg Olsen. The only problem is that new offensive coordinator Martz is not exactly Mr. Tight End. Martz prefers to chuck the ball downfield early and often. Martz’s offense demands a great offensive line because so many of the plays either require lineman to hold blocks for a long time while players get open downfield or to get out in front blocking on screen plays. In short, Martz prefers a solid blocker capping the line, not a pass catcher. Changing the personnel around on offense is as challenging as it is vital this offseason.

Also on offense is the issue presented by Jay Cutler’s rather inauspicious start under center in Chicago… after sky high expectations and plenty of pressure from a general manager that staked his career and reputation on the acquisition of Cutler.

While the Urlacher injury hurt the team because Urlacher is such a special player, it also exposed a lack of depth on the Bears that Angelo is mostly responsible for. Trading several draft picks for several years has left the team without young talent on both sides of the ball. The Bears are currently on a path that is difficult to sustain with the stars getting older and few young players capable of stepping up and filling big shoes. The Bears have a lot of holes to fill on the team and few options. Oh, and all that pressure to succeed for Angelo and Smith and his revamped coaching staff.

The team aging is also a problem especially at the all-important linebacker position. The Tampa 2 defense requires linebackers to cover a great deal of ground. Urlacher’s aging, and a lack of depth, drastically diminishes the effectiveness of this defense.

Cutler unfairly took a lot of fire for the team’s offensive struggles this season. In his defense – though the turnovers in the red zone cannot be explained away – it is difficult to throw from the ground… a place he spent a great deal of time in 2009 due to repeated failures from both tackles, including future hall of fame left tackle Orlando Pace. Sure, Cutler needs to get better. But that starts with the offensive line, so Cutler does not feel pressure to throw the ball into places he should not because he does not have enough time for his receivers to get open.

The Bears have a lot of questions and few options to answer them. Without a doubt, the Chicago Bears are facing the most important and difficult offseason of any team in the NFL.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest 2010 NFL Offseason Debate – Trouble in the Nation’s Capital

February 8, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Loyal Homer.



We get it, the Saints won the Super Bowl… but that is SOOOO last night! For the 31 other teams in the league, Super Bowl XLIV is ancient history. So, while the Black and Gold continue their partying on Bourbon Street, the rest of the NFL is already looking ahead to what needs to be done in 2010.

Some teams have already made changes in their coaching personnel, while others are getting ready for free agency and the draft. Then there is the Washington Redskins.

The Redskins may not have had the worst record in the NFL, but I still believe they were the worst team in the NFL. Of their 4-12 record, they only managed to beat ONE team with a better record than them, the 8-8 Denver Broncos. Their remaining three wins came against the 1-15 Rams (whom they BARELY beat by a score of 9-7), the 3-13 Buccaneers (in another nailbiter – 16-13), and the 4-12 Raiders. Among their losses were teams like the 4-12 Kansas City Chiefs and the 2-14 Detroit Lions (which, by the way, snapped a Lions’ losing streak that spanned into three different NFL seasons).

No team underwhelmed quite like the Redskins did in 2009. As a result of the lackluster showing, their (former) head coach, Jim Zorn, was stripped of all play calling responsibilities only six weeks into the season. Everyone knew it would be just a matter of time before Zorn was fired, and the only question was to try and guess just how bad the state of the team would be when the axe finally fell.

Allow me to answer that question for newly appointed head coach Mike Shanahan – the state of the team is TERRIBLE! The laundry-list of problems Shanahan must solve before the 2010 season gets underway is extremely daunting. Unfortunately, there is not a single issue that can be EASILY remedied!

For his part, Shanahan has been to the promised-land as a head coach, and has two Super Bowl rings already to his credit. It should be noted, though, that was with a Denver Broncos team that included John Elway, Rod Smith, Terrell Davis, Shannon Sharpe, and a host of other outstanding athletes. This Redskins organization that he is inheriting is a completely different monster, and it will be an arduous uphill battle for Shanahan if fans in our nation’s capital expect to see ANY results.

To begin with, Shanahan must first build his coaching staff. He has gotten a jump on this particular assignment, including the hiring of his own son, Kyle, as the new offensive coordinator. His biggest problem, however, is going to be in deciding the direction he wants to take his team with regard to the players in his locker-room, including a MAJOR deficiency at the quarterback position.

I will say it again – Jason Campbell is NOT a solid quarterback in the NFL. Do not let his numbers fool you. With 3,618 passing yards, 20 touchdowns, and 64.5 percent accuracy, it appears that Campbell is a good passer. When you break down those numbers a bit further, though they it tell a much different story. To begin with, the only stat that he was among the top-10 quarterbacks in the league in during 2009 was interceptions, of which he threw 15.

The Redskins spent much of 2009 playing from behind. As such, they saw a lot of soft coverage in the defenses they faced, and even the prevent. It is not surprising, then, to find out that Campbell’s only REAL effectiveness came in situations when the ‘Skins trailed by at least two scores. During those games when the Redskins were behind by at least nine points, Campbell threw for a combined total of five touchdowns and only one interception. When the scoring margin was +/- 8 points (which usually brings tighter pass coverage on the defensive side of the ball), Campbell was good for only eight touchdowns, but he threw TEN interceptions.

Likewise, he only had two games in the season where he threw for more than 300-yards, both of which came in losses. To counter those totals, he had six games with LESS THAN 200-yards passing. In the game against the Kansas City Chiefs he threw the ball only 16 times for 89 yards and an interception before finally being benched for backup quarterback Todd Collins.

Compounding the problems that come from lacking a reliable quarterback are the locker-room issues that stem from a losing mentality. Running back Clinton Portis, who is no stranger to controversy, once again made headlines for his locker-room antics… which included an incident where Portis admittedly approached the Redskins coaches during a game and requested they bench one of his teammates, fullback Mike Sellers.

After the season ended, Portis was at it again. Only this time it was in a war of words with Jason Campbell. During an interview, Portis criticized Campbell for not being a leader, which evoked a very quick and harsh response from Campbell.

These are just some of the examples of the mess that Shanahan has been tasked with trying to clean up. The Washington Redskins (who are already in one of the NFL’s toughest divisions with the Dallas Cowboys, New York Giants, and Philadelphia Eagles) have a LOT to fix this offseason, and they do not have much time to get it done.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest 2010 NFL Offseason Debate – Can Pete Carroll Get It Done?

February 8, 2010

Read opposing arguments from Sports Geek and Bleacher Fan.



It is a sad day for me. I am upset because seemingly for the twentieth straight year, I did not win anything in Super Bowl Squares. I am also upset because after last night’s entertaining Super Bowl, it means we have to go MONTHS with no football! What is a single guy supposed to do during that time? Well for starters, the NFL Draft is not that far away… and if you did not know that, you do now after watching the promo for it during the Super Bowl. And to whet your appetites until then, The Sports Debates is already looking forward to the 2010 campaign and taking an in-depth look at which team has the most to fix. Obviously, many teams have things to fix, even the defending champion New Orleans Saints, but I think the team with the biggest offseason coming up is the Seattle Seahawks.

First and foremost, we all know who is in charge up in the Northwest now. Head coach Pete Carroll makes his long anticipated return to the NFL and he has decided to make that return in Seattle. Big Pete had built a dynasty at Southern Cal, and now he comes to a team not all that far from a Super Bowl appearance, with that game taking place only four years ago. A lot has changed since then, though. Former coach Mike Holmgren now works in the Cleveland front office, and the most recent coach, Jim Mora, has joined millions of Americans on the unemployment line.

One of the first things Carroll and rookie general manager John Schneider have to do is decide what to do with the offense. Quarterback Matt Hasselbeck is seemingly older than the 34 years he actually is, and that is because he seemingly has suffered some type of injury every year since that Super Bowl run. Will the Seahawks spend their first round pick, the sixth overall, on a quarterback? Sam Bradford and Jimmy Clausen could be available.

My personal opinion is that running back needs to be addressed first, either through the draft or through free agency. Can you name the leading rusher for the Seahawks last year? It was Julius Jones. Is he a running back capable of handling the full load? Is Justin Forsett that answer? Carroll has brought renowned offensive-line coach Alex Gibbs and his sometimes controversial cut-blocking schemes to town. This new approach will surely improve the run game. But do the Seahawks currently have the personnel to run behind cut blocks? However it happens, the Seahawks definitely need to improve on offense, as scoring 280 points in 16 games is not going to win a lot of games in the NFL.

Fans in Seattle have high expectations for Pete Carroll and his bunch. Perhaps they are a little too high. There is a lot of work to be done to improve that team and get Qwest Field, home of the NFL’s 12th Man, rocking. Whether or not Carroll can work his magic remains to be seen. But all football fans will definitely be watching!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Peyton Manning: The Greatest Player Who Ever Lived

February 5, 2010

Read the arguments by Bleacher Fan and Loyal Homer.

 

If children dream of being NFL players, then what do NFL players dream of being? I’ll tell you. They dream of being Peyton Manning.  This year’s Super Bowl only further cements his legacy as the greatest NFL player of all time.

For those who doubt my assertion that Peyton Manning is the best football player ever, I suggest you take a look at his credentials. Most of Manning’s detractors point to his lack of Super Bowl championships as their entire case against his greatness (“Rings? Rings!? He don’t need no stinking rings!”), even though Peyton Manning already has one Super Bowl ring from 2007. He is ranked among the top in every quarterback statistic that matters (passing yards, touchdowns, wins, etc.) and has an unprecedented four league MVP awards as well. While even the biggest Manning-haters will at least admit he is among the best quarterbacks today, I say that he is making a campaign for the greatest player of all time, and I’m not alone. Sports Illustrated writer Ross Tucker points out that Peyton’s accomplishments exceed those of Dan Marino, John Elway, Brett Farve,  Joe Montana, and Tom Brady…and I could not agree with him more. Marino never won a Super Bowl - This Sunday Manning attempts to win his second. Two Super Bowl victories would tie those of Elway, and would surpass Farve.

Tucker also makes the argument that Montana played for a stacked 49ers team that preceded the days of free agency, and that Brady benefited from the genius of Bill Billichick’s defenses and strategies. On top of all this, Tucker points out something I covered here on TSD last month, Peyton Manning’s success this year came without the assistance of his usual all-star supporting cast. Manning carried his team to the Super Bowl and he did it without Tony Dungy’s brilliant leadership, or Marvin Harrison’s seemingly ageless hands. Few would doubt the fact that Manning is the brains behind his own success, because his tireless hours of film breakdown and an ability to read defenses and play call at the line of scrimmage are unparalleled. While each of aforementioned quarterbacks are legends in their own right, Manning’s resume boasts superior accolades.  

This year’s Super Bowl puts him Over The Top like Lincoln Hawk (don’t tell me you don’t remember the 1980s arm wrestling movie staring Sylvester Stallone, who played a trucker competing for a new big rig and his son’s love).

 His greatness transcends the game. Some celebrities’ fame makes them the national face of their city, but Mr. Manning’s relationship the city of Indianapolis even exceeds the wildest of expectations. Like a benevolent Mussolini he controls the education system and makes the buses run on time. Seriously! Peyton Manning controls the opening and closing of schools Indianapolis, a power usually reserved for the weather and natural disasters. Want proof? In 2007 the Indianapolis Public School system actually had to cancel school because of the celebrations of Peyton’s first Super Bowl ring. Apparently the raucous celebrations left the bus drivers so wiped out they could not even drive their routes that day. This year the school district is on a two hour delay. I think all the elementary school students should have to write thank you cards for their extra two hours of Manning Break. 

His celebrity is not embraced just regionally, but around the country. As Rod Tidwell might say, “he is an Ambassador of Quan”. He has the love, respect, community, and the dollars too…the Quan. Manning continues to become a cultural icon, but better. He is like Ellen DeGeneres - He makes us laugh and cry, but instead of giving away free stuff he gives away unforgettable moments. The next memorable gift is scheduled for delivery this Sunday during the Super Bowl.

This game holds exceptional meaning and value for the legacy of Peyton Manning. New Orleans is in many respects Manning’s home, and it holds special meaning to the Manning family.

The Manning family, which appears to pass on a genetically enhanced football gene (some have even suggest that Archie Manning be cryogenically frozen in order to produce enhanced players in the future…true story) continue to have a profound connection to New Orleans. It was the stomping grounds for Peyton’s father, Archie Manning, when he played for the Saints. Peyton and his brother Eli have stayed invested in the area as evidence by their assistance with Hurricane Katrina relief. Now so many years later, New Orleans seeks to defeat one of its favorite sons, and in the Super Bowl no less. This is sure to be a big, emotionally charged game for Peyton Manning, to which he usually responds with big outings. Who can forget his decimation of the Saints at the Superdome in 2003 where he put up 6 scores in just 3 quarters, just one shy of the NFL record. He was certainly motivated then by all the attention of a nationally televised game against his father’s old team in his old home town. I think this year’s Super Bowl will just be another benchmark in the storied history of the greatest player the game has ever known.

This debate is supposed to be about the Super Bowl’s biggest winner, and it is abundantly clear that the marquee story is Peyton Manning. Peyton Manning’s legacy will shine that much brighter, not if, but when he leads his Colts to a victory over his father’s Saints in Super Bowl XLIV.

But I think at least on some level, the Super Bowl itself wins because it can feature the greatest player the NFL has to offer—Peyton Manning.


The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Reggie Bush Can Take That Next Step

February 5, 2010

Read the arguments by Bleacher Fan and Babe Ruthless.

Hopefully by now you’ve gotten an invitation to a Super Bowl party. Surely, you have your Super Bowl squares all lined up (unless you’re Bleacher Fan, who seemingly can’t find enough participants in Ohio).

As for the game itself, it should be an excellent, high-scoring affair. Outside of the winner (and hopefully me in my Super Bowl squares contest), the biggest winner Sunday night could the legitimacy of Reggie Bush’s career.

I met some USC fans from California over the New Years holiday and let me tell you, they think their Trojans hung the moon. Of course, they also had bad things to say about Lane Kiffin at the time (this was before Kiffin’s hire). But they really believe Reggie Bush is the greatest thing since sliced bread. This is despite the trouble that Bush might eventually get USC into, and despite the fact that, for the better part of his professional career, he has quite simply been a bust. Some may say that’s harsh, but I don’t.

As a number two pick back in 2006, much was expected of him after a record-breaking collegiate career. Still, he has yet to have that breakout year with the Saints. This past regular season, he had only 70 carries for the Saints, and he’s a player I will likely never touch in fantasy football. But he’s fit into a nice role down in New Orleans. He compliments that team well and has become a Dave Meggett-like back. He is still a force returning punts when given the opportunity, and if I’m a defensive coordinator, I would still shiver at the thought of Bush running free in the open field.

He has shown signs of breaking out this postseason. He had perhaps his best game as a pro in the divisional round against the Arizona Cardinals, rushing for 84 yards on just 5 carries and returning a punt 83 yards for a touchdown. Watching the game that afternoon, I thought to myself, “This is the Reggie of old.” That’s certainly the type of performance that Saints fans are hoping for on Sunday night. A big game on Sunday, and the hype for #25 will build all over again. I think the opportunity is certainly there for him Sunday, as the game is expected to be a high scoring shootout.

Let’s be real folks. He is beginning to be known as the guy who dates Kim Kardashian, and that’s not a good thing if you are a football player. You want to establish yourself as a professional, and Bush has not yet fully managed that. Quite simply, he is still getting by on the things he accomplished as a USC Trojan.

A big game Sunday could elevate him, though. He would be forever worshipped in the Big Easy, and his reputation around the league would improve dramatically.

The stage is yours, Reggie. You’ve played in big games before. Let’s see what you’ve got!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The Biggest Winner of the Super Bowl Debate – Big Win for the Big Easy

February 5, 2010

Read Babe Ruthless’ and Loyal Homer’s arguments about who they feel the biggest winner of the Super Bowl is.

It is every football fan’s dream to one day get their hands on a pair of Super Bowl tickets. After all, who wouldn’t want to be in Miami on Sunday evening as the Colts battle the Saints for the Super Bowl Championship? I’ll tell you who – ME (but only this year).

As exciting as it would be to actually have the opportunity to attend a Super Bowl game, there is one place THIS year that I would much rather be – New Orleans! In a city already known for their ability to have a great time, just imagine the excitement and the atmosphere as the fervor of support for the New Orleans Saints mingles with the already abundant party-goers on Bourbon St. It will be the perfect party storm.

Obviously, a win on Sunday night will raise the citizens of NOLA to fever pitch, but even a loss by the Saints will still mean a BIG win for the city.

New Orleans has hosted the Super Bowl before, and reaped the economic benefits of being a host city. In those years, though, the circus left town on Monday morning, and all the money left with it. Things will be slightly different for the ‘Who Dat?’ nation this year, however. The after-effects of having their own beloved Saints actually reach the NFL’s championship game will be felt in that city long after the clock ticks to 00:00.

I have witnessed first hand the benefit that a successful sports team can have on a struggling city. Cleveland transforms on game night for the Cavaliers from an industrial ghost town into an overcrowded mecca of #23 jerseys, #33 jerseys, and even a few #11’s thrown into the mix. Likewise, the city was flooded with tailgaters and bar-crawlers during the 2007 Browns season, and THAT was just because the Browns won 10 games that year (they didn’t even make the playoffs). From the sale of merchandise in the stores to the turn out at local bars and eateries throughout the city, people are always happy to spend money in support of a successful team.

Casinos, restaurants, and bars alike will be packed to the hilt in New Orleans on Sunday night, and for many Sundays to come. The thrill of having reached their first ever Super Bowl will not die down after the game ends. Instead, it will feed a contagious buzz that will fester and grow throughout the entire offseason. Having finally received a taste of the good life, the city of New Orleans will be giddy with anticipation for more. That excitement will spill over into summer time training camp, and will carry throughout the 2010 football season.

If the Saints are fortunate enough to continue their success into next season, the excitement (and corresponding benefit) will be amplified exponentially.

Whether or not the Saints are able to cap off their season with a championship on the field, the city of New Orleans will be shining like gold on Sunday night!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Signing Day Debate – Supply and Demand

February 5, 2010

Read the debate intro, Sports Geek’s, and Loyal Homer’s arguments about whether or not the media puts too much stock into college recruiting.

There are a lot of things that I feel are wrong about National Signing Day. I got another reminder just this week on how out of control the entire recruiting process is when I read the story of David Sills, one of Lane Kiffin’s newest recruits at USC.

What’s the big deal about David Sills? Only the fact that he is a 13 YEAR OLD SEVENTH GRADER!

That’s right, Lane Kiffin, the poster boy of everything that is wrong with coaching in college football, has decided to hand out a scholarship for the year 2015. What’s the point?! He’s not even gonna be there in 2015!

As for Sills, a lot can change between the ages of 13 and 18, both physically and mentally. When I was 13 I thought I was going to be an astronaut. Of course, that was back when my biggest concern was whether or not Optimus Prime’s Autobots could stop Megatron and the rest of the Decepticon horde – Wait a minute, I guess not THAT much has changed for me mentally. Physically, though, the changes that a boy will go through can be drastic, and that’s assuming that Sills doesn’t suffer some injury while playing football in High School, or while skateboarding, or doing any other number of stupid things that KIDS do.

How are kids who haven’t graduated from high school supposed to cope with the pressures of being a national sports star before they have even taken their SATs?!

Unfortunately, it appears that my distaste for the circus of college recruiting is not shared by all (although our good friend ‘Mr. Doots’ is on my side, accurately referring to the idea of scouting 13 and 14-year olds “Creepy”). Sports Geek wins this debate for pointing out that so much attention is heaped onto the college recruiting process because so many people out there care very deeply about it. Simply put, this obsession with recruiting is not a product of media overhype. Instead, it is a product of the media feeding the needs of those so-called “diehard fans”.

Let’s face it, as much as I may complain about the role the media can play as a hype-machine, there is clearly a market for it in this case. It is a simple law of supply and demand. The media wouldn’t focus so heavily on recruiting if people out there didn’t care about it (which is why you never see the professional Jai Alai draft covered on ESPN, I suppose).

Loyal Homer is absolutely correct in pointing out that there is no guarantee that a Five Star recruit will amount to anything in college. That problem, though, is secondary to the real issue. Nobody denies the fact that these decisions are based purely on projections and potential. However, speculation is a very powerful moving force. From Wall Street to the iPad, potential drives a great deal of our life today.

The fact is that head coaches in college football are expected to do two things – win on the field, and build a successful program. The first step to building a successful program is finding the most talented kids and getting them into your school. Although the process of recruiting is purely speculative, it serves as a standard by which all coaches are held at least partially accountable.

Fans and boosters expect strong recruiting from their coaches. It is for that reason that such a big deal is made about recruiting. The media does not place too much stock in recruiting, they are simply enabling an addiction suffered by many across the nation, called ‘collegefootballaholism’.

I may not agree with the excessive, almost worshipful attention given to these boys who just learned how to drive a car last year, but that does not mean that the media is to blame for having overblown the process and making it out to be something that it is not. The media’s focus on the recruiting process is valuable because very large portions of the fan base, as well as the university athletic programs of the NCAA, all perceive it as being valuable. It is the information they crave, and the media is simply giving them what they want.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Signing Day Debate – Worthless or Worthwhile?

February 4, 2010

Read the opposing arguments from Loyal Homer and Sports Geek.



Amidst the media blitz of Super Bowl week, a different kind of press storm swept through the nation yesterday – National Signing Day.

National Signing Day has become a sort of national holiday in the college football world, as it is the final day for high school seniors across the country to declare the school they will be attending (and playing football for) after graduation.

Originally, the day was intended as a deadline so that prospective students who would otherwise drag their feet would finally commit to one institution. Today National Signing Day has transformed into a sort of coming-out party for the highest-profile, most heavily coveted recruits who wish to start the timer on their fifteen minutes of fame. Seventeen-year-old boys who should be studying for their Bio exams and trying to get up the nerve to ask some girl to the prom are suddenly transformed into miniature versions of superstar athletes. These boys schedule official press conferences and set news releases, all for a single moment of glory when they will don a college ball cap and announce to all the world, “I will attend _____.”

Who can blame them, though? The media LOVES the pomp and circumstance of National Signing Day, and what 17 year-old WOULD NOT love to be superstar for a day? For some people, it ultimately marks the birth of a great football player. Since football is king in America, fans are always on the lookout for the next great Montana, or Sanders, or even Tebow. That search begins with the transition from high school to college, when boys become men and legends are born.

Recruiting and scouting is an inexact science, though. The transformation from potential to proven is not an easy one, and there is no formula that exists to confidently identify those people who will successfully reach the next level of performance. Instead, it is all just a crap shoot. Sure, trained scouts may be better at identifying potential talent, and some athletes simply possess the raw natural ability to succeed at any level, but there is no guarantee that a five-star high school recruit will amount to ANYTHING at the college level. Likewise, being a two-star recruit has little to no REAL bearing on whether or not that athlete will ultimately find success in college, or even the pros.

Which brings us to our question for the day: Does the media put too much stock in recruiting?

Clearly, every college and professional superstar was at one time a high school recruit. There is no disputing the necessity for, and overall impact of, recruiting on the game of football. However, is the media today placing too much emphasis on intangible qualities that cannot be measured in players who have not yet been proven beyond their own high school fields?

Sports Geek will take the position that the media attention in regards to recruiting is appropriate while Loyal Homer will argue that the media places far too much stock in this one aspect of the game.

The nation awaits your responses!

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Signing Day Debate – Recruiting Deserves the Attention for Diehards

February 4, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Loyal Homer.



For college football diehards, the single best week prior to the first week of September is nearing completion. Yesterday was National Signing Day, when every college football program revealed the future of their respective programs by announcing the new student-athletes coming to campus. Some talent is in need of being cultivated, other talent is coming to campus immediately ready. Either way, the diehard fans are very excited about the new talent and potential of the next generation of talent.

But, is all of the hubbub about college football recruiting too much? Do fans and the media make too much of the attention paid to unproven recruits? No way. Seldom are fans able to glimpse the real future of the program, and signing day – and all of the coverage about recruiting – gives fans an insiders perspective on the current and future state of their favorite team.

College football is a massive business, and diehard fans are an important audience. Diehard fans are also hungry for any news about their favorite schools. Diehards are a legitimate, money-paying, important part of the overall college football target audience. They are willing to pay a great deal of money for access to knowledge about their preferred team’s recruiting. The media attention about recruiting is not just a frivolous invasion of high schooler’s lives, as detractors may choose to paint the hoopla around recruiting. Recruiting information is a legitimate, legal product offered to paying customers. It is good information and good marketing. It generates excitement about the sport in what would otherwise be a downtime, making it a winning business proposition. Frankly, to steal any headlines from the NFL during Super Bowl week is impressive, and it proves how much fans care about college football and recruiting.

Now, the product is offered and paid for, but why? It is legal to offer the information as a “product,” but why would even the diehard audience pay for this content? Because recruiting matters. A single recruit can make a substantial difference in the present and future of a program. A good example is the recruiting story of Clemson running back, and eventually first round NFL draft pick, C.J. Spiller.

Spiller was a top recruit in the nation, the top rated running back on some lists and even the top recruiting according to some services. Every major college football program was after him due to his once in a generation speed, leadership, and explosiveness. Clemson is not considered a top tier program on a national scale. Florida, Notre Dame, Florida State, and other major schools were all vying for Spiller’s services. Yet, Clemson’s former recruiting coordinator turned head coach Dabo Swinney convinced Spiller that Clemson was the right place for him. Shortly after Spiller’s shocking announcement, other four star, blue chip recruits committed to Clemson over the next several recruiting seasons – even on defense – and now the prospects for Clemson’s program are looking up. In fact, Clemson’s recruiting class for 2010 includes multiple four-star recruits. A single recruit has changed the general talent Clemson is able to attract. That, folks, is why diehard fans pay such close attention to recruiting. A good class, plus good coaching once they get to campus, has the ability to transform a program and from a middle tier to a top tier school. Diehards pay and the media cares because recruiting does matter. Detractors fail to see the value of the long-term payoff and undervalue the passion some fans demonstrate for a college football program, not just a team.

True fans do not care about a single season. They care about every aspect of the program, including its long-term sustainability. Recruiting is as important as any Saturday night featured game, only the payoff is more drawn out.

Diehard fans and media members think in a similar way to coaches. As soon as the season is over, conventional thinking turns from general excitement about how the season ended (or disappointment, depending on the team) to which players from the team are turning pro… and therefore what the new recruiting class must look like. Responsible reporters must cover recruiting because diehard fans thirst for the knowledge.

Good recruiting makes major positive impacts on a team and a program. Perhaps the reporting on recruiting is not always that great. More emphasis is placed on physicality and 40-yard dash time, and less on smarts, coachability, and overall fit within the program. The recruiting reporting should be deeper and better overall.

What do Southern Cal, Texas, and Florida all have in common? They are dominant programs, and they are all on top of the recruiting charts year in and year out. If the best programs also lead in recruiting, it is logical to look to outcome of recruiting each year to get a strong indication about what college football programs are the best. There is an inescapable, direct correlation between recruiting and success.

Recruiting is important. Sports Illustrated college football writer Andy Staples recently published an article about the top 15 recruiting classes of all time. There are some amazing players on this list that completely transformed the fortunes of some of the greatest programs in the history of college football. A significant recruiting class can make a massive impact on the notoriety – and therefore the financial statement – of a college football program. Any reporters who ignore that is foolish.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg!
Bookmark and Share


The NCAAF Signing Day Debate – It Has Gotten Out of Hand

February 4, 2010

Read the opposing argument from Sports Geek.



Even as a diehard sports nut I admit there are some things in sports that may be perceived as overrated. I am sure I will catch some flak for this, but I believe the Kentucky Derby is overrated. Some can make the case that the Daytona 500 is overrated. The NFL Draft is certainly overhyped and to some extent, so is the Super Bowl. But without question, there is no doubt that one event is as overhyped by the media as National Signing Day for college football.

Recruiting has gotten to be a year-round extravaganza. Recruits are being contacted at younger ages than ever before. There are hundreds of recruiting websites and blogs to track these things. I do not know who I feel sorrier for, the players or the coaches. The players are receiving constant visits, calls, and text messages from coaches. The coaches have to do these things to stay in the game for that particular player.

If you watched any sports or read any sports news yesterday you know that yesterday was National Signing Day and that the usual suspects were at the top of most of the “rankings” put out by the recruiting gurus. Florida, USC, Texas, and others are said to have the best classes, with Florida said to have one of the best classes ever despite the uncertainty surrounding Urban Meyer. My question is, how do they really know? What makes guys like Tom Luginbill so special? Why are websites like Rivals considering the best of the best when it comes to recruits? I had a friend from the University of Georgia tell me yesterday, “We signed a kid who is going to be the best safety to ever dress up in red and black.” Really? How do you know? Because the UGA beat writer said so? Because Luginbill said so? Have you seen this guy play live?

What does a player having a five-star rating really mean? Are those players supposed to be THAT good? If so, how come only three out of 33 five-star signees from last year made the Rivals Freshman-All American team? Where are the other 30? It really is a crapshoot. We just do not know how these kids will respond, on or off the field. Psychologically, it is hard to determine what will happen. How is a small town kid from a rural town in Georgia going to respond to playing in front of 93,000 screaming people in Athens? How is he going to respond walking through a campus full of thousands of students when his entire high school only had 300 kids? How is a guy from a small town in Ohio going to respond when he walks into an English 101 class that has 400 people in it when his hometown only has 250 people? Maybe he gets homesick and that affects his attitude and his performance on the field and at practice. Those types of things affect 18- and 19-year-olds and it indirectly impacts the growth of a football player. There are just so many variables that come into play that it is hard to effectively tie recruiting classes to successful programs. Recruiting is an inexact science.

The sheer fact that we are even having this debate today proves my point. Too much emotion is put into signing day by fans and the media. Sure, we would all like our school to have the top rated recruiting class in the land. But that does not guarantee a national championship in the next four years. The last four recruiting classes at Georgia have been “ranked” in the top ten by Rivals. All that did was lead to an 8-5 2009 campaign and a trip to lovely Shreveport, Louisiana for the high profile Independence Bowl.

Having a good recruiting class is a good start to success and it gives all of us something to talk about in February. But do not get too discouraged if your school did not get 15 five-star recruits. Rely on your coaches to get the best out of the players they recruit. They know the players and the team’s needs better than these recruiting experts do.

My Zimbio Blog Directory Sport Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
Add us to your technorati favorites Digg! Bookmark and Share